|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
'Bents and Lower Abs???
|
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
'Bents and Lower Abs???
On 13 Mar 2006 08:21:42 -0800, "NYC XYZ"
wrote: Peter Clinch wrote: No personal experience, but since the designer has ridden one around the Tour de France route in the wake of the official tour it looks like the practicalities aren't too bad. Don't forget that most of a bike's turning action comes from leaning it. Right, but much more so with this machine, and much more often, and probably rather harder, too...can you imagine nudging your hips or thighs while rowing this thing, your whole torso stretching back and forth? I'd get one for the exercise benefits if it could also be practical enough for urban terrain. Beware of riding it in a litigious area. You'd get sued for causing accidents by distracting people from their cell phone conversations. -- Typoes are a feature, not a bug. Some gardening required to reply via email. Words processed in a facility that contains nuts. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
'Bents and Lower Abs???
Peter Clinch wrote:
Why should it? they're in different planes. Um, okay...next time you lean into a curve, try doing some ab crunches and see what happens.... They do? I just, well, *lean*. And since my upper body is free, and my lower body is restricted by being sat on the bike and powering it, I generally do a fair bit of the leaning upstairs, or so ISTM. Okay, so it seems to you, fine. Just wondering how on *this* bike, the Thys row-bike, it all might be different. The limiting case here is the unicycle, where I can /assure/ you upper body movement plays a significant role! But the issue isn't upper-body versus lower-body. Why? If I lean down onto the bars on a DF as I'm going round a corner, or sit more upright, that doesn't require me to consciously modify the lean. There may well be more work to do in total, but I doubt it's of the thinking variety, rather than just doing. You're bringing in the "thinking variety" yourself, not me. You seem to go off on digressions and then imagine it's me that's brought them up and had the problem! But if the imagination is wrong, it isn't really an insight... Non sequitor. But I'm sick of debating straw-man arguments with you, with all due respect. Furthermore, I haven't ridden a Thys, so I'm using my imagination to come up with answers here. Though it appears they tie in with the experience of folk that do ride them, since I've yet to hear any comments on the lines of "they're very hard to steer!". Yes...I think I'll just let you debate yourself on this, now. =) Pete. -- Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/ |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
'Bents and Lower Abs???
LOL! I live in NYC -- chutzpah is required! Werehatrack wrote: Beware of riding it in a litigious area. You'd get sued for causing accidents by distracting people from their cell phone conversations. -- Typoes are a feature, not a bug. Some gardening required to reply via email. Words processed in a facility that contains nuts. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
'Bents and Lower Abs???
Peter Clinch wrote:
snip No "nudging of thighs" to be done to lean a bike into a turn, or that I've ever noticed, so no need to imagine it. I think your imagination is a bit too active for your own good sometimes, as it seems to throw up all sorts of problems that aren't there! Throw up is right. I've never thought about this before... when your nose runs on a regular bike, it just drips away harmlessly. Do recumbent riders have to contend with snot streaking across their faces? Another observation that really has nothing to do with your post: the website's claim that the rowbike is "full of well-considerated and new technology" and has "superb aerodynamical qualities" makes me suspect this whole thing is just a hoax. -Vee |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
'Bents and Lower Abs???
"Vee" wrote
Another observation that really has nothing to do with your post: the website's claim that the rowbike is "full of well-considerated and new technology" and has "superb aerodynamical qualities" makes me suspect this whole thing is just a hoax. I don't know the particular "row bike" previously mentioned, but I do know someone who owns a Rowbike brand one (http://www.rowbike.com/). As far as I know, Rowbike does not claim "superb aerodynamically qualities". In fact, they do admit/claim their bike: - Burns approximately 50% more calories than ordinary biking - Provides nearly twice the cardiovascular benefits as ordinary biking It definitely has a learning curve associated with it. I saw the owner ride it and two other people try it. I declined to try it... %^P Jon Meinecke |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
'Bents and Lower Abs???
In article .com, Vee
) wrote: Throw up is right. I've never thought about this before... when your nose runs on a regular bike, it just drips away harmlessly. Do recumbent riders have to contend with snot streaking across their faces? Nope. Doesn't run at all, in my experience. -- Dave Larrington - http://www.legslarry.beerdrinkers.co.uk/ Jack Hackett for Pope, next time! |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
'Bents and Lower Abs???
Vee wrote:
Do recumbent riders have to contend with snot streaking across their faces? Not in my experience. Another observation that really has nothing to do with your post: the website's claim that the rowbike is "full of well-considerated and new technology" and has "superb aerodynamical qualities" makes me suspect this whole thing is just a hoax. If you want to see a rowing bike in action, go to the following page and click on "Course Future-Bike à genéve 2002" http://www.m5france.com/Video.html Also included: several lowracers (RazzFazz, M5, Birkenstock) and a back-to-back-tandem. Kurt |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
'Bents and Lower Abs???
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 01:29:15 -0600, A Muzi
wrote: Vee wrote: Another observation that really has nothing to do with your post: the website's claim that the rowbike is "full of well-considerated and new technology" and has "superb aerodynamical qualities" makes me suspect this whole thing is just a hoax. Peter Clinch wrote: A Thys rowbike was the first recumbent finisher in a recent Paris-Brest-Paris, so pretty amazing for a hoax! I thought this was about abdominal muscles: http://www.mowerciser.com/indextemp.html That device's maker claims that it provides a total body workout, not just abs. In my area, it would merely provide frustration; between the mower-jamming oak twigs and the lush mixture of grasses, a human-powered reel-type mower is a device that will soon have the user calling a lawn service. (I've seen people buy them around here once in a while, but they swiftly discover that a week's worth of rain will create a level of grass growth that such a mower is unable to address.) -- Typoes are a feature, not a bug. Some gardening required to reply via email. Words processed in a facility that contains nuts. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
'Bents and Lower Abs???
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 13:02:58 -0600, "Jon Meinecke"
wrote: "Vee" wrote Another observation that really has nothing to do with your post: the website's claim that the rowbike is "full of well-considerated and new technology" and has "superb aerodynamical qualities" makes me suspect this whole thing is just a hoax. I don't know the particular "row bike" previously mentioned, but I do know someone who owns a Rowbike brand one (http://www.rowbike.com/). As far as I know, Rowbike does not claim "superb aerodynamically qualities". In fact, they do admit/claim their bike: - Burns approximately 50% more calories than ordinary biking - Provides nearly twice the cardiovascular benefits as ordinary biking It definitely has a learning curve associated with it. I saw the owner ride it and two other people try it. I declined to try it... %^P The other one cited has a much less upright position, and more closely mimics the rowing position and technique used in a racing shell. As is almost always the case with advertising claims, they're probably puffing up the description quite a bit with glittering generalities and misleading or invented "statistics", but my impression is that of the two, the Rowbike would be much slower. -- Typoes are a feature, not a bug. Some gardening required to reply via email. Words processed in a facility that contains nuts. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
'Bents and Lower Abs??? | NYC XYZ | Techniques | 27 | March 16th 06 01:06 PM |
New to bents, need a recommendation.. | Duane Mason | Recumbent Biking | 2 | July 28th 04 04:17 AM |
'bents: who sells Challenge in the UK? | Simon Brooke | UK | 6 | June 30th 04 11:50 AM |
'Bents not Smart? | Terry D | UK | 8 | June 6th 04 05:18 PM |
Noob: 'Bents and Lumbar Problems | xkred27 | Recumbent Biking | 17 | May 1st 04 06:57 AM |