|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Meanwhile back in the real world of hit and runs
Doug wrote:
On Aug 21, 9:34 am, "Mrcheerful" wrote: Doug wrote: On Aug 20, 1:56 pm, nik.morgan wrote: Doug wrote: On Aug 19, 6:32 pm, Judith wrote: On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 09:50:37 -0700 (PDT), Squashme wrote: http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/...ction/leeds-hi... "West Yorkshire Police said the driver slowed down to see what had happened, then sped away from the scene." Sorry - who was it on the cycle? This clearly demonstrates how motorists are much more dangerous than cyclists and it indicates why there is a need for greater legal constraints on motorists than on cyclists. How can you be calling for legal constraints, you claimed to be an anarchist? You obviously know little about anarchism and its many forms and you are probably guided by the popular view of it alone. BTW, are you a motorist? anarchy has only one form: 'without a leader' That is like saying democracy only has one form: 'mob rule'. "...In the German uprising known as the Bavarian Soviet Republic the anarchists Gustav Landauer, Silvio Gesell and Erich Mhsam had important leadership positions within the revolutionary councilist structures..." And thank you for revealing your own dismal ignorance of the subject of anarchy. "...There are many types and traditions of anarchism, not all of which are mutually exclusive.[13] Anarchist schools of thought can differ fundamentally, supporting anything from extreme individualism to complete collectivism..." I always look at the root of the word first. |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Meanwhile back in the real world of hit and runs
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 23:24:29 -0700, Doug wrote:
On Aug 21, 8:10*am, nik.morgan wrote: Doug wrote: On Aug 20, 1:56 pm, nik.morgan wrote: Doug wrote: On Aug 19, 6:32 pm, Judith wrote: On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 09:50:37 -0700 (PDT), Squashme wrote: http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/.../main-section/ leeds-hi... "West Yorkshire Police said the driver slowed down to see what had happened, then sped away from the scene." Sorry - who was it on the cycle? This clearly demonstrates how motorists are much more dangerous than cyclists and it indicates why there is a need for greater legal constraints on motorists than on cyclists. How can you be calling for legal constraints, you claimed to be an anarchist? You obviously know little about anarchism and its many forms and you are probably guided by the popular view of it alone. Is it like ozone, i.e. more than one type? What is it about 'many forms' you do not understand? BTW, are you a motorist? Yes, lucky I'm not an anarchist as well, otherwise I would drive wherever I liked, pavements for example. You still don't understand anarchism at all do you and the fact that you are a motorist explains a lot about your stance in this thread.. I am not a motorist and I don't understand you neither. The insult of "being a motorist" has nothing to do with anarchy. -- Life is a venereal disease with 100% mortality. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Meanwhile back in the real world of hit and runs
On Aug 22, 4:23*pm, "Mrcheerful" wrote:
Doug wrote: On Aug 21, 9:34 am, "Mrcheerful" wrote: Doug wrote: On Aug 20, 1:56 pm, nik.morgan wrote: Doug wrote: On Aug 19, 6:32 pm, Judith wrote: On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 09:50:37 -0700 (PDT), Squashme wrote: http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/...ction/leeds-hi... "West Yorkshire Police said the driver slowed down to see what had happened, then sped away from the scene." Sorry - who was it on the cycle? This clearly demonstrates how motorists are much more dangerous than cyclists and it indicates why there is a need for greater legal constraints on motorists than on cyclists. How can you be calling for legal constraints, you claimed to be an anarchist? You obviously know little about anarchism and its many forms and you are probably guided by the popular view of it alone. BTW, are you a motorist? anarchy has only one form: 'without a leader' That is like saying democracy only has one form: 'mob rule'. "...In the German uprising known as the Bavarian Soviet Republic the anarchists Gustav Landauer, Silvio Gesell and Erich M hsam had important leadership positions within the revolutionary councilist structures..." And thank you for revealing your own dismal ignorance of the subject of anarchy. "...There are many types and traditions of anarchism, not all of which are mutually exclusive.[13] Anarchist schools of thought can differ fundamentally, supporting anything from extreme individualism to complete collectivism..." I always look at the root of the word first. That usually tells you very little. -- . A driving licence is sometimes a licence to kill. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Meanwhile back in the real world of hit and runs
