Cyclist attacked elderly man and broke his leg.

The 70-year-old was in Woodgrange Drive, near to the junction with
Malborough Road, when a cyclist rode past him.

The man then stopped and ran up behind the victim, pushing him into a wall.

The incident happened on Thursday, 15 October at around 8.15am.

Investigating officer PC Ben Leaver said: “This was a nasty attack on an
elderly man that left him in hospital for several days with a broken leg
and two lacerations that required stitches.

http://www.theenquirer.co.uk/elderly...uthend-street/

Mrcheerful wrote:

The 70-year-old was in Woodgrange Drive, near to the junction with
Malborough Road, when a cyclist rode past him.

The man then stopped and ran up behind the victim, pushing him into a
wall.

So in other words, the alleged assault was committed by a person on foot.

--
john smith
'_The Guardian_. Wrong about everything. All the time'
(Anon)

On 02/11/2015 14:08, John Smith wrote:
Mrcheerful wrote:

The 70-year-old was in Woodgrange Drive, near to the junction with
Malborough Road, when a cyclist rode past him.

The man then stopped and ran up behind the victim, pushing him into a
wall.

So in other words, the alleged assault was committed by a person on foot.

And in other words, your attempt at rationalisation was committed by a
sophist.

On Monday, 2 November 2015 14:10:04 UTC, John Smith wrote:

So in other words, the alleged assault was committed by a person on foot.

If I exceed the speed limit in my car can I get out of it by insisting that I am really a cyclist?

On 02/11/2015 20:15, Alycidon wrote:
On Monday, 2 November 2015 14:10:04 UTC, John Smith wrote:

So in other words, the alleged assault was committed by a person on foot.

If I exceed the speed limit in my car can I get out of it by insisting that I am really a cyclist?

No, but you could say your name was David Lang and plead insanity.

Alycidon wrote:
On Monday, 2 November 2015 14:10:04 UTC, John Smith wrote:

So in other words, the alleged assault was committed by a person on
foot.

If I exceed the speed limit in my car can I get out of it by insisting
that I am really a cyclist?

No doubt. Of course, the psychopaths would have you believe that if
there's a bicycle rusting in your garage and you subsequently commit a
crime five hundred miles away whilst on holiday, and that if you drove to
the airport and from the airport at your destination, the offence was still
committed by 'a cyclist'.

--
john smith
'_The Guardian_. Wrong about everything. All the time'
(Anon)

JNugent wrote:
On 02/11/2015 14:08, John Smith wrote:
Mrcheerful wrote:

The 70-year-old was in Woodgrange Drive, near to the junction with
Malborough Road, when a cyclist rode past him.

The man then stopped and ran up behind the victim, pushing him into a
wall.

So in other words, the alleged assault was committed by a person on foot.

And in other words, your attempt at rationalisation was committed by a
sophist.

Look up 'rationalisation' and 'sophist', thicko.


--
john smith
'_The Guardian_. Wrong about everything. All the time'
(Anon)

On 03/11/2015 16:56, John Smith wrote:
JNugent wrote:
On 02/11/2015 14:08, John Smith wrote:
Mrcheerful wrote:

The 70-year-old was in Woodgrange Drive, near to the junction with
Malborough Road, when a cyclist rode past him.

The man then stopped and ran up behind the victim, pushing him into a
wall.

So in other words, the alleged assault was committed by a person on foot.

And in other words, your attempt at rationalisation was committed by a
sophist.

Look up 'rationalisation' and 'sophist', thicko.

No need this end.

You are the one who doesn't understand them.

On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 16:58:04 UTC, John Smith wrote:
Alycidon wrote:
On Monday, 2 November 2015 14:10:04 UTC, John Smith wrote:

So in other words, the alleged assault was committed by a person on
foot.

If I exceed the speed limit in my car can I get out of it by insisting
that I am really a cyclist?

No doubt. Of course, the psychopaths would have you believe that if
there's a bicycle rusting in your garage and you subsequently commit a
crime five hundred miles away whilst on holiday, and that if you drove to
the airport and from the airport at your destination, the offence was still
committed by 'a cyclist'.

A troll called "judith" was notorious for celebrating wildly if a 4 year old girl cyclist was killed by a lorry which had mounted the pavement, but if the same girl had ran out into the road and been lightly grazed by a passing cyclist, the cyclist somehow became a "murdering criminal".

Psychopaths, the lot of them.

"Alycidon" wrote in message
...

On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 16:58:04 UTC, John Smith wrote:
Alycidon wrote:
On Monday, 2 November 2015 14:10:04 UTC, John Smith wrote:

So in other words, the alleged assault was committed by a person on
foot.

If I exceed the speed limit in my car can I get out of it by insisting
that I am really a cyclist?

No doubt. Of course, the psychopaths would have you believe that if
there's a bicycle rusting in your garage and you subsequently commit a
crime five hundred miles away whilst on holiday, and that if you drove to
the airport and from the airport at your destination, the offence was
still
committed by 'a cyclist'.

A troll called "judith" was notorious for celebrating wildly if a 4 year old
girl cyclist was killed by a lorry which had mounted the pavement, but if
the same girl had ran out into the road and been lightly grazed by a passing
cyclist, the cyclist somehow became a "murdering criminal".

Could we have a cite for that, or did you just make it up?