More cool ideas from me

First, my idea. It's a safety device.
Bike trails cross roads. Cyclists have to stop to see if cars are coming.
Why not put up some sort of split screen display which shows traffic in each
direction so that cyclists don't have to stop if it's not necessary. Better
yet, just put in stop signs and train crossing equipment to stop cars every
time somebody on the bike trail wants to cross the road.

Who should pay for this? Motorists. They're the ones that made cycling,
walking and pushing baby carriages so dangerous in the first place. Why
shouldn't they pay?

Great lawn mowing idea...
http://images.craigslist.org/0101120...7d00c111 .jpg

Recumbent lawn mowing idea...
http://www.core77.com/competition200...ower/main.html

On Sep 1, 6:37 pm, "Greens" wrote:
First, my idea. It's a safety device.
Bike trails cross roads. Cyclists have to stop to see if cars are coming.
Why not put up some sort of split screen display which shows traffic in each
direction so that cyclists don't have to stop if it's not necessary. Better
yet, just put in stop signs and train crossing equipment to stop cars every
time somebody on the bike trail wants to cross the road.

Who should pay for this? Motorists. They're the ones that made cycling,
walking and pushing baby carriages so dangerous in the first place. Why
shouldn't they pay?

Great lawn mowing idea...http://images.craigslist.org/0101120...eea3966ac623b3...

Recumbent lawn mowing idea...http://www.core77.com/competition200...ower/main.html

Spilling more pavement for bike trails is already enough ecologically
destructive **** in the name of bikes, and in some cases too much..
don't electronicize them, please.

Greens wrote:

First, my idea. It's a safety device.
Bike trails cross roads. Cyclists have to stop to see if cars are coming.
Why not put up some sort of split screen display which shows traffic in each
direction so that cyclists don't have to stop if it's not necessary. Better
yet, just put in stop signs and train crossing equipment to stop cars every
time somebody on the bike trail wants to cross the road.

Why not just use the road, professor? It's a safety device.

Chalo

On Sat, 1 Sep 2007 21:37:33 -0400, in rec.bicycles.tech "Greens"
wrote:

Who should pay for this? Motorists. They're the ones that made cycling,
walking and pushing baby carriages so dangerous in the first place. Why
shouldn't they pay?

Agreed, *WE* shouldn't have to pay... the *government* should pay for
that!