#1
|
|||
|
|||
Let 'em race.
Over the weekend I had a bit of a change of heart Operation
Puerto and the current code of ethics the Pro Tour teams are operating under, in which they've agreed that no rider involved in a doping investigation be allowed to compete. I'm wondering when, if ever, there'll be a statute of limitations on doping allegations? Let's say for the sake of argument everyone implicated in Operation Puerto was legitimately implicated and not just being accused falsely. At what point does someone have the right to continue to make a living while being investigated? We let very serious criminals out of custody on bail all the time while they are under investigation or awaiting trial. No one says they can't work while the process is going on. Why should someone be forced to sit out forever while the wheels of "justice" (I use the term loosely here, on purpose) grind on? I say, if someone is found guilty of involvement in doping with Dr. Fuentes, then we invalidate the appropriate results garnered unethically and impose the appropriate fines/suspensions. In the meantime, if a rider is not under suspicion of current doping practices and isn't failing doping tests, I think they should be allowed to compete. Fred |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Let 'em race.
At what point does someone have the right to continue to make a living while being investigated? WHEN YOU'RE FRENCH |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Michelin Pro2 Race vs Pro Race? | Bestest Handsander | Techniques | 2 | March 9th 05 10:24 PM |
F/S ** Michelin PRO RACE & PRO2 RACE TIRES ** | CritUSA | Marketplace | 2 | December 8th 04 03:20 PM |