|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#121
|
|||
|
|||
Inconsiderate parking
On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 09:43:49 -0000, FMurtz wrote:
William Gothberg wrote: On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 22:43:00 -0000, Rod Speed wrote: "William Gothberg" wrote in message news On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 22:05:29 -0000, Rod Speed wrote: "William Gothberg" wrote in message news On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 19:42:42 -0000, Rod Speed wrote: "William Gothberg" wrote in message news On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 18:53:45 -0000, Rod Speed wrote: "William Gothberg" wrote in message news he wasn't intelligent enough to understand, I thought a simple diagram might help him, or he can get his wife to explain. Taint gunna work. Well there's always the mess a key makes of paintwork. That wont get them all parking on the same side either. But it'll cost the **** money, and it'll give me immense satisfaction. And see you ****ed over when they use their surveillance cameras to see who did it. He doesn't have surveillance cameras. Someone will have. I can easily drive past his car with my hand out the window and scrape his car. Cameras will just see me driving past, like every other car. They won't know who did it. What if the single car stay there and all the other cars go to work then come home again,do they have to park on his side? No, because they all know he's the arsehole. |
Ads |
#122
|
|||
|
|||
Inconsiderate parking
On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 09:16:59 -0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 27/12/2018 19:08, William Gothberg wrote: It shouldn't be legal Sigh., Another person who thinks they are the sole arbiter of moral codes *plonk* It's common sense to anyone with more brain cells than you. You're one of those 2 digit IQ people aren't you? 50% of the population (by definition) actually has a 2 digit IQ. Have you ever spoken to someone with 2 digits? They really are thick. And 1 in 2 people you meet are really that stupid. |
#123
|
|||
|
|||
Inconsiderate parking
I agree with most of what you said. However as a driver I ignore any stupid cyclist who thinks he deserves the same width as a car, or cycles in a busy road when there's a pavement or cycle path neighbouring it! I also detest health and softy cyclists, bright green clothing, protective helmets, skin tight clothing to show the size of their cock to everybody, you'd think they were entering a war zone or something. Be thankful you can't see how utterly stupid they look.
On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 08:21:22 -0000, Brian Gaff wrote: Well this thread has gone off in all kinds of directions. firstly no point in having parking rules if nobody enforces them I know this as being blind I get ****ed off a lot by footway obstruction either from large vehicles on footways with overhanging hard wing mirrors. I still bear the scars on my forehead. and people who buy cars longer than their front garden that overhang the footway and blind people encounter while shorelining the fence line, to name but two issues. I could very easily make a case against the individual I'm sure, under the bylaws, but really its the lack of enforcement which is the issue. rude signs do nothing but annoy folk, and several organisations actually make stickers with Pavements are for people on them etc, but none have ever resulted in any improvement. Much as in the rest of society, if there is no penalty involved people will ignore any law they like, often oblivious of its existence, but often if approached reasonably will admit they had never actually given any thought to what it might mean to any particular type of road user. If I had a tenner for every cyclist I know who has been hit by a car door being opened I'd be in the Bahamas. Cyclists themselves, however are not angels. Whenever they are allowed to share a surface they really should be more attentive and looking for white sticks and guide dogs instead of riding two abreast talking to each other or on their mobiles. Brian |
#124
|
|||
|
|||
Inconsiderate parking
On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 05:47:20 -0000, Bob F wrote:
On 12/27/2018 6:22 AM, William Gothberg wrote: On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 13:55:10 -0000, Ed Pawlowski wrote: On 12/27/2018 5:17 AM, Tom Evans wrote: On 26/12/2018 18:05, William Gothberg wrote: Think this will help? This will be printed off and placed under the wipers of all the nutters who park on the wrong side of the road: Side 1, facing outwards for everyone to see: https://www.dropbox.com/s/koaz45k1yh...e%201.jpg?dl=0 How do you know if it is the Green or the Blue car that has parked incorrectly on the wrong side of the road? I guess the best thing would be to ban all on road parking outside of specifically designated areas. Needs a place to put your name and phone number so they know who placed it. I don't think that would help. Then he'd just vent his anger at me instead of thinking about his own stupidity. Anonymous might have more effect. Are you that the new incarnation of that idiot James Wilkenson Sword? You have the same self centered "always right" way of "thinking". I have common sense, unlike all you lot. Not one of you has come up with a counter argument against what I said - that parking on both sides USES MORE ROAD SPACE. |
#125
|
|||
|
|||
Inconsiderate parking
On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 04:54:51 -0000, Bob F wrote:
On 12/27/2018 1:14 PM, William Gothberg wrote: On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 20:17:56 -0000, Bob F wrote: On 12/27/2018 11:10 AM, William Gothberg wrote: On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 18:52:30 -0000, Graham. wrote: On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 18:15:21 -0000, Rod Speed wrote: "William Gothberg" "William wrote in message news On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 15:04:45 -0000, Simon Jester wrote: On Wednesday, December 26, 2018 at 6:05:50 PM UTC, William Gothberg wrote: Think this will help? This will be printed off and placed under the wipers of all the nutters who park on the wrong side of the road: Side 1, facing outwards for everyone to see: https://www.dropbox.com/s/koaz45k1yh...e%201.jpg?dl=0 Side 2, facing inwards: https://www.dropbox.com/s/3sogvc7e8w...e%202.jpg?dl=0 ******son Sword Troll As a cyclist you should appreciate that bad parking is annoying. You putting stuff under wipers isnt going to change anything Short of pushing the car to the correct position, what would you suggest? The police have already told me it's "not a police matter". The council are lazy ****s who won't do anything. When I spoke to the guy in person, he just looked completely confused, he wasn't intelligent enough to understand, I thought a simple diagram might help him, or he can get his wife to explain. I still don't see which is the correct side of the street to park. Is it dictated by local custom and usage, or is it down to the first car to park dictating which side? First car to park obviously. It works ok in most streets, particularly ones that get completely full when everyone's at home. If people parked on the other side, someone would end up with nowhere to park and there'd be arguments. How difficult is it to park on the same side as another car which is close to where you're parking? I always manage it, it's not rocket science. And how do you know which car parked first to set your rule in effect? When there are 4 on one side and 1 on the other, it's clear who went wrong. No, it is NOT. It's probable, especially when it's the same car every ****ing time. Park on the same side as the person already there, it's not rocket science. |
#126
|
|||
|
|||
Inconsiderate parking
On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 04:53:50 -0000, Bob F wrote:
On 12/27/2018 1:16 PM, William Gothberg wrote: On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 20:13:31 -0000, Bob F wrote: On 12/27/2018 3:36 AM, William Gothberg wrote: On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 10:17:08 -0000, Tom Evans wrote: On 26/12/2018 18:05, William Gothberg wrote: Think this will help? This will be printed off and placed under the wipers of all the nutters who park on the wrong side of the road: Side 1, facing outwards for everyone to see: https://www.dropbox.com/s/koaz45k1yh...e%201.jpg?dl=0 How do you know if it is the Green or the Blue car that has parked incorrectly on the wrong side of the road? The diagram is simplified. There are in the street that annoys me most, 5 cars on one side and 1 on the other. It's clear that making 1 park on the other side to his house is better than making 5 park opposite. And who decides? The first one to park? Of course, what else? And you KNOW that the single car parked on one side was NOT the first? There are 5 other cars. I doubt very much he's always first, especially as I've almost never seen the road empty. |
#127
|
|||
|
|||
Inconsiderate parking
On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 02:12:09 -0000, Rod Speed wrote:
"William Gothberg" wrote in message news On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 23:41:43 -0000, Rod Speed wrote: "William Gothberg" wrote in message news On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 22:43:00 -0000, Rod Speed wrote: "William Gothberg" wrote in message news On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 22:05:29 -0000, Rod Speed wrote: "William Gothberg" wrote in message news On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 19:42:42 -0000, Rod Speed wrote: "William Gothberg" wrote in message news On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 18:53:45 -0000, Rod Speed wrote: "William Gothberg" wrote in message news On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 18:15:21 -0000, Rod Speed wrote: "William Gothberg" "William wrote in message news On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 15:04:45 -0000, Simon Jester wrote: On Wednesday, December 26, 2018 at 6:05:50 PM UTC, William Gothberg wrote: Think this will help? This will be printed off and placed under the wipers of all the nutters who park on the wrong side of the road: Side 1, facing outwards for everyone to see: https://www.dropbox.com/s/koaz45k1yh...e%201.jpg?dl=0 Side 2, facing inwards: https://www.dropbox.com/s/3sogvc7e8w...e%202.jpg?dl=0 ******son Sword Troll As a cyclist you should appreciate that bad parking is annoying. You putting stuff under wipers isnt going to change anything Short of pushing the car to the correct position, what would you suggest? Not suggesting anything. Nothing you can do will change what they do parking wise. It did once. Nope. I was parking in a street for 5 minutes, and deliberately parked so as to block the road. I parked the same side as 10 other cars, ignoring the BMW (it's almost always a BMW, they're selfish pricks) that was stupidly on the other side. When someone tried to get past, I pointed to the BMW and blamed its driver. The guy trying to get past went and knocked on his door and started yelling. I drove away and left them to it. Had no effect on where he parked. I don't know what the conversation was, as I'd left, but I've since seen that car parked on the other side. It used to always be on the wrong side. The guy trying to get past was built substantially more heavy than the BMW owner. The police have already told me it's "not a police matter". They're right, they are parking legally. It shouldn't be legal to take up two spaces with one car. They arent doing that. You can't be that thick. You clearly are, that's why you are unemployable. Draw a diagram similar to the one I posted. Don't need to. Imagine every other car parks on the left, and every other car parks on the right. Leave enough gap for passing traffic to get past, and parked cars are at least one car's length apart. Now put them all on the same side, no gaps required. That's not take up two spaces with one car. The explanation was clearly too complicated for you. You never could bull**** your way out of a wet paper bag. If every other car is on alternate sides of a road two car widths wide, clearly you need a 1 car length gap between each parked car. It wouldn't be possible drive down the street like that. Indeed, the space would probably have to be longer, Absolutely certainly would have to be longer, so your original was just plain wrong, as always. No, you just made my point even more valid. Cars all on one side take up less room. Duh. Which is my whole ****ing point. So you agree with me now? That if he parks on the other side, along with the other cars, he makes more room for everyone else. Always did on that, your pathetic excuse for a bull**** artist. So why are you arguing a point that you agree on? If you wish to deny this, then explain why. Having fun thrashing that straw man ? Replying with paper bag nonsense only serves to show you're an ignorant fool. You never could bull**** your way out of a wet paper bag. I'd get further talking to a robot. You never could bull**** your way out of a wet paper bag. Oh do **** off you retard. Enter a sensible discussion or you'll have nobody to talk to at all. This equates to taking up twice as much space as all cars parked on one side. Wrong, as always. The council are lazy ****s who won't do anything. Nothing they can do either. My council won't do anything about anything, They obviously do collect the rubbish and put in those speed bumps you froth at the mouth about. They do both of those very badly indeed. Then do the decent thing and set fire to yourself outside their office. That will fix the problem. and it's usually them causing the problem in the first place! Then do the decent thing and set fire to yourself outside their offices. Best just to set fire to their offices. That won't get them doing anything any better. It'll prevent them from doing the harm they are currently doing. Nope. They'd just use temporary offices till that one is replaced. They have limited funds. Not when the building is insured they don't. The policy will rise. Wrong, as always, Don't you know how insurance works? Anyway, councils don't insure, Wrong, as always, See below and stop interrupting. they cover their own losses, Wrong, as always, See below and stop interrupting. it works out cheaper. Wrong, as always, See below and stop interrupting. I used to work for one.... But are so ****ing stupid that you don't have a ****ing clue about how they operate, I WORKED FOR ONE. I KNOW HOW THEY OPERATE. Open your thick Aussie lugholes for once in your life. Perhaps they would then spend less on building speed bumps at £10,000 a piece. Or the insurance covers the new building and they carry on regardless with speed bumps. Yet again, you split what I say in two and respond twice., Stupids never understand anything the first time. That's why you are completely unemployable. Again, more cut and paste ****. I might as well be talking to a bot. I think you actually are one. This is a sign of a ****ed up mind. Or maybe you just like the sound of your own typing? You never could bull**** your way out of a wet paper bag. And more, **** off. [NO CARRIER] |
#128
|
|||
|
|||
Inconsiderate parking
"William Gothberg" wrote in message news On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 02:12:09 -0000, Rod Speed wrote: "William Gothberg" wrote in message news On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 23:41:43 -0000, Rod Speed wrote: "William Gothberg" wrote in message news On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 22:43:00 -0000, Rod Speed wrote: "William Gothberg" wrote in message news On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 22:05:29 -0000, Rod Speed wrote: "William Gothberg" wrote in message news On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 19:42:42 -0000, Rod Speed wrote: "William Gothberg" wrote in message news On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 18:53:45 -0000, Rod Speed wrote: "William Gothberg" wrote in message news On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 18:15:21 -0000, Rod Speed wrote: "William Gothberg" "William wrote in message news On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 15:04:45 -0000, Simon Jester wrote: On Wednesday, December 26, 2018 at 6:05:50 PM UTC, William Gothberg wrote: Think this will help? This will be printed off and placed under the wipers of all the nutters who park on the wrong side of the road: Side 1, facing outwards for everyone to see: https://www.dropbox.com/s/koaz45k1yh...e%201.jpg?dl=0 Side 2, facing inwards: https://www.dropbox.com/s/3sogvc7e8w...e%202.jpg?dl=0 ******son Sword Troll As a cyclist you should appreciate that bad parking is annoying. You putting stuff under wipers isnt going to change anything Short of pushing the car to the correct position, what would you suggest? Not suggesting anything. Nothing you can do will change what they do parking wise. It did once. Nope. I was parking in a street for 5 minutes, and deliberately parked so as to block the road. I parked the same side as 10 other cars, ignoring the BMW (it's almost always a BMW, they're selfish pricks) that was stupidly on the other side. When someone tried to get past, I pointed to the BMW and blamed its driver. The guy trying to get past went and knocked on his door and started yelling. I drove away and left them to it. Had no effect on where he parked. I don't know what the conversation was, as I'd left, but I've since seen that car parked on the other side. It used to always be on the wrong side. The guy trying to get past was built substantially more heavy than the BMW owner. The police have already told me it's "not a police matter". They're right, they are parking legally. It shouldn't be legal to take up two spaces with one car. They arent doing that. You can't be that thick. You clearly are, that's why you are unemployable. Draw a diagram similar to the one I posted. Don't need to. Imagine every other car parks on the left, and every other car parks on the right. Leave enough gap for passing traffic to get past, and parked cars are at least one car's length apart. Now put them all on the same side, no gaps required. That's not take up two spaces with one car. The explanation was clearly too complicated for you. You never could bull**** your way out of a wet paper bag. If every other car is on alternate sides of a road two car widths wide, clearly you need a 1 car length gap between each parked car. It wouldn't be possible drive down the street like that. Indeed, the space would probably have to be longer, Absolutely certainly would have to be longer, so your original was just plain wrong, as always. No, you just made my point even more valid. Cars all on one side take up less room. Duh. Which is my whole ****ing point. So you agree with me now? That if he parks on the other