#41
|
|||
|
|||
Bicycle trailers:
"Mike Kruger" wrote
1. A milk crate costs about $3 at a hardware store, and most people already have one. Panniers are more expensive. I have a milk crate, my wife has a fold-out "grocery bag" pannier. Hers cost $9, mine was free. 2. The dorky look of a milk crate serves as an effective anti-theft device for the entire bike. It marks the rider as somebody not worth mugging, because how much money could they possibly have? Certainly it's hard to imagine stealing the milk crate itself. Panniers make a bike look more attractive, and can be stolen easily if left on the bike. Her pannier is much better looking, especially with its day-glo rain cover. 3. The milk crate doesn't need any extra attention in rain. She needs to put her cover on, which she usually uses anyway. 4. You can stick a backpack in a milk crate more easily than in panniers, which is an advantage for students. I like this feature the most. When I ride my bike downtown for shopping or Dr. visit, etc., I can throw my backpack into the crate, then grab it & put helmet, etc. away for errands. The pannier easily detaches though, and has handles, looks like a square, black, fabric shopping bag, not too bad either. 5. No heel strike problems with a milk crate. Also a big issue for me with size 52 shoes. 6. The back of the milk crate makes a nice surface for bumper stickers containing the irritating political slogan of your choice. I've thought of that, but think a big reflector might be more pragmatic. The pannier does have reflective material. I've used both, and prefer panniers. The humble milk crate is not without appeal, however. I agree. Another drawback of the crate is that sitting directly on the rack as it does, it subjects the contents to a harsher ride. I keep a bit of foam in mine, helps when delivering things like a 12-pack of bottles. |
Ads |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Bicycle trailers:
In article BmiDc.100294$Hg2.30504@attbi_s04,
"Peter Cole" writes: 4. You can stick a backpack in a milk crate more easily than in panniers, which is an advantage for students. I like this feature the most. When I ride my bike downtown for shopping or Dr. visit, etc., I can throw my backpack into the crate, then grab it & put helmet, etc. away for errands. The pannier easily detaches though, and has handles, looks like a square, black, fabric shopping bag, not too bad either. With my pack in the crate, I can stuff a water bottle or two in the near right corner -- easily accessible, and the bottles stay upright against the pack. Milk crates are also better than panniers, I think, for transporting certain delicate things, like foot-high potted zinnias. I've found small pizza boxes fit quite nicely right inside the crate; large one fits over the top and can be bungee'd on. But medium-sized pizza boxes want to go in at an angle, causing a pie-valanche inside the box. Take-out pizzas carried uninsulated on a bike, and unprotected from the airflow, get cold very fast. The only 'stability' problem I've experienced has been while transporting large sacks of flour. They lean out over the back of the crate, and cause the bike to tend to sponaneously wheelie. In fact there's a bit of effort involved just in holding the front of the bike down while mounting. I've used both, and prefer panniers. The humble milk crate is not without appeal, however. I agree. Another drawback of the crate is that sitting directly on the rack as it does, it subjects the contents to a harsher ride. I keep a bit of foam in mine, helps when delivering things like a 12-pack of bottles. I haven't yet broken an egg coming home from the supermarket. But I'll pick the line that traverses the best pavement. That can be a little slower and somewhat squirrely. And I'll gingerly negotiate the unavoidable bumps. It's been good practice for me, for riding light on the saddle. /Be/ the suspension :-) Actually, I don't really know for sure if unweighting the saddle lessens any jolts inflicted on things in the milk crate. But it doesn't hurt. I haven't had the courage to pack bottled beer beyond one or two bottles at a time. Cans are easier to take back for the deposit, anyway (we get a 10-cents-per-can- or-bottle deposit back here.) cheers, Tom -- -- Powered by FreeBSD Above address is just a spam midden. I'm really at: tkeats [curlicue] vcn [point] bc [point] ca |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Bicycle trailers:
Tom Keats wrote:
In article BmiDc.100294$Hg2.30504@attbi_s04, "Peter Cole" writes: 4. You can stick a backpack in a milk crate more easily than in panniers, which is an advantage for students. I like this feature the most. When I ride my bike downtown for shopping or Dr. visit, etc., I can throw my backpack into the crate, then grab it & put helmet, etc. away for errands. The pannier easily detaches though, and has handles, looks like a square, black, fabric shopping bag, not too bad either. With my pack in the crate, I can stuff a water bottle or two in the near right corner -- easily accessible, and the bottles stay upright against the pack. Milk crates are also better than panniers, I think, for transporting certain delicate things, like foot-high potted zinnias. I've found small pizza boxes fit quite nicely right inside the crate; large one fits over the top and can be bungee'd on. But medium-sized pizza boxes want to go in at an angle, causing a pie-valanche inside the box. Take-out pizzas carried uninsulated on a bike, and unprotected from the airflow, get cold very fast. The only 'stability' problem I've experienced has been while transporting large sacks of flour. They lean out over the back of the crate, and cause the bike to tend to sponaneously wheelie. In fact there's a bit of effort involved just in holding the front of the bike down while mounting. I've used both, and prefer panniers. The humble milk crate is not without appeal, however. I agree. Another