|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Republicans: Nancy Pelosi Was Mean To Us - Petty Sissies Vote No
On Sep 29, 3:51 pm, Republicans Are Sissies
wrote: Yes, the republicans are blaming house speaker Nancy Pelosi for the failure of the Bailout to pass. Why? Because she made a partisan speech. We can't have people voting for a bill if there have been any partisan speeches. The devastation of listening to a partisan speech on the floor of the house was just too much for the delicate sensibilities of the sissies on the right. So they were forced to vote no against the bill, regardless of whether it was good for the economy. As Nancy Pelosi walked from the lectern the republicans all started handing her their balls since they would not be needing them anymore. Democrats voted 140 to 95 in favor of the legislation. That's 40% of Dems voting NO "regardless of whether it was good for the economy." |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Republicans: Nancy Pelosi Was Mean To Us - Petty Sissies Vote No
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Republicans: Nancy Pelosi Was Mean To Us - Petty Sissies Vote No
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Republicans: Nancy Pelosi Was Mean To Us - Petty Sissies Vote No
On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 07:44:47 -0700, Aratzio
wrote: On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 01:33:19 -0700 (PDT), in alt.usenet.kooks, bloviated: On Sep 29, 3:51 pm, Republicans Are Sissies wrote: Yes, the republicans are blaming house speaker Nancy Pelosi for the failure of the Bailout to pass. Why? Because she made a partisan speech. We can't have people voting for a bill if there have been any partisan speeches. The devastation of listening to a partisan speech on the floor of the house was just too much for the delicate sensibilities of the sissies on the right. So they were forced to vote no against the bill, regardless of whether it was good for the economy. As Nancy Pelosi walked from the lectern the republicans all started handing her their balls since they would not be needing them anymore. Democrats voted 140 to 95 in favor of the legislation. That's 40% of Dems voting NO "regardless of whether it was good for the economy." 2/3 of the Democrats voted FOR the bill. Now, one more time for the slow kids, 2/3 of the REPUBLICANS voted no on a REPUBLICAN proposed bill. A bill supported by the Republican president, Republican presidential nominee and ALL of the house Republican leaders. The Arizona republican house representatives ALL voted no. Only 3 Texas republican (out of 19?) voted yes. So the current Republican presidential nominee who was working so very hard (by phoning it in) to get the bill through the house could not get even ONE of his own state's congressional representatives to vote for a bill he favored. Whqt effective leadership displayed by the nominee. The current Republican President could not deliver even 20% of his own supposed home state. The list of Republicans who voted no is almost 100% congressmen who are either behind in the polls or in a tight race. And then they blame Nancy Pelosi because she was mean to them. Poor little delicate flowers. So just what makes you think that just because a handful fo replblicans came up with this 'act', that all the rest of the republicans are supppose to vote for it? Do you honestly believe that our congress critters are supposed to vote the party line? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Republicans: Nancy Pelosi Was Mean To Us - Petty Sissies Vote No
On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 18:25:42 -0700, Matt Stawicki
wrote: On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 07:44:47 -0700, Aratzio wrote: On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 01:33:19 -0700 (PDT), in alt.usenet.kooks, bloviated: On Sep 29, 3:51 pm, Republicans Are Sissies wrote: Yes, the republicans are blaming house speaker Nancy Pelosi for the failure of the Bailout to pass. Why? Because she made a partisan speech. We can't have people voting for a bill if there have been any partisan speeches. The devastation of listening to a partisan speech on the floor of the house was just too much for the delicate sensibilities of the sissies on the right. So they were forced to vote no against the bill, regardless of whether it was good for the economy. As Nancy Pelosi walked from the lectern the republicans all started handing her their balls since they would not be needing them anymore. Democrats voted 140 to 95 in favor of the legislation. That's 40% of Dems voting NO "regardless of whether it was good for the economy." 