A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » rec.bicycles » Techniques
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Road Bike Geometry: Traditional vs. Comfort (eg. Trek 1000 vs. Trek Pilot 1.0)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old September 14th 06, 01:18 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
41
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 193
Default Road Bike Geometry: Traditional vs. Comfort (eg. Trek 1000 vs. Trek Pilot 1.0)

Sorry, make that the May issue of Velo News.
á

Ads
  #32  
Old September 14th 06, 06:32 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Booker C. Bense
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default Road Bike Geometry: Traditional vs. Comfort (eg. Trek 1000 vs. Trek Pilot 1.0)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In article . com,
41 wrote:

Bicycles have much more compliance laterally. Some work (at Trek) seems
to show that lateral stiffness does indeed have something to do with
perceived ride comfort, although how exactly this works is not clear.
This was reported in the Velo News article on frame stiffness testing
that I mentioned some time ago. I believe it was the May issue.



_ One thing I've always pondered is how often a bicycle is actually
completely vertical. If you tilt a bike sideways lateral
compliance in the frame has a vertical component. I'd also
guess that even if the bike is completely vertical, there is
generally some lateral component to the driving forces from
"road noise". In particular there is likely an imbalance of
force between the front and back wheel.

_ I doubt any of this matters, but the mind wanders...

_ Booker C. Bense




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBRQmSO2TWTAjn5N/lAQH7lQQAreaYq4pEyMhq+UGs8RVOUR2fZlW6ixn9
Yrs5g0Vkz4FfaeNV9ueJzpP4nd3PSSg9lJLpZcs/vUIOwxYUDofq690PSvKvkDXG
SHoM7Py5mLWwPZ+D/bwBUJuNS5hepexeGKfJ29V1cITmdMLKIKAmq9mlyO0eU8Mg
xy0GnT5y2Hk=
=qTwC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
  #33  
Old September 14th 06, 11:48 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,130
Default Road Bike Geometry: Traditional vs. Comfort (eg. Trek 1000 vs. Trek Pilot 1.0)


Mark Hickey wrote:
"Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman" wrote:

Mark Hickey wrote:
"* * Chas" wrote:

...BTW, I like the geometries that you use on
your frames.

Thanks - I haven't found anything that works better. ;-)


See http://www.ransbikes.com/images06/F5XP/7F5XP.jpg for an example
of a better frame geometry.


Wait, I was talking about bikes... ;-)


Bicycle - noun
1. A vehicle with two wheels in tandem, usually propelled by pedals
connected to a wheel by a chain, and having handlebars for steering and
a seat.

Do we need to explain this further to Mark?

--
Tom Sherman - Here, not there.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tour suggestions for Great Plains (central USA) Dave Rusin Rides 10 March 16th 06 01:44 AM
Sunday Times: Death row: Britain's most dangerous road Sufaud UK 45 September 28th 04 09:06 PM
Some questions etc.. Douglas Harrington General 10 August 17th 04 02:42 AM
Last Chance Road [email protected] Rides 2 June 3rd 04 03:01 AM
aus.bicycle FAQ (Monthly(ish) Posting) kingsley Australia 3 February 24th 04 08:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.