Doug wrote:
On Aug 22, 4:23 pm, "Mrcheerful" wrote: Doug wrote: On Aug 21, 9:34 am, "Mrcheerful" wrote: Doug wrote: On Aug 20, 1:56 pm, nik.morgan wrote: Doug wrote: On Aug 19, 6:32 pm, Judith wrote: On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 09:50:37 -0700 (PDT), Squashme wrote: http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/...ction/leeds-hi... "West Yorkshire Police said the driver slowed down to see what had happened, then sped away from the scene." Sorry - who was it on the cycle? This clearly demonstrates how motorists are much more dangerous than cyclists and it indicates why there is a need for greater legal constraints on motorists than on cyclists. How can you be calling for legal constraints, you claimed to be an anarchist? You obviously know little about anarchism and its many forms and you are probably guided by the popular view of it alone. BTW, are you a motorist? anarchy has only one form: 'without a leader' That is like saying democracy only has one form: 'mob rule'. "...In the German uprising known as the Bavarian Soviet Republic the anarchists Gustav Landauer, Silvio Gesell and Erich M hsam had important leadership positions within the revolutionary councilist structures..." And thank you for revealing your own dismal ignorance of the subject of anarchy. "...There are many types and traditions of anarchism, not all of which are mutually exclusive.[13] Anarchist schools of thought can differ fundamentally, supporting anything from extreme individualism to complete collectivism..." I always look at the root of the word first. That usually tells you very little. That may rate as the silliest thing you have ever written. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Meanwhile back in the real world of hit and runs
On Aug 23, 9:03*am, "Mrcheerful" wrote:
Doug wrote: On Aug 22, 4:23 pm, "Mrcheerful" wrote: Doug wrote: On Aug 21, 9:34 am, "Mrcheerful" wrote: Doug wrote: On Aug 20, 1:56 pm, nik.morgan wrote: Doug wrote: On Aug 19, 6:32 pm, Judith wrote: On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 09:50:37 -0700 (PDT), Squashme wrote: http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/...ction/leeds-hi... "West Yorkshire Police said the driver slowed down to see what had happened, then sped away from the scene." Sorry - who was it on the cycle? This clearly demonstrates how motorists are much more dangerous than cyclists and it indicates why there is a need for greater legal constraints on motorists than on cyclists. How can you be calling for legal constraints, you claimed to be an anarchist? You obviously know little about anarchism and its many forms and you are probably guided by the popular view of it alone. BTW, are you a motorist? anarchy has only one form: 'without a leader' That is like saying democracy only has one form: 'mob rule'. "...In the German uprising known as the Bavarian Soviet Republic the anarchists Gustav Landauer, Silvio Gesell and Erich M hsam had important leadership positions within the revolutionary councilist structures..." And thank you for revealing your own dismal ignorance of the subject of anarchy. "...There are many types and traditions of anarchism, not all of which are mutually exclusive.[13] Anarchist schools of thought can differ fundamentally, supporting anything from extreme individualism to complete collectivism..." I always look at the root of the word first. That usually tells you very little. That may rate as the silliest thing you have ever written. Not when you consider your peculiar faith in the roots of words. You simplistic and populist view of anarchy doesn't begin to describe its many variants as a political system. This may help you to understand. "Anarchy (from the ancient Greek ἀναρχία, anarchia, from ἀν an, "not" + ἀρχός arkhos, "ruler", meaning "absence of a leader", "without rulers"), has more than one definition. In the United States, the term "anarchy" typically is used to refer to a society without a publicly enforced government or violently enforced political authority.[1][2] When used in this sense, anarchy may[3] or may not[4] be intended to imply political disorder or lawlessness within a society..." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchy So, "more than one definition" eh? -- . A driving licence is sometimes a licence to kill. Outside of the US, and by most individuals that self-identify as anarchists, it implies a system of governance, mostly theoretical at a nation state level although there are a few successful historical examples,[5] that goes to lengths to avoid the use of coercion, violence, force and authority, while still producing a productive and desirable society.[6] |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Meanwhile back in the real world of hit and runs
