A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » rec.bicycles » Techniques
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Frames used to be a little more complicated



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old January 24th 10, 10:20 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
thirty-six
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,049
Default Frames used to be a little more complicated

On 24 Jan, 21:51, AMuzi wrote:
Nate Nagel wrote:
wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/yac5m39


Cheers,


Carl Fogel


I see the name "Garford" on the saddle, wonder if there's any connection
with the Garford that manufactured automobiles? *Only reason I know that
name is because there was a Studebaker-Garford automobile, prior to
Studebaker introducing their own completely in-house designs. *(for
those who don't know, I have a penchant for 50's and 60's Studebaker
cars, hence my knowledge of such arcana; also, Studebaker started off as
a manufacturer of horse-drawn wagons, and transitioned to automobiles
first by outsourcing, as in the case of Garford, or in one instance,
purchasing EMF, an established automobile company)


Hmmm.... let me google that


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Lovett_Garford


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Studebaker-Garford


yup, same company. *And apparently credited with the first "padded
bicycle seat." *I learned something new today!


Also, I once broke down in Elyria, due to my alternator having failed
somewhere around Toledo. *I thought I could make it to Pittsburgh, where
I had family and friends, but then it started to rain


Nate, Nate, an alternator?
I would have thought a generator. Maybe a magneto.


Always a magneto with acetylene lamps. Or ws it carbon arc?
Ads
  #22  
Old January 24th 10, 10:39 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
thirty-six
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,049
Default Frames used to be a little more complicated

On 24 Jan, 22:28, * Still Just Me *
wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 15:51:40 -0600, AMuzi wrote:

Nate, Nate, an alternator?
I would have thought a generator. Maybe a magneto.


The Tesla designed bikes had alternators.


Just use a small motor off a toy car and connect to LED array.
  #23  
Old January 24th 10, 11:39 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Nate Nagel[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,872
Default Frames used to be a little more complicated

AMuzi wrote:
Nate Nagel wrote:
wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/yac5m39

Cheers,

Carl Fogel


I see the name "Garford" on the saddle, wonder if there's any
connection with the Garford that manufactured automobiles? Only
reason I know that name is because there was a Studebaker-Garford
automobile, prior to Studebaker introducing their own completely
in-house designs. (for those who don't know, I have a penchant for
50's and 60's Studebaker cars, hence my knowledge of such arcana;
also, Studebaker started off as a manufacturer of horse-drawn wagons,
and transitioned to automobiles first by outsourcing, as in the case
of Garford, or in one instance, purchasing EMF, an established
automobile company)

Hmmm.... let me google that

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Lovett_Garford

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Studebaker-Garford

yup, same company. And apparently credited with the first "padded
bicycle seat." I learned something new today!

Also, I once broke down in Elyria, due to my alternator having failed
somewhere around Toledo. I thought I could make it to Pittsburgh,
where I had family and friends, but then it started to rain



Nate, Nate, an alternator?
I would have thought a generator. Maybe a magneto.


I was driving a vee-dub... actually I was in one, my "old faithful"
Scirocco, and the girl was in another, a newer GTI. I had doubts about
the GTI so I went over it with a fine toothed comb before we left, but
I'd been driving the 'roccet every day for years and it'd never even
given me a hint of trouble without plenty of warning beforehand. I
can't remember why she preferred to drive the GTI, maybe because it rode
a little smoother (I'd worked over the suspension in the 'roccet a
couple years earlier to make it ride and handle more to my liking.)
That was the one and only time the Scirocco ever let me down, to the
point that it was unable to continue. Several centibucks and a day
later, and I was back on the road... shoulda never sold that car.

The GTI, of course, ran flawlessly the whole way to Maryland :/

nate

--
replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply.
http://members.cox.net/njnagel
  #24  
Old January 24th 10, 11:43 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Nate Nagel[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,872
Default Frames used to be a little more complicated

Nate Nagel wrote:
AMuzi wrote:
Nate Nagel wrote:
wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/yac5m39

Cheers,

Carl Fogel

I see the name "Garford" on the saddle, wonder if there's any
connection with the Garford that manufactured automobiles? Only
reason I know that name is because there was a Studebaker-Garford
automobile, prior to Studebaker introducing their own completely
in-house designs. (for those who don't know, I have a penchant for
50's and 60's Studebaker cars, hence my knowledge of such arcana;
also, Studebaker started off as a manufacturer of horse-drawn wagons,
and transitioned to automobiles first by outsourcing, as in the case
of Garford, or in one instance, purchasing EMF, an established
automobile company)

Hmmm.... let me google that

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Lovett_Garford

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Studebaker-Garford

yup, same company. And apparently credited with the first "padded
bicycle seat." I learned something new today!

Also, I once broke down in Elyria, due to my alternator having failed
somewhere around Toledo. I thought I could make it to Pittsburgh,
where I had family and friends, but then it started to rain



Nate, Nate, an alternator?
I would have thought a generator. Maybe a magneto.


I was driving a vee-dub... actually I was in one, my "old faithful"
Scirocco, and the girl was in another, a newer GTI. I had doubts about
the GTI so I went over it with a fine toothed comb before we left, but
I'd been driving the 'roccet every day for years and it'd never even
given me a hint of trouble without plenty of warning beforehand. I
can't remember why she preferred to drive the GTI, maybe because it rode
a little smoother (I'd worked over the suspension in the 'roccet a
couple years earlier to make it ride and handle more to my liking.) That
was the one and only time the Scirocco ever let me down, to the point
that it was unable to continue. Several centibucks and a day later, and
I was back on the road... shoulda never sold that car.

