#1
|
|||
|
|||
Climbing
Not more than ten minutes into my morning commute, there's a short,
steep hill to climb (maybe 100 meters or so and up to 15% grade). It was usually fairly easy in low gear (40:28) on my road bike (700Cx28) out of the saddle. Later I started using 2nd gear (40:24), and eventually replaced the 14-28 freewheel with a 13-24. This has been going all right, but I began to worry about no bailout gear in case I ever lost my mojo or something. So I determined to try it in 2nd gear (now 40:21) again. Today I approached as usual in 5th gear on the big chainwheel (52), downshifted to 4th a little early, thought for a moment about what I was doing, didn't come to any conclusion, then downshifted to 3rd (chain didn't want to shift and I had to lean on the lever a bit)... then 2nd (again with the difficulty getting ti to shift)... (I'll bet some of you already know the end of this story :-)... and finally to 1st gear. The difficulty shifting into the lower gears bugged me a bit, but then I remembered my intention to climb in 2nd gear, and shifted back up to 2nd. I had expected the 21-tooth to be more work than the 24, but man I really had to pull the cranks over the top and slalom up the hill. As I finally crested the hill and sat down for a drink, I figured I'd eventually have to see about switching to a triple crankset. Then I put the water bottle down and shifted up to 3rd... then 4th... then reached for the front shifter and... what's this?! It's already in high? I had forgotten to move the chain onto the small chainwheel at the foot of the hill. Well, at least now I know the chain is long enough. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Climbing
On Sep 13, 12:55*am, Dan O wrote:
Not more than ten minutes into my morning commute, there's a short, steep hill to climb (maybe 100 meters or so and up to 15% grade). *It was usually fairly easy in low gear (40:28) on my road bike (700Cx28) out of the saddle. Later I started using 2nd gear (40:24), and eventually replaced the 14-28 freewheel with a 13-24. *This has been going all right, but I began to worry about no bailout gear in case I ever lost my mojo or something. *So I determined to try it in 2nd gear (now 40:21) again. Today I approached as usual in 5th gear on the big chainwheel (52), downshifted to 4th a little early, thought for a moment about what I was doing, didn't come to any conclusion, then downshifted to 3rd (chain didn't want to shift and I had to lean on the lever a bit)... then 2nd (again with the difficulty getting ti to shift)... (I'll bet some of you already know the end of this story :-)... and finally to 1st gear. *The difficulty shifting into the lower gears bugged me a bit, but then I remembered my intention to climb in 2nd gear, and shifted back up to 2nd. I had expected the 21-tooth to be more work than the 24, but man I really had to pull the cranks over the top and slalom up the hill. As I finally crested the hill and sat down for a drink, I figured I'd eventually have to see about switching to a triple crankset. *Then I put the water bottle down and shifted up to 3rd... then 4th... then reached for the front shifter and... what's this?! *It's already in high? *I had forgotten to move the chain onto the small chainwheel at the foot of the hill. Well, at least now I know the chain is long enough. seated climbing in the big ring is a good way to test your position for power and tweak if necessary- sounds like you're dialed in. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Climbing
Dan O wrote:
Not more than ten minutes into my morning commute, there's a short, steep hill to climb (maybe 100 meters or so and up to 15% grade). *It was usually fairly easy in low gear (40:28) on my road bike (700Cx28) out of the saddle. Later I started using 2nd gear (40:24), and eventually replaced the 14-28 freewheel with a 13-24. * *I had forgotten to move the chain onto the small chainwheel at the foot of the hill. That's a good tale that many of us can relate to. But unless you're using a 6-speed freewheel and are trying to avoid gaps, why limit yourself to a 40:24 if you have to deal with grades up to 15%? I guess we all tend to use the gears we have, and get a little "lazy" at times if we have low gears. But I prefer that to struggling when tired or when I encounter a new monster hill. Art Harris |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Climbing
Art Harris wrote:
Not more than ten minutes into my morning commute, there's a short, steep hill to climb (maybe 100 meters or so and up to 15% grade). Â*It was usually fairly easy in low gear (40:28) on my road bike (700Cx28) out of the saddle. Later I started using 2nd gear (40:24), and eventually replaced the 14-28 freewheel with a 13-24. Â* Â*I had forgotten to move the chain onto the small chainwheel at the foot of the hill. That's a good tale that many of us can relate to. But unless you're using a 6-speed freewheel and are trying to avoid gaps, why limit yourself to a 40:24 if you have to deal with grades up to 15%? I guess we all tend to use the gears we have, and get a little "lazy" at times if we have low gears. But I prefer that to struggling when tired or when I encounter a new monster hill. I think there is a preoccupation with gears and similarity between humans and motor driven vehicles. As Long as the legs can turn the pedals, it's the rate of climb that determines speed because that is what work on a bicycle is in the absence of significant (wind) speed. Local bicyclists have participated in a common hill-climb (on Old La Honda Rd.) and achieved the same ET in 20% differing gears. This underscores that it is ft-lbs/sec elevation gain that counts. My experience is the same for a local ride over Mt. Hamilton to Livermore and back to the start with 7800 ft of climbing. Since a gear enthusiast once told riders they needed especially low gears for Mt. Hamilton, I ride the same 50-15t gear without shifting for the entire route. The first time, gear-friend rode his motorcycle up the main grade to the observatory, as I rode with some friends, to see if I really used a corncob 5-speed cluster (13-14-15-16-17) and was suitably rewarded. That was 30 years ago but it still worked yesterday. http://www.rntl.net/mthamiltonlookout.htm http://mthamilton.ucolick.org/public/pictures/snowpics/ http://tinyurl.com/58yfbp Jobst Brandt |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Climbing
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Climbing
Henny-Penny wrote:
Not more than ten minutes into my morning commute, there's a short, steep hill to climb (maybe 100 meters or so and up to 15% grade). Â*It was usually fairly easy in low gear (40:28) on my road bike (700Cx28) out of the saddle. Later I started using 2nd gear (40:24), and eventually replaced the 14-28 freewheel with a 13-24. Â* Â*I had forgotten to move the chain onto the small chainwheel at the foot of the hill. That's a good tale that many of us can relate to. But unless you're using a 6-speed freewheel and are trying to avoid gaps, why limit yourself to a 40:24 if you have to deal with grades up to 15%? I guess we all tend to use the gears we have, and get a little "lazy" at times if we have low gears. But I prefer that to struggling when tired or when I encounter a new monster hill. I think there is a preoccupation with gears and similarity between humans and motor driven vehicles. As Long as the legs can turn the pedals, it's the rate of climb that determines speed because that is what work on a bicycle is in the absence of significant (wind) speed. Well, of course, if the legs can turn the gears. I'm not sure what you are trying to say here. Humans can stall, like an engine, as well as do permanent damage to joints if they try to show off and push too high a gear under load/uphill. If you stall, then the legs cannot turn the gear. THat is what I said. It's the ground speed at which the gears can be turned that varies, and I mentioned the TT results to underscore that. http://www.sacred-texts.com/neu/eng/eft/eft21.htm Jobst Brandt |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Climbing
On Sep 14, 1:54 pm, wrote:
So why do the overwhelming majority of riders use low gears to climb? Define low gears. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Climbing
On Sep 14, 10:02 am, Art Harris wrote:
Dan O wrote: Not more than ten minutes into my morning commute, there's a short, steep hill to climb (maybe 100 meters or so and up to 15% grade). It was usually fairly easy in low gear (40:28) on my road bike (700Cx28) out of the saddle. Later I started using 2nd gear (40:24), and eventually replaced the 14-28 freewheel with a 13-24. I had forgotten to move the chain onto the small chainwheel at the foot of the hill. That's a good tale that many of us can relate to. But unless you're using a 6-speed freewheel and are trying to avoid gaps, why limit yourself to a 40:24 if you have to deal with grades up to 15%? The bike was originally a six-speed (14-16-18-21-24-28). Now it has a seven-speed (13-14-15-17-19-21-24). This is a greatly improved configuration for my needs. I now have a higher top end *and* finer gradation. There are always trade-offs. Maybe someday I will get a triple crankset. In consideration of advice received here, I have recently been willing to downshift more readily and work with a little higher cadence sometimes (something made far more practical by the tighter gear cluster). I *am*, however, also getting a lot of good use from that 13-tooth ;-) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Climbing
On Sep 14, 12:54 pm, wrote:
On 14 Sep 2008 19:16:45 GMT, wrote: Art Harris wrote: Not more than ten minutes into my morning commute, there's a short, steep hill to climb (maybe 100 meters or so and up to 15% grade). It was usually fairly easy in low gear (40:28) on my road bike (700Cx28) out of the saddle. Later I started using 2nd gear (40:24), and eventually replaced the 14-28 freewheel with a 13-24. I had forgotten to move the chain onto the small chainwheel at the foot of the hill. That's a good tale that many of us can relate to. But unless you're using a 6-speed freewheel and are trying to avoid gaps, why limit yourself to a 40:24 if you have to deal with grades up to 15%? I guess we all tend to use the gears we have, and get a little "lazy" at times if we have low gears. But I prefer that to struggling when tired or when I encounter a new monster hill. I think there is a preoccupation with gears and similarity between humans and motor driven vehicles. As Long as the legs can turn the pedals, it's the rate of climb that determines speed because that is what work on a bicycle is in the absence of significant (wind) speed. Local bicyclists have participated in a common hill-climb (on Old La Honda Rd.) and achieved the same ET in 20% differing gears. This underscores that it is ft-lbs/sec elevation gain that counts. My experience is the same for a local ride over Mt. Hamilton to Livermore and back to the start with 7800 ft of climbing. Since a gear enthusiast once told riders they needed especially low gears for Mt. Hamilton, I ride the same 50-15t gear without shifting for the entire route. The first time, gear-friend rode his motorcycle up the main grade to the observatory, as I rode with some friends, to see if I really used a corncob 5-speed cluster (13-14-15-16-17) and was suitably rewarded. That was 30 years ago but it still worked yesterday. http://www.rntl.net/mthamiltonlookout.htm http://mthamilton.ucolick.org/public/pictures/snowpics/ http://tinyurl.com/58yfbp So why do the overwhelming majority of riders use low gears to climb? Path of least resistance? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wheelset for climbing | Claus Assmann | Techniques | 9 | July 18th 07 10:45 PM |
climbing | Zebee Johnstone | Australia | 7 | July 3rd 06 09:26 PM |
Climbing OTB | p e t e f a g e r l i n | Mountain Biking | 26 | May 9th 06 03:56 PM |
Level one and climbing... | EvanWilson | Unicycling | 3 | April 4th 06 11:45 AM |
Climbing tires? | Spider | Mountain Biking | 30 | November 7th 04 09:19 PM |