A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » rec.bicycles » General
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

2nd-hand track bike - advice needed



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 1st 03, 02:51 PM
hippy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default 2nd-hand track bike - advice needed

(X-POST: aus.bicycle, rec.bicycles.misc)

I spotted this bike for sale and spoke to the owner.
I'd like any opinions about such a setup as a
beginner track bike:

Track Bike with 22inch frame (55cm)
Brooks saddle ($200AUD new?)
Reynolds 351 tubing (I assume he means 531?)
extra wheels for training,
Campag record hubs ($400AUD new)
Conti singles (used once)
Look clipless pedals
Cinelli alu bar/stem
Sugino cranks
6 chainrings
Shimano size 44 shoes
HomeMageTrainer
$650AUD

Without the trainer and shoes, he wants $500AUD
which is about the cost of a new Miche track
groupset these days, I believe.
He said the frame is 30 years old but in top
condition and really stiff - but then of course
he is going to say that!
55cm is slightly smaller than the 56cm road frame
I currently ride - does track geometry differ
vastly from road geometry? Would this be in my
region for sizing?
It has brand new singles which he said had been
raced on once and are quite expensive, along with
Record hubs and even a spare set of wheels which,
I assume, take clincher tyres for training rides.
I have a frame sitting at home that I was going
to build into a cheap track bike but I just can't
get cheap parts for it quick enough so this looks
like the next best thing. It's still cheaper than buying
a new track bike for ~$1000AUD.

So, assuming this bike is in good condition, would
you recommend it?
What would you look for in a second hand
track bike?
What questions should I ask the guy before
driving miles away to check it out?
What should I look for on it if I do drive
miles away to check it out?

Thanks for any suggestions,
hippy


Ads
  #2  
Old September 1st 03, 04:58 PM
David L. Johnson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default 2nd-hand track bike - advice needed

On Mon, 01 Sep 2003 23:51:06 +1000, hippy wrote:

(X-POST: aus.bicycle, rec.bicycles.misc)

I spotted this bike for sale and spoke to the owner. I'd like any opinions
about such a setup as a beginner track bike:

Track Bike with 22inch frame (55cm)
Brooks saddle ($200AUD new?)


Without the trainer and shoes, he wants $500AUD which is about the cost of
a new Miche track groupset these days, I believe.
He said the frame is 30 years old but in top condition and really stiff -
but then of course he is going to say that!


Well, the thirty years old is probably true, if it's 531. I ride such a
track bike. The condition of the bike and the saddle (if you want a
Brooks saddle) will matter a lot in terms of its value.

55cm is slightly smaller than the 56cm road frame I currently ride - does
track geometry differ vastly from road geometry? Would this be in my
region for sizing?


Probably. It used to be standard advice to go about 1cm smaller in a
track frame -- but that was in the days when road frames were typically
sized larger than today. You will also have to check out top tube length
and other things to see if it really fits.

Geometry of a track bike of that vintage was steep and tight for the time, which
makes it about standard for road bikes now.

It has brand new singles which he said had been raced on once and are
quite expensive,


It does depend on how long they have sat in the garage since.

along with Record hubs and even a spare set of wheels
which, I assume, take clincher tyres for training rides. I have a frame
sitting at home that I was going to build into a cheap track bike but I
just can't get cheap parts for it quick enough so this looks like the next
best thing. It's still cheaper than buying a new track bike for

~$1000AUD.

Well, yes. It will be heavier, too. To compare this to a new track bike,
the frame itself will be a pound to two pounds heavier. It will not be as
stiff as a typical aluminum frame you can get now. The components are
good -- if the hubs have been taken care of. Those Campy hubs were
beautifully made. I still have a set, though I don't use them since they
are still laced up to tubular rims.

So, assuming this bike is in good condition, would you recommend it?


Possibly

What would you look for in a second hand track bike?


Frame condition; evidence of crashes or serious repair.

What questions should I ask the guy before driving miles away to check it
out?


He's probably not going to tell you if he has crashed -- or how badly --
or if a tube has been replaced. Ask him what brand it is. That can tell
you a lot about the initial quality. If it's a Cinelli or Masi, then at
least at one time it was definitely worth something. If it's a post-1972
Legnano, maybe not.

What should I look for on it if I do drive miles away to check it out?


Ride it. See how it feels. Is it the type of bike you are looking for?
Track bikes are not all alike. Back then, a sprint bike would have round
fork tubes, really beefy lugs, steep angles, and would be strongly built
for the abuse a sprinter would mete out. A pursuit bike would have more
road-like angles and lugs, would be somewhat lighter (by the standards of
the day), and might be more comfortable for road use.

