A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » Regional Cycling » UK
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Naked road scheme in London



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 6th 05, 12:53 PM
Colin Blackburn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Naked road scheme in London

From:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/4151047.stm

"Exhibition Road, home of the Science, Natural History and Victoria and
Albert museum, could have a maximum speed limit of 20mph and drivers
will not automatically have right of way over pedestrians who will be
able to cross anywhere on the road."

It is interesting that drivers on Exhibition Road do currently have
automatic right of way of pedestrians. No mention in the article of the
potential effects for cyclists.



Full story below:

"""
Road users mingle in naked scheme

A west London road may be stripped of its kerb, traffic lights and signs
in an attempt to encourage pedestrians and cars to mingle.

Exhibition Road in Kensington has been chosen for the "naked road"
experiment - a scheme pioneered in Holland.

Organisers say the idea works as a form of psychological traffic calming
which encourages drivers to be more considerate to pedestrians.

But an RAC spokesman said it may encourage drivers to be more reckless.

RAC Foundation executive director Edmund King said: "This is a form of
psychological traffic calming which encourages drivers to slow down and
think a lot more about pedestrians and other road users.

"We shall be following this trial very closely.

"In Holland, there have been places where a number of roads meet and no
one has the automatic right of way. Although this might make drivers
more careful, it could also encourage the aggressive motorist to behave
more recklessly.

"We would certainly question whether this type of experiment should be
implemented on a wider scale."

Exhibition Road, home of the Science, Natural History and Victoria and
Albert museum, could have a maximum speed limit of 20mph and drivers
will not automatically have right of way over pedestrians who will be
able to cross anywhere on the road.

Kensington and Chelsea Council, the lead authority on the project, plan
to introduce similar principles to Sloane Square by removing the
roundabout and creating two large pedestrian areas.

A similar naked road scheme is already in place in Wiltshire.
"""

Colin
Ads
  #2  
Old January 6th 05, 12:56 PM
cupra
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Colin Blackburn wrote:
From:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/4151047.stm

snip

If the exponential increase in crap driving upon crossing the M25 threshold
is anything to go buy, I expect many collisions


  #3  
Old January 6th 05, 01:05 PM
Eiron
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Colin Blackburn wrote:

A west London road may be stripped of its kerb, traffic lights and signs
in an attempt to encourage pedestrians and cars to mingle.

Exhibition Road in Kensington has been chosen for the "naked road"
experiment - a scheme pioneered in Holland.


If Kensington council wants to spend money on roads it could start
by fixing the drains in the High Street.
It was like a river last time I was there.

As a pedestrian, cyclist, motorcyclist and driver, I am quite
confident that such a scheme will do nobody any good and will
cause accidents.

--
Eiron.
  #4  
Old January 6th 05, 01:09 PM
Nathaniel David Porter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Colin Blackburn wrote:

From:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/4151047.stm

"Exhibition Road, home of the Science, Natural History and Victoria
and Albert museum, could have a maximum speed limit of 20mph


I don't know the road, so I'll trust a 20mph limit is fine and
appropriate for the road - but I thought the whole point of the naked
roads business was that drivers had to work everything out for
themselves, and thus drive more carefully? (as opposed to being nannied
with excessie warning and restrictions to an extent that they don't
think and thus miss the hazards they weren't warned of). Surely
(stricter) traffic regulations go against this, in so much as there is
still an element of nannying?

and drivers will not automatically have right of way over pedestrians
who will be able to cross anywhere on the road."


*Sigh*

This is already the case -

Also I hope that there is still an expectation that pedestrians should
look before crossing instead of just bumbling into the road (and of
course that there remains one that drivers et al be prepared for the
possibility that pedestrians may cross without looking just in case).

There are too many of these schemes which perpetrate the myth that there
is or should be a heirarchy of road users, where as IMV more should be
done to promote the reality that everyone has equal right to use the
road and that people should be considerate of that.



It is interesting that drivers on Exhibition Road do currently have
automatic right of way of pedestrians. No mention in the article of
the potential effects for cyclists.

