|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Excellent Cyclist Laws in Australia
On Friday, 29 January 2016 15:00:31 UTC, John T wrote:
"Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein" wrote I just love the way that ****tards like you spout ****e and then get all offended when someone points it out to you. So you're all in favour of cyclists riding on pavements and ignoring traffic lights and not using lights at night? Just Google "cyclist kills predestrian" if you don't think there's a problem. Here are FOUR YEARS worth of pedestrians killed by cyclists in ONE event. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...oxing-Day.html |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Excellent Cyclist Laws in Australia
Alycidon wrote:
On Friday, 29 January 2016 15:00:31 UTC, John T wrote: "Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein" wrote I just love the way that ****tards like you spout ****e and then get all offended when someone points it out to you. So you're all in favour of cyclists riding on pavements and ignoring traffic lights and not using lights at night? Just Google "cyclist kills predestrian" if you don't think there's a problem. Here are FOUR YEARS worth of pedestrians killed by cyclists in ONE event. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...oxing-Day.html http://www.heraldscotland.com/opinion/14116575.Cars_have_killed_45_000_Britons_in_the_21 st_century__bicycles_less_than_10/ -- john smith |MA (Hons)|MPhil (Hons)|CAPES (mention très bien)|LLB (Hons) 'It never gets any easier. You just get faster' (Greg LeMond (1961 - )) |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Excellent Cyclist Laws in Australia
In uk.rec.cycling Nick wrote:
On 29/01/2016 11:19, John T wrote: "John Smith" wrote Yeah, 'cos when you see all that carnage caused by cyclists, I mean, what's the government up to, eh? You ****ing tool. Just love your capacity for reasoned discussion. Well he does appear to have a point. Indeed. It's very difficult to penetrate the inherent prejudice. In the UK, probably the majority of psychopaths truly believe that paying VED gives them the right to use the road. It doesn't. But even when this is pointed out to them, their response is usually that 'VED' is just road tax 'after a name change'. And the problem with ****s is that, well .. they're ****s. And because they're ****s, they don't know that they're ****s. Some of them even believe that they're intelligent and that their debate is subtle, eloquent and effective. Nugent is one such ****. Go and watch Twitter for examples of this. It's fascinating. ****1: 'fackin' #cyclists don't pay nuffink towards #roadtax' Cyclist: 'That's because there is no such thing' ****1: 'yeah, cos you don't pay it, innit?' Cyclist: 'No one pays it. It doesn't exist' ****1: 'What do I pay £205 a year for, then?' Cyclist: 'That's #VED. It is based on #emissions' ****1: 'I told ye! An' you don't pay it!' Cyclist: '**** this. #blocked' ****2: 'U showed him m8 well done. #audicars' I recall a conversation with a mate. To be charitable, this gentleman is somewhat intellectually challenged. His rhetoric could be excused by the amount of Australian white that we consumed that night, but he comes out with similar **** when he's as sober as a judge. We were sitting watching news of yet another bombing by Islam. '****ing religion!' exclaimed my mate. 'Not religion,' I replied. 'One religion'. 'Are you denying that Islam is a religion?' he replied [1]. 'Well, no, I'm not denying it...' I said. 'Well, then. There you go'. But because he's a bit thick, I can't really say to him, '**** off, you thick ****'. Lack of intelligence can be a strength, because we live in such a PC, 'everyone wins' world, that when you point out their crass ****ing intelligence, the response is usually some whine about how you're 'not nice', or that you're not engaging in 'reasoned debate'. [1] at this time, I still considered Islam to be a religion - this was in 1997 or so -- john smith |MA (Hons)|MPhil (Hons)|CAPES (mention très bien)|LLB (Hons) 'It never gets any easier. You just get faster' (Greg LeMond (1961 - )) |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Excellent Cyclist Laws in Australia
On 29/01/2016 11:50, Nick wrote:
On 29/01/2016 11:19, John T wrote: "John Smith" wrote Yeah, 'cos when you see all that carnage caused by cyclists, I mean, what's the government up to, eh? You ****ing tool. Just love your capacity for reasoned discussion. Well he does appear to have a point. Does he? What is it? |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Excellent Cyclist Laws in Australia
On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 13:39:18 -0000, burfordTjustice
wrote: On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 07:55:33 +0000 Judith wrote: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-01-2...rry-id/7123360 From March 2016, riding without an ID will result in a $106 fine. Not wearing a helmet or holding onto a moving car will cost $319 Running a red light will incur a $425 penalty. How very sensible. Sorry - I must go - I have a letter to write to my MP. First all cars should be banned. No reasonable person needs their own car. Think of all the deaths.. Then work on getting workable cyclists laws. PDFTT -- Bah, and indeed, Humbug |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Excellent Cyclist Laws in Australia
On 29/01/2016 15:37, John Smith wrote:
In uk.rec.cycling Nick wrote: On 29/01/2016 11:19, John T wrote: "John Smith" wrote Yeah, 'cos when you see all that carnage caused by cyclists, I mean, what's the government up to, eh? You ****ing tool. Just love your capacity for reasoned discussion. Well he does appear to have a point. Indeed. It's very difficult to penetrate the inherent prejudice. In the UK, probably the majority of psychopaths truly believe that paying VED gives them the right to use the road. It doesn't. But even when this is pointed out to them, their response is usually that 'VED' is just road tax 'after a name change'. And the problem with ****s is that, well .. they're ****s. And because they're ****s, they don't know that they're ****s. Some of them even believe that they're intelligent and that their debate is subtle, eloquent and effective. Nugent is one such ****. Go and watch Twitter for examples of this. It's fascinating. ****1: 'fackin' #cyclists don't pay nuffink towards #roadtax' Cyclist: 'That's because there is no such thing' ****1: 'yeah, cos you don't pay it, innit?' Cyclist: 'No one pays it. It doesn't exist' ****1: 'What do I pay £205 a year for, then?' Cyclist: 'That's #VED. It is based on #emissions' ****1: 'I told ye! An' you don't pay it!' Cyclist: '**** this. #blocked' ****2: 'U showed him m8 well done. #audicars' I recall a conversation with a mate. To be charitable, this gentleman is somewhat intellectually challenged. His rhetoric could be excused by the amount of Australian white that we consumed that night, but he comes out with similar **** when he's as sober as a judge. We were sitting watching news of yet another bombing by Islam. '****ing religion!' exclaimed my mate. 'Not religion,' I replied. 'One religion'. 'Are you denying that Islam is a religion?' he replied [1]. 'Well, no, I'm not denying it...' I said. 'Well, then. There you go'. But because he's a bit thick, I can't really say to him, '**** off, you thick ****'. Lack of intelligence can be a strength, because we live in such a PC, 'everyone wins' world, that when you point out their crass ****ing intelligence, the response is usually some whine about how you're 'not nice', or that you're not engaging in 'reasoned debate'. [1] at this time, I still considered Islam to be a religion - this was in 1997 or so Surely you could get help from whatever health system you have over there? You shouldn't have to suffer like that. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Excellent Cyclist Laws in Australia
On 29/01/2016 07:55, Judith wrote:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-01-2...rry-id/7123360 From March 2016, riding without an ID will result in a $106 fine. What're they gonna do - stop *every* cyclist to check?! Not wearing a helmet or holding onto a moving car will cost $319 The way the above is phrased suggests they will be fined for *not* holding onto a moving car. -- Paul Hyett, Cheltenham |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Excellent Cyclist Laws in Australia
burfordTjustice wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 07:55:33 +0000 Judith wrote: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-01-2...rry-id/7123360 From March 2016, riding without an ID will result in a $106 fine. Not wearing a helmet or holding onto a moving car will cost $319 Running a red light will incur a $425 penalty. How very sensible. Sorry - I must go - I have a letter to write to my MP. First all cars should be banned. No reasonable person needs their own car. Think of all the deaths.. If you mean that no reasonable person needs a car (removed own) it is an indication of some sort of mental problem you have,in this day and age the worlds people could not exist with today's level of amenities and population with out them. Then work on getting workable cyclists laws. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Excellent Cyclist Laws in Australia
On 30/01/2016 04:54, F Murtz wrote:
burfordTjustice wrote: On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 07:55:33 +0000 Judith wrote: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-01-2...rry-id/7123360 From March 2016, riding without an ID will result in a $106 fine. Not wearing a helmet or holding onto a moving car will cost $319 Running a red light will incur a $425 penalty. How very sensible. Sorry - I must go - I have a letter to write to my MP. First all cars should be banned. No reasonable person needs their own car. Think of all the deaths.. If you mean that no reasonable person needs a car (removed own) it is an indication of some sort of mental problem you have,in this day and age the worlds people could not exist with today's level of amenities and population with out them. It seem strange to deliberately edit a post to get a version that you consider nonsensical and then point out your edited version is nonsensical. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Excellent Cyclist Laws in Australia
Nick wrote:
On 30/01/2016 04:54, F Murtz wrote: burfordTjustice wrote: On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 07:55:33 +0000 Judith wrote: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-01-2...rry-id/7123360 From March 2016, riding without an ID will result in a $106 fine. Not wearing a helmet or holding onto a moving car will cost $319 Running a red light will incur a $425 penalty. How very sensible. Sorry - I must go - I have a letter to write to my MP. First all cars should be banned. No reasonable person needs their own car. Think of all the deaths.. If you mean that no reasonable person needs a car (removed own) it is an indication of some sort of mental problem you have,in this day and age the worlds people could not exist with today's level of amenities and population with out them. It seem strange to deliberately edit a post to get a version that you consider nonsensical and then point out your edited version is nonsensical. ???? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
News from down under on helmet laws, passing laws and fighting betweenso called advocacy groups. | James[_8_] | Techniques | 25 | December 6th 13 01:30 PM |
OT. USA helmet laws will make each cyclist more likely to have a crash ??? | Mrcheerful[_3_] | UK | 3 | February 13th 13 11:36 AM |
Around Australia Cyclist | Poiter | Australia | 1 | June 22nd 06 09:48 AM |
Cyclist begins 30 000 km trip around Australia | Donga | Australia | 8 | April 28th 06 04:42 AM |
Runicycle Laws in Australia | mord_borin | Unicycling | 2 | March 3rd 04 11:58 AM |