A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » Regional Cycling » UK
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Speeding driver who killed dedicated cyclist days before Christmasgets jail sentence



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old September 8th 20, 11:58 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
TMS320
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,695
Default Speeding driver who killed dedicated cyclist days beforeChristmas gets jail sentence

On 08/09/2020 23:37, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 17:25, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 15:25, JNugent wrote:



You could read the thread and realise your mistake.


I have read it and not made a mistake.


You made a mistake by wrongly assuming...


You assume that "not made a mistake" does not mean what it says.


Ads
  #22  
Old September 9th 20, 12:14 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Mike Collins
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 584
Default Speeding driver who killed dedicated cyclist days beforeChristmas gets jail sentence

On Tuesday, 8 September 2020 23:35:54 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 17:25, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 15:25, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 14:15, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 13:42, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 10:02, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 00:49, JNugent wrote:
On 07/09/2020 22:02, Mike Collins wrote:
On Monday, 7 September 2020 17:23:39 UTC+1, JNugentĀ* wrote:

We need to bear in mind the Police investigators have to report
a speed based on their measurements and errors then give the
defendant the benefit of the doubt and report the MINIMUM
possible speed. If the report showed a MINIMUM speed of 59mph
it was more likely an indicated speed of 90mph.

.....

Do you actually realise the depth of your own ignorance?

Not knowing the meaning of the word "likely" shows you don't know
the depth of yours.

You have, of course, missed the point entirely and snipped the wrong
things.

Only in your worthless opinion.

Please yourself.

You could read the thread and realise your mistake.


I have read it and not made a mistake.


Collins made a mistake as to the a provision of the C&R regulations and
that fact was pointed out to him. he at least realised he was wrong
because he's gone quiet about it.


This may come as a surprise but not everyone's life revolves around this newsgroup.

https://www.thecarexpert.co.uk/how-a...r-speedometer/

Before you answer get someone to explain Black Body Radiation to you.
  #23  
Old September 9th 20, 01:03 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Mike Collins
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 584
Default Speeding driver who killed dedicated cyclist days beforeChristmas gets jail sentence

On Wednesday, 9 September 2020 00:14:07 UTC+1, Mike Collins wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 September 2020 23:35:54 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 17:25, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 15:25, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 14:15, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 13:42, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 10:02, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 00:49, JNugent wrote:
On 07/09/2020 22:02, Mike Collins wrote:
On Monday, 7 September 2020 17:23:39 UTC+1, JNugentĀ* wrote:

We need to bear in mind the Police investigators have to report
a speed based on their measurements and errors then give the
defendant the benefit of the doubt and report the MINIMUM
possible speed. If the report showed a MINIMUM speed of 59mph
it was more likely an indicated speed of 90mph.

.....

Do you actually realise the depth of your own ignorance?

Not knowing the meaning of the word "likely" shows you don't know
the depth of yours.

You have, of course, missed the point entirely and snipped the wrong
things.

Only in your worthless opinion.

Please yourself.

You could read the thread and realise your mistake.

I have read it and not made a mistake.


Collins made a mistake as to the a provision of the C&R regulations and
that fact was pointed out to him. he at least realised he was wrong
because he's gone quiet about it.


This may come as a surprise but not everyone's life revolves around this newsgroup.

https://www.thecarexpert.co.uk/how-a...r-speedometer/

Before you answer get someone to explain Black Body Radiation to you.


Nugents made a mistake as to the a provision of the C&R regulations and that fact was pointed out to him. he at least realised he was wrong because he's gone quiet about it.
  #24  
Old September 9th 20, 02:02 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
JNugent[_12_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 626
Default Speeding driver who killed dedicated cyclist days beforeChristmas gets jail sentence

On 09/09/2020 00:14, Mike Collins wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 September 2020 23:35:54 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 17:25, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 15:25, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 14:15, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 13:42, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 10:02, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 00:49, JNugent wrote:
On 07/09/2020 22:02, Mike Collins wrote:
On Monday, 7 September 2020 17:23:39 UTC+1, JNugentĀ* wrote:

We need to bear in mind the Police investigators have to report
a speed based on their measurements and errors then give the
defendant the benefit of the doubt and report the MINIMUM
possible speed. If the report showed a MINIMUM speed of 59mph
it was more likely an indicated speed of 90mph.

.....

Do you actually realise the depth of your own ignorance?

Not knowing the meaning of the word "likely" shows you don't know
the depth of yours.

You have, of course, missed the point entirely and snipped the wrong
things.

