|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#361
|
|||
|
|||
Should Cyclists Pack Guns?
Stephen! wrote:
BrianNZ wrote in : http://imagesdesavions.com/me.jpg God god man, you could have shaved! You obviously aren't one of those new age 'back, sac & crack' wax guys...... To tell ya the truth, it ain't mine. Thats what they all say....... It's something I pulled off the web to use as a redirect for all those ****ing myspace (and a few other "friends" sites) assholes who were killing my bandwidth by linking directly to my best photos for their background... If ya got a myspace profile, try linking any of my images as a background and you'll see what happens. The day I discovered the uses of an .htacess file was a wonderful day... |
Ads |
#362
|
|||
|
|||
Should Cyclists Pack Guns?
Stephen! wrote:
You ever try to take a picture of yer own asshole? It ain't as easy as it sounds... Thread ender! Bill "yeah, pun intended" S. |
#363
|
|||
|
|||
THE ONLY SAFE WAY IS TO TAKE THE LANE!
donquijote1954 wrote:
On May 1, 10:21 pm, Wayne Pein wrote: Mike Young wrote: By law in IL, bicyclists are entitled to the full width of the traffic lane. Most of the time, especially in the city, they tend to hug the curb side of the curb lane, allowing motorized traffic to go by. How thoughtful of them. I don't suppose bicyclists get any credit in your accounting scheme for that? Of course, you should know that there is no advantage to riding near the side of the road, only disadvantages like poor sight lines, less conspicuity, and motorists trying to squeeze by when its unsafe to do so. Thank you. I want to say it in my jungle language: bicyclists get the scraps, but that puts their life in danger. THE ONLY SAFE WAY IS TO TAKE THE LANE! But then the lion comes and roars at you, and if you won't budge, he swallows you. But I guess if motorists are allowed to pass and you are a motorist its all good for you. The lion wants his lion's share, and still is mad that the monkey is there at all! Every now and again, though, a militant bunch or another blocks up the two lane suburban artery roads here with their 15 mph asses. What makes you think they are militant rather than merely exercising their right to use the lane? And why don't you pass in the oncoming lane? Oh I know, its full of other motorists. I think, one lane is good for taking. Taking the whole road though puts is a recipe for trouble. Traffic? Yeah, I suppose they are. Special status in the law, however, shouldn't preclude courtesy and consideration for others. No special status. Just status. It makes sense. According to your logic, although bicyclists are entitled to use of the full lane like other road users, they must be "courteous" and allow you to use it for passing them. If they don't, then they are militant. Come to think of it, grown men wearing brightly colored leotards have very little to say that might interest me. Why would they want to talk to you? You're a selfish, illogical lout who doesn't ride a bike unless it has a mechanical engine and who doesn't have the sense to understand that hi viz clothing is useful. Wayne That's reasonable and it will make it to the Bicycle Statutes of the revolution. What kind of flowers are fit for a lane taker who gets in front of a 40 ton semi? Bill Baka |
#364
|
|||
|
|||
Should Cyclists Pack Guns?
On May 2, 3:43 pm, "DI" wrote:
"evelyn" wrote in message ups.com... On May 2, 1:44 pm, Patrick Lamb wrote: (newsgroups trimmed a bit...) wrote: On May 2, 12:10 pm, Turby wrote: On 2 May 2007 07:23:29 -0700, wrote: Again - so many fearful people in this country. It's kind of sad. Yeah, it is. The statistics say that one out of three women in America will be sexually assaulted in her lifetime. Oh? Do you have a citation for that? I'd like to see it. For it to be true, the definition of "sexually assault" must be very broad, indeed! I've seen similar statistics before. Doesn't mean it's right, but it's become (becoming?) conventional wisdom. But even if true (which I seriously doubt) ISTM the solution isn't for all women to pack guns all the time. If you take 70 years as the mean life span, and 1/3 of the women in the US are assaulted, you're chance of being sexually assaulted today is something like 1 out of 75,000. It wouldn't be worth it to me to pack a pistol every day, given that remote a chance, but if one was a regular patron of the Fearmonger's Shop like "evelyn" seems to be, maybe one might think it worthwhile for onesself. Pat What do you suggest women do? I've taken self defense classes, karate classes and finally a class to be certified to carry a fire arm. I'm not living in the fairy tale world where nothing bad ever happens. Even in rural, country communities, crime can occur. I don't think there is any problem with women carrying guns. Evelyn I can't believe all these fruitcakes are blasting you for wanting to carry some personal protection when you are out alone, you're smarter than they are. You have every right to do whatever you feel is necessary, it's none of their business. A .38 is excellent personal defense gun for a woman, might be a little lightweight in some instances but with 125 grain hollow points, quite effective. Keep carrying it and don't worry about this bunch.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Thank you. Finally someone who has an intellegent thought. |
#365
|
|||
|
|||
Should Cyclists Pack Guns?
