Fake Youtube videos

On 21:02 23 May 2020, Simon Mason said:

On Tuesday, May 19, 2020 at 12:38:18 PM UTC+1, Pamela wrote:

If a cyclist jumps a red light then it's wrong. It doesn't make any
difference how many murders, fatal crashes or armed robberies occur
that

day.

Actually it does. If there are 1000's of car drivers speeding along a
certain stretch of road, usually the police will allocate resources to
address these blatant transgressions of the law by placing safety
cameras there. If a cyclist passes through a red light with nobody
around to see it, nothing will happen. The police have only a finite
amount of resourses and have to prioritise them according to their
impact on society.

If you think through that argument then you'll see you have just argued
against yourself.

On Saturday, 23 May 2020 20:33:12 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 23/05/2020 16:52, Mike Collins wrote:
On Friday, 22 May 2020 17:33:33 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 22/05/2020 17:14, Mike Collins wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 May 2020 17:05:09 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 20/05/2020 11:21, Pamela wrote:
On 20:18 19 May 2020, Mike Collins said:

On Tuesday, 19 May 2020 19:44:44 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:

True. And I too can say it as a pedestrian. But I have never had a car
approach me driving along a footway. I can't say that about cycles -
sometimes a whole family, who can never see anything wrong with their
behaviour.


When I had the misfortune to work in Liverpool I was walking up Lord
Nelson Street from Lime Street Station and a car drove at me on the
footway. The moronist's excuse for attempted murder was he was just
trying to keep the traffic flowing.

You failed to provide any evidence to support that far-fetched claim about
"attempted murder". A police report would do.

I know Lord Nelson Street *very* well. I have known it all my life,
because my family (both sides) have residential and other roots in the
area dating from before WW2 right up until the 1970s.

There is no appreciable traffic in Lord Nelson Street. It is a
destination, not a route. Traffic using it cannot make progress since it
feeds back into one-way streets and dual-carriageways with limited
turns. MC's not knowing that led him into the fabrication of his story.

With Lime St taxi rank on LN st there is a lot of traffic heading uphill after the London train arrives. On that day a parked van was blocking the downhill traffic and one driver decided driving on the footway straight at a pedestrian was the best solution.
Great Newton street was even worse in the rush hour because of the resident parking turning it into a single lane road motorists thought it is acceptable to turn the footway into a second lane and expected pedestrians to move out of their way.

Do you remember that programme "Jackanory"?

Unlike you I don't live in a fantasy world where motorists have to duck when going under low bridges so their haloes don't get damaged.

A fantasy world is exactly where you dwell.

So you DO believe that no motorist in history has ever broken a law.
Be careful in case Captain Hook is reading your posts, he may be hiding under your bed tonight.

On 23/05/2020 22:22, Mike Collins wrote:
On Saturday, 23 May 2020 20:33:12 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 23/05/2020 16:52, Mike Collins wrote:
On Friday, 22 May 2020 17:33:33 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 22/05/2020 17:14, Mike Collins wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 May 2020 17:05:09 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 20/05/2020 11:21, Pamela wrote:
On 20:18 19 May 2020, Mike Collins said:

On Tuesday, 19 May 2020 19:44:44 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:

True. And I too can say it as a pedestrian. But I have never had a car
approach me driving along a footway. I can't say that about cycles -
sometimes a whole family, who can never see anything wrong with their
behaviour.


When I had the misfortune to work in Liverpool I was walking up Lord
Nelson Street from Lime Street Station and a car drove at me on the
footway. The moronist's excuse for attempted murder was he was just
trying to keep the traffic flowing.

You failed to provide any evidence to support that far-fetched claim about
"attempted murder". A police report would do.

I know Lord Nelson Street *very* well. I have known it all my life,
because my family (both sides) have residential and other roots in the
area dating from before WW2 right up until the 1970s.

There is no appreciable traffic in Lord Nelson Street. It is a
destination, not a route. Traffic using it cannot make progress since it
feeds back into one-way streets and dual-carriageways with limited
turns. MC's not knowing that led him into the fabrication of his story.

With Lime St taxi rank on LN st there is a lot of traffic heading uphill after the London train arrives. On that day a parked van was blocking the downhill traffic and one driver decided driving on the footway straight at a pedestrian was the best solution.
Great Newton street was even worse in the rush hour because of the resident parking turning it into a single lane road motorists thought it is acceptable to turn the footway into a second lane and expected pedestrians to move out of their way.

Do you remember that programme "Jackanory"?

Unlike you I don't live in a fantasy world where motorists have to duck when going under low bridges so their haloes don't get damaged.

A fantasy world is exactly where you dwell.

So you DO believe that no motorist in history has ever broken a law.
Be careful in case Captain Hook is reading your posts, he may be hiding under your bed tonight.

