|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Frames used to be a little more complicated
On 24 Jan, 21:51, AMuzi wrote:
Nate Nagel wrote: wrote: http://tinyurl.com/yac5m39 Cheers, Carl Fogel I see the name "Garford" on the saddle, wonder if there's any connection with the Garford that manufactured automobiles? *Only reason I know that name is because there was a Studebaker-Garford automobile, prior to Studebaker introducing their own completely in-house designs. *(for those who don't know, I have a penchant for 50's and 60's Studebaker cars, hence my knowledge of such arcana; also, Studebaker started off as a manufacturer of horse-drawn wagons, and transitioned to automobiles first by outsourcing, as in the case of Garford, or in one instance, purchasing EMF, an established automobile company) Hmmm.... let me google that http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Lovett_Garford http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Studebaker-Garford yup, same company. *And apparently credited with the first "padded bicycle seat." *I learned something new today! Also, I once broke down in Elyria, due to my alternator having failed somewhere around Toledo. *I thought I could make it to Pittsburgh, where I had family and friends, but then it started to rain Nate, Nate, an alternator? I would have thought a generator. Maybe a magneto. Always a magneto with acetylene lamps. Or ws it carbon arc? |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Frames used to be a little more complicated
On 24 Jan, 22:28, * Still Just Me *
wrote: On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 15:51:40 -0600, AMuzi wrote: Nate, Nate, an alternator? I would have thought a generator. Maybe a magneto. The Tesla designed bikes had alternators. Just use a small motor off a toy car and connect to LED array. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Frames used to be a little more complicated
AMuzi wrote:
Nate Nagel wrote: wrote: http://tinyurl.com/yac5m39 Cheers, Carl Fogel I see the name "Garford" on the saddle, wonder if there's any connection with the Garford that manufactured automobiles? Only reason I know that name is because there was a Studebaker-Garford automobile, prior to Studebaker introducing their own completely in-house designs. (for those who don't know, I have a penchant for 50's and 60's Studebaker cars, hence my knowledge of such arcana; also, Studebaker started off as a manufacturer of horse-drawn wagons, and transitioned to automobiles first by outsourcing, as in the case of Garford, or in one instance, purchasing EMF, an established automobile company) Hmmm.... let me google that http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Lovett_Garford http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Studebaker-Garford yup, same company. And apparently credited with the first "padded bicycle seat." I learned something new today! Also, I once broke down in Elyria, due to my alternator having failed somewhere around Toledo. I thought I could make it to Pittsburgh, where I had family and friends, but then it started to rain Nate, Nate, an alternator? I would have thought a generator. Maybe a magneto. I was driving a vee-dub... actually I was in one, my "old faithful" Scirocco, and the girl was in another, a newer GTI. I had doubts about the GTI so I went over it with a fine toothed comb before we left, but I'd been driving the 'roccet every day for years and it'd never even given me a hint of trouble without plenty of warning beforehand. I can't remember why she preferred to drive the GTI, maybe because it rode a little smoother (I'd worked over the suspension in the 'roccet a couple years earlier to make it ride and handle more to my liking.) That was the one and only time the Scirocco ever let me down, to the point that it was unable to continue. Several centibucks and a day later, and I was back on the road... shoulda never sold that car. The GTI, of course, ran flawlessly the whole way to Maryland :/ nate -- replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply. http://members.cox.net/njnagel |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Frames used to be a little more complicated
Nate Nagel wrote:
AMuzi wrote: Nate Nagel wrote: wrote: http://tinyurl.com/yac5m39 Cheers, Carl Fogel I see the name "Garford" on the saddle, wonder if there's any connection with the Garford that manufactured automobiles? Only reason I know that name is because there was a Studebaker-Garford automobile, prior to Studebaker introducing their own completely in-house designs. (for those who don't know, I have a penchant for 50's and 60's Studebaker cars, hence my knowledge of such arcana; also, Studebaker started off as a manufacturer of horse-drawn wagons, and transitioned to automobiles first by outsourcing, as in the case of Garford, or in one instance, purchasing EMF, an established automobile company) Hmmm.... let me google that http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Lovett_Garford http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Studebaker-Garford yup, same company. And apparently credited with the first "padded bicycle seat." I learned something new today! Also, I once broke down in Elyria, due to my alternator having failed somewhere around Toledo. I thought I could make it to Pittsburgh, where I had family and friends, but then it started to rain Nate, Nate, an alternator? I would have thought a generator. Maybe a magneto. I was driving a vee-dub... actually I was in one, my "old faithful" Scirocco, and the girl was in another, a newer GTI. I had doubts about the GTI so I went over it with a fine toothed comb before we left, but I'd been driving the 'roccet every day for years and it'd never even given me a hint of trouble without plenty of warning beforehand. I can't remember why she preferred to drive the GTI, maybe because it rode a little smoother (I'd worked over the suspension in