A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » rec.bicycles » Mountain Biking
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

"Equestrians Say 'No Way!' to Mountain Bikes on City Trails "



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 21st 09, 11:45 PM posted to alt.mountain-bike,rec.bicycles.soc,rec.backcountry,ca.environment,sci.environment
Mike Vandeman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,798
Default "Equestrians Say 'No Way!' to Mountain Bikes on City Trails "

I wonder how in the world "misinformation" can be "based upon personal
experiences"? First-hand personal experiences are the data of science.

Mike


http://www.theequestriannews.com/new...railsnoway.htm

By Nancy Cole

Mountain bikers looking to gain entry to Los Angeles City Parks met
with unified opposition from hikers and equestrians, who refused to
give an inch in two meetings convened by the city's newly formed
Bicycle Master Planning Committee (BMPC) at L.A. City Hall.

Held under the auspices of the Off-Road Bicycle Policy Stakeholder
Advisory Group, the meetings seem to be the result of the well-funded
bicyclists' increasingly aggressive efforts to expand their territory
for recreational riding beyond the state and county parks and into
city parks, where they're currently prohibited. While bicyclists say
it is a matter of fairness*that all residents should have equal rights
to enjoy city property*the equestrians are concerned about the
potential hazards of combining horses and mountain bikers on what are
often steep and narrow trails.

The meetings, held April 15 and May 13, were intended to be neutral
and exploratory, but it did not go unnoticed that everything from the
name chosen for the committee to the groups hired to do the fact
finding have cyclist leanings.

Los Angeles Department of Transportation's (LADOT) Michelle Mowery,
senior coordinator for Bicycle Outreach and Planning, said the city
has contracted to pay $450,000 to Alta Planning and Design for
services related to bicycle planning. The discussion stemmed from a
plan to tap into stimulus funding for cyclist commuting that has
expanded to include mountain biking in parks.

Alta*the League of American Bicyclists' "Gold" winner for
Bicycle-Friendly Business of 2008*in turn hired the Boulder,
Colorado-based Osprey Group to facilitate the meetings of nine
community members. The bikers and the equestrians were each
represented by three individuals, while the Sierra Club represented
the hikers.

While some might call Osprey a lobbying firm, its Web site says the
company works to "facilitate the formulation and implementation of
public policy." Having exerted itself on behalf of the bikers on prior
occasions, it is no stranger to that world.

In a letter sent out in February on City of Los Angeles Department of
City Planning letterhead and co-signed by City Planner Helene Bibas
and Bike Plan Project manager Jordann Turner, recipients were advised
that L.A. is "looking to develop opportunities for mountain bicycling
within some city parks." To that end, it is working with the Osprey
Group, which seeks representatives from the riding, hiking and biking
sectors to represent their constituencies at meetings.

The mailing went to members of the L.A. Horse Council, Equestrian
Trails Inc. (ETI) and the L.A. Trails Project, along with members of
the Los Angeles Sierra Club and mountain biking enthusiasts.

According to the letter, Osprey's role would be to mediate between
equestrians, hikers and mountain bikers, "exploring equitable
solutions that increase mountain biking access."

The mere mention of mountain bikes on L.A. City Park trails sent a
string of e-mails through the Los Angeles equestrian community, which
quickly banded together to voice its opposition. Many said they
believed they were being herded into a discussion whose outcome was
predetermined and questioned the use of Osprey, an out-of-state
mediator with no knowledge of L.A. City parks and with previous ties
to Alta and the cyclists.

"Why did the city have to spend for a simple mediation between parties
that didn't agree and go to Colorado to find experts that deal with
putting mountain bikes on trails?" asked Mary Benson, president of the
L.A. Trails Project. "Osprey is a mountain bike mediation group." She
also questioned the role of LADOT in the discussion of mountain
biking, which she calls "an extreme sport," on park trails. "That's
clearly recreational, not transportation," she said.

"They just about steamrolled right through us," said ETI national
coordinator Lynn Brown, who was one of the panel's equestrian voices,
along with Benson and Dale Gibson. "I'll bet this tactic has worked in
small towns, where you have [fewer] battle-hardened folk to defend
against it*but not here," she added.

The meetings were facilitated by Osprey's John Huyler. In addition to
projects dealing with outdoor advertising and studies involving the
road development and planning, Huyler's credits as stated on the
group's Web site include training and formatting services for the
Bicycle Leadership Conference, an annual event focused on "strategies
for expanding the use of bicycles."

Equestrians and hikers were largely unified in their opposition to
mountain bikers, and at times disagreement between the factions became
heated and accusatory. Sierra Club member Joe Young accused the Osprey
Group of being overly influenced by the Bicycle Advisory Committee
(BAC) and faulted each of the sessions for not allowing public
comment. Although the two meetings were open to the public, comments
were limited to the community representatives.

Gibson, a Hollywood stunt rider, continued to stress the importance of
safety, and he questioned why mountain bikers don't have private
facilities for their activities, just as equestrians have. "Why should
the city pay to provide this?" he asked, noting that there would be an
increased insurance risk for the city if mountain bikers were allowed
into city parks.

Jim Hasenauer, a member of the International Mountain Bicycling
Association (MBA) said the city has "a duty to provide for the
recreational needs of bikers. It wasn't the original mandate, but now,
to the extent it tries to meet the recreational needs of the people of
L.A., they should be investigating how to make this happen."

At the end of the second session Huyler tried to find middle ground on
which all three groups could agree. Other than to ask the L.A. City
Council for more money to maintain and map trails within city parks,
the nine participants, each representing their own constituency, found
no room for common ground. Huyler and co-mediator Dennis McDonald
ended the session saying they were returning to Colorado, "where
people are friendlier."

While equestrians believe they may they have dodged a bullet in the
fight over the future of L.A. City Parks' equestrian and hiking
trails, many, like Brown, believe this is only the first shot by a
powerful lobbying group. "They'll be back," Brown predicted. "We still
have to see how Osprey files their report."

Bicyclist Aaron Kirsh, a member of the L.A. Bicycle Advisory
Committee, said he was disappointed that "the process had gone
nowhere." Michael Goodman, with the Concerned Off-Road Bicyclists
Association, apologized for losing his temper during the discussions
and said that he found the process "disagreeable."

A summation of the findings by the Osprey Group is expected to be
given to the Bicycle Master Planning Committee over the coming weeks,
and only then will the findings be made available for public comment.
"We'll internalize it and put it into the policy for the bicycle
plan," said the Bike Plan Project's Turner, who said that "a lot of
misinformation based upon personal experiences" will make the study
particularly difficult.
--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
Ads
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mountain Bikers Advocate "Poaching" New Wilderness Trails Mike Vandeman Mountain Biking 0 March 28th 09 04:33 AM
"Lack of Open Trails Causes Illegal Mountain Biking" Mike Vandeman Mountain Biking 0 December 6th 07 04:41 PM
"Lack of Open Trails Causes Illegal Mountain Biking" Mike Vandeman Social Issues 0 December 6th 07 04:41 PM
Euphemism for Illegal Mountain Bike Trails: "Gray Trails" Mike Vandeman Mountain Biking 88 June 10th 07 10:48 PM
Euphemism for Illegal Mountain Bike Trails: "Gray Trails" Mike Vandeman Social Issues 88 June 10th 07 10:48 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.