A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » rec.bicycles » Techniques
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tensiometer curiosity



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old March 31st 07, 06:34 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,751
Default Tensiometer curiosity

Ozark writes:

In other words, is "each spoke tightened to so many Kg" as important as
knowing all spokes are tensioned equally?


As others have said you can pluck the spokes to get relative tension
even on each side


It can be quite illuminating to set even tension by "plucking" and
then go around the wheel spoke by spoke and see how even the tension
truly is.


Other than measurement anomalies such as stiction or a wavy spoke, the
readings will be identical as the observer's ear to detect tone. For
this reason a tensiometer should have a zero-on-the-fly capability to
correct for slight waves in spokes. Of course if the test load is as
great as the Hozan, that doesn't make much difference.

Jobst Brandt
Ads
  #12  
Old March 31st 07, 08:01 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,934
Default Tensiometer curiosity

On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 08:56:12 -0700, jim beam
wrote:

[snip]

[spokes at the rim joint are often over-tension . . .


Dear Jim,

There seems to be some disagreement about whether spokes at the rim
joint end up tighter or looser.

Perhaps "over-tension" was just the kind of obvious oops that we all
make now and then, and you meant "under-tension"?

(Aaargh! Smack forehead! Never mind!)

But perhaps you really do expect spokes at the rim joint to be
tighter?

Anyway, here's the usual thinking on spokes at the rim joint:

"Note that some rims require spokes adjacent to the joint to be looser
than others to correct for their greater thickness at the splice."

"The Bicycle Wheel," 3rd edition, p. 95

"Most rims are made from straight material that is formed into a hoop
and joined by welding or splicing. Sometimes the joint causes
irregular alignment that is difficult to correct. For spliced rims,
the extent of the error may not appear until after the spokes are
tensioned. In both welded and spliced rims spokes near the joint may
be looser than others, and completely correcting this error may be
impossible."

"The Bicycle Wheel," 3rd edition, p. 104

Cheers,

Carl Fogel
  #13  
Old March 31st 07, 09:13 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Ron Ruff
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,304
Default Tensiometer curiosity

On Mar 31, 11:23 am, jim beam wrote:
maybe it's because jobst never builds with welded rims. /my/ experience
is that welded rims need over-tension. and i would expect that if
excess weld material makes that section more rigid.


The change in curvature between a built and unbuilt wheel is going to
be very small, though. I'd wager that it depends on how the rim was
distorted when the joint was put in... could go either way.

  #14  
Old March 31st 07, 09:27 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Ozark Bicycle
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,591
Default Tensiometer curiosity

On Mar 31, 11:34 am, wrote:
Ozark writes:
In other words, is "each spoke tightened to so many Kg" as important as
knowing all spokes are tensioned equally?
As others have said you can pluck the spokes to get relative tension
even on each side

It can be quite illuminating to set even tension by "plucking" and
then go around the wheel spoke by spoke and see how even the tension
truly is.


Other than measurement anomalies such as stiction or a wavy spoke, the
readings will be identical as the observer's ear to detect tone.



Which, of course, can vary with mood, time of day, ambient noise,
distractions, etc.

Why not just use the tensiometer?





  #15  
Old March 31st 07, 09:38 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Ben C
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,084
Default Tensiometer curiosity

On 2007-03-31, jim beam wrote:
wrote:

[...]
Dear Jim,

There seems to be some disagreement about whether spokes at the rim
joint end up tighter or looser.

[...]
Anyway, here's the usual thinking on spokes at the rim joint:

"Note that some rims require spokes adjacent to the joint to be looser
than others to correct for their greater thickness at the splice."

[...]
maybe it's because jobst never builds with welded rims. /my/ experience
is that welded rims need over-tension. and i would expect that if
excess weld material makes that section more rigid.

http://flickr.com/photos/38636024@N00/275085692/

I've noticed a very small flat-spot on modern Mavic rims (CXP-23) around
the weld. Or around the join, I assume they were welded.

Normally to correct a flat spot you'd loosen the spokes a bit under the
flat spot. If that section is more rigid I suppose you'd just need an
even bigger difference in tension.

If the rim was round initially but stiffer at the weld, then you might
expect a high spot there after building which you'd correct by
increasing the tension around the weld.

So there might be two factors here-- first the weld making the rim
stiffer at that point, and second, the presence of the weld making the
rim a bit flattened at that point for some other reason, which might
just be random on particular rims.
  #16  
Old April 1st 07, 12:11 AM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Tim McNamara
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,945
Default Tensiometer curiosity

In article ,
jim beam wrote:

/my/ experience is that welded rims need over-tension. and i would
expect that if excess weld material makes that section more rigid.