Not at all. He'll be driving an imaginary car along the pavement
directly at you. Even if the pavement is only four weet wide.

On Sunday, 24 May 2020 01:19:32 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 23/05/2020 22:22, Mike Collins wrote:
On Saturday, 23 May 2020 20:33:12 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 23/05/2020 16:52, Mike Collins wrote:
On Friday, 22 May 2020 17:33:33 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 22/05/2020 17:14, Mike Collins wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 May 2020 17:05:09 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 20/05/2020 11:21, Pamela wrote:
On 20:18 19 May 2020, Mike Collins said:

On Tuesday, 19 May 2020 19:44:44 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:

True. And I too can say it as a pedestrian. But I have never had a car
approach me driving along a footway. I can't say that about cycles -
sometimes a whole family, who can never see anything wrong with their
behaviour.


When I had the misfortune to work in Liverpool I was walking up Lord
Nelson Street from Lime Street Station and a car drove at me on the
footway. The moronist's excuse for attempted murder was he was just
trying to keep the traffic flowing.

You failed to provide any evidence to support that far-fetched claim about
"attempted murder". A police report would do.

I know Lord Nelson Street *very* well. I have known it all my life,
because my family (both sides) have residential and other roots in the
area dating from before WW2 right up until the 1970s.

There is no appreciable traffic in Lord Nelson Street. It is a
destination, not a route. Traffic using it cannot make progress since it
feeds back into one-way streets and dual-carriageways with limited
turns. MC's not knowing that led him into the fabrication of his story.

With Lime St taxi rank on LN st there is a lot of traffic heading uphill after the London train arrives. On that day a parked van was blocking the downhill traffic and one driver decided driving on the footway straight at a pedestrian was the best solution.
Great Newton street was even worse in the rush hour because of the resident parking turning it into a single lane road motorists thought it is acceptable to turn the footway into a second lane and expected pedestrians to move out of their way.

Do you remember that programme "Jackanory"?

Unlike you I don't live in a fantasy world where motorists have to duck when going under low bridges so their haloes don't get damaged.

A fantasy world is exactly where you dwell.

So you DO believe that no motorist in history has ever broken a law.
Be careful in case Captain Hook is reading your posts, he may be hiding under your bed tonight.

Not at all. He'll be driving an imaginary car along the pavement
directly at you. Even if the pavement is only four weet wide.

This is pointless. Let's just leave at you believe in fairies, I believe in facts.

On 01:28 24 May 2020, Mike Collins said:

On Sunday, 24 May 2020 01:19:32 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 23/05/2020 22:22, Mike Collins wrote:
On Saturday, 23 May 2020 20:33:12 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 23/05/2020 16:52, Mike Collins wrote:
On Friday, 22 May 2020 17:33:33 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 22/05/2020 17:14, Mike Collins wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 May 2020 17:05:09 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 20/05/2020 11:21, Pamela wrote:
On 20:18 19 May 2020, Mike Collins said:
On Tuesday, 19 May 2020 19:44:44 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:


True. And I too can say it as a pedestrian. But I have never
had a car approach me driving along a footway. I can't say
that about cycles - sometimes a whole family, who can never
see anything wrong with their behaviour.

When I had the misfortune to work in Liverpool I was walking
up Lord Nelson Street from Lime Street Station and a car drove
at me on the footway. The moronist's excuse for attempted
murder was he was just trying to keep the traffic flowing.

You failed to provide any evidence to support that far-fetched
claim about "attempted murder". A police report would do.

I know Lord Nelson Street *very* well. I have known it all my
life, because my family (both sides) have residential and other
roots in the area dating from before WW2 right up until the
1970s.

There is no appreciable traffic in Lord Nelson Street. It is a
destination, not a route. Traffic using it cannot make progress
since it feeds back into one-way streets and dual-carriageways
with limited turns. MC's not knowing that led him into the
fabrication of his story.

With Lime St taxi rank on LN st there is a lot of traffic heading
uphill after the London train arrives. On that day a parked van
was blocking the downhill traffic and one driver decided driving
on the footway straight at a pedestrian was the best solution.
Great Newton street was even worse in the rush hour because of
the resident parking turning it into a single lane road motorists
thought it is acceptable to turn the footway into a second lane
and expected pedestrians to move out of their way.

Do you remember that programme "Jackanory"?

Unlike you I don't live in a fantasy world where motorists have to
duck when going under low bridges so their haloes don't get
damaged.

A fantasy world is exactly where you dwell.

So you DO believe that no motorist in history has ever broken a law.
Be careful in case Captain Hook is reading your posts, he may be
hiding under your bed tonight.

Not at all. He'll be driving an imaginary car along the pavement
directly at you. Even if the pavement is only four weet wide.

This is pointless. Let's just leave at you believe in fairies, I believe
in facts.

Michael, do you still claim it was "attempted murder"? Did you report
this murder attempt to the police?