The GTI, of course, ran flawlessly the whole way to Maryland :/

nate


Oh, and I forgot to mention, I don't own a car with a generator - the
'55 sports a Delco 10SI scavenged from some old Cadillac. My '62 had
the original Autolite generator, and I just never appreciated the charms
of having the wipers slow and headlights dim every time the engine
dropped below 1000 RPM. Retro-cool is nice, but only if it's functional!

nate
--
replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply.
http://members.cox.net/njnagel
  #25  
Old January 25th 10, 12:11 AM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
AMuzi
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 13,447
Default Frames used to be a little more complicated

-snip meandering Sunday conversation-

Nate Nagel wrote:
Oh, and I forgot to mention, I don't own a car with a

generator - the
'55 sports a Delco 10SI scavenged from some old Cadillac. My '62 had
the original Autolite generator, and I just never appreciated the charms
of having the wipers slow and headlights dim every time the engine
dropped below 1000 RPM. Retro-cool is nice, but only if it's functional!


Sure if you _always_ have a battery ...

--
Andrew Muzi
www.yellowjersey.org/
Open every day since 1 April, 1971
  #26  
Old January 25th 10, 03:55 AM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Frank Krygowski[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,511
Default Frames used to be a little more complicated

On Jan 24, 6:39*pm, Nate Nagel wrote:
*Several centibucks and a day
later, and I was back on the road... *


If it really was centibucks, you were very lucky. A centibuck is a
little less than 20 millimeters diameter, and copper colored.

It usually takes some hectobucks to fix something like that.

- Frank Krygowski
  #27  
Old January 25th 10, 11:54 AM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Andre Jute[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,422
Default Frames used to be a little more complicated

On Jan 25, 12:11*am, AMuzi wrote:
-snip meandering Sunday conversation-

Nate Nagel wrote:

* Oh, and I forgot to mention, I don't own a car with a
generator - the

'55 sports a Delco 10SI scavenged from some old Cadillac. *My '62 had
the original Autolite generator, and I just never appreciated the charms
of having the wipers slow and headlights dim every time the engine
dropped below 1000 RPM. *Retro-cool is nice, but only if it's functional!


Sure if you _always_ have a battery ...


Phooey, you don't need a battery. A magneto is more than good enough.
It is also self-contained and beyond its manufacture wastes no more of
the earth's resources, unlike any other ignition system. I'm amazed
that on a cycling conference there can even be a discussion of the
relative merits of generators and dynamos with their accompanying
batteries.

Andre Jute
Real men swing starting handles

  #28  
Old January 25th 10, 07:07 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,934
Default Frames used to be a little more complicated

On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 15:23:39 -0600, AMuzi wrote:

wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/yac5m39


Obviously a crude early model without any urethane inserts
nor even one single aluminum-carbon glued joint.


Dear Andrew,

Mature frame technology, natural carbon-fiber:
http://www.nostalgic.net/pictures/1742.htm

Joints are bonded not with glue but with the oxy-ferric process.

Further details:
http://www.nostalgic.net/pictures/1740.htm
http://www.nostalgic.net/bicycle404.htm

Cheers,

Carl Fogel
  #29  
Old January 25th 10, 11:04 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
AMuzi
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 13,447
Default Frames used to be a little more complicated

Andre Jute wrote:
On Jan 25, 12:11 am, AMuzi wrote:
-snip meandering Sunday conversation-

Nate Nagel wrote:

Oh, and I forgot to mention, I don't own a car with a

generator - the

'55 sports a Delco 10SI scavenged from some old Cadillac. My '62 had
the original Autolite generator, and I just never appreciated the charms
of having the wipers slow and headlights dim every time the engine
dropped below 1000 RPM. Retro-cool is nice, but only if it's functional!

Sure if you _always_ have a battery ...


Phooey, you don't need a battery. A magneto is more than good enough.
It is also self-contained and beyond its manufacture wastes no more of
the earth's resources, unlike any other ignition system. I'm amazed
that on a cycling conference there can even be a discussion of the
relative merits of generators and dynamos with their accompanying
batteries.

Andre Jute
Real men swing starting handles


Geez Andre. Nate has an alternator. Which needs a battery.

With a generator or magneto, one merely rolls the car while
in gear and it goes. (or park on a hill...)

--
Andrew Muzi
www.yellowjersey.org/
Open every day since 1 April, 1971
  #30  
Old January 25th 10, 11:36 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Michael Press
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,202
Default Frames used to be a little more complicated

In article
,
Andre Jute wrote:

On Jan 24, 12:44Â*am, wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/yac5m39

Cheers,

Carl Fogel


I like this frame. With only a little development (double-butted
tubes, simplification of joints, balloon tyres instead of the
halfheart suspension, suchlike modernizations) it could be a very
comfortable and relatively lightweight modern frame. I absolutely love
the simple length adjustment of the cranks. BTW, considered only as a
triangulation, this is one frame in which the two seatstays are
superfluous, as the stacked chainstays are already triangulated, and
the seat tube too.


I would stay away from it. A steel frame that old has
lost its snap.

--
Michael Press
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Damn! Riding a bicycle sure does make life complicated! Bill General 11 July 10th 09 02:34 AM
Patek Complicated Gondolo Calendario Yellow Gold Men's Watch 5135J [email protected] Unicycling 0 September 24th 08 04:07 AM
complicated bicycle Zebee Johnstone Australia 2 March 2nd 07 08:57 AM
Pulley cages - why so complicated? richard Techniques 5 August 31st 05 04:41 PM
Frames Matt Ellman Mountain Biking 4 December 30th 03 04:50 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.