2/3 of the Democrats voted FOR the bill. Now, one more time for the slow kids, 2/3 of the REPUBLICANS voted no on a REPUBLICAN proposed bill. A bill supported by the Republican president, Republican presidential nominee and ALL of the house Republican leaders. The Arizona republican house representatives ALL voted no. Only 3 Texas republican (out of 19?) voted yes. So the current Republican presidential nominee who was working so very hard (by phoning it in) to get the bill through the house could not get even ONE of his own state's congressional representatives to vote for a bill he favored. Whqt effective leadership displayed by the nominee. The current Republican President could not deliver even 20% of his own supposed home state. The list of Republicans who voted no is almost 100% congressmen who are either behind in the polls or in a tight race. And then they blame Nancy Pelosi because she was mean to them. Poor little delicate flowers. So just what makes you think that just because a handful fo replblicans came up with this 'act', that all the rest of the republicans are supppose to vote for it? Do you honestly believe that our congress critters are supposed to vote the party line? Im sure he does. Its standard procedure for the Mind Numbed Democrats "Obama, raises taxes and kills babies. Sarah Palin - raises babies and kills taxes." Pyotr Flipivich |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Republicans: Nancy Pelosi Was Mean To Us - Petty Sissies Vote No
In article ,
Gunner Asch wrote: On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 18:25:42 -0700, Matt Stawicki wrote: On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 07:44:47 -0700, Aratzio wrote: On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 01:33:19 -0700 (PDT), in alt.usenet.kooks, bloviated: On Sep 29, 3:51 pm, Republicans Are Sissies wrote: Yes, the republicans are blaming house speaker Nancy Pelosi for the failure of the Bailout to pass. Why? Because she made a partisan speech. We can't have people voting for a bill if there have been any partisan speeches. The devastation of listening to a partisan speech on the floor of the house was just too much for the delicate sensibilities of the sissies on the right. So they were forced to vote no against the bill, regardless of whether it was good for the economy. As Nancy Pelosi walked from the lectern the republicans all started handing her their balls since they would not be needing them anymore. Democrats voted 140 to 95 in favor of the legislation. That's 40% of Dems voting NO "regardless of whether it was good for the economy." 2/3 of the Democrats voted FOR the bill. Now, one more time for the slow kids, 2/3 of the REPUBLICANS voted no on a REPUBLICAN proposed bill. A bill supported by the Republican president, Republican presidential nominee and ALL of the house Republican leaders. The Arizona republican house representatives ALL voted no. Only 3 Texas republican (out of 19?) voted yes. So the current Republican presidential nominee who was working so very hard (by phoning it in) to get the bill through the house could not get even ONE of his own state's congressional representatives to vote for a bill he favored. Whqt effective leadership displayed by the nominee. The current Republican President could not deliver even 20% of his own supposed home state. The list of Republicans who voted no is almost 100% congressmen who are either behind in the polls or in a tight race. And then they blame Nancy Pelosi because she was mean to them. Poor little delicate flowers. So just what makes you think that just because a handful fo replblicans came up with this 'act', that all the rest of the republicans are supppose to vote for it? Do you honestly believe that our congress critters are supposed to vote the party line? Im sure he does. Its standard procedure for the Mind Numbed Democrats "Obama, raises taxes and kills babies. Sarah Palin - raises babies and kills taxes." Pyotr Flipivich youre losing it arf meow arf - cats and dogs living together - who ya goin call its the end of the world as you know it - filler text goes here this is how the world ends - not with a whimper but with a bang this is how the world ends - not with a whimper but with a bang |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Republicans: Nancy Pelosi Was Mean To Us - Petty Sissies Vote No
Matt Stawicki wrote:
On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 07:44:47 -0700, Aratzio wrote: On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 01:33:19 -0700 (PDT), in alt.usenet.kooks, bloviated: On Sep 29, 3:51 pm, Republicans Are Sissies wrote: Yes, the republicans are blaming house speaker Nancy Pelosi for the failure of the Bailout to pass. Why? Because she made a partisan speech. We can't have people voting for a bill if there have been any partisan speeches. The devastation of listening to a partisan speech on the floor of the house was just too much for the delicate sensibilities of the sissies on the right. So they were forced to vote no against the bill, regardless of whether it was good for the economy. As Nancy Pelosi walked from the lectern the republicans all started handing her their balls since they would not be needing them anymore. Democrats voted 140 to 95 in favor of the legislation. That's 40% of Dems voting NO "regardless of whether it was good for the economy." 