|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Tensiometer curiosity
Ozark writes:
In other words, is "each spoke tightened to so many Kg" as important as knowing all spokes are tensioned equally? As others have said you can pluck the spokes to get relative tension even on each side It can be quite illuminating to set even tension by "plucking" and then go around the wheel spoke by spoke and see how even the tension truly is. Other than measurement anomalies such as stiction or a wavy spoke, the readings will be identical as the observer's ear to detect tone. For this reason a tensiometer should have a zero-on-the-fly capability to correct for slight waves in spokes. Of course if the test load is as great as the Hozan, that doesn't make much difference. Jobst Brandt |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Tensiometer curiosity
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 08:56:12 -0700, jim beam
wrote: [snip] [spokes at the rim joint are often over-tension . . . Dear Jim, There seems to be some disagreement about whether spokes at the rim joint end up tighter or looser. Perhaps "over-tension" was just the kind of obvious oops that we all make now and then, and you meant "under-tension"? (Aaargh! Smack forehead! Never mind!) But perhaps you really do expect spokes at the rim joint to be tighter? Anyway, here's the usual thinking on spokes at the rim joint: "Note that some rims require spokes adjacent to the joint to be looser than others to correct for their greater thickness at the splice." "The Bicycle Wheel," 3rd edition, p. 95 "Most rims are made from straight material that is formed into a hoop and joined by welding or splicing. Sometimes the joint causes irregular alignment that is difficult to correct. For spliced rims, the extent of the error may not appear until after the spokes are tensioned. In both welded and spliced rims spokes near the joint may be looser than others, and completely correcting this error may be impossible." "The Bicycle Wheel," 3rd edition, p. 104 Cheers, Carl Fogel |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Tensiometer curiosity
On Mar 31, 11:23 am, jim beam wrote:
maybe it's because jobst never builds with welded rims. /my/ experience is that welded rims need over-tension. and i would expect that if excess weld material makes that section more rigid. The change in curvature between a built and unbuilt wheel is going to be very small, though. I'd wager that it depends on how the rim was distorted when the joint was put in... could go either way. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Tensiometer curiosity
On Mar 31, 11:34 am, wrote:
Ozark writes: In other words, is "each spoke tightened to so many Kg" as important as knowing all spokes are tensioned equally? As others have said you can pluck the spokes to get relative tension even on each side It can be quite illuminating to set even tension by "plucking" and then go around the wheel spoke by spoke and see how even the tension truly is. Other than measurement anomalies such as stiction or a wavy spoke, the readings will be identical as the observer's ear to detect tone. Which, of course, can vary with mood, time of day, ambient noise, distractions, etc. Why not just use the tensiometer? |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Tensiometer curiosity
On 2007-03-31, jim beam wrote:
wrote: [...] Dear Jim, There seems to be some disagreement about whether spokes at the rim joint end up tighter or looser. [...] Anyway, here's the usual thinking on spokes at the rim joint: "Note that some rims require spokes adjacent to the joint to be looser than others to correct for their greater thickness at the splice." [...] maybe it's because jobst never builds with welded rims. /my/ experience is that welded rims need over-tension. and i would expect that if excess weld material makes that section more rigid. http://flickr.com/photos/38636024@N00/275085692/ I've noticed a very small flat-spot on modern Mavic rims (CXP-23) around the weld. Or around the join, I assume they were welded. Normally to correct a flat spot you'd loosen the spokes a bit under the flat spot. If that section is more rigid I suppose you'd just need an even bigger difference in tension. If the rim was round initially but stiffer at the weld, then you might expect a high spot there after building which you'd correct by increasing the tension around the weld. So there might be two factors here-- first the weld making the rim stiffer at that point, and second, the presence of the weld making the rim a bit flattened at that point for some other reason, which might just be random on particular rims. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Tensiometer curiosity
In article ,
