|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#81
|
|||
|
|||
Drug scandal rocks Australian cycling
Originally posted by L'Acrobat Of course it won't evolve, the net
itself isn't changing at all is it you pillock... So, yeah, how about that aussie drug scandal, eh? ;-) hippy - very bored with this, can we just organise a punch up and be done with it? :P -- |
Ads |
#82
|
|||
|
|||
Drug scandal rocks Australian cycling
hippy wrote in news:hE1Ec.35937$zS.33610
@fe17.usenetserver.com: very bored with this, can we just organise a punch up and be done with it? :P And if that doesn't work, how about we form a lynch mob? Graeme |
#83
|
|||
|
|||
Drug scandal rocks Australian cycling
Graeme wrote:
h And if that doesn't work, how about we form a lynch mob? Graeme How about a new thread voting who agrees/disagrees so these 2 can ge tthe message loud and clear and stop being conveniently ignorant... -- |
#84
|
|||
|
|||
Idiots arguing
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:28:42 GMT, "L'acrobat"
wrote: Your sig is a classic example of whining, and the funny part is that it is actually counterproductive. Oh yes, your crusade is going swimmingly, you have actually convinced someone to take up top posting. So, Top Posting - 1 v DRS - 0 What a sad loser you are. Oh dear. We've attracted a fool. This is a nice, friendly newsgroup where occasional lapses in Usenet protocols are not jumped on and where learners are gently advised of the correct way to do things. Of course, if they continue to ignore the advice and get all precious about their rights to annoy other people, they will be plonked. -- Regards. Richard. |
#85
|
|||
|
|||
Idiots arguing
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:42:26 GMT, "L'acrobat"
wrote: Yes, we've been through this before - if you have to tell people it's clever, it isn't. It's whiny, which is why it suits you to a tee. You are simply pathetic. Ooo er. You are so butch. ^k Bye. -- Regards. Richard. |
#86
|
|||
|
|||
The Big Vote
How about a new thread voting who agrees/disagrees so these 2 can ge tthe message loud and clear and stop being conveniently ignorant... Ok here's the plan. I've created a hotmail account (who gives a rat's arse). If you think it's important to bottom post send an email to that address with bottom post in the subject. If you couldn't give a rats whether top or bottom is used send an email with the topic cgara. Anyone who wants to check on the polling can logon with the password toppost . I'm sure none of this will have any impact on DRS's OCD but at least there will be some data to backup any arguments, heavy scarcasm and we all know how important it is not to post opinions without data /heavy scarcasm. DaveB |
#87
|
|||
|
|||
The Big Vote
DaveB wrote:
How about a new thread voting who agrees/disagrees so these 2 can ge tthe message loud and clear and stop being conveniently ignorant... Ok here's the plan. I've created a hotmail account (who gives a rat's arse). If you think it's important to bottom post send an email to that address with bottom post in the subject. If you couldn't give a rats whether top or bottom is used send an email with the topic cgara. Anyone who wants to check on the polling can logon with the password toppost . I'm sure none of this will have any impact on DRS's OCD but at least there will be some data to backup any arguments, heavy scarcasm and we all know how important it is not to post opinions without data /heavy scarcasm. DaveB Doh! stupid hotmail !@#$%^. Send the emails to . |
#88
|
|||
|
|||
Drug scandal rocks Australian cycling
"flyingdutch" wrote in message
Graeme wrote: h And if that doesn't work, how about we form a lynch mob? How about a new thread voting who agrees/disagrees so these 2 can ge tthe message loud and clear and stop being conveniently ignorant... I'm not in the least ignorant about Usenet standards and etiquette, unlike that drop-kick. -- A: Top-posters. Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet? |
#89
|
|||
|
|||
Drug scandal rocks Australian cycling
"DRS" wrote in news:cbrnft$1bg$1
@lust.ihug.co.nz: I'm not in the least ignorant about Usenet standards No, but you are ignorant of when to just drop it. You're flogging a dead horse. Graeme |
#90
|
|||
|
|||
Drug scandal rocks Australian cycling
"Graeme" wrote in message
4.51 "DRS" wrote in news:cbrnft$1bg$1 @lust.ihug.co.nz: I'm not in the least ignorant about Usenet standards No, but you are ignorant of when to just drop it. You're flogging a dead horse. I'll believe that when I start seeing people telling off the troublemakers instead of me. -- A: Top-posters. Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
published helmet research - not troll | Frank Krygowski | General | 1927 | October 24th 04 06:39 AM |
More Paris Cycling - Along Southern Rim | Elisa Francesca Roselli | General | 3 | May 26th 04 02:01 AM |
Age doesn't stop 70-somethings who are cycling devotees | Garrison Hilliard | General | 5 | March 22nd 04 04:56 AM |
Reports from Sweden | Garry Jones | General | 17 | October 14th 03 05:23 PM |
Doping or not? Read this: | never_doped | Racing | 0 | August 4th 03 01:46 AM |