On May 2, 4:39 pm, wrote:
On May 2, 1:07 pm, evelyn wrote: On May 2, 1:00 pm, wrote: On May 2, 12:10 pm, Turby wrote: On 2 May 2007 07:23:29 -0700, wrote: Again - so many fearful people in this country. It's kind of sad. Yeah, it is. The statistics say that one out of three women in America will be sexually assaulted in her lifetime. and if I carry my gun while riding/running in a rural area, I will be able to protect myself! Oh? Do you have a citation for that? I'd like to see it. For it to be true, the definition of "sexually assault" must be very broad, indeed! How broad do you want? Being touched, groped, penetrated or sodomized, I call all that rape if I don't want it. Well, if "being touched" qualifies as sexual assault, I suppose that _would_ make one out of three American women victims! I could bump into a woman in a grocery and be guilty of sexual assault! Who knew? I just hope I won't get shot for it. Hmm. Maybe the world really is a dangerous place after all! ;-) Isn't it easy for men to say these things. I don't think that a man getting ready to go for a ride will ask himself if he will get hurt or raped while out by himself. Sorry, I still think you're paranoid. I know _many_ women who ride their bikes by themselves. _None_ of them carry guns, nor have they ever needed one, AFAIK. (And yes, I do believe they would tell me.) Good for them. It only takes one time though. It is perfectly legal for me to carry my firearm, and I will continue to do so. I really don't care if you think I am being paranoid. Again, I would better be safe than sorry. And carrying a gun gives me some type of protection agains the weirdos out there. Watch out! The paranoids are after you! ;-) - Frank Krygowski- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
#366
|
|||
|
|||
Should Cyclists Pack Guns?
On May 2, 4:55 pm, wrote:
On May 2, 2:12 pm, evelyn wrote: I've taken self defense classes, karate classes and finally a class to be certified to carry a fire arm. I'm not living in the fairy tale world where nothing bad ever happens. Even in rural, country communities, crime can occur. Of course it _can_. We hear that sort of thinking all the time - the fact that no, disaster is NOT literally impossible. It's that kind of thinking that gets people driving 1000 miles because they're afraid of flying, or never riding bikes because they're afraid of getting hit by a car. Problem is, such thinking often puts people into worse conditions than the one they fear. Don't fly, get in a car crash instead (much more likely). Don't bike, die of heart disease while sitting safe on your couch. Just like crime, getting hit by a meteorite can occur. Having a tree topple on you as you ride by can occur. So can having an earthquake crack the road open and swallow you. But when the odds of a particular danger get low enough, it's just not worth worrying about. What do you suggest women do? The first thing I'd suggest is simply not being afraid! It's not that bad out there! IMO, taking a self-defence class is fine. I believe the few bad guys that are out there are influenced by a person's confidence, or lack of same. Staying out of really sketchy neighborhoods makes sense to me too (although I routinely ride through some that scare more timid folk). But I'm struck by the fact that I've never, ever, in 30+ years of cycling, met a man or woman who felt the need to have a pistol ready at their side. Somehow all those people are surviving. Maybe you should observe what most cyclists do, and imitate that? Why do I? Again, this is America and if I want to carry a weapon for protection, I have that right. I don't have to be like others, I'm my own person. I am fully capable of handling my weapon and I am perfectly within the law to carry it. In Virginia, I can carry a concealed weapon. Therefore, I will continue to carry it, no matter what other people may say. - Frank Krygowski |
#367
|
|||
|
|||
Should Cyclists Pack Guns?
