The pleasures of illegal cycling

jms wrote:

I would strongly object to this person being a moderator in the
proposed group; however it is an excellent example of why the
moderated group is needed.

On the contrary, it's an excellent example of why a moderated newsgroup
is not needed. Moderators are idiots and become self-important pricks -
use your killfile if trolls bother you.

Anthony R. Gold wrote:

You cross-posted. If you hadn't I wouldn't have seen it. Trying to blame
someone else for your conscious decision is bizarre.

But did you really ever see it?

Of course I did, I replied to "it".

"It" does not have to be the original post, "it" refers in this case to
the crossposted message created by Chapman. Unless you're somehow trying
to argue that big boys made him do it then ran away.

On Mon, 1 Jun 2009 23:58:27 +0100, (Steve Firth)
wrote:

Anthony R. Gold wrote:

You cross-posted. If you hadn't I wouldn't have seen it. Trying to blame
someone else for your conscious decision is bizarre.

But did you really ever see it?

Of course I did, I replied to "it".

"It" does not have to be the original post, "it" refers in this case to
the crossposted message created by Chapman. Unless you're somehow trying
to argue that big boys made him do it then ran away.

Your position in this argument, and the one with me, is becoming ever
increasingly insane.

I suggest you apologise, but I know you won't: it takes courage to
submit to a bit of humility.

Prove me wrong, and I'll apologise.

Tom Crispin wrote:
[snip]

Your position in this argument, and the one with me, is becoming ever
increasingly insane.

Ah yes, and that was so mature of you.

I suggest you apologise, but I know you won't: it takes courage to
submit to a bit of humility.

Apologise for what?

Prove me wrong, and I'll apologise.

Prove you wrong about what?

On Tue, 2 Jun 2009 01:00:00 +0100, (Steve Firth)
wrote:

[Follow-ups set]

Tom Crispin wrote:
[snip]

Your position in this argument, and the one with me, is becoming ever
increasingly insane.

Ah yes, and that was so mature of you.

I suggest you apologise, but I know you won't: it takes courage to
submit to a bit of humility.

Apologise for what?

Prove me wrong, and I'll apologise.

Prove you wrong about what?

Oh dear!

On Sun, 31 May 2009 17:04:09 +0100, "Just zis Guy, you know?"
wrote:

I had completely forgotten the pleasures of illegal cycling!


Is this it?


http://cid-b514760b346cef0a.skydrive.../Stinger-1.jpg



What is illegal about it?



--
Someone calling himself Lou Knee made a post in urc
referring to another poster as "a piece of ****".
The post was made from an IP address which had been used in urc over the last 6 years
uniquely by Guy Chapman.
All available evidence points to Lou Knee being a nym shift of Guy Chapman.
A respected poster to URC, JNugent, has categorically asked Guy Chapman if he has ever posted using the name Lou Knee.
Guy Chapman has refused to answer this question.
Conclusion: Guy Chapman and Lou Knee are one and the same despicable person.