Yet another pavement motorist kills and injures pedestrians.

On 19/04/2012 06:42, Doug wrote:

[ ... ]

... In this case the car was also travelling at speed across the pavement.

Under control or out of control?

On Apr 19, 6:43*pm, Tony Dragon wrote:
On 19/04/2012 09:53, Simon Mason wrote:

On Apr 19, 6:42 am, *wrote:

Obviously, for the label 'pavement motorist'. In this case the car was
also travelling at speed across the pavement. It is plain that this is
all it takes for a motorist to kill someone on a pavement.

Indeed - they should not be allowed in a car unless they can stay ON
the road.

--
Simon Mason

Indeed, cyclists should not be allowed to cycle unless they can stay on
the road.

Cyclists could never cause anything approaching as much damage as
pavement motorists. Indeed, cyclists are seriously at risk from
pavement motorists, a risk which cannot be reciprocated.

-- .
A driving licence is sometimes a licence to kill.

On 20/04/2012 06:41, Doug wrote:
On Apr 19, 6:43 pm, Tony wrote:
On 19/04/2012 09:53, Simon Mason wrote:

On Apr 19, 6:42 am, wrote:

Obviously, for the label 'pavement motorist'. In this case the car was
also travelling at speed across the pavement. It is plain that this is
all it takes for a motorist to kill someone on a pavement.

Indeed - they should not be allowed in a car unless they can stay ON
the road.

--
Simon Mason

Indeed, cyclists should not be allowed to cycle unless they can stay on
the road.

Cyclists could never cause anything approaching as much damage as
pavement motorists. Indeed, cyclists are seriously at risk from
pavement motorists, a risk which cannot be reciprocated.

-- .
A driving licence is sometimes a licence to kill.

So you refuse to criticise pavement cyclists.