Only in your worthless opinion.

Please yourself.

You could read the thread and realise your mistake.

I have read it and not made a mistake.


Collins made a mistake as to the a provision of the C&R regulations and
that fact was pointed out to him. he at least realised he was wrong
because he's gone quiet about it.


This may come as a surprise but not everyone's life revolves around this newsgroup.


*Yours* certainly does.

https://www.thecarexpert.co.uk/how-a...r-speedometer/


Unclicked and unread because irrelevant.

Your claim was that the law provides that a speedometer must over-read.
You've even tried to cover it up by snipping it from the above text.

Before you answer get someone to explain Black Body Radiation to you.


Your diversion attempt will not make your silly claim any less silly,
will it?
  #25  
Old September 9th 20, 02:02 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
JNugent[_12_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 626
Default Speeding driver who killed dedicated cyclist days beforeChristmas gets jail sentence

On 09/09/2020 01:03, Mike Collins wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 September 2020 00:14:07 UTC+1, Mike Collins wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 September 2020 23:35:54 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 17:25, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 15:25, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 14:15, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 13:42, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 10:02, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 00:49, JNugent wrote:
On 07/09/2020 22:02, Mike Collins wrote:
On Monday, 7 September 2020 17:23:39 UTC+1, JNugentĀ* wrote:

We need to bear in mind the Police investigators have to report
a speed based on their measurements and errors then give the
defendant the benefit of the doubt and report the MINIMUM
possible speed. If the report showed a MINIMUM speed of 59mph
it was more likely an indicated speed of 90mph.

.....

Do you actually realise the depth of your own ignorance?

Not knowing the meaning of the word "likely" shows you don't know
the depth of yours.

You have, of course, missed the point entirely and snipped the wrong
things.

Only in your worthless opinion.

Please yourself.

You could read the thread and realise your mistake.

I have read it and not made a mistake.

Collins made a mistake as to the a provision of the C&R regulations and
that fact was pointed out to him. he at least realised he was wrong
because he's gone quiet about it.


This may come as a surprise but not everyone's life revolves around this newsgroup.

https://www.thecarexpert.co.uk/how-a...r-speedometer/

Before you answer get someone to explain Black Body Radiation to you.


Nugents made a mistake as to the a provision of the C&R regulations and that fact was pointed out to him. he at least realised he was wrong because he's gone quiet about it.


Gibberish from Collins.

Yet again.
  #26  
Old September 9th 20, 02:53 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Mike Collins
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 584
Default Speeding driver who killed dedicated cyclist days beforeChristmas gets jail sentence

On Wednesday, 9 September 2020 02:00:52 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 09/09/2020 00:14, Mike Collins wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 September 2020 23:35:54 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 17:25, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 15:25, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 14:15, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 13:42, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 10:02, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 00:49, JNugent wrote:
On 07/09/2020 22:02, Mike Collins wrote:
On Monday, 7 September 2020 17:23:39 UTC+1, JNugentĀ* wrote:

We need to bear in mind the Police investigators have to report
a speed based on their measurements and errors then give the
defendant the benefit of the doubt and report the MINIMUM
possible speed. If the report showed a MINIMUM speed of 59mph
it was more likely an indicated speed of 90mph.

.....

Do you actually realise the depth of your own ignorance?

Not knowing the meaning of the word "likely" shows you don't know
the depth of yours.

You have, of course, missed the point entirely and snipped the wrong
things.

Only in your worthless opinion.

Please yourself.

You could read the thread and realise your mistake.

I have read it and not made a mistake.

Collins made a mistake as to the a provision of the C&R regulations and
that fact was pointed out to him. he at least realised he was wrong
because he's gone quiet about it.


This may come as a surprise but not everyone's life revolves around this newsgroup.


*Yours* certainly does.

https://www.thecarexpert.co.uk/how-a...r-speedometer/


Unclicked and unread because irrelevant.

Your claim was that the law provides that a speedometer must over-read.
You've even tried to cover it up by snipping it from the above text.

Before you answer get someone to explain Black Body Radiation to you.


Your diversion attempt will not make your silly claim any less silly,
will it?


So you deny a vehicle in motion occupies a large but finite number of distinct energy states as defined by Planck's Constant?

