|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Test rode a bike - LOVED IT - but need quick question answered
This evening I test rode a Bianchi SASS. It was a pure slice a
heaven! And it was SOOOO light... However my deal is the bike shop didn't have my proper size in - they only had a 15.5. The other sizes are 17.5, 19.5, and 21.5. The bike shops salesperson told me that if I ordered one that I would want one in 17.5. However someone here mentioned (I can't find their name) that I would want 19.5 instead. Can anyone back up either person? Which size should I go with? As for the bike I am in lust. Yes it's expensive... But it is so cool! And the single speed wore out my legs in no time - which is a GOOD thing in situation. I am pretty much given up on the Redline Mono Cog. I've heard too many horror stories of poor quality to even risk it. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Test rode a bike - LOVED IT - but need quick question answered
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 16:51:03 -0800, Lobo Tommy wrote:
This evening I test rode a Bianchi SASS. It was a pure slice a heaven! And it was SOOOO light... However my deal is the bike shop didn't have my proper size in - they only had a 15.5. The other sizes are 17.5, 19.5, and 21.5. The bike shops salesperson told me that if I ordered one that I would want one in 17.5. However someone here mentioned (I can't find their name) that I would want 19.5 instead. Can anyone back up either person? Which size should I go with? How can we know? It really depends on your size, you know. How does it fit you? As the seattube length (what the nominal size is) changes, so do the lengths of other tubes, such as the top tube (and thus the distance to the handlebars). If the 15.5 feels so good to you, why is it not the proper size?* By how much is it not? Think about what it would be with a longer reach as well as longer seat tube. The bars would be higher as well. You have to decide what is best. How much did the salesman go through before he decided you needed the 17.5? Did you ride a different bike in that size? Are you going into this completely blind, listening to random recommendations rather than getting properly fit for your body? -- David L. Johnson __o | "Business!" cried the Ghost. "Mankind was my business. The common _`\(,_ | welfare was my business; charity, mercy, forbearance, and (_)/ (_) | benevolence, were, all, my business. The dealings of my trade were but a drop of water in the comprehensive ocean of my business!" --Dickens, "A Christmas Carol" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Test rode a bike - LOVED IT - but need quick question answered
"Lobo Tommy" wrote in message m... This evening I test rode a Bianchi SASS. It was a pure slice a heaven! And it was SOOOO light... However my deal is the bike shop didn't have my proper size in - they only had a 15.5. The other sizes are 17.5, 19.5, and 21.5. The bike shops salesperson told me that if I ordered one that I would want one in 17.5. However someone here mentioned (I can't find their name) that I would want 19.5 instead. Can anyone back up either person? Which size should I go with? Why not compare it to other Bianchi hardtails in a fifteen-five and a seventeen-five. Check the stem lengths are the same for precision, and go to the Bianchi site to see if single-speed geometry is the same as geared hardtails. If you want to just jump in, it's better to err on the side of the smaller bike. Chris |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Test rode a bike - LOVED IT - but need quick question answered
"Lobo Tommy" wrote in message
m... This evening I test rode a Bianchi SASS. It was a pure slice a heaven! And it was SOOOO light... However my deal is the bike shop didn't have my proper size in - they only had a 15.5. The other sizes are 17.5, 19.5, and 21.5. The bike shops salesperson told me that if I ordered one that I would want one in 17.5. However someone here mentioned (I can't find their name) that I would want 19.5 instead. Can anyone back up either person? Which size should I go with? Two questions. What is your inseam, and are you going to be doing hard core mountain biking? 17.5" is quite small, assuming that your inseam is about 32". If you're mainly doing road riding, then 19.5" is probably a better choice. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Test rode a bike - LOVED IT - but need quick question answered
"Steven M. Scharf" wrote in message ink.net...