side, along with the other cars, he makes more room for everyone else. Always did on that, your pathetic excuse for a bull**** artist. So why are you arguing a point that you agree on? I'm not. I'm point out that your stupid TWICE and HALF is just plain wrong, as always. If you wish to deny this, then explain why. Having fun thrashing that straw man ? Replying with paper bag nonsense only serves to show you're an ignorant fool. You never could bull**** your way out of a wet paper bag. I'd get further talking to a robot. You never could bull**** your way out of a wet paper bag. Oh do **** off you retard. Enter a sensible discussion or you'll have nobody to talk to at all. You never could bull**** your way out of a wet paper bag. This equates to taking up twice as much space as all cars parked on one side. Wrong, as always. The council are lazy ****s who won't do anything. Nothing they can do either. My council won't do anything about anything, They obviously do collect the rubbish and put in those speed bumps you froth at the mouth about. They do both of those very badly indeed. Then do the decent thing and set fire to yourself outside their office. That will fix the problem. and it's usually them causing the problem in the first place! Then do the decent thing and set fire to yourself outside their offices. Best just to set fire to their offices. That won't get them doing anything any better. It'll prevent them from doing the harm they are currently doing. Nope. They'd just use temporary offices till that one is replaced. They have limited funds. Not when the building is insured they don't. The policy will rise. Wrong, as always, Don't you know how insurance works? Corse I do, but it doesn't work like that with operations the sized of councils. Anyway, councils don't insure, Wrong, as always, See below and stop interrupting. Go and **** yourself, again. they cover their own losses, Wrong, as always, See below and stop interrupting. Go and **** yourself, again. it works out cheaper. Wrong, as always, See below and stop interrupting. Go and **** yourself, again. I used to work for one.... But are so ****ing stupid that you don't have a ****ing clue about how they operate, I WORKED FOR ONE. BUT ARE SO ****ING STUPID THAT YOU DON'T HAVE A ****ING CLUE ABOUT HOW THEY OPERATE. I KNOW HOW THEY OPERATE. YOU NEVER DO BECAUSE YOU ARE SO ****ING STUPID THAT YOU ARE COMPLETELY UNEMPLOYABLE. Perhaps they would then spend less on building speed bumps at £10,000 a piece. Or the insurance covers the new building and they carry on regardless with speed bumps. Yet again, you split what I say in two and respond twice., Stupids never understand anything the first time. That's why you are completely unemployable. Again, more cut and paste ****. That isnt cut and paste you pathetic excuse for a bull**** artist. I might as well be talking to a bot. I think you actually are one. You never could bull**** your way out of a wet paper bag. This is a sign of a ****ed up mind. Or maybe you just like the sound of your own typing? You never could bull**** your way out of a wet paper bag. And more, **** off. [NO CARRIER] You never could bull**** your way out of a wet paper bag. |
#129
|
|||
|
|||
Inconsiderate parking
On 12/28/2018 12:47 AM, Bob F wrote:
On 12/27/2018 6:22 AM, William Gothberg wrote: On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 13:55:10 -0000, Ed Pawlowski wrote: On 12/27/2018 5:17 AM, Tom Evans wrote: On 26/12/2018 18:05, William Gothberg wrote: Think this will help?* This will be printed off and placed under the wipers of all the nutters who park on the wrong side of the road: Side 1, facing outwards for everyone to see: https://www.dropbox.com/s/koaz45k1yh...e%201.jpg?dl=0 How do you know if it is the Green or the Blue car that has parked incorrectly on the wrong side of the road? I guess the best thing would be to ban all on road parking outside of specifically designated areas. Needs a place to put your name and phone number so they know who placed it. I don't think that would help.* Then he'd just vent his anger at me instead of thinking about his own stupidity.* Anonymous might have more effect. Are you that the new incarnation of that idiot James Wilkenson Sword? You have the same self centered "always right" way of "thinking". Where the hell have you been? It's already been brought up many times. Yes, it's him. |
#130
|
|||
|
|||
Inconsiderate parking
On 12/27/2018 6:19 PM, William Gothberg wrote:
