uk.rec.cycling.moderation

On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 20:30:17 +0000 (UTC), Ian Smith
wrote:

I ran out of any good faith in your motives about the seventh time you
protested innocence and assured one and all you had learnt your lesson
and really were going to ignore her from now on.

Really. Funny, because it looked to me as if that was where you
started from.

This is a sterile exchange. I will leave you to your misconceptions.
Hopefully one day we will meet in meatspace and you will realise that
it's not quite as simple as you think.

Guy
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk/urc

jms wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:55:41 -0700 (PDT), "Just zis Guy, you know?"
wrote:

On Oct 19, 3:31 pm, "Mr Benn" wrote:

You will have to excuse Guy Chapman, he has an unhealthy obsession with
Judith.
Funny man.


He is funny I agree - but he was spot on here wasn't he?

You have demonstrated yet again in this very post that you *cannot*
let things go - you must always have the last word in every thread.

Well here it is - just for you :

****wit.


How does that work?
If Guy has to have the last word and jms provides it then is Guy jms?
If that's the case then jms must be Lou Knee.

Case solved.

JMS = Lou Knee

--
Its never too late to reinvent the bicycle

On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:32:51 +0100, Keitht KeithT wrote:

jms wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:55:41 -0700 (PDT), "Just zis Guy, you know?"
wrote:

On Oct 19, 3:31 pm, "Mr Benn" wrote:

You will have to excuse Guy Chapman, he has an unhealthy obsession with
Judith.
Funny man.


He is funny I agree - but he was spot on here wasn't he?

You have demonstrated yet again in this very post that you *cannot*
let things go - you must always have the last word in every thread.

Well here it is - just for you :

****wit.


How does that work?
If Guy has to have the last word and jms provides it then is Guy jms?
If that's the case then jms must be Lou Knee.

Case solved.

JMS = Lou Knee

Now then Thick.

What was it Panther described you as part of :
"a small number of up and coming troll lovers"

--

British Medical Association (BMA)
View on helmets:

Several studies provided solid scientific evidence that bicycle helmets
protect against head, brain, severe brain and facial injuries,
as well as death, as a result of cycling accidents

On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 20:41:14 +0100, "Just zis Guy, you know?"
wrote:

On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 19:04:19 +0100, Marc
wrote:

But accurate? :-(

No. Not even slightly. If it fell off the face fo the earth tomorrow
I would not even wonder where it had gone.

Here's "unhealthy obsession" for you:
http://groups.google.com/group/uk.rec.cycling/search?q=chapman+author%3Ajudith

Guy


Did you see that post which Ian Smith made about you:


"He likes to wallow in ****, then raise an almighty protest that he's
covered in ****. It's terrible that all the **** sticks to him, when
all he does is lie down in it, roll around in it, throw it up in the
air and give it a good stir whenever an opportunity arises."


It really was so appropriate wasn't it.


--

I have never said that I encourage my children to wear helmets.
I would challenge judith to find the place where I said I encourage my children to wear helmets.
I encourage my children to wear helmets. (Guy Chapman)

Ian Smith wrote:

He likes to wallow in ****, then raise an almighty protest that he's
covered in ****. It's terrible that all the **** sticks to him, when
all he does is lie down in it, roll around in it, throw it up in the
air and give it a good stir whenever an opportunity arises.

He does it all with an apparent cast-iron faith in his hard-done-by
innocence. Apparently, if you throw **** up in the air then stand
around looking aggrieved, it's someone else's fault if it lands on
you.

He'd feel picked on if he got stung after giving a wasps nest a good
prodding with a pointy stick. He'd then go and find another wasps
nest to prod just to prove how blameless he is.

I can only assume there's something wrong with him - some fundamental
inability to recognise cause and effect, maybe. Some disjoint where
he thinks that being annoying proves he is important. It's almost
indistinguishable from troll behaviour, but altogether more strange
mainly because it's his own doorstep he craps on, his own pool his
****es in (proudly and publicly, before complaining about the turd
that's floating in the deep end).


Great post, The first paragraph especially.