Doug wrote:
On Aug 23, 9:03 am, "Mrcheerful" wrote: Doug wrote: On Aug 22, 4:23 pm, "Mrcheerful" wrote: Doug wrote: On Aug 21, 9:34 am, "Mrcheerful" wrote: Doug wrote: On Aug 20, 1:56 pm, nik.morgan wrote: Doug wrote: On Aug 19, 6:32 pm, Judith wrote: On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 09:50:37 -0700 (PDT), Squashme wrote: http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/...ction/leeds-hi... "West Yorkshire Police said the driver slowed down to see what had happened, then sped away from the scene." Sorry - who was it on the cycle? This clearly demonstrates how motorists are much more dangerous than cyclists and it indicates why there is a need for greater legal constraints on motorists than on cyclists. How can you be calling for legal constraints, you claimed to be an anarchist? You obviously know little about anarchism and its many forms and you are probably guided by the popular view of it alone. BTW, are you a motorist? anarchy has only one form: 'without a leader' That is like saying democracy only has one form: 'mob rule'. "...In the German uprising known as the Bavarian Soviet Republic the anarchists Gustav Landauer, Silvio Gesell and Erich M hsam had important leadership positions within the revolutionary councilist structures..." And thank you for revealing your own dismal ignorance of the subject of anarchy. "...There are many types and traditions of anarchism, not all of which are mutually exclusive.[13] Anarchist schools of thought can differ fundamentally, supporting anything from extreme individualism to complete collectivism..." I always look at the root of the word first. That usually tells you very little. That may rate as the silliest thing you have ever written. Not when you consider your peculiar faith in the roots of words. You simplistic and populist view of anarchy doesn't begin to describe its many variants as a political system. This may help you to understand. "Anarchy (from the ancient Greek ???????, anarchia, from ?? an, "not" +? ????? arkhos, "ruler", meaning "absence of a leader", "without rulers"), has more than one definition. In the United States, the term "anarchy" typically is used to refer to a society without a publicly enforced government or violently enforced political authority.[1][2] When used in this sense, anarchy may[3] or may not[4] be intended to imply political disorder or lawlessness within a society..." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchy So, "more than one definition" eh? -- . A driving licence is sometimes a licence to kill. Outside of the US, and by most individuals that self-identify as anarchists, it implies a system of governance, mostly theoretical at a nation state level although there are a few successful historical examples,[5] that goes to lengths to avoid the use of coercion, violence, force and authority, while still producing a productive and desirable society.[6] Happily I live in the UK, anarchy is, for me, defined by its historical roots, not a wikipedia or indymedia reference or you. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Meanwhile back in the real world of hit and runs
On Aug 25, 9:52*am, "Mrcheerful" wrote:
Doug wrote: On Aug 23, 9:03 am, "Mrcheerful" wrote: Doug wrote: On Aug 22, 4:23 pm, "Mrcheerful" wrote: Doug wrote: On Aug 21, 9:34 am, "Mrcheerful" wrote: Doug wrote: On Aug 20, 1:56 pm, nik.morgan wrote: Doug wrote: On Aug 19, 6:32 pm, Judith wrote: On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 09:50:37 -0700 (PDT), Squashme wrote: http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/...ction/leeds-hi... "West Yorkshire Police said the driver slowed down to see what had happened, then sped away from the scene." Sorry - who was it on the cycle? This clearly demonstrates how motorists are much more dangerous than cyclists and it indicates why there is a need for greater legal constraints on motorists than on cyclists. How can you be calling for legal constraints, you claimed to be an anarchist? You obviously know little about anarchism and its many forms and you are probably guided by the popular view of it alone. BTW, are you a motorist? anarchy has only one form: 'without a leader' That is like saying democracy only has one form: 'mob rule'. "...In the German uprising known as the Bavarian Soviet Republic the anarchists Gustav Landauer, Silvio Gesell and Erich M hsam had important leadership positions within the revolutionary councilist structures..." And thank you for revealing your own dismal ignorance of the subject of anarchy. "...There are many types and traditions of anarchism, not all of which are mutually exclusive.