|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Chain alignment friction losses
Some time ago I posted a question about the possible friction losses when various "gears" are used. Subsequently I have come across a test of both chain misalignment and sprocket size friction losses. The test was done with 53-39 front chain rings and a 11-12-13-14-15-17-19-21-28 cassette. The lowest losses were with the 39/17 combination and the highest with the 53/11. Losses with the 53/11 combination were 3.467 times higher than with the 39/17. The graph states that it is based on the "optimal shift sequence using the ring-cog combinations with the lowest frictional losses yet maintaining an acceptable range of final gear ratios." https://www.ceramicspeed.com/en/cycl...g-size-report/ The second part of the test shows the friction losses with the chain aligned and using the various ratios of the cassette and chain rings above. The lowest losses were with the 53 tooth chain ring and the highest with the 39 tooth chain ring in all "gears". In other words the 53/ 11 ratio had ~8.2 watts losses while the 39/11 ration had ~8.5 watts. The 53/28 had ~5.6 watts losses and the 39/28 had ~6.2. -- cheers, John B. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The effects of temperature on chain lubricant and friction | TheCoz | Techniques | 23 | November 25th 12 12:37 PM |
WTB: Barend shifters - friction or with friction mode | [email protected] | Marketplace | 0 | October 11th 07 02:32 PM |
Suspension energy losses? | [email protected] | Techniques | 39 | January 11th 07 05:36 PM |
Energy losses in chain drive? | Peter Fox | UK | 39 | November 27th 06 06:24 PM |
Most of the Friction In A Bicycle Chain | BretCahill | Techniques | 30 | September 18th 03 09:51 AM |