A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » Regional Cycling » UK
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Lobbying against Martlew



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 4th 04, 09:48 AM
Just zis Guy, you know?
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Lobbying against Martlew

I will bung this on my Martlew page but I want to share the experience
of a group of cycle campaigners I met with yesterday in how to
approach your MP regarding Martlew.

First, check history. Did they sign EDM1783, 2003 (last year's BeHIT
one) and have they signed EDM778 (Active Travel) this year? If they
have not, urