#1
|
|||
|
|||
I was misled
|
Ads |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I was misled
"So we have an obligation of enormous consequence, an obligation to guarantee that Saddam Hussein cannot ignore the United Nations. He cannot be permitted to go unobserved and unimpeded toward his horrific objective of amassing a stockpile of weapons of mass destruction. This is not a matter about which there should be any debate whatsoever in the Security Council, or, certainly, in this Nation." John Kerry on Senate floor, 11/9/97. Bill "fix your user name, Jobst" S. It has occurred to me, as it should to you, that the intelligence reports which John Kerry was receiving were not of the same quality that George Bush was receiving. Indeed, many if not all of his reports were filtered down through the present administration. Therefore, how can you believe that the remarks of the two men should be considered equally when one is the sitting president and the other is not privy to all of the same information? Pat in TX. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I was misled
"S o r n i" wrote:
wrote: http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1310344&l=42227 "So we have an obligation of enormous consequence, an obligation to guarantee that Saddam Hussein cannot ignore the United Nations. He cannot be permitted to go unobserved and unimpeded toward his horrific objective of amassing a stockpile of weapons of mass destruction. This is not a matter about which there should be any debate whatsoever in the Security Council, or, certainly, in this Nation." John Kerry on Senate floor, 11/9/97. Jobst is just gullible because he would rather get his news from biased sources so he doesn't have to confront the truth. For example, when Russian President Vladimir Putin recently told the press how Russia warned us repeatedly that they had solid evidence that Iraq was planning to attack the US and US interests abroad after the 9/11 attacks... http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3819057.stm Guess how the major networks in the US handled it? NOT A FRIGGIN' WORD. The NY Times and other liberal papers buried the story at the bottom of an inside page. If you'd rather form an opinion unencumbered by the facts, by all means follow the links to the propaganda that Jobst posted. If you'd rather actually know what's going on, I'd suggest starting with an unbiased compilation like the Drudge Report (recently determined to be by far less biased than any other news source that was analyzed). That becomes pretty obvious when you see it... www.drudgereport.com Mark Hickey Habanero Cycles http://www.habcycles.com Home of the $695 ti frame |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I was misled
"Mark Hickey" wrote in message
[...] For example, when Russian President Vladimir Putin recently told the press how Russia warned us repeatedly that they had solid evidence that Iraq was planning to attack the US and US interests abroad after the 9/11 attacks... http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3819057.stm Hmmm, it seems Putin is finally repaying Dubbya for his redefining the Chechyns from freedom fighters to terrorists. How very convenient it all is. -- A: Top-posters. Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
I was misled
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
I was misled
I was misled into thinking that I was browsing rec.bicycles.misc....oh
wait I am browsing the right forum. Shouldn't you be posting to misc.activism.progressive or talk.politics.misc???? -- |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
I was misled
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
I was misled
"Kevan Smith" wrote It's not like it matters. Both men are comitted to continuing the illegal occupation of Iraq, heaping more misery on a country which should by rights be getting reparations payments instead. Bush shouldn't be President; he should be in the dock for war crimes. This Iraq War is a great national shame. You mean the UN sanctioned "illegal occupation" put in place after GW I? Pete |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|