|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
An experiment to prove the helmet law proponants RIGHT (or wrong)
"Peter Clinch" wrote in message ... Edward Dolan wrote: You are too incredibly stupid to even know what you are talking about. You are too incredibly stupid to even know what you are talking about. You are too incredibly stupid to even know what you are talking about. You are too incredibly stupid to even know what you are talking about. You are too incredibly stupid to even know what you are talking about. You can't argue with the facts, so you resort to name calling. The names don't bother me, and that the facts don't bother you speaks for itself. What speaks for itself is that you and DiscoDuck are a couple of screwballs. I do not believe in plowing the same old ground over and over, especially for nuts like the two of you who do not know how to read. Pete. -- Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/ By the way, congrats on having the world's worst signature. Every time I see it I want to puke. -- Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Edward Dolan wrote:
What speaks for itself is that you and DiscoDuck are a couple of screwballs. I do not believe in plowing the same old ground over and over, especially for nuts like the two of you who do not know how to read. You can't argue with the facts, so you resort to name calling. The names don't bother me, and that the facts don't bother you speaks for itself. Pete. -- Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 03:48:51 -0600, "Edward Dolan"
wrote: Ed Dolan the great - Minnesota An anagram of which is "Oh Dear Me! Stagnant deletion" *plonk* |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Peter Clinch" wrote in message ... Edward Dolan wrote: What speaks for itself is that you and DiscoDuck are a couple of screwballs. I do not believe in plowing the same old ground over and over, especially for nuts like the two of you who do not know how to read. You can't argue with the facts, so you resort to name calling. The names don't bother me, and that the facts don't bother you speaks for itself. What speaks for itself is that you and DiscoDuck are a couple of screwballs. I do not believe in plowing the same old ground over and over, especially for nuts like the two of you who do not know how to read. Pete. -- Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/ By the way, congrats on having the world's worst signature. Every time I see it I want to puke. -- Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
What speaks for itself is that you and DiscoDuck are a couple of
screwballs. I do not believe in plowing the same old ground over and over, especially for nuts like the two of you who do not know how to read. You can't argue with the facts, so you resort to name calling. The names don't bother him, and that the facts don't bother you speaks for itself. Mark. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Mark Thompson" wrote in message .4... What speaks for itself is that you and DiscoDuck are a couple of screwballs. I do not believe in plowing the same old ground over and over, especially for nuts like the two of you who do not know how to read. You can't argue with the facts, so you resort to name calling. The names don't bother him, and that the facts don't bother you speaks for itself. Exactly. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Rich" wrote in message k... "Mark Thompson" wrote in message .4... Edward Dolan wrote: What speaks for itself is that you and DiscoDuck are a couple of screwballs. I do not believe in plowing the same old ground over and over, especially for nuts like the two of you who do not know how to read. You can't argue with the facts, so you resort to name calling. The names don't bother him, and that the facts don't bother you speaks for itself. Exactly. What facts! Just some inane statistic that no one, least of all the bunch of you, can make any sense of. Those who advocate breaking the law belong in jail. There you would learn a whole new set of rules and regulations that would govern your every waking hour. That would knock some sense into your addled brains. -- Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
An experiment to prove the helmet law proponants RIGHT (or wrong) | Judith Wheat | UK | 5 | December 5th 04 06:15 AM |
An experiment to prove the helmet law proponants RIGHT (or wrong) | elyob | UK | 0 | November 30th 04 09:13 AM |
published helmet research - not troll | patrick | Racing | 1790 | November 8th 04 03:16 AM |
Reports from Sweden | Garry Jones | General | 17 | October 14th 03 05:23 PM |
Reports from Sweden | Garry Jones | Social Issues | 14 | October 14th 03 05:23 PM |