Does Armstrong have a medical "right" to take testosterone?

On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 19:27:03 -0700 (PDT), Breeder
wrote:

On Oct 22, 9:46*am, nmp wrote:
Friar Broccoli:

It is my understanding that Armstrong had his testicles removed as a
result of his cancer. *That (I presume) would reduce his natural
production of the steroid testosterone. *Thus, he should have the
medical right to replace the missing testosterone.

I have never heard this discussed.
Does anybody here *know* anything about this?

It is public knowledge that he had *one* testicle removed. We must assume
the remaining testicle is still functional. Thus there would be no need
for testosterone replacement therapy.