|
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
May 15th 11, 07:53 PM
posted to rec.bicycles.racing
|
|||
|
|||
UCI List of all dopers ranked 0-10 "Most likely to succeed"
On May 14, 7:11*am, Anton Berlin wrote:
So is the consensus these are clean riders or just really good dopers? Reality isn't subject to a majority vote. The folks that do the testing know what this means but I doubt if we will get to learn the finer details of the ranking system. The whole thing generates a lot more questions than answers. Phil H 
|
| Ads |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| UCI List of all dopers ranked 0-10 "Most likely to succeed" | Anton Berlin | Racing | 1 | May 14th 11 09:08 PM |
| UCI List of all dopers ranked 0-10 "Most likely to succeed" | Anton Berlin | Racing | 8 | May 14th 11 05:49 PM |
| UCI List of all dopers ranked 0-10 "Most likely to succeed" | RicodJour | Racing | 0 | May 14th 11 04:10 PM |
| What is the "rock family tree" of dopers ?? | S Perryman | Racing | 25 | May 25th 10 03:10 PM |
| Number 2 on the list "Best names for a pro cycling team" | [email protected] | Racing | 4 | June 11th 07 09:07 PM |
Linear Mode
