|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#121
|
|||
|
|||
Blue railway signals?
On Sun, 16 Dec 2018 09:30:43 -0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 16/12/2018 09:25, Max Demian wrote: On 15/12/2018 19:25, Johnny B Good wrote: On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 18:21:55 +0000, Fred Johnson wrote: On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 11:22:05 -0000, Max Demian wrote: ====snip==== Usually hot is on the left. Seems to be that way on all my sinks, but I'd say in other people's houses I see it the other way round in about 20% of cases. When I were a lad, the bathroom sink was definitely the other way round, can't remember the kitchen sink. Back in the day when *cold* running water was a luxury, the tap (fawcet) would be mounted on the RHS for ease of use by right handed people (the majority of the population - most left handers learn soon enough to become ambidextrous). The hot tap being a much later luxury add on had to make do with the only remaining space on the LHS. Thus was the convention of LHS hot/RHS cold tap placement born. The other way round is usually the result of lazy plumbing and pure chance. Any evidence for that? Surely they would put the single tap in the middle for symmetry. Was there ever a time when hot taps were added as an extra to an existing cold water tap, rather than installing them together? I have seen te odd one like that yes, in pretty old un-renovated properties back in the 1970s Sounds like a neat, invented explanation. That I agree with. As soon as twin taps were vthe norm for some reaosn sonmeone decided that the right hand more often than not wanted the cold tap Depends on the person. I always wash my hands in cold water, I don't see the need for hot water to dissolve a bar of soap. Some people always use hot water, for comfort I think. Prior to that the cold tap was generally either central or in an random corner Probably just depending in where the pipe happened to be. Why run it further than necessary? Mind you, you'd think a sink designed for one tap would have one hole, in one place. |
Ads |
#122
|
|||
|
|||
Blue railway signals?
On Sun, 16 Dec 2018 09:35:33 -0000, Rod Speed wrote:
"Max Demian" wrote in message o.uk... On 15/12/2018 19:25, Johnny B Good wrote: On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 18:21:55 +0000, Fred Johnson wrote: On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 11:22:05 -0000, Max Demian wrote: ====snip==== Usually hot is on the left. Seems to be that way on all my sinks, but I'd say in other people's houses I see it the other way round in about 20% of cases. When I were a lad, the bathroom sink was definitely the other way round, can't remember the kitchen sink. Back in the day when *cold* running water was a luxury, the tap (fawcet) would be mounted on the RHS for ease of use by right handed people (the majority of the population - most left handers learn soon enough to become ambidextrous). The hot tap being a much later luxury add on had to make do with the only remaining space on the LHS. Thus was the convention of LHS hot/RHS cold tap placement born. The other way round is usually the result of lazy plumbing and pure chance. Any evidence for that? Surely they would put the single tap in the middle for symmetry. Was there ever a time when hot taps were added as an extra to an existing cold water tap, rather than installing them together? Corse there was. Sounds like a neat, invented explanation. Then you need a new hearing aid, bad. Yet again you disagree without providing any reasoning or evidence for your point of view. |
#123
|
|||
|
|||
Blue railway signals?
On 16/12/2018 13:37, Kristy Ogilvie wrote:
On Sun, 16 Dec 2018 09:30:43 -0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 16/12/2018 09:25, Max Demian wrote: On 15/12/2018 19:25, Johnny B Good wrote: On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 18:21:55 +0000, Fred Johnson wrote: On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 11:22:05 -0000, Max Demian wrote: ====snip==== Usually hot is on the left. Seems to be that way on all my sinks, but I'd say in other people's houses I see it the other way round in about 20% of cases.Â* When I were a lad, the bathroom sink was definitely the other way round, can't remember the kitchen sink. Â* Back in the day when *cold* running water was a luxury, the tap (fawcet) would be mounted on the RHS for ease of use by right handed people (the majority of the population - most left handers learn soon enough to become ambidextrous). Â* The hot tap being a much later luxury add on had to make do with the only remaining space on the LHS. Thus was the convention of LHS hot/RHS cold tap placement born. The other way round is usually the result of lazy plumbing and pure chance. Any evidence for that? Surely they would put the single tap in the middle for symmetry. Was there ever a time when hot taps were added as an extra to an existing cold water tap, rather than installing them together? I have seen te odd one like that yes, in pretty old un-renovated properties back in the 1970s Sounds like a neat, invented explanation. That I agree with. As soon as twin taps were vthe norm for some reaosn sonmeone decided that the right hand more often than not wanted the cold tap Depends on the person.Â* I always wash my hands in cold water, I don't see the need for hot water to dissolve a bar of soap.Â* Some people always use hot water, for comfort I think. Prior to that the cold tap was generally either central or in an random corner Probably just depending in where the pipe happened to be.Â* Why run it further than necessary? Mind you, you'd think a sink designed for one tap would have one hole, in one place. Sinks in them days didnt have holes They were universally butlers type china basin with just a drain hole Or maybe a galvabised tin thing - integrated tap holes and draining boards are a massively later development. My parents 1953 new build had a butltres sink on two brackets soldered lead outflow pipe and a wooden draining board on IIRC both sides. I can't remember whether it had a hot tap or not, or whether that was only for the bath and two WC basins. By and large there was never any hot water unless monumental amounts of coal were heaped on the dining room fire for an hour or so., Then a 2" deep bath used by the whole shivering family resulted. Mostly hot water was boiled on a gas stove. -- "When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him." Jonathan Swift. |
#124
|
|||
|
|||
Blue railway signals?