[13] Anarchist schools of thought can differ fundamentally, supporting anything from extreme individualism to complete collectivism..." I always look at the root of the word first. That usually tells you very little. That may rate as the silliest thing you have ever written. Not when you consider your peculiar faith in the roots of words. You simplistic and populist view of anarchy doesn't begin to describe its many variants as a political system. This may help you to understand. "Anarchy (from the ancient Greek ???????, anarchia, from ?? an, "not" +? ????? arkhos, "ruler", meaning "absence of a leader", "without rulers"), has more than one definition. In the United States, the term "anarchy" typically is used to refer to a society without a publicly enforced government or violently enforced political authority.[1][2] When used in this sense, anarchy may[3] or may not[4] be intended to imply political disorder or lawlessness within a society..." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchy So, "more than one definition" eh? -- . A driving licence is sometimes a licence to kill. Outside of the US, and by most individuals that self-identify as anarchists, it implies a system of governance, mostly theoretical at a nation state level although there are a few successful historical examples,[5] that goes to lengths to avoid the use of coercion, violence, force and authority, while still producing a productive and desirable society.[6] Happily I live in the UK, anarchy is, for me, defined by its historical roots, not a wikipedia or indymedia reference or you. "Orwell described in his book Homage to Catalonia the time during which Barcelona rose up with the CNT and anarchism. In the ninth chapter of his book, Orwell commented that "As far as my purely personal preferences went I would have liked to join the Anarchists."" (Wikipedia) ----------------------------------------- http://www.camiloberneri.org/cartelescnt.htm |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Meanwhile back in the real world of hit and runs
On Aug 25, 9:52*am, "Mrcheerful" wrote:
Doug wrote: On Aug 23, 9:03 am, "Mrcheerful" wrote: Doug wrote: On Aug 22, 4:23 pm, "Mrcheerful" wrote: Doug wrote: On Aug 21, 9:34 am, "Mrcheerful" wrote: Doug wrote: On Aug 20, 1:56 pm, nik.morgan wrote: Doug wrote: On Aug 19, 6:32 pm, Judith wrote: On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 09:50:37 -0700 (PDT), Squashme wrote: http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/...ction/leeds-hi... "West Yorkshire Police said the driver slowed down to see what had happened, then sped away from the scene." Sorry - who was it on the cycle? This clearly demonstrates how motorists are much more dangerous than cyclists and it indicates why there is a need for greater legal constraints on motorists than on cyclists. How can you be calling for legal constraints, you claimed to be an anarchist? You obviously know little about anarchism and its many forms and you are probably guided by the popular view of it alone. BTW, are you a motorist? anarchy has only one form: 'without a leader' That is like saying democracy only has one form: 'mob rule'. "...In the German uprising known as the Bavarian Soviet Republic the anarchists Gustav Landauer, Silvio Gesell and Erich M hsam had important leadership positions within the revolutionary councilist structures..." And thank you for revealing your own dismal ignorance of the subject of anarchy. "...There are many types and traditions of anarchism, not all of which are mutually exclusive.[13] Anarchist schools of thought can differ fundamentally, supporting anything from extreme individualism to complete collectivism..." I always look at the root of the word first. That usually tells you very little. That may rate as the silliest thing you have ever written. Not when you consider your peculiar faith in the roots of words. You simplistic and populist view of anarchy doesn't begin to describe its many variants as a political system. This may help you to understand. "Anarchy (from the ancient Greek ???????, anarchia, from ?? an, "not" +? ????? arkhos, "ruler", meaning "absence of a leader", "without rulers"), has more than one definition. In the United States, the term "anarchy" typically is used to refer to a society without a publicly enforced government or violently enforced political authority.[1][2] When used in this sense, anarchy may[3] or may not[4] be intended to imply political disorder or lawlessness within a society..." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchy So, "more than one definition" eh? Outside of the US, and by most individuals that self-identify as anarchists, it implies a system of governance, mostly theoretical at a nation state level although there are a few successful historical examples,[5] that goes to lengths to avoid the use of coercion, violence, force and authority, while still producing a productive and desirable society.[6] Happily I live in the UK, anarchy is, for me, defined by its historical roots, not a wikipedia or indymedia reference or you. So where are your 'historical roots' of anarchy published? You seem to be lacking in any sources or quotes so far. -- . A driving licence is sometimes a licence to kill. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Meanwhile back in the real world of hit and runs
