Troll helmet post in uk.legal

If anyone has some time extra you could ask him why he hasn't posted here
in the cycling group.

In article , wrote:
If anyone has some time extra you could ask him why he hasn't posted here
in the cycling group.

Because he's observed that the last couple of uk.legal crossposted
threads have had several posts suggesting that the trolls should take
themselves back to uk.legal and stop cluttering uk.rec.cycling with
uninformed rubbish? This is me not bothering to go and look.

On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:51:14 GMT,
_ wrote:
If anyone has some time extra you could ask him why he hasn't posted here
in the cycling group.

No thank you.

Tim.
--
God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = - @B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t,"
and there was light.

http://www.woodall.me.uk/ http://www.locofungus.btinternet.co.uk/

On Jul 15, 8:51*pm, _
wrote:
If anyone has some time extra you could ask him why he hasn't posted here
in the cycling group.

_'s definition of a troll: anyone who doesn't agree with him/her/it,
especially if they also stick up for motorists.

In this case at least, ****tery is inversely proportional to handle
length.

_ wrote:
If anyone has some time extra you could ask him why he hasn't posted here
in the cycling group.

If it's a troll then I'm very happy for it to stay under the uk.legal
bridge.

The helmet trolls we get here are bad enough as it is, why would I
invite more?

Pete.
--
Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
net http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/