"Lobo Tommy" wrote in message m... This evening I test rode a Bianchi SASS. It was a pure slice a heaven! And it was SOOOO light... However my deal is the bike shop didn't have my proper size in - they only had a 15.5. The other sizes are 17.5, 19.5, and 21.5. The bike shops salesperson told me that if I ordered one that I would want one in 17.5. However someone here mentioned (I can't find their name) that I would want 19.5 instead. Can anyone back up either person? Which size should I go with? Two questions. What is your inseam, and are you going to be doing hard core mountain biking? 17.5" is quite small, assuming that your inseam is about 32". If you're mainly doing road riding, then 19.5" is probably a better choice. My inseam is 32" |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Test rode a bike - LOVED IT - but need quick question answered
On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 05:37:38 -0800, Lobo Tommy wrote:
My inseam is 32" Provided you're not some sort of ape, I'd go with the 17.5". -- a.m-b FAQ: http://www.j-harris.net/bike/ambfaq.htm a.bmx FAQ: http://www.t-online.de/~jharris/bmx_faq.htm |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Test rode a bike - LOVED IT - but need quick question answered
"bomba" wrote in message
news On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 05:37:38 -0800, Lobo Tommy wrote: My inseam is 32" Provided you're not some sort of ape, I'd go with the 17.5". Depends on the kind of riding he's doing. For mountain biking, 17.5" is about right, though still a bit small, but 19.5" is too large, 18.5" would be better. For road riding 19.5" is about right. On a touring bike, he'd be on a 58cm/23" frame. On a road bike, he'd be on a 55cm/22" frame. On a commute/hybrid, he'd be on a 53cm/21" frame. 19.5" is about right for mainly road/occasional off-road. Of course the usual caveats about the differences between manufacturers, and how they size their frames, apply. But bike shops always seem to try to sell you bikes that are too small. There is an excellent article about sizing at: http://rivbike.com/html/bikes_framesize.html |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Test rode a bike - LOVED IT - but need quick question answered
Lobo Tommy wrote:
"Steven M. Scharf" wrote in message ink.net... "Lobo Tommy" wrote in message news:91177ef.0403251- ng.google.com... This evening I test rode a Bianchi SASS. It was a pure slice a heaven! And it was SOOOO light... However my deal is the bike shop didn't have my proper size in - they only had a 15.5. The other sizes are 17.5, 19.5, and 21.5. The bike shops salesperson told me that if I ordered one that I would want one in 17.5. However someone here mentioned (I can't find their name) that I would want 19.5 instead. Can anyone back up either person? Which size should I go with? Two questions. What is your inseam, and are you going to be doing hard core mountain biking? 17.5" is quite small, assuming that your inseam is about 32". If you're mainly doing road riding, then 19.5" is probably a better choice. My inseam is 32" I have a S.A.S.S have a 32 inseam and have the 19.5" Just to mudd up your desicion for you a bit!!! If you fear having the frame fi too large I am sure the 17" would work... might need to do a littl stem swapping Jimbo(san - |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Test rode a bike - LOVED IT - but need quick question answered
On a touring bike, he'd be on a 58cm/23" frame. On a road bike, he'd be on a 55cm/22" frame. On a commute/hybrid, he'd be on a 53cm/21" frame. 19.5" is about right for mainly road/occasional off-road. Of course the usual caveats about the differences between manufacturers, and how they size their frames, apply. But bike shops always seem to try to sell you bikes that are too small. Your comments are interesting. In 1984 I was told by the bike shop that the Schwinn touring bike I wanted was perfect for me in the 23" size. I, too, have a 32" inseam. When I would stop, I had to lean the bike over to the side in order to put one foot on the ground. But, the ride was excellent, and I rode all over Germany without any back/neck/shoulder pains. Then, I come to the States and the LBS says I need a 55 cm frame on my road bike. The main difference seems to me to be that I no longer have to tilt it when I stop. There are other differences such as this Bianchi Veloce feels like I am riding a mosquito whereas the old Schwinn moved about much like a tractor trailer. But neither one of them causes any muscular pain anywhere. Well, at least now I don't have to feel as if I was taken advantage of by the LBS in 1984.... Pat in TX |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Test rode a bike - LOVED IT - but need quick question answered
"Lobo Tommy" wrote in message
m... This evening I test rode a Bianchi SASS. It was a pure slice a heaven! And it was SOOOO light... No kidding... However my deal is the bike shop didn't have my proper size in - they only had a 15.5. The other sizes are 17.5, 19.5, and 21.5. The bike shops salesperson told me that if I ordered one that I would want one in 17.5. However someone here mentioned (I can't find their name) that I would want 19.5 instead. Can anyone back up either person? Which size should I go with? Bianchi has the tendency of having shorter top tubes compared to other bikes. I think Jim's inseam is about the same as yours and he rides a 19.5" and it fits him perfect. I ride a pre-production SASS in miniature sizing for my small body. As for the bike I am in lust. Yes it's expensive... But it is so cool! And the single speed wore out my legs in no time - which is a GOOD thing in situation. I am pretty much given up on the Redline Mono Cog. I've heard too many horror stories of poor quality to even risk it. No, its not expensive, actually. Its good value for the money, IMO. Good quality frame, quality components, a great bike. - CA-G Can-Am Girls Kick Ass! |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Trips for Kids 13th Annual Bike Swap & Sale | Marilyn Price | General | 0 | June 1st 04 04:52 AM |
Canadian Tire bike: Super Cycle Gravity | cam | Mountain Biking | 15 | March 22nd 04 08:11 AM |
How old were you when you got your first really nice bike? | Brink | General | 43 | November 13th 03 10:49 AM |
Bike maintenance question | Jim Willis | General | 2 | July 29th 03 01:00 AM |
Glacier Point Magna 26" Bike Repair Question | sandy | Mountain Biking | 8 | July 21st 03 02:21 PM |