I've seen both conditions. The joint is, as you say, stiffer than the
rest of the rim if it's sleeved inside the weld which makes compensating
for the concentric error result in exaggerated differences in spoke
tension.

In some wheels the spokes at the rim joint- whether welded, pinned,
whatever, makes no difference- have higher tension than the rest of the
spokes, and in some wheels they have lower tension. I've also built
wheels in which the spoke tension at the joint was the same as the rest
of the spokes. It depends on which way the concentric error at the
joint, if any, goes. If the joint is a high spot, spoke tension will be
higher; if the joint is a low spot joint tension will be lower.
  #17  
Old April 1st 07, 12:18 AM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Tim McNamara
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,945
Default Tensiometer curiosity

In article ,
Ben C wrote:

On 2007-03-31, Tim McNamara wrote:
In article ,
Ben C wrote:

[...]
This is something I've never understood. I don't bother with a
tensiometer myself, but surely if the spoke tensions aren't all
about the same then the wheel will be out of true? And if the only
way to get it true is with uneven tensions (if for example the rim
isn't round and flat in the first place), then you probably need
uneven tension since you will obviously require the wheel to be
true.


Take wheels at random and pluck them and you will often find that
there are some spokes that are much tighter than others. That's
because the lateral pull of spokes affects not on the part of the
rim the spokes are connected to but also a few inches to either
side.


So you could end up with, for example, one spoke that was too tight
with the two either side of it on that side of the rim a bit loose,
and still have a fairly true wheel since the rim's rigidity will not
permit a wobble that small. This is especially possible with 36H and
a rigid rim which is what Antti also said.


Even rims that aren't particularly rigid. I saw this back in the days
of simple U-channel rims, before box section rims were common. The
reverse scenario is also possible. You can often find a loose spoke in
a wheel that is compensated for by its adjacent same-side spokes being
tensioned a bit tighter, making the wheel laterally true.

We use this to our advantage when we break a spoke and adjust the
same-side spokes on either side of the gap to reduce the wow in the rim
to ride home.

This is because of the lateral rigidity of the rim. This scenario
can potentially result in the looser spoke going slack under load
and the nipple backing off, which can eventually put the wheel out
of true.


Which I suppose is the basic reason why even tension is desirable.


A vertically stiffer rim might even magnify the issue, since the wheel
stands on fewer spokes in the load-affected zone. That one loose spoke
would lose more tension as a result.
  #18  
Old April 1st 07, 12:19 AM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Tim McNamara
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,945
Default Tensiometer curiosity

In article .com,
"Ron Ruff" wrote:

It is very easy to get a wheel acceptably true, but still have
tensions varying all over the place. Basically, the rim stiffness is
enough to mask the variation.


That's a good description.
  #19  
Old April 1st 07, 03:16 AM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Ron Ruff
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,304
Default Tensiometer curiosity

On Mar 31, 4:18 pm, Tim McNamara wrote:
A vertically stiffer rim might even magnify the issue, since the wheel
stands on fewer spokes in the load-affected zone. That one loose spoke
would lose more tension as a result.


I think you have it backwards on that one. The stiffer rim will
increase the dimensions of the load effected zone (all else being
equal), resulting in less of a tension change.


  #20  
Old April 1st 07, 05:35 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
jim beam
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,758
Default Tensiometer curiosity

Ron Ruff wrote:
On Mar 31, 11:23 am, jim beam wrote:
maybe it's because jobst never builds with welded rims. /my/ experience
is that welded rims need over-tension. and i would expect that if
excess weld material makes that section more rigid.


The change in curvature between a built and unbuilt wheel is going to
be very small, though. I'd wager that it depends on how the rim was
distorted when the joint was put in... could go either way.

in theory, yes. as pointed out by others, there's often a tiny flat
spot where the weld flashing is machined off, and using a truing stand
like a ts2 doesn't exactly emphasize the problem, but with every welded
rim i've built, it's needed higher tension for the 2 spokes at the join.
i build with an attachment to my ts2 so i have a proper handle on radial
trueness, not just lateral, which is all that stand really does.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Mavic Tensiometer? Gary Young Techniques 5 December 28th 06 12:32 AM
Curiosity and amusement: a Poll oldhickory Racing 1 August 10th 06 02:22 PM
out of curiosity... adypops Unicycling 23 April 7th 06 10:34 AM
Curiosity- why chain on right? Tom Weaver Techniques 22 August 5th 05 02:53 PM
Another curiosity question Tom Weaver Techniques 15 June 8th 05 12:00 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.