|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Guilty until proven innocent.
The theme throughout sports, in regards to performance enhancing drug
use, is "guilty until proven innocent". That would be fine if they could prove innocence. But they can't. No matter how many negative tests a person has (armstrong, for example) the person cannot be proven innocent so they are assumed guilty. It's a fked up system. Musashi |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Musashi wrote in message . ..
The theme throughout sports, in regards to performance enhancing drug use, is "guilty until proven innocent". That would be fine if they could prove innocence. But they can't. No matter how many negative tests a person has (armstrong, for example) the person cannot be proven innocent so they are assumed guilty. It's a fked up system. Musashi There's an old saying that one rotten apple spoils the whole barrel. In the case of pro sports there are lots and lots of proven rotten apples. So, the barrel is very spoiled. I tend not to be overly cynical--except concerning politicians and pro athletes. so, I agree the system is f' ed up. But look at who f'ed it up. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hamilton Affair - Guilty by redefinition? | Bestest Handsander | Racing | 15 | September 24th 04 07:14 AM |
Driver guilty of killing cyclist | Dave Larrington | UK | 15 | January 16th 04 08:05 PM |