On Sat, 15 Dec 2018 13:43:09 GMT, "Mr Pounder Esquire"
wrote: Kristy Ogilvie wrote: On Sat, 15 Dec 2018 11:02:40 -0000, Rod Speed wrote: "Kristy Ogilvie" wrote in message news On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 00:55:55 -0000, Rod Speed wrote: "Fred Johnson" wrote in message news On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 23:43:41 -0000, Rod Speed wrote: "Fred Johnson" wrote in message news On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 23:12:50 -0000, Rod Speed wrote: "Fred Johnson" wrote in message news On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 21:03:57 -0000, Mike Humphrey wrote: Fred Johnson wrote: [] Yes, there are always morons. And ******s like you. That would imply deliberately mis-designing your own product. **** off Hucker. Suscinct as usual -- Bah, and indeed, Humbug. |
#125
|
|||
|
|||
Blue railway signals?
On 16/12/2018 13:33, Kristy Ogilvie wrote:
On Sun, 16 Dec 2018 12:37:49 -0000, newshound wrote: On 14/12/2018 18:22, Fred Johnson wrote: People with colour blindness shouldn't drive trains (or cars for that matter). And it's not very many, in fact I know of only one person who's colourblind. You may not know *of* many but I bet you know quite a lot. It's about 8% of men, although many of them do not realise that, or discover it until tested later in life. I think you'd notice when you saw all the traffic light bulbs looking identical.* You're not safe to drive if you can't tell red from green. I suspect they don't look *identical*, just not as distinct as to someone with normal colour vision. They would use the position to confirm which is which. -- Max Demian |
#126
|
|||
|
|||
Blue railway signals?
On 16/12/2018 15:00, Max Demian wrote:
On 16/12/2018 13:33, Kristy Ogilvie wrote: On Sun, 16 Dec 2018 12:37:49 -0000, newshound wrote: On 14/12/2018 18:22, Fred Johnson wrote: People with colour blindness shouldn't drive trains (or cars for that matter). And it's not very many, in fact I know of only one person who's colourblind. You may not know *of* many but I bet you know quite a lot. It's about 8% of men, although many of them do not realise that, or discover it until tested later in life. I think you'd notice when you saw all the traffic light bulbs looking identical.* You're not safe to drive if you can't tell red from green. I suspect they don't look *identical*, just not as distinct as to someone with normal colour vision. They would use the position to confirm which is which. Correct. Which is why colour-blindness is not even notifiable to the DVLA. Driving a train is of course totally different as braking needs to be commenced way earlier and the position of the light cannot be determined at that point. SteveW |
#128
|
|||
|
|||
Blue railway signals?
|
#129
|
|||
|
|||
Blue railway signals?
On Sun, 16 Dec 2018 15:39:40 -0000, Steve Walker wrote:
On 16/12/2018 15:00, Max Demian wrote: On 16/12/2018 13:33, Kristy Ogilvie wrote: On Sun, 16 Dec 2018 12:37:49 -0000, newshound wrote: On 14/12/2018 18:22, Fred Johnson wrote: People with colour blindness shouldn't drive trains (or cars for that matter). And it's not very many, in fact I know of only one person who's colourblind. You may not know *of* many but I bet you know quite a lot. It's about 8% of men, although many of them do not realise that, or discover it until tested later in life. I think you'd notice when you saw all the traffic light bulbs looking identical. You're not safe to drive if you can't tell red from green. I suspect they don't look *identical*, just not as distinct as to someone with normal colour vision. They would use the position to confirm which is which. Correct. Which is why colour-blindness is not even notifiable to the DVLA. Driving a train is of course totally different as braking needs to be commenced way earlier and the position of the light cannot be determined at that point. I'm not colour blind, and I don't look directly at the traffic lights. I see red or green out of the corner of my eye and act accordingly. If they suddenly became the same or very similar colours, I'd make mistakes regularly. Are you saying a colour blind person already knows to look carefully at things? I can't think of where else colour and position are that important. |
#130
|
|||
|
|||
Blue railway signals?
On Sun, 16 Dec 2018 15:00:21 -0000, Max Demian wrote:
On 16/12/2018 13:33, Kristy Ogilvie wrote: On Sun, 16 Dec 2018 12:37:49 -0000, newshound wrote: On 14/12/2018 18:22, Fred Johnson wrote: People with colour blindness shouldn't drive trains (or cars for that matter). And it's not very many, in fact I know of only one person who's colourblind. You may not know *of* many but I bet you know quite a lot. It's about 8% of men, although many of them do not realise that, or discover it until tested later in life. I think you'd notice when you saw all the traffic light bulbs looking identical. You're not safe to drive if you can't tell red from green. I suspect they don't look *identical*, just not as distinct as to someone with normal colour vision. They would use the position to confirm which is which. The only colour blind person I know says red and green look IDENTICAL (presumably in his eyes the red and green receptors are shorted together somehow). They're only different if one is lighter than the other, but then light green and light red are the same, and dark red and dark green are the same, so that might depend on the traffic light design and the position of the sun. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hand signals from car | Tough Guy no. 1265 | UK | 87 | October 25th 15 03:17 PM |
Hand signals? | Squashme | UK | 27 | May 23rd 13 11:58 AM |
Invicta Men's Chronograph Blue Leather Blue Dial Watch 3314 | [email protected] | UK | 0 | April 3rd 08 04:17 AM |
Hand signals | Bean Long | Australia | 3 | December 9th 05 01:31 PM |
Hand signals | Arpit | Australia | 52 | September 14th 03 06:05 AM |