Are you planning to race this?* What event? For a pursuit specialist I
can't see getting 30-year old iron. You give away too much weight
penalty, when for a few hundred more you can get something built for the
task. Sprinters are more conservative, and still tend to ride strong,
heavier bikes (I've seen steel bars on some even recently), so that would
not be so much of a negative.

If you are just going to ride it, on the road, go for what you like.
However, do plan to hang a brake on the front -- and make sure the crown
can be drilled without problems. Mine has a big, thick Nervex crown which
is vastly overengineered; drilling that was no problem.

--

David L. Johnson

__o | If all economists were laid end to end, they would not reach a
_`\(,_ | conclusion. -- George Bernard Shaw
(_)/ (_) |


  #3  
Old September 1st 03, 05:41 PM
alan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default 2nd-hand track bike - advice needed

David Johnson covers this much more thoroughly than I can, but I'll refer
you to the fixed gear list at:

http://lists.davintech.ca

--

alan

Anyone who believes in a liberal media has never read the "Daily Oklahoman."


"hippy" wrote in message
...
(X-POST: aus.bicycle, rec.bicycles.misc)

I spotted this bike for sale and spoke to the owner.
I'd like any opinions about such a setup as a
beginner track bike:

Track Bike with 22inch frame (55cm)
Brooks saddle ($200AUD new?)
Reynolds 351 tubing (I assume he means 531?)
extra wheels for training,
Campag record hubs ($400AUD new)
Conti singles (used once)
Look clipless pedals
Cinelli alu bar/stem
Sugino cranks
6 chainrings
Shimano size 44 shoes
HomeMageTrainer
$650AUD



  #4  
Old September 1st 03, 09:56 PM
Suzy Jackson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default 2nd-hand track bike - advice needed


"hippy" wrote in message
...

lots of good stuff about a lovely sounding track bike

For $500, how far wrong can you go? Even if the frame is complete junk, I'm
sure it'd have $500 worth of parts on it.

Is it actually possible to have too many bikes?

Regards,

Suzy

PS: If you do decide you don't want it, please let me know the details of
the seller so I can buy it


  #5  
Old September 2nd 03, 12:54 AM
hippy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default 2nd-hand track bike - advice needed

"David L. Johnson" wrote in message
...
sized larger than today. You will also have to check out top tube

length
and other things to see if it really fits.


How much adjustment could I expect from a track stem in terms
of fore/aft movement, if the top tube length wasn't optimal?

Well, yes. It will be heavier, too. To compare this to a new track

bike,
the frame itself will be a pound to two pounds heavier. It will not

be as
stiff as a typical aluminum frame you can get now. The components are


Does weight really matter that much on a track bike? Especially one used
by a total track novice?

He's probably not going to tell you if he has crashed -- or how

badly --
or if a tube has been replaced. Ask him what brand it is.


I did ask about brand and he didn't know, so I guess he bought it second
hand as well. It's probably had 20 coats of paint in its 30 year life.
If I
do go and have a look at it, I'll check for any distictive markings.
Actually
if I did drive to look at it I'd probably just buy it :-)

you a lot about the initial quality. If it's a Cinelli or Masi, then

at
least at one time it was definitely worth something. If it's a

post-1972
Legnano, maybe not.


Other than paint and stickers, is there any way to tell what brand it
could
be?

Are you planning to race this? What event? For a pursuit specialist I
can't see getting 30-year old iron. You give away too much weight
penalty, when for a few hundred more you can get something built for

the
task. Sprinters are more conservative, and still tend to ride strong,
heavier bikes (I've seen steel bars on some even recently), so that

would
not be so much of a negative.


Well, I want to give track racing a shot. It's difficult/impossible for
me
to arrive early enough to use club bikes and I wanted to avoid spending
$1k on a new one. As for types of events, I have no idea. I doubt I will
be very competitive starting out anyway.

If you are just going to ride it, on the road, go for what you like.
However, do plan to hang a brake on the front -- and make sure the

crown
can be drilled without problems. Mine has a big, thick Nervex crown

which
is vastly overengineered; drilling that was no problem.


That is a slight problem - I would like to try fixed-gear on the road
but
track bikes have no brakes. I will have to check out the crown as you
say. What are the chances of fitting a different fork to it for road
use?

Thanks muchly,
hippy


  #6  
Old September 2nd 03, 12:54 AM
hippy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default 2nd-hand track bike - advice needed

"Suzy Jackson" wrote in message
...
For $500, how far wrong can you go? Even if the frame is complete

junk, I'm
sure it'd have $500 worth of parts on it.


Yeah, well that's what I was thinking. It does sound to me like
a pretty good option - but I don't know anything about track
bikes, hence this post.

Is it actually possible to have too many bikes?