On Sunday, 24 May 2020 11:07:03 UTC+1, Pamela wrote:
On 01:28 24 May 2020, Mike Collins said:

On Sunday, 24 May 2020 01:19:32 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 23/05/2020 22:22, Mike Collins wrote:
On Saturday, 23 May 2020 20:33:12 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 23/05/2020 16:52, Mike Collins wrote:
On Friday, 22 May 2020 17:33:33 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 22/05/2020 17:14, Mike Collins wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 May 2020 17:05:09 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 20/05/2020 11:21, Pamela wrote:
On 20:18 19 May 2020, Mike Collins said:
On Tuesday, 19 May 2020 19:44:44 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:


True. And I too can say it as a pedestrian. But I have never
had a car approach me driving along a footway. I can't say
that about cycles - sometimes a whole family, who can never
see anything wrong with their behaviour.

When I had the misfortune to work in Liverpool I was walking
up Lord Nelson Street from Lime Street Station and a car drove
at me on the footway. The moronist's excuse for attempted
murder was he was just trying to keep the traffic flowing.

You failed to provide any evidence to support that far-fetched
claim about "attempted murder". A police report would do.

I know Lord Nelson Street *very* well. I have known it all my
life, because my family (both sides) have residential and other
roots in the area dating from before WW2 right up until the
1970s.

There is no appreciable traffic in Lord Nelson Street. It is a
destination, not a route. Traffic using it cannot make progress
since it feeds back into one-way streets and dual-carriageways
with limited turns. MC's not knowing that led him into the
fabrication of his story.

With Lime St taxi rank on LN st there is a lot of traffic heading
uphill after the London train arrives. On that day a parked van
was blocking the downhill traffic and one driver decided driving
on the footway straight at a pedestrian was the best solution.
Great Newton street was even worse in the rush hour because of
the resident parking turning it into a single lane road motorists
thought it is acceptable to turn the footway into a second lane
and expected pedestrians to move out of their way.

Do you remember that programme "Jackanory"?

Unlike you I don't live in a fantasy world where motorists have to
duck when going under low bridges so their haloes don't get
damaged.

A fantasy world is exactly where you dwell.

So you DO believe that no motorist in history has ever broken a law.
Be careful in case Captain Hook is reading your posts, he may be
hiding under your bed tonight.

Not at all. He'll be driving an imaginary car along the pavement
directly at you. Even if the pavement is only four weet wide.

This is pointless. Let's just leave at you believe in fairies, I believe
in facts.

Michael, do you still claim it was "attempted murder"? Did you report
this murder attempt to the police?

There is no universe in which you could ever possibly understand how little I care what you think.

On 16:48 24 May 2020, Mike Collins said:

On Sunday, 24 May 2020 11:07:03 UTC+1, Pamela wrote:
On 01:28 24 May 2020, Mike Collins said:

On Sunday, 24 May 2020 01:19:32 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 23/05/2020 22:22, Mike Collins wrote:
On Saturday, 23 May 2020 20:33:12 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 23/05/2020 16:52, Mike Collins wrote:
On Friday, 22 May 2020 17:33:33 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 22/05/2020 17:14, Mike Collins wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 May 2020 17:05:09 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 20/05/2020 11:21, Pamela wrote:
On 20:18 19 May 2020, Mike Collins said:
On Tuesday, 19 May 2020 19:44:44 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:


True. And I too can say it as a pedestrian. But I have
never had a car approach me driving along a footway. I
can't say that about cycles - sometimes a whole family,
who can never see anything wrong with their behaviour.

When I had the misfortune to work in Liverpool I was
walking up Lord Nelson Street from Lime Street Station and
a car drove at me on the footway. The moronist's excuse for
attempted murder was he was just trying to keep the traffic
flowing.

You failed to provide any evidence to support that
far-fetched claim about "attempted murder". A police report
would do.

I know Lord Nelson Street *very* well. I have known it all my
life, because my family (both sides) have residential and
other roots in the area dating from before WW2 right up until
the 1970s.

There is no appreciable traffic in Lord Nelson Street. It is
a destination, not a route. Traffic using it cannot make
progress since it feeds back into one-way streets and
dual-carriageways with limited turns. MC's not knowing that
led him into the fabrication of his story.

With Lime St taxi rank on LN st there is a lot of traffic
heading uphill after the London train arrives. On that day a
parked van was blocking the downhill traffic and one driver
decided driving on the footway straight at a pedestrian was
the best solution. Great Newton street was even worse in the
rush hour because of the resident parking turning it into a
single lane road motorists thought it is acceptable to turn
the footway into a second lane and expected pedestrians to
move out of their way.

Do you remember that programme "Jackanory"?

Unlike you I don't live in a fantasy world where motorists have
to duck when going under low bridges so their haloes don't get
damaged.

