Mountain biker tumbles 50 feet down Panorama Bluffs

ZZZZZZZZZ! Sorry it took me so long to get back to you. I was riding! I
don't have time for this anyway!
"Marz" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Apr 26, 9:13 am, "Bob Magatagan" wrote:
That's all you came up with?..... some OLD info. I'm laughing too hard!
What's my favorite color!?"Marz" wrote in
message

And it was still too much info for me, I don't care. The point is why
do you think it's important to use your full name rather than a
nickname. It doesn't invoke any more trust in comments you may post.

On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:27:54 +1200, Westie
wrote:

Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 08:21:20 -0700, "Bill Sornson"
wrote:

Westie wrote:
Mike Vandeman wrote:
Mountain biker tumbles 50 feet down Panorama Bluffs
Last Update: Apr 5, 2007 7:26 PM

LOL!

http://tvnz.co.nz/view/page/411749/1074638

Tourist Bus using designated paved roadway tumbles 75 feet
down bluff.

Anyone can do it, Mike.
Plus, of course, the "source material" for hiker and motorist
deaths is
about a thousand times bigger than for mountain biker deaths.

Not per person or per outing. Mountain biking is MUCH more dangerous
than either of those.

I'm inclined to think that those forty tourists in that single bus
would
say that this outing was more dangerous than mountain biking.

They weren't hiking. They were riding in a bus. Mountain biking is FAR
more dangerous than hiking.
===

I imagine that hiking in mountainous countryside containing vicious wild
animals is much more dangerous than walking in a suburban park.
Likewise, walking in a suburban park is probably more dangerous than
sitting on a sofa in your living room all day.
By your logic one should wrap oneself in cotton wool and not ever leave
the house.
What, exactly, was your point anyway?
--
Westie