Drug scandal rocks Australian cycling

"Marty Wallace" wrote in message
om.au

[...]

Oh no!!!
You top posted!
We'll never hear the end of it now!
Woe is us.

And you left in extraneous quoted material. Are you done making a fool of
yourself now?

--

A: Top-posters.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

hippy writes:

Originally posted by Unkey Munkey This ****s me. Why the hell shouldn't
they pay tax? In this case the claim that over $100k a year in earnings
is not carrying on a business. An amateur that gets $100k a year? I can
understand someone who wins, say $10k per annum not wanting to declare
it as income, but come on.

You can't have it both ways... either ALL athletes pay tax on their
winnings or none. That means that my $10 crit wins will now be $9..

Not necceryally. You can have a threashold over which you should be
considered a bizzness.

--
Please excuse my spelling as I suffer from agraphia. See
http://dformosa.zeta.org.au/~dformosa/Spelling.html to find out more.
Free the Memes.

Originally posted by Macca
hippy wrote: Is it still
cheating if everyone is doing it? hippy Mmm maybe if you
follow the dictionary definition.. but if these guys have
a choice of taking drugs and competing at the top level or
not taking drugs and never seeing top level competition, I
know which option most will choose..


So this makes it right then.??

Did I say it makes it right?? All I'm saying is that, given the choice
to make it to the top level by cheating or not make it to the top level
by staying clean, I think a lot of these high level riders would cheat
if they felt they had to in order to 'make it'.

hippy



--

Did he? the *******! I say we hunt him down and snip his extraneous
material!

Get the pitchforks and torches, we is formin' a mob!


"DRS" wrote in message
...
"Marty Wallace" wrote in message
om.au

[...]

Oh no!!!
You top posted!
We'll never hear the end of it now!
Woe is us.

And you left in extraneous quoted material. Are you done making a fool of
yourself now?

--

A: Top-posters.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

"L'acrobat" wrote in message

Did he? the *******! I say we hunt him down and snip his extraneous
material!

Get the pitchforks and torches, we is formin' a mob!

You really are a ****wit.

--

A: Top-posters.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

Dear, dear, ad hom AND swearing! what a rude person.


"DRS" wrote in message
...
"L'acrobat" wrote in message

Did he? the *******! I say we hunt him down and snip his extraneous
material!

Get the pitchforks and torches, we is formin' a mob!

You really are a ****wit.

--

A: Top-posters.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

We have ALL been here L'Acrobat and Drs.

we no longer care

( altho Im just a tad curious to know what " -- " is...)

start your own thread and go hammer-n-tong all you like. We got the
message the first 9,723 times



--

Dammit man you are top posting!


"flyingdutch" wrote in message
. ..
We have ALL been here L'Acrobat and Drs.

we no longer care

( altho Im just a tad curious to know what " -- " is...)

start your own thread and go hammer-n-tong all you like. We got the
message the first 9,723 times



--

Latest info:
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?...un04/jun24news

French's statement: http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?...n04/jun24news-
french

hippy



--

"L'acrobat" wrote in message

Dear, dear, ad hom AND swearing! what a rude person.

No-one here is as rude as you, you top-posting loser.

--

A: Top-posters.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?