On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 23:01:43 -0000, % wrote: On 2018-12-27 3:20 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 21:19:47 -0000, % wrote: On 2018-12-27 2:15 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 20:17:27 -0000, % wrote: On 2018-12-27 1:08 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 19:42:42 -0000, Rod Speed wrote: "William Gothberg" wrote in message news On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 18:53:45 -0000, Rod Speed wrote: "William Gothberg" wrote in message news On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 18:15:21 -0000, Rod Speed wrote: "William Gothberg" "William wrote in message news On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 15:04:45 -0000, Simon Jester wrote: On Wednesday, December 26, 2018 at 6:05:50 PM UTC, William Gothberg wrote: Think this will help?* This will be printed off and placed under the wipers of all the nutters who park on the wrong side of the road: Side 1, facing outwards for everyone to see: https://www.dropbox.com/s/koaz45k1yh...e%201.jpg?dl=0 Side 2, facing inwards: https://www.dropbox.com/s/3sogvc7e8w...e%202.jpg?dl=0 ******son Sword Troll As a cyclist you should appreciate that bad parking is annoying. You putting stuff under wipers isnt going to change anything Short of pushing the car to the correct position, what would you suggest? Not suggesting anything. Nothing you can do will change what they do parking wise. It did once. Nope. I was parking in a street for 5 minutes, and deliberately parked so as to block the road.* I parked the same side as 10 other cars, ignoring the BMW (it's almost always a BMW, they're selfish pricks) that was stupidly on the other side.* When someone tried to get past, I pointed to the BMW and blamed its driver.* The guy trying to get past went and knocked on his door and started yelling.* I drove away and left them to it. Had no effect on where he parked. I don't know what the conversation was, as I'd left, but I've since seen that car parked on the other side.* It used to always be on the wrong side.* The guy trying to get past was built substantially more heavy than the BMW owner. The police have already told me it's "not a police matter". They're right, they are parking legally. It shouldn't be legal to take up two spaces with one car. They arent doing that. You can't be that thick.* Draw a diagram similar to the one I posted. Imagine every other car parks on the left, and every other car parks on the right.* Leave enough gap for passing traffic to get past, and parked cars are at least one car's length apart.* Now put them all on the same side, no gaps required. The council are lazy ****s who won't do anything. Nothing they can do either. My council won't do anything about anything, They obviously do collect the rubbish and put in those speed bumps you froth at the mouth about. They do both of those very badly indeed. and it's usually them causing the problem in the first place! Then do the decent thing and set fire to yourself outside their offices. Best just to set fire to their offices. When I spoke to the guy in person, he just looked completely confused, Yep, while thinking to himself 'this ****er is completely out of his ****ing tree' I took you as a bloke with some logic and common sense. You never could bull**** your way out of a wet paper bag. So you don't have common sense then, I can believe that. Draw a little diagram for yourself if it helps, or just use mine. You never could bull**** your way out of a wet paper bag. Parking on alternate sides of a street which is two car widths, takes up twice the room. And yet the council doesn't ban parking on one side of the street. They do when it becomes a problem.* But usually when a street gets very busy, people start seeing sense. he wasn't intelligent enough to understand, I thought a simple diagram might help him, or he can get his wife to explain. Taint gunna work. Well there's always the mess a key makes of paintwork. That wont get them all parking on the same side either. But it'll cost the **** money, and it'll give me immense satisfaction. he'll drive a scratched car and won't care Nope, seen him washing the ****ing thing almost every day.* He'll care. you could just learn how to drive you obviously suck at it My driving ability is irrelevant to the fact that he is wasting parking spaces. learn to drive anyway Already have, and I'm better than every other driver on the road. Yes, once again we are aware you're the best at everything. I'm sure you even scream your own name when you're wanking. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Inconsiderate drivers | Jimmy Wilkinson Knife[_2_] | UK | 4 | July 19th 18 08:58 PM |
Inconsiderate Cycling? | Budstaff | UK | 19 | February 6th 07 01:12 PM |
inconsiderate drivers! | leadpan | Unicycling | 15 | September 16th 05 01:31 AM |
Inconsiderate bikers | Maybe_one_time | Mountain Biking | 44 | August 26th 04 01:15 PM |
Inconsiderate bikers | Gary S. | Social Issues | 0 | August 13th 04 10:18 PM |