Well, I have 7 at the moment (after getting rid of the kiddy bike)
and I am quite low on space in my unit with all my other crap...
But I'll always find room for another bike :-)

PS: If you do decide you don't want it, please let me know the

details of
the seller so I can buy it


I will do that.

hippy


  #7  
Old September 2nd 03, 02:41 AM
David L. Johnson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default 2nd-hand track bike - advice needed

On Mon, 01 Sep 2003 23:54:49 +0000, hippy wrote:

"David L. Johnson" wrote in message
...
sized larger than today. You will also have to check out top tube

length
and other things to see if it really fits.


How much adjustment could I expect from a track stem in terms of fore/aft
movement, if the top tube length wasn't optimal?


Huh? You might mean one of two things here.

1) How many other "track
stems" are available, and in what lengths. The answer to that is that
there is not really a "track stem", any good stem will do. Hard core
sprinters may want something really beefy, but for most of us, there is no
problem. Now, you mentioned Cinelli bars. You need a stem that matches
the Cinelli 26.4mm diameter. That is not easy to find these days, but
some do exist. You can also get new bars for a reasonable price and use
commonly-available stems.

2) There are a few _adjustable_ stems out there, including some
commonly used on track bikes. Major Taylor invented an early adjustable
stem. Maybe this bike has one? If so, typically they have quite a bit of
adjustment.

Does weight really matter that much on a track bike? Especially one used
by a total track novice?


No, not really. As a bike to get you into the sport, it could be just
fine. If it's in good condition it'll get a lot of appreciative attention.

Actually
if I did drive to look at it I'd probably just buy it :-)


I probably would, too.

Other than paint and stickers, is there any way to tell what brand it
could
be?


Sure, within reason. All three of the brands I mentioned are pretty
distincitive. Lug design is key to determining brand for many frames.
But a lot of good frames used lugs like Nervex, so it would be hard to
tell one of those from another -- and it wouldn't matter much, since those
would all be pretty similar -- and good quality.

That is a slight problem - I would like to try fixed-gear on the road but
track bikes have no brakes. I will have to check out the crown as you say.
What are the chances of fitting a different fork to it for road use?


Pretty good, actually. Modern forks tend to be 700c with tight
clearances and short rake, quite similar to track forks of the 70s in size
and rake. The crown height might be a bit more than this old one, but
probably not enough to matter. But swapping out a fork would be tedius if
you are going to use a separate fork for the road. You can, of course,
use a new fork on the track and even save a bit of weight. On the other
hand, a good fork might cost what this bike costs.

I drilled a hole in my fork crown 30 years ago, and it hasn't broken yet.
A pursuit bike might have been a different story, though.

--

David L. Johnson

__o | What is objectionable, and what is dangerous about extremists is
_`\(,_ | not that they are extreme, but that they are intolerant.
(_)/ (_) | --Robert F. Kennedy


  #8  
Old September 2nd 03, 03:03 AM
Andy G
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default 2nd-hand track bike - advice needed

i'd buy it so long as the frame is still straight.
a slightly smaller frame on the tarck is ok.
"David L. Johnson" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 01 Sep 2003 23:51:06 +1000, hippy wrote:

(X-POST: aus.bicycle, rec.bicycles.misc)

I spotted this bike for sale and spoke to the owner. I'd like any

opinions
about such a setup as a beginner track bike:

Track Bike with 22inch frame (55cm)
Brooks saddle ($200AUD new?)


Without the trainer and shoes, he wants $500AUD which is about the cost

of
a new Miche track groupset these days, I believe.
He said the frame is 30 years old but in top condition and really

stiff -
but then of course he is going to say that!


Well, the thirty years old is probably true, if it's 531. I ride such a
track bike. The condition of the bike and the saddle (if you want a
Brooks saddle) will matter a lot in terms of its value.

55cm is slightly smaller than the 56cm road frame I currently ride -

does
track geometry differ vastly from road geometry? Would this be in my
region for sizing?


Probably. It used to be standard advice to go about 1cm smaller in a
track frame -- but that was in the days when road frames were typically
sized larger than today. You will also have to check out top tube length
and other things to see if it really fits.

Geometry of a track bike of that vintage was steep and tight for the time,

which
makes it about standard for road bikes now.

It has brand new singles which he said had been raced on once and are
quite expensive,


It does depend on how long they have sat in the garage since.

along with Record hubs and even a spare set of wheels
which, I assume, take clincher tyres for training rides. I have a frame
sitting at home that I was going to build into a cheap track bike but I
just can't get cheap parts for it quick enough so this looks like the

next
best thing. It's still cheaper than buying a new track bike for

~$1000AUD.

Well, yes. It will be heavier, too. To compare this to a new track bike,
the frame itself will be a pound to two pounds heavier. It will not be as
stiff as a typical aluminum frame you can get now. The components are
good -- if the hubs have been taken care of. Those Campy hubs were
beautifully made. I still have a set, though I don't use them since they
are still laced up to tubular rims.