drawback of the crate is that sitting directly on the rack as it does, it subjects the contents to a harsher ride. I keep a bit of foam in mine, helps when delivering things like a 12-pack of bottles. I haven't yet broken an egg coming home from the supermarket. But I'll pick the line that traverses the best pavement. That can be a little slower and somewhat squirrely. And I'll gingerly negotiate the unavoidable bumps. It's been good practice for me, for riding light on the saddle. /Be/ the suspension :-) Actually, I don't really know for sure if unweighting the saddle lessens any jolts inflicted on things in the milk crate. But it doesn't hurt. I haven't had the courage to pack bottled beer beyond one or two bottles at a time. Cans are easier to take back for the deposit, anyway (we get a 10-cents-per-can- or-bottle deposit back here.) cheers, Tom Shopping bag type panniers excel for carrying bottles. Each holds two sixpacks of bottles perfectly. I haven't bought cans for a while but you should be able to stack them and carry twice as many. Sixpacks should be the universal standard of carrying capacity. Lorenzo L. Love http://home.thegrid.net/~lllove "Americans are broad-minded people. They'll accept the fact that a person can be an alcoholic, a dope fiend, a wife beater, and even a newspaperman, but if a man doesn't drive there's something wrong with him." Art Buchwald |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Bicycle trailers:
Tom Keats wrote:
Milk crates are also better than panniers, I think, for transporting certain delicate things, like foot-high potted zinnias. I carried a 8 foot tall maple tree home from Kmart (10 miles) in the shade of my own tree, shade most of the way, with its pot in the milk crate. Today it's much bigger. I was hoping to make a shady spot for my Doberman Susie to lie under, but it was pretty slow-growing, and even living to 13 and a half she never got a decent shady spot from it. The successor Doberman Annie however has a nice shady spot today, and it's turned into a very shapely Maple. Every day I transport at least a gallon of water or milk, sometimes two; weekly 20 pounds of snapple as well; and monthly 40 pounds of salt, if I haven't trailered it home from the salt place 160 pounds at a time in time, which I usually haven't. It's impossible to overbuy for a milk crate. There's always some way to pile it all in or on, though you may look like a bag lady in the end. -- Ron Hardin On the internet, nobody knows you're a jerk. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Bicycle trailers:
"Ron Hardin" wrote in message ... and monthly 40 pounds of salt, if I haven't trailered it home from the salt place 160 pounds at a time in time, which I usually haven't. What do you do with that much salt? Dave |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Bicycle trailers:
In article ,
Ron Hardin writes: I carried a 8 foot tall maple tree home from Kmart (10 miles) in the shade of my own tree, shade most of the way, with its pot in the milk crate. That would've made a cool snapshot; especially with you, your bike and the tree sillhouetted against a sunset. Sort of haiku-inspiring. cheers, Tom -- -- Powered by FreeBSD Above address is just a spam midden. I'm really at: tkeats [curlicue] vcn [point] bc [point] ca |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Bicycle trailers:
Raoul Duke wrote:
and monthly 40 pounds of salt, if I haven't trailered it home from the salt place 160 pounds at a time in time, which I usually haven't. What do you do with that much salt? Salt runs water softeners. -- Ron Hardin On the internet, nobody knows you're a jerk. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Bicycle trailers:
wrote in message ...
...The idea of a trailer has been going through my mind and am wondering what sort, as in single rear wheel, or twin wheeled type. --------------- there are pros/cons of single vs double-wheel, so you'll need to make that decision first. Secondly, the attachment hardware of the *best* ones is pretty sophisticated in both cases to allow secure attachment and proper articulation... so you might want to just buy something rather than attempt to fabricate. the single wheel cons a - whatever weight you haul adds to the load on YOUR rear wheel - when you hit a bump that weight pounds your wheel - you have to "balance" the weight and will feel crosswinds pros a - it tracks right with your tires... easier to avoid debris, etc. - can be much smaller, lighter, and more aero double-wheel (like Burley) cons a - size and shape tend to be BIG for kids - added width can make it hard to avoid debris/holes pros a - bigger payloads d |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Bicycle trailers:
dan baker wrote:
wrote in message ... ...The idea of a trailer has been going through my mind and am wondering what sort, as in single rear wheel, or twin wheeled type. --------------- there are pros/cons of single vs double-wheel, so you'll need to make that decision first. Secondly, the attachment hardware of the *best* ones is pretty sophisticated in both cases to allow secure attachment and proper articulation... so you might want to just buy something rather than attempt to fabricate. I put a Burley hitch on my Tanjor trailer in fact (same tongue tube diamater); it was about $25 special order at the LBS, for 2-wheel. -- Ron Hardin On the internet, nobody knows you're a jerk. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
National Bicycle Greenway Riders Welcomed by Sausalito | Cycle America | General | 0 | June 7th 04 07:44 PM |
experiences with bicycle trailers for kids? | Andrea | General | 4 | January 8th 04 07:01 PM |
Those bicycle builders big mistake! | Garrison Hilliard | General | 30 | December 23rd 03 06:03 AM |
Reports from Sweden | Garry Jones | General | 17 | October 14th 03 05:23 PM |
A Bicycle Story | Marian Rosenberg | General | 5 | September 7th 03 01:40 PM |