A fantasy world is exactly where you dwell.

So you DO believe that no motorist in history has ever broken a
law. Be careful in case Captain Hook is reading your posts, he may
be hiding under your bed tonight.

Not at all. He'll be driving an imaginary car along the pavement
directly at you. Even if the pavement is only four weet wide.

This is pointless. Let's just leave at you believe in fairies, I
believe in facts.

Michael, do you still claim it was "attempted murder"? Did you report
this murder attempt to the police?

There is no universe in which you could ever possibly understand how
little I care what you think.

So that's "No" and "No".

Thank you for showing readers must take care with your exaggerations.

On Sunday, May 24, 2020 at 7:01:41 PM UTC+1, Pamela wrote:
There is no universe in which you could ever possibly understand how
little I care what you think.

So that's "No" and "No".

Thank you for showing readers must take care with your exaggerations.

I think "readers" is somewhat of an exaggeration, in itself.
Maybe in 2002.

On 24/05/2020 16:48, Mike Collins wrote:
On Sunday, 24 May 2020 11:07:03 UTC+1, Pamela wrote:
On 01:28 24 May 2020, Mike Collins said:

On Sunday, 24 May 2020 01:19:32 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 23/05/2020 22:22, Mike Collins wrote:
On Saturday, 23 May 2020 20:33:12 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 23/05/2020 16:52, Mike Collins wrote:
On Friday, 22 May 2020 17:33:33 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 22/05/2020 17:14, Mike Collins wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 May 2020 17:05:09 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 20/05/2020 11:21, Pamela wrote:
On 20:18 19 May 2020, Mike Collins said:
On Tuesday, 19 May 2020 19:44:44 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:


True. And I too can say it as a pedestrian. But I have never
had a car approach me driving along a footway. I can't say
that about cycles - sometimes a whole family, who can never
see anything wrong with their behaviour.

When I had the misfortune to work in Liverpool I was walking
up Lord Nelson Street from Lime Street Station and a car drove
at me on the footway. The moronist's excuse for attempted
murder was he was just trying to keep the traffic flowing.

You failed to provide any evidence to support that far-fetched
claim about "attempted murder". A police report would do.

I know Lord Nelson Street *very* well. I have known it all my
life, because my family (both sides) have residential and other
roots in the area dating from before WW2 right up until the
1970s.

There is no appreciable traffic in Lord Nelson Street. It is a
destination, not a route. Traffic using it cannot make progress
since it feeds back into one-way streets and dual-carriageways
with limited turns. MC's not knowing that led him into the
fabrication of his story.

With Lime St taxi rank on LN st there is a lot of traffic heading
uphill after the London train arrives. On that day a parked van
was blocking the downhill traffic and one driver decided driving
on the footway straight at a pedestrian was the best solution.
Great Newton street was even worse in the rush hour because of
the resident parking turning it into a single lane road motorists
thought it is acceptable to turn the footway into a second lane
and expected pedestrians to move out of their way.

Do you remember that programme "Jackanory"?

Unlike you I don't live in a fantasy world where motorists have to
duck when going under low bridges so their haloes don't get
damaged.

A fantasy world is exactly where you dwell.

So you DO believe that no motorist in history has ever broken a law.
Be careful in case Captain Hook is reading your posts, he may be
hiding under your bed tonight.

Not at all. He'll be driving an imaginary car along the pavement
directly at you. Even if the pavement is only four weet wide.

This is pointless. Let's just leave at you believe in fairies, I believe
in facts.

Michael, do you still claim it was "attempted murder"? Did you report
this murder attempt to the police?

There is no universe in which you could ever possibly understand how little I care what you think.

The three words in your sentence: "care what you" were obviously added
in error.

On Wednesday, 20 May 2020 17:05:09 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 20/05/2020 11:21, Pamela wrote:
On 20:18 19 May 2020, Mike Collins said:

On Tuesday, 19 May 2020 19:44:44 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:

True. And I too can say it as a pedestrian. But I have never had a car
approach me driving along a footway. I can't say that about cycles -
sometimes a whole family, who can never see anything wrong with their
behaviour.


When I had the misfortune to work in Liverpool I was walking up Lord
Nelson Street from Lime Street Station and a car drove at me on the
footway. The moronist's excuse for attempted murder was he was just
trying to keep the traffic flowing.

You failed to provide any evidence to support that far-fetched claim about
"attempted murder". A police report would do.

I know Lord Nelson Street *very* well. I have known it all my life,
because my family (both sides) have residential and other roots in the
area dating from before WW2 right up until the 1970s.

There is no appreciable traffic in Lord Nelson Street. It is a
destination, not a route. Traffic using it cannot make progress since it
feeds back into one-way streets and dual-carriageways with limited
turns. MC's not knowing that led him into the fabrication of his story.

When did you last visit Lord Nelson St?