|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#91
|
|||
|
|||
Threaded versus threadless headset
Gary Young wrote:
David Damerell wrote in message ... [1] I still don't see how this happens - the head is usually at least somewhat aft of the bars, and the apparent wind will blow droplets of sweat to the rear. When I sweat enough that it cannot evaporate it hits me on the knees, not on the headset! When I'm riding my road bike, my head is almost directly over the headset. I looked and I see this is the case for me when riding in the drops - I have my bars mounted quite high, so I ride in the drops most of the time and in the hoods uphill, which I find most comfortable. When climbing a steep hill there is little apparent wind, but then the combination of riding in the hoods and the slope _has_ moved my head definitely to the rear of the headset. You're right that apparent wind keeps the sweat away most of the time, but what about when you've made a hard effort on a hot day and then have to stop for a light? If I'm going to be there for any length of time I let go of the bars and stand upright. -- David Damerell Distortion Field! |
Ads |
#92
|
|||
|
|||
Threaded versus threadless headset
In my opinion, no real differences. Threadless makes adjustment easier, but a
well-adjusted threaded shoud never need adjustment. The real reason for the whole threadless thing goes back to mountain-bikes. It was a huge inventory pain in the ass to keep forks around with 5-9 steerer tube diameters/length combinations. Imagine the bike companies needing hundreds of thousands of forks, some 1 inch, some 1 1/8 inch, some 1 1/4'. Some threaded, some not. So make them all the same diameter, 1 1/8 seemed about right, make them threadless and then you only need 1 steerer tube ( long) and it could be trimmed to length as needed. Then, convince the public that this is lighter, safer, cheaper and better and they'll buy in. By the way, it generally isn't lighter, costs about the same to us ( though is cheaper for the manufacturers). is easier to set up and adjust. So it wasn't all bad. But on road bikes? Answers a question nobody asked. But it did make it easier on shops not having to stock 8 different lengths of each carbon replacement fork. 1 long one was enough. |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
Threaded versus threadless headset
"David Damerell" wrote:
Well, I'm not disputing that most of the quill stems that came with bikes are just as pointlessly low as the threadless equivalents that come with bikes now... I didn't think for a moment that you we you were clearly saying that an unusual A-head stem would be needed to put your bars where your unusual quill stem now puts them. The fact that some quill stems and some threadless steerers are too short to allow some riders to find their favoured position is an argument for providing longer-quilled stems for those who require them, and supplying threadless forks with long, uncut steerers. It has little to do with the relative merits of the two systems. James Thomson |
#94
|
|||
|
|||
Threaded versus threadless headset
"Bikefixr" wrote in message ... In my opinion, no real differences. Threadless makes adjustment easier, but a well-adjusted threaded shoud never need adjustment. The real reason for the whole threadless thing goes back to mountain-bikes. It was a huge inventory pain in the ass to keep forks around with 5-9 steerer tube diameters/length combinations. Imagine the bike companies needing hundreds of thousands of forks, some 1 inch, some 1 1/8 inch, some 1 1/4'. Some threaded, some not. So make them all the same diameter, 1 1/8 seemed about right, make them threadless and then you only need 1 steerer tube ( long) and it could be trimmed to length as needed. Then, convince the public that this is lighter, safer, cheaper and better and they'll buy in. By the way, it generally isn't lighter, costs about the same to us ( though is cheaper for the manufacturers). is easier to set up and adjust. So it wasn't all bad. But on road bikes? Answers a question nobody asked. But it did make it easier on shops not having to stock 8 different lengths of each carbon replacement fork. 1 long one was enough. Used to be that one long steerer steel fork was good to keep around for an emergency. Then all you had to do is thread down to the right length and cut. Voila! Instant custom length fork steerer. Mike |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
handlebar height | n crowley | General | 35 | April 19th 04 07:12 PM |
hands and neck bothering me. Geometry? | curt | General | 14 | March 8th 04 02:27 AM |
Threaded versus threadless headset | Hjalmar Duklęt | General | 64 | August 29th 03 06:55 PM |
Threadless versus treaded | Hjalmar Duklęt | Racing | 4 | August 15th 03 08:29 AM |