|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
Speeding driver who killed dedicated cyclist days beforeChristmas gets jail sentence
On 12/09/2020 14:43, Mike Collins wrote:
On Saturday, 12 September 2020 14:40:01 UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 12/09/2020 13:14, Mike Collins wrote: On Saturday, 12 September 2020 12:17:21 UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 12/09/2020 03:32, Mike Collins wrote: [ ... ] I admit I was wrong about the wording of the legislation, that is not the same as an apology. You were 100% wrong but you won't apologise? I see. To whom do I need to apologise? To anybody who saw your erroneous claim and were so credulous and ignorant of the facts that they might have been misled by it* and also those whom you abused for pointing out your latest error. [*Don't dismiss that possibility - you saw something which mentioned the required the legally-required standard of accuracy of a speedometer and drew entirely the wrong conclusion from it.] So nobody. Let's leave aside the fact that there are some cyclists even more stupid than you, who would have grasped at your your faulty statements as though gospel truth. How about when, in an exchange on your blatant untruth about the provisions of the C&U Regs with respect to speedometers, you said (serially: QUOTE: Nugents made a mistake as to the a provision of the C&R regulations and that fact was pointed out to him. he at least realised he was wrong because he's gone quiet about it ENDQUOTE [Yes, it was *you* who had gone quiet], or [in response to my question:] QUOTE: How much more idiotic can you possibly prove yourself to be? Surely you can't have much further to go? Do you still insist that a UK motor vehicle's speedometer (where its presence is mandated by the C&U Regs) *must* over-read? ENDQUOTE You answered: QUOTE: "Yes" ENDQUOTE So nobody is the correct answer. On reflection, I accept your implied position that nobody could possibly be so stupid as to believe what you say. I hope that helps. |
Ads |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Speeding driver who killed dedicated cyclist days beforeChristmas gets jail sentence
On Saturday, 12 September 2020 15:06:41 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 12/09/2020 14:43, Mike Collins wrote: On Saturday, 12 September 2020 14:40:01 UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 12/09/2020 13:14, Mike Collins wrote: On Saturday, 12 September 2020 12:17:21 UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 12/09/2020 03:32, Mike Collins wrote: [ ... ] I admit I was wrong about the wording of the legislation, that is not the same as an apology. You were 100% wrong but you won't apologise? I see. To whom do I need to apologise? To anybody who saw your erroneous claim and were so credulous and ignorant of the facts that they might have been misled by it* and also those whom you abused for pointing out your latest error. [*Don't dismiss that possibility - you saw something which mentioned the required the legally-required standard of accuracy of a speedometer and drew entirely the wrong conclusion from it.] So nobody. Let's leave aside the fact that there are some cyclists even more stupid than you, who would have grasped at your your faulty statements as though gospel truth. How about when, in an exchange on your blatant untruth about the provisions of the C&U Regs with respect to speedometers, you said (serially: QUOTE: Nugents made a mistake as to the a provision of the C&R regulations and that fact was pointed out to him. he at least realised he was wrong because he's gone quiet about it ENDQUOTE [Yes, it was *you* who had gone quiet], or [in response to my question:] QUOTE: How much more idiotic can you possibly prove yourself to be? Surely you can't have much further to go? Do you still insist that a UK motor vehicle's speedometer (where its presence is mandated by the C&U Regs) *must* over-read? ENDQUOTE You answered: QUOTE: "Yes" ENDQUOTE So nobody is the correct answer. On reflection, I accept your implied position that nobody could possibly be so stupid as to believe what you say. I hope that helps. Thank you for the playground insult. |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Speeding driver who killed dedicated cyclist days beforeChristmas gets jail sentence
On 12/09/2020 15:12, Mike Collins wrote:
On Saturday, 12 September 2020 15:06:41 UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 12/09/2020 14:43, Mike Collins wrote: On Saturday, 12 September 2020 14:40:01 UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 12/09/2020 13:14, Mike Collins wrote: On Saturday, 12 September 2020 12:17:21 UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 12/09/2020 03:32, Mike Collins wrote: [ ... ] I admit I was wrong about the wording of the legislation, that is not the same as an apology. You were 100% wrong but you won't apologise? I see. To whom do I need to apologise? To anybody who saw your erroneous claim and were so credulous and ignorant of the facts that they might have been misled by it* and also those whom you abused for pointing out your latest error. [*Don't dismiss that possibility - you saw something which mentioned the required the legally-required standard of accuracy of a speedometer and drew entirely the wrong conclusion from it.] So nobody. Let's leave aside the fact that there are some cyclists even more stupid than you, who would have grasped at your your faulty statements as though gospel truth. How about when, in an exchange on your blatant untruth about the provisions of the C&U Regs with respect to speedometers, you said (serially: QUOTE: Nugents made a mistake as to the a provision of the C&R regulations and that fact was pointed out to him. he at least realised he was wrong because he's gone quiet about it ENDQUOTE [Yes, it was *you* who had gone quiet], or [in response to my question:] QUOTE: How much more idiotic can you possibly prove yourself to be? Surely you can't have much further to go? Do you still insist that a UK motor vehicle's speedometer (where its presence is mandated by the C&U Regs) *must* over-read? ENDQUOTE You answered: QUOTE: "Yes" ENDQUOTE So nobody is the correct answer. On reflection, I accept your implied position that nobody could possibly be so stupid as to believe what you say. I hope that helps. Thank you for the playground insult. It's the only construction of what you said that makes sense. You lied, but insist that no-one was stupid enough to be misled by your lie. I'll go along with that. Unless you want to change it (again)? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Jail for speeding driver who killed Cambridge cyclist | Simon Mason[_6_] | UK | 0 | August 25th 20 11:43 AM |
Jail sentence for driver who killed cyclist when he was ‘running late’, | Bod[_5_] | UK | 1 | March 17th 16 10:32 AM |
RLJ driver gets jail sentence for killing cyclist | Simon Mason | UK | 7 | August 25th 11 09:12 AM |
Driver who killed cyclist told to expect jail. | Simon Mason[_2_] | UK | 22 | February 3rd 08 08:17 PM |
Driver who killed a cyclist gets just under the maximum sentence. | Bill Z. | Social Issues | 1 | January 29th 08 04:06 AM |