  #27  
Old September 9th 20, 03:10 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
JNugent[_12_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 626
Default Speeding driver who killed dedicated cyclist days beforeChristmas gets jail sentence

On 09/09/2020 02:53, Mike Collins wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 September 2020 02:00:52 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 09/09/2020 00:14, Mike Collins wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 September 2020 23:35:54 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 17:25, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 15:25, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 14:15, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 13:42, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 10:02, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 00:49, JNugent wrote:
On 07/09/2020 22:02, Mike Collins wrote:
On Monday, 7 September 2020 17:23:39 UTC+1, JNugentĀ* wrote:

We need to bear in mind the Police investigators have to report
a speed based on their measurements and errors then give the
defendant the benefit of the doubt and report the MINIMUM
possible speed. If the report showed a MINIMUM speed of 59mph
it was more likely an indicated speed of 90mph.

.....

Do you actually realise the depth of your own ignorance?

Not knowing the meaning of the word "likely" shows you don't know
the depth of yours.

You have, of course, missed the point entirely and snipped the wrong
things.

Only in your worthless opinion.

Please yourself.

You could read the thread and realise your mistake.

I have read it and not made a mistake.

Collins made a mistake as to the a provision of the C&R regulations and
that fact was pointed out to him. he at least realised he was wrong
because he's gone quiet about it.


This may come as a surprise but not everyone's life revolves around this newsgroup.


*Yours* certainly does.

https://www.thecarexpert.co.uk/how-a...r-speedometer/


Unclicked and unread because irrelevant.

Your claim was that the law provides that a speedometer must over-read.
You've even tried to cover it up by snipping it from the above text.

Before you answer get someone to explain Black Body Radiation to you.


Your diversion attempt will not make your silly claim any less silly,
will it?


So you deny a vehicle in motion occupies a large but finite number of distinct energy states as defined by Planck's Constant?


How much more idiotic can you possibly prove yourself to be?

Surely you can't have much further to go?

Do you still insist that a UK motor vehicle's speedometer (where its
presence is mandated by the C&U Regs) *must* over-read?
  #28  
Old September 9th 20, 04:43 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Mike Collins
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 584
Default Speeding driver who killed dedicated cyclist days beforeChristmas gets jail sentence

On Wednesday, 9 September 2020 15:09:08 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 09/09/2020 02:53, Mike Collins wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 September 2020 02:00:52 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 09/09/2020 00:14, Mike Collins wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 September 2020 23:35:54 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 17:25, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 15:25, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 14:15, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 13:42, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 10:02, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 00:49, JNugent wrote:
On 07/09/2020 22:02, Mike Collins wrote:
On Monday, 7 September 2020 17:23:39 UTC+1, JNugentĀ* wrote:

We need to bear in mind the Police investigators have to report
a speed based on their measurements and errors then give the
defendant the benefit of the doubt and report the MINIMUM
possible speed. If the report showed a MINIMUM speed of 59mph
it was more likely an indicated speed of 90mph.

.....

Do you actually realise the depth of your own ignorance?

Not knowing the meaning of the word "likely" shows you don't know
the depth of yours.

You have, of course, missed the point entirely and snipped the wrong
things.

Only in your worthless opinion.

Please yourself.

You could read the thread and realise your mistake.

I have read it and not made a mistake.

Collins made a mistake as to the a provision of the C&R regulations and
that fact was pointed out to him. he at least realised he was wrong
because he's gone quiet about it.


This may come as a surprise but not everyone's life revolves around this newsgroup.

*Yours* certainly does.

https://www.thecarexpert.co.uk/how-a...r-speedometer/

Unclicked and unread because irrelevant.

Your claim was that the law provides that a speedometer must over-read..
You've even tried to cover it up by snipping it from the above text.

Before you answer get someone to explain Black Body Radiation to you.

Your diversion attempt will not make your silly claim any less silly,
will it?


So you deny a vehicle in motion occupies a large but finite number of distinct energy states as defined by Planck's Constant?


How much more idiotic can you possibly prove yourself to be?

Surely you can't have much further to go?

Do you still insist that a UK motor vehicle's speedometer (where its
presence is mandated by the C&U Regs) *must* over-read?


Yes
  #29  
Old September 9th 20, 07:25 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Mike Collins
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 584
Default Speeding driver who killed dedicated cyclist days beforeChristmas gets jail sentence

On Wednesday, 9 September 2020 16:43:21 UTC+1, Mike Collins wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 September 2020 15:09:08 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 09/09/2020 02:53, Mike Collins wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 September 2020 02:00:52 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 09/09/2020 00:14, Mike Collins wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 September 2020 23:35:54 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 17:25, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 15:25, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 14:15, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 13:42, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 10:02, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 00:49, JNugent wrote:
On 07/09/2020 22:02, Mike Collins wrote:
On Monday, 7 September 2020 17:23:39 UTC+1, JNugentĀ* wrote:

We need to bear in mind the Police investigators have to report
a speed based on their measurements and errors then give the
defendant the benefit of the doubt and report the MINIMUM
possible speed. If the report showed a MINIMUM speed of 59mph
it was more likely an indicated speed of 90mph.