On May 2, 5:07 pm, BrianNZ wrote:
evelyn wrote: how do you know.? I could be bigger than you or stronger than you, you are makine lots of assumptions because I assume I am a woman. You have no idea of what kind of person i am, what type of shape I am in, NOTHING. Hmmmmm....you assume you are a woman!? Drop your pants and take a look.....if you have a penis, you are a guy. Hope this helped clear that assumption up for you. Unless you are one of those confused individuals who has a penis but prefers wearing womens clothes...... how intellegent? how about sticking to the arguement and not being a dumbass? |
#368
|
|||
|
|||
Should Cyclists Pack Guns?
Stephen! wrote:
Wayne Pein wrote in news:4638b259$0$9929 : Hey Boy, "Sharing" by your and other's definition seems to mean, "Bicyclists stay right in the lane so motorists can pass." CVC 21202. Any person operating a bicycle upon a roadway at a speed less than the normal speed of traffic moving in the same direction at that time *shall* ride as close as practicable to the right-hand curb or edge of the roadway NC§20-146(b) “Upon all highways any vehicle proceeding at less than the legal maximum speed limit shall be driven in the right-hand lane then available for thru traffic, or as close as practicable to the right-hand curb or edge of the highway...” In NC bicyclists use the right lane, or if the lanes are not marked then, like other vehicles, as far to the right as practicable. Your state attempts to be discriminatory to bicyclists. However, practicable means that the bicyclist chooses what that distance is. And, the "normal" speed of traffic is subject to interpretation. If bicyclists are traffic, which they are, then "normal" is bicyclist speed. Further, your statute doesn't explicity say motorists can pass in the same lane. It merely implies it. I doubt that statute would hold up in court. Wayne |
#369
|
|||
|
|||
Should Cyclists Pack Guns?
Mike Young wrote:
"Wayne Pein" wrote in message ... If a slow user (bicyclist, front loader, farm tractor) had to pull over every time there was one vehicle delayed they would never get anywhere. Bingo! Take a prize from the top shelf. You've earned it. Bingo! Do not collect a prize. Bicyclists are not going to pull over for Mike Young. The role of a handgun is to impose your personal will, by threat of or actual use of deadly force. How should one respond to the imposition of your discourteous view of fair road use? Idiot. That is not the role of a handgun. Grow up. Then, pray tell. What is the role of a handgun? For criminals, it's to impose personal will by threat or actual use of deadly force. For law abiding citizens, its for self defense from criminals. For you, it's to stuff in your mouth and remove yourself from the gene pool. Wayne |
#370
|
|||
|
|||
Should Cyclists Pack Guns?
On May 2, 6:13 pm, "Mike Young" wrote:
"evelyn" wrote in message oups.com... On May 2, 2:14 pm, (Matthew T. Russotto) wrote: In article .com, evelyn wrote: How broad do you want? Being touched, groped, penetrated or sodomized, I call all that rape if I don't want it. Then get a better definition, because you're cheapening the word "rape". -- There's no such thing as a free lunch, but certain accounting practices can result in a fully-depreciated one. maybe i should clarify: being touched, groped, penetrated or sodomized, I call all that SEXUAL ASSAULT if I don't want it. does this sound better? You are right, I don't want to cheapen the word "rape" Bloody hell. You forgot innuendo and off color jokes.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Whatever. I do believe being groped, penetrated by anything, or sodomized is rape. Ladies, do you agree? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Car Hits Pack of Cyclists in St. Pete | Rodney Kuehl | Recumbent Biking | 40 | February 24th 07 02:20 AM |
Back pack for cyclists | scouselad | General | 18 | June 28th 05 01:39 PM |
guns and bikes | byron27 | Australia | 1 | October 7th 04 11:35 PM |
guns and bikes | byron27 | Australia | 9 | October 7th 04 01:21 AM |
" 400mph cyclists kill opponents with handlebar-mounted guns " | Gawnsoft | UK | 4 | March 11th 04 12:56 AM |