the 'roccet a couple years earlier to make it ride and handle more to my liking.) That was the one and only time the Scirocco ever let me down, to the point that it was unable to continue. Several centibucks and a day later, and I was back on the road... shoulda never sold that car. The GTI, of course, ran flawlessly the whole way to Maryland :/ nate Oh, and I forgot to mention, I don't own a car with a generator - the '55 sports a Delco 10SI scavenged from some old Cadillac. My '62 had the original Autolite generator, and I just never appreciated the charms of having the wipers slow and headlights dim every time the engine dropped below 1000 RPM. Retro-cool is nice, but only if it's functional! nate -- replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply. http://members.cox.net/njnagel |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Frames used to be a little more complicated
-snip meandering Sunday conversation-
Nate Nagel wrote: Oh, and I forgot to mention, I don't own a car with a generator - the '55 sports a Delco 10SI scavenged from some old Cadillac. My '62 had the original Autolite generator, and I just never appreciated the charms of having the wipers slow and headlights dim every time the engine dropped below 1000 RPM. Retro-cool is nice, but only if it's functional! Sure if you _always_ have a battery ... -- Andrew Muzi www.yellowjersey.org/ Open every day since 1 April, 1971 |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Frames used to be a little more complicated
On Jan 24, 6:39*pm, Nate Nagel wrote:
*Several centibucks and a day later, and I was back on the road... * If it really was centibucks, you were very lucky. A centibuck is a little less than 20 millimeters diameter, and copper colored. It usually takes some hectobucks to fix something like that. - Frank Krygowski |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Frames used to be a little more complicated
On Jan 25, 12:11*am, AMuzi wrote:
-snip meandering Sunday conversation- Nate Nagel wrote: * Oh, and I forgot to mention, I don't own a car with a generator - the '55 sports a Delco 10SI scavenged from some old Cadillac. *My '62 had the original Autolite generator, and I just never appreciated the charms of having the wipers slow and headlights dim every time the engine dropped below 1000 RPM. *Retro-cool is nice, but only if it's functional! Sure if you _always_ have a battery ... Phooey, you don't need a battery. A magneto is more than good enough. It is also self-contained and beyond its manufacture wastes no more of the earth's resources, unlike any other ignition system. I'm amazed that on a cycling conference there can even be a discussion of the relative merits of generators and dynamos with their accompanying batteries. Andre Jute Real men swing starting handles |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Frames used to be a little more complicated
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 15:23:39 -0600, AMuzi wrote:
wrote: http://tinyurl.com/yac5m39 Obviously a crude early model without any urethane inserts nor even one single aluminum-carbon glued joint. Dear Andrew, Mature frame technology, natural carbon-fiber: http://www.nostalgic.net/pictures/1742.htm Joints are bonded not with glue but with the oxy-ferric process. Further details: http://www.nostalgic.net/pictures/1740.htm http://www.nostalgic.net/bicycle404.htm Cheers, Carl Fogel |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Frames used to be a little more complicated
Andre Jute wrote:
On Jan 25, 12:11 am, AMuzi wrote: -snip meandering Sunday conversation- Nate Nagel wrote: Oh, and I forgot to mention, I don't own a car with a generator - the '55 sports a Delco 10SI scavenged from some old Cadillac. My '62 had the original Autolite generator, and I just never appreciated the charms of having the wipers slow and headlights dim every time the engine dropped below 1000 RPM. Retro-cool is nice, but only if it's functional! Sure if you _always_ have a battery ... Phooey, you don't need a battery. A magneto is more than good enough. It is also self-contained and beyond its manufacture wastes no more of the earth's resources, unlike any other ignition system. I'm amazed that on a cycling conference there can even be a discussion of the relative merits of generators and dynamos with their accompanying batteries. Andre Jute Real men swing starting handles Geez Andre. Nate has an alternator. Which needs a battery. With a generator or magneto, one merely rolls the car while in gear and it goes. (or park on a hill...) -- Andrew Muzi www.yellowjersey.org/ Open every day since 1 April, 1971 |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Frames used to be a little more complicated
In article
, Andre Jute wrote: On Jan 24, 12:44Â*am, wrote: http://tinyurl.com/yac5m39 Cheers, Carl Fogel I like this frame. With only a little development (double-butted tubes, simplification of joints, balloon tyres instead of the halfheart suspension, suchlike modernizations) it could be a very comfortable and relatively lightweight modern frame. I absolutely love the simple length adjustment of the cranks. BTW, considered only as a triangulation, this is one frame in which the two seatstays are superfluous, as the stacked chainstays are already triangulated, and the seat tube too. I would stay away from it. A steel frame that old has lost its snap. -- Michael Press |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Damn! Riding a bicycle sure does make life complicated! | Bill | General | 11 | July 10th 09 02:34 AM |
Patek Complicated Gondolo Calendario Yellow Gold Men's Watch 5135J | [email protected] | Unicycling | 0 | September 24th 08 04:07 AM |
complicated bicycle | Zebee Johnstone | Australia | 2 | March 2nd 07 08:57 AM |
Pulley cages - why so complicated? | richard | Techniques | 5 | August 31st 05 04:41 PM |
Frames | Matt Ellman | Mountain Biking | 4 | December 30th 03 04:50 PM |