I would assume they would be the same as for other vehicles, but it
wouldn't surprise me if this possibility of a cyclist using the road
simply hadn't been considered.

article snip

I do support anything that encourages road users to think more when
using the road - but this sounds a bit like a LA trying to be trendy and
wasting vast sums of money in doing so.

  #5  
Old January 6th 05, 01:33 PM
dkahn400
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Nathaniel David Porter wrote:

There are too many of these schemes which perpetrate the myth
that there is or should be a heirarchy of road users, where as
IMV more should be done to promote the reality that everyone has
equal right to use the road and that people should be considerate
of that.


There are too few of these schemes. Motorists do not have an equal
right to cyclists and pedestrians to use roads.

I would assume they would be the same as for other vehicles, but
it wouldn't surprise me if this possibility of a cyclist using the
road simply hadn't been considered.


Cyclists should not require any special consideration or provision in
this kind of scheme.

--
Dave...

  #6  
Old January 6th 05, 01:35 PM
dkahn400
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Eiron wrote:

As a pedestrian, cyclist, motorcyclist and driver, I am quite
confident that such a scheme will do nobody any good and will
cause accidents.


I believe that has not generally been the case where similar schemes
have been tried elsewhere.

--
Dave...

  #7  
Old January 6th 05, 01:52 PM
Nathaniel Porter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"dkahn400" wrote in message
oups.com...
Nathaniel David Porter wrote:

There are too many of these schemes which perpetrate the myth
that there is or should be a heirarchy of road users, where as
IMV more should be done to promote the reality that everyone has
equal right to use the road and that people should be considerate
of that.


There are too few of these schemes. Motorists do not have an equal
right to cyclists and pedestrians to use roads.


How precisely does that work?

I find that the mentality some road users have that they and/or their
(current) road user group is somehow superior or righteous than some or all
of the rest tends to lead to reckless behaviour on their part - we've all
seen the idiot who while driving whinging about pedestrians bumbling into
the road only to get out of his car and bumble into the road, effing and
blinding about the car who has had to stop for him. I would suggest that
this mentality is one of the biggest obstacles to improved road safety in
this country today.

Essentially the Clarkson-esque "get off my road" mentality that some
motorists have is the same as the "holier than thou" (a la Doug) attitude
some cyclists have, and similar mentailities than some other road users
have - it's little more than "me first".

I would assume they would be the same as for other vehicles, but
it wouldn't surprise me if this possibility of a cyclist using the
road simply hadn't been considered.


Cyclists should not require any special consideration or provision in
this kind of scheme.


The needs of cyclists have to be considered when designing any scheme on a
road which cyclists are permitted to use. It may well be these needs do not
require any special provision, or any alteration to the scheme, however the
consideration still needs to be there - and if this scheme follows form then
cyclists needs will not have been considered enough (if at all).


  #8  
Old January 6th 05, 02:10 PM
Mark Thompson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

There are too few of these schemes. Motorists do not have an equal
right to cyclists and pedestrians to use roads.


How precisely does that work?


Driving licences, "road tax", MOT, insurance?
  #9  
Old January 6th 05, 02:13 PM
Tony Raven
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Eiron wrote:

As a pedestrian, cyclist, motorcyclist and driver, I am quite
confident that such a scheme will do nobody any good and will
cause accidents.


That's not the experience of places where they have been introduced -
quite the opposite in fact which is why this is such an interesting trial.

Tony

  #10  
Old January 6th 05, 02:18 PM
Vincent Wilcox
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Nathaniel Porter wrote:
"dkahn400" wrote in message

There are too few of these schemes. Motorists do not have an equal
right to cyclists and pedestrians to use roads.



How precisely does that work?


Because driving isnt a right?
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
off road or on road tyre Skunk UK 14 July 21st 04 07:55 PM
Spring ride in the Sierra [email protected] Rides 1 June 2nd 04 08:01 PM
Spring ride in the Sierra [email protected] Rides 0 May 27th 04 02:59 PM
Fame at last! [warning: contains 5m*th] Just zis Guy, you know? UK 308 March 29th 04 12:00 AM
Braking while turning [email protected] Techniques 45 August 1st 03 06:56 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.