So, assuming this bike is in good condition, would you recommend it?


Possibly

What would you look for in a second hand track bike?


Frame condition; evidence of crashes or serious repair.

What questions should I ask the guy before driving miles away to check

it
out?


He's probably not going to tell you if he has crashed -- or how badly --
or if a tube has been replaced. Ask him what brand it is. That can tell
you a lot about the initial quality. If it's a Cinelli or Masi, then at
least at one time it was definitely worth something. If it's a post-1972
Legnano, maybe not.

What should I look for on it if I do drive miles away to check it out?


Ride it. See how it feels. Is it the type of bike you are looking for?
Track bikes are not all alike. Back then, a sprint bike would have round
fork tubes, really beefy lugs, steep angles, and would be strongly built
for the abuse a sprinter would mete out. A pursuit bike would have more
road-like angles and lugs, would be somewhat lighter (by the standards of
the day), and might be more comfortable for road use.

Are you planning to race this? What event? For a pursuit specialist I
can't see getting 30-year old iron. You give away too much weight
penalty, when for a few hundred more you can get something built for the
task. Sprinters are more conservative, and still tend to ride strong,
heavier bikes (I've seen steel bars on some even recently), so that would
not be so much of a negative.

If you are just going to ride it, on the road, go for what you like.
However, do plan to hang a brake on the front -- and make sure the crown
can be drilled without problems. Mine has a big, thick Nervex crown which
is vastly overengineered; drilling that was no problem.

--

David L. Johnson

__o | If all economists were laid end to end, they would not reach a
_`\(,_ | conclusion. -- George Bernard Shaw
(_)/ (_) |




  #9  
Old September 2nd 03, 04:07 AM
hippy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default 2nd-hand track bike - advice needed

"David L. Johnson" wrote in message
...
How much adjustment could I expect from a track stem in terms of

fore/aft
movement, if the top tube length wasn't optimal?


Huh? You might mean one of two things here.

1) How many other "track stems" are available, and in what lengths.


Yeah, that was what I meant.

2) There are a few _adjustable_ stems out there, including some


Nope, not adjustable.

Actually if I did drive to look at it I'd probably just buy it :-)


I probably would, too.


You're supposed to talk me out of it ;-)

use a new fork on the track and even save a bit of weight. On the

other
hand, a good fork might cost what this bike costs.
I drilled a hole in my fork crown 30 years ago, and it hasn't broken

yet.
A pursuit bike might have been a different story, though.


I think I will just have a look at it and decide on a course of action
from there. I might see how computer literate he is - he may be
able to email me some pictures of it?

Thanks again,
hippy


  #10  
Old September 5th 03, 02:51 PM
hippy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default 2nd-hand track bike - advice needed

"hippy" wrote in message
...
Track Bike with 22inch frame (55cm)
Brooks saddle ($200AUD new?)
Reynolds 351 tubing (I assume he means 531?)
extra wheels for training,
Campag record hubs ($400AUD new)
Conti singles (used once)
Look clipless pedals
Cinelli alu bar/stem
Sugino cranks
6 chainrings


Well thanks everyone and sorry Suzy J but I
bought this nice little ride tonight! :-)
Another bike for me yay!
Another bike for me yay!

I tell you what though... I've got some SERIOUS
learning to do with that fixed gear!!!
It's totally freaky.. can't corner like normal, freak
coz I can't grab my brakes for a trackstand like
normal, can't trackstand pretty much at all on this
compared to my freewheel fitted bikes...
No brakes makes stopping VERY difficult - I mean
sure, you can slow down with back pressure (which
in itself feels weird) but you can't just STOP like you
would with brakes. Scary!
The bike itself appears to be in top condition as the
owner said. Came with a bunch of rings, some cogs,
tools, spare wheels.. uh everything listed above :-)
It's blue with yellow Gibson stickers, yellow bar tape.
I'll get some photos on the web soon but until then,
any suggestions on the best way to learn these things?
I don't think I will be able to fit brakes to the fork
crown so I'm not going to be heading out on the road
any time soon.. is a velodrome my only other option?
Suggested starter gear? Should I go for the lowest or
not? It has 49/16 on it at the moment. The lowest
would be a 45/17 combo.
Yeah, totally freaky experience not being able to
back pedal - I must level out the cranks ALL the
time with a freewheel!

stay tuned...
hippy


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Best Way to Travel with a Bike on an Airplane F1 General 5 August 14th 03 10:39 PM
New Bike Recommendations Needed James Howe General 7 August 8th 03 05:48 AM
Need advice re. buying bike Pat General 2 July 23rd 03 07:11 PM
Returning rider, advice needed Michael S. General 2 July 23rd 03 01:44 AM
Long distance transportation advice needed Geoff G General 4 July 13th 03 04:16 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.