.....

Do you actually realise the depth of your own ignorance?

Not knowing the meaning of the word "likely" shows you don't know
the depth of yours.

You have, of course, missed the point entirely and snipped the wrong
things.

Only in your worthless opinion.

Please yourself.

You could read the thread and realise your mistake.

I have read it and not made a mistake.

Collins made a mistake as to the a provision of the C&R regulations and
that fact was pointed out to him. he at least realised he was wrong
because he's gone quiet about it.


This may come as a surprise but not everyone's life revolves around this newsgroup.

*Yours* certainly does.

https://www.thecarexpert.co.uk/how-a...r-speedometer/

Unclicked and unread because irrelevant.

Your claim was that the law provides that a speedometer must over-read.
You've even tried to cover it up by snipping it from the above text.

Before you answer get someone to explain Black Body Radiation to you.

Your diversion attempt will not make your silly claim any less silly,
will it?

So you deny a vehicle in motion occupies a large but finite number of distinct energy states as defined by Planck's Constant?


How much more idiotic can you possibly prove yourself to be?

Surely you can't have much further to go?

Do you still insist that a UK motor vehicle's speedometer (where its
presence is mandated by the C&U Regs) *must* over-read?


Yes


Using Nugent Logic, Nugent's failure to respond in a timely fashion proves I am right.
  #30  
Old September 10th 20, 12:53 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
JNugent[_12_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 626
Default Speeding driver who killed dedicated cyclist days before Christmas gets jail sentence

On 09/09/2020 16:43, Mike Collins wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 September 2020 15:09:08 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 09/09/2020 02:53, Mike Collins wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 September 2020 02:00:52 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 09/09/2020 00:14, Mike Collins wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 September 2020 23:35:54 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 17:25, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 15:25, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 14:15, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 13:42, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 10:02, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/09/2020 00:49, JNugent wrote:
On 07/09/2020 22:02, Mike Collins wrote:
On Monday, 7 September 2020 17:23:39 UTC+1, JNugentĀ* wrote:

We need to bear in mind the Police investigators have to report
a speed based on their measurements and errors then give the
defendant the benefit of the doubt and report the MINIMUM
possible speed. If the report showed a MINIMUM speed of 59mph
it was more likely an indicated speed of 90mph.

.....

Do you actually realise the depth of your own ignorance?

Not knowing the meaning of the word "likely" shows you don't know
the depth of yours.

You have, of course, missed the point entirely and snipped the wrong
things.

Only in your worthless opinion.

Please yourself.

You could read the thread and realise your mistake.

I have read it and not made a mistake.

Collins made a mistake as to the a provision of the C&R regulations and
that fact was pointed out to him. he at least realised he was wrong
because he's gone quiet about it.


This may come as a surprise but not everyone's life revolves around this newsgroup.

*Yours* certainly does.

https://www.thecarexpert.co.uk/how-a...r-speedometer/

Unclicked and unread because irrelevant.

Your claim was that the law provides that a speedometer must over-read.
You've even tried to cover it up by snipping it from the above text.

Before you answer get someone to explain Black Body Radiation to you.

Your diversion attempt will not make your silly claim any less silly,
will it?

So you deny a vehicle in motion occupies a large but finite number of distinct energy states as defined by Planck's Constant?


How much more idiotic can you possibly prove yourself to be?

Surely you can't have much further to go?

Do you still insist that a UK motor vehicle's speedometer (where its
presence is mandated by the C&U Regs) *must* over-read?


Yes


sigh

Please cite the Regulation.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Jail for speeding driver who killed Cambridge cyclist Simon Mason[_6_] UK 0 August 25th 20 11:43 AM
Jail sentence for driver who killed cyclist when he was ā€˜running lateā€™, Bod[_5_] UK 1 March 17th 16 10:32 AM
RLJ driver gets jail sentence for killing cyclist Simon Mason UK 7 August 25th 11 09:12 AM
Driver who killed cyclist told to expect jail. Simon Mason[_2_] UK 22 February 3rd 08 08:17 PM
Driver who killed a cyclist gets just under the maximum sentence. Bill Z. Social Issues 1 January 29th 08 04:06 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2020 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.