Doug wrote:
On Aug 25, 9:52 am, "Mrcheerful" wrote: Doug wrote: On Aug 23, 9:03 am, "Mrcheerful" wrote: Doug wrote: On Aug 22, 4:23 pm, "Mrcheerful" wrote: Doug wrote: On Aug 21, 9:34 am, "Mrcheerful" wrote: Doug wrote: On Aug 20, 1:56 pm, nik.morgan wrote: Doug wrote: On Aug 19, 6:32 pm, Judith wrote: On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 09:50:37 -0700 (PDT), Squashme wrote: http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/...ction/leeds-hi... "West Yorkshire Police said the driver slowed down to see what had happened, then sped away from the scene." Sorry - who was it on the cycle? This clearly demonstrates how motorists are much more dangerous than cyclists and it indicates why there is a need for greater legal constraints on motorists than on cyclists. How can you be calling for legal constraints, you claimed to be an anarchist? You obviously know little about anarchism and its many forms and you are probably guided by the popular view of it alone. BTW, are you a motorist? anarchy has only one form: 'without a leader' That is like saying democracy only has one form: 'mob rule'. "...In the German uprising known as the Bavarian Soviet Republic the anarchists Gustav Landauer, Silvio Gesell and Erich M hsam had important leadership positions within the revolutionary councilist structures..." And thank you for revealing your own dismal ignorance of the subject of anarchy. "...There are many types and traditions of anarchism, not all of which are mutually exclusive.[13] Anarchist schools of thought can differ fundamentally, supporting anything from extreme individualism to complete collectivism..." I always look at the root of the word first. That usually tells you very little. That may rate as the silliest thing you have ever written. Not when you consider your peculiar faith in the roots of words. You simplistic and populist view of anarchy doesn't begin to describe its many variants as a political system. This may help you to understand. "Anarchy (from the ancient Greek ???????, anarchia, from ?? an, "not" +? ????? arkhos, "ruler", meaning "absence of a leader", "without rulers"), has more than one definition. In the United States, the term "anarchy" typically is used to refer to a society without a publicly enforced government or violently enforced political authority.[1][2] When used in this sense, anarchy may[3] or may not[4] be intended to imply political disorder or lawlessness within a society..." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchy So, "more than one definition" eh? Outside of the US, and by most individuals that self-identify as anarchists, it implies a system of governance, mostly theoretical at a nation state level although there are a few successful historical examples,[5] that goes to lengths to avoid the use of coercion, violence, force and authority, while still producing a productive and desirable society.[6] Happily I live in the UK, anarchy is, for me, defined by its historical roots, not a wikipedia or indymedia reference or you. So where are your 'historical roots' of anarchy published? You seem to be lacking in any sources or quotes so far. -- . A driving licence is sometimes a licence to kill. There is no requirement to justify original words, everyone should have knowledge of how most words are formed, it allows you to work out what an unfamiliar word means, there are possibly free classes available to you. The word comes from the Greek: an (means: without, example : an-aerobic, without air) arch (means leader, example arch-bishop: top bishop having leadership over ordinary bishops.) I feel sure that you should be able to use a dictionary by now, even Google can give you helpful information. a good example would be this: http://oxforddictionaries.com/defini...nglish/anarchy |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
rbr memes infecting the real world | Fredmaster of Brainerd | Racing | 6 | July 4th 11 07:35 AM |
The real reason behind the exit of World Bank President | [email protected] | Australia | 1 | June 18th 07 11:52 AM |
Stem, ask the racers, real world info | Scott | Racing | 12 | January 12th 06 05:46 PM |
I'm back.. had a real _-BLAST-_ | J G | Mountain Biking | 9 | August 30th 04 07:33 PM |
Real World | A Muzi | Techniques | 10 | December 25th 03 02:11 AM |