jim beam wrote: /my/ experience is that welded rims need over-tension. and i would expect that if excess weld material makes that section more rigid. I've seen both conditions. The joint is, as you say, stiffer than the rest of the rim if it's sleeved inside the weld which makes compensating for the concentric error result in exaggerated differences in spoke tension. In some wheels the spokes at the rim joint- whether welded, pinned, whatever, makes no difference- have higher tension than the rest of the spokes, and in some wheels they have lower tension. I've also built wheels in which the spoke tension at the joint was the same as the rest of the spokes. It depends on which way the concentric error at the joint, if any, goes. If the joint is a high spot, spoke tension will be higher; if the joint is a low spot joint tension will be lower. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Tensiometer curiosity
In article ,
Ben C wrote: On 2007-03-31, Tim McNamara wrote: In article , Ben C wrote: [...] This is something I've never understood. I don't bother with a tensiometer myself, but surely if the spoke tensions aren't all about the same then the wheel will be out of true? And if the only way to get it true is with uneven tensions (if for example the rim isn't round and flat in the first place), then you probably need uneven tension since you will obviously require the wheel to be true. Take wheels at random and pluck them and you will often find that there are some spokes that are much tighter than others. That's because the lateral pull of spokes affects not on the part of the rim the spokes are connected to but also a few inches to either side. So you could end up with, for example, one spoke that was too tight with the two either side of it on that side of the rim a bit loose, and still have a fairly true wheel since the rim's rigidity will not permit a wobble that small. This is especially possible with 36H and a rigid rim which is what Antti also said. Even rims that aren't particularly rigid. I saw this back in the days of simple U-channel rims, before box section rims were common. The reverse scenario is also possible. You can often find a loose spoke in a wheel that is compensated for by its adjacent same-side spokes being tensioned a bit tighter, making the wheel laterally true. We use this to our advantage when we break a spoke and adjust the same-side spokes on either side of the gap to reduce the wow in the rim to ride home. This is because of the lateral rigidity of the rim. This scenario can potentially result in the looser spoke going slack under load and the nipple backing off, which can eventually put the wheel out of true. Which I suppose is the basic reason why even tension is desirable. A vertically stiffer rim might even magnify the issue, since the wheel stands on fewer spokes in the load-affected zone. That one loose spoke would lose more tension as a result. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Tensiometer curiosity
In article .com,
"Ron Ruff" wrote: It is very easy to get a wheel acceptably true, but still have tensions varying all over the place. Basically, the rim stiffness is enough to mask the variation. That's a good description. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Tensiometer curiosity
On Mar 31, 4:18 pm, Tim McNamara wrote:
A vertically stiffer rim might even magnify the issue, since the wheel stands on fewer spokes in the load-affected zone. That one loose spoke would lose more tension as a result. I think you have it backwards on that one. The stiffer rim will increase the dimensions of the load effected zone (all else being equal), resulting in less of a tension change. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Tensiometer curiosity
Ron Ruff wrote:
On Mar 31, 11:23 am, jim beam wrote: maybe it's because jobst never builds with welded rims. /my/ experience is that welded rims need over-tension. and i would expect that if excess weld material makes that section more rigid. The change in curvature between a built and unbuilt wheel is going to be very small, though. I'd wager that it depends on how the rim was distorted when the joint was put in... could go either way. in theory, yes. as pointed out by others, there's often a tiny flat spot where the weld flashing is machined off, and using a truing stand like a ts2 doesn't exactly emphasize the problem, but with every welded rim i've built, it's needed higher tension for the 2 spokes at the join. i build with an attachment to my ts2 so i have a proper handle on radial trueness, not just lateral, which is all that stand really does. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New Mavic Tensiometer? | Gary Young | Techniques | 5 | December 28th 06 12:32 AM |
Curiosity and amusement: a Poll | oldhickory | Racing | 1 | August 10th 06 02:22 PM |
out of curiosity... | adypops | Unicycling | 23 | April 7th 06 10:34 AM |
Curiosity- why chain on right? | Tom Weaver | Techniques | 22 | August 5th 05 02:53 PM |
Another curiosity question | Tom Weaver | Techniques | 15 | June 8th 05 12:00 AM |