2/3 of the Democrats voted FOR the bill. Now, one more time for the slow kids, 2/3 of the REPUBLICANS voted no on a REPUBLICAN proposed bill. A bill supported by the Republican president, Republican presidential nominee and ALL of the house Republican leaders. The Arizona republican house representatives ALL voted no. Only 3 Texas republican (out of 19?) voted yes. So the current Republican presidential nominee who was working so very hard (by phoning it in) to get the bill through the house could not get even ONE of his own state's congressional representatives to vote for a bill he favored. Whqt effective leadership displayed by the nominee. The current Republican President could not deliver even 20% of his own supposed home state. The list of Republicans who voted no is almost 100% congressmen who are either behind in the polls or in a tight race. And then they blame Nancy Pelosi because she was mean to them. Poor little delicate flowers. So just what makes you think that just because a handful fo replblicans came up with this 'act', that all the rest of the republicans are supppose to vote for it? Do you honestly believe that our congress critters are supposed to vote the party line? Well, that's pretty-much what they do all the time . . . why should we expect anything different, now? -- ah |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Republicans: Nancy Pelosi Was Mean To Us - Petty Sissies Vote No
In article s.com,
ah wrote: Matt Stawicki wrote: On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 07:44:47 -0700, Aratzio wrote: On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 01:33:19 -0700 (PDT), in alt.usenet.kooks, bloviated: On Sep 29, 3:51 pm, Republicans Are Sissies wrote: Yes, the republicans are blaming house speaker Nancy Pelosi for the failure of the Bailout to pass. Why? Because she made a partisan speech. We can't have people voting for a bill if there have been any partisan speeches. The devastation of listening to a partisan speech on the floor of the house was just too much for the delicate sensibilities of the sissies on the right. So they were forced to vote no against the bill, regardless of whether it was good for the economy. As Nancy Pelosi walked from the lectern the republicans all started handing her their balls since they would not be needing them anymore. Democrats voted 140 to 95 in favor of the legislation. That's 40% of Dems voting NO "regardless of whether it was good for the economy." 2/3 of the Democrats voted FOR the bill. Now, one more time for the slow kids, 2/3 of the REPUBLICANS voted no on a REPUBLICAN proposed bill. A bill supported by the Republican president, Republican presidential nominee and ALL of the house Republican leaders. The Arizona republican house representatives ALL voted no. Only 3 Texas republican (out of 19?) voted yes. So the current Republican presidential nominee who was working so very hard (by phoning it in) to get the bill through the house could not get even ONE of his own state's congressional representatives to vote for a bill he favored. Whqt effective leadership displayed by the nominee. The current Republican President could not deliver even 20% of his own supposed home state. The list of Republicans who voted no is almost 100% congressmen who are either behind in the polls or in a tight race. And then they blame Nancy Pelosi because she was mean to them. Poor little delicate flowers. So just what makes you think that just because a handful fo replblicans came up with this 'act', that all the rest of the republicans are supppose to vote for it? Do you honestly believe that our congress critters are supposed to vote the party line? Well, that's pretty-much what they do all the time . . . why should we expect anything different, now? party loyality is the last refuge of the unelectable arf meow arf - cats and dogs living together - who ya goin call its the end of the world as you know it - filler text goes here this is how the world ends - not with a whimper but with a bang this is how the world ends - not with a whimper but with a bang |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Republicans: Nancy Pelosi Was Mean To Us - Petty Sissies Vote No
rand mair fheal wrote:
In article s.com, ah wrote: Matt Stawicki wrote: On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 07:44:47 -0700, Aratzio wrote: On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 01:33:19 -0700 (PDT), in alt.usenet.kooks, bloviated: On Sep 29, 3:51 pm, Republicans Are Sissies wrote: Yes, the republicans are blaming house speaker Nancy Pelosi for the failure of the Bailout to pass. Why? Because she made a partisan speech. We can't have people voting for a bill if there have been any partisan speeches. The devastation of listening to a partisan speech on the floor of the house was just too much for the delicate sensibilities of the sissies on the right. So they were forced to vote no against the bill, regardless of whether it was good for the economy. As Nancy Pelosi walked from the lectern the republicans all started handing her their balls since they would not be needing them anymore. Democrats voted 140 to 95 in favor of the legislation. That's 40% of Dems voting NO "regardless of whether it was good for the economy." 2/3 of the Democrats voted FOR the bill. Now, one more time for the slow kids, 2/3 of the REPUBLICANS voted no on a REPUBLICAN proposed bill. A bill supported by the Republican president, Republican presidential nominee and ALL of the house Republican leaders. The Arizona republican house representatives ALL voted no. Only 3 Texas republican (out of 19?) voted yes. So the current Republican presidential nominee who was working so very hard (by phoning it in) to get the bill through the house could not get even ONE of his own state's congressional representatives to vote for a bill he favored. Whqt effective leadership displayed by the nominee. The current Republican President could not deliver even 20% of his own supposed home state. The list of Republicans who voted no is almost 100% congressmen who are either behind in the polls or in a tight race. And then they blame Nancy Pelosi because she was mean to them. Poor little delicate flowers. So just what makes you think that just because a handful fo replblicans came up with this 'act', that all the rest of the republicans are supppose to vote for it? Do you honestly believe that our congress critters are supposed to vote the party line? Well, that's pretty-much what they do all the time . . . why should we expect anything different, now? party loyality is the last refuge of the unelectable You can say that again, Bro-Sis. -- ah |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Republicans: Nancy Pelosi Was Mean To Us - Petty Sissies Vote No
In article s.com,
ah wrote: rand mair fheal wrote: In article s.com, ah wrote: Matt Stawicki wrote: On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 07:44:47 -0700, Aratzio wrote: On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 01:33:19 -0700 (PDT), in alt.usenet.kooks, bloviated: On Sep 29, 3:51 pm, Republicans Are Sissies wrote: Yes, the republicans are blaming house speaker Nancy Pelosi for the failure of the Bailout to pass. Why? Because she made a partisan speech. We can't have people voting for a bill if there have been any partisan speeches. The devastation of listening to a partisan speech on the floor of the house was just too much for the delicate sensibilities of the sissies on the right. So they were forced to vote no against the bill, regardless of whether it was good for the economy. As Nancy Pelosi walked from the lectern the republicans all started handing her their balls since they would not be needing them anymore. Democrats voted 140 to 95 in favor of the legislation. That's 40% of Dems voting NO "regardless of whether it was good for the economy." 2/3 of the Democrats voted FOR the bill. Now, one more time for the slow kids, 2/3 of the REPUBLICANS voted no on a REPUBLICAN proposed bill. A bill supported by the Republican president, Republican presidential nominee and ALL of the house Republican leaders. The Arizona republican house representatives ALL voted no. Only 3 Texas republican (out of 19?) voted yes. So the current Republican presidential nominee who was working so very hard (by phoning it in) to get the bill through the house could not get even ONE of his own state's congressional representatives to vote for a bill he favored. Whqt effective leadership displayed by the nominee. The current Republican President could not deliver even 20% of his own supposed home state. The list of Republicans who voted no is almost 100% congressmen who are either behind in the polls or in a tight race. And then they blame Nancy Pelosi because she was mean to them. Poor little delicate flowers. So just what makes you think that just because a handful fo replblicans came up with this 'act', that all the rest of the republicans are supppose to vote for it? Do you honestly believe that our congress critters are supposed to vote the party line? Well, that's pretty-much what they do all the time . . . why should we expect anything different, now? party loyality is the last refuge of the unelectable You can say that again, Bro-Sis. party loyality is the last refuge of the unelectable arf meow arf - cats and dogs living together - who ya goin call its the end of the world as you know it - filler text goes here this is how the world ends - not with a whimper but with a bang this is how the world ends - not with a whimper but with a bang |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Republicans: Nancy Pelosi Was Mean To Us - Petty Sissies Vote No | joepierson | Racing | 1 | September 30th 08 02:35 AM |
Sustrans Connect2 projects, vote early vote often! | Mike Causer | UK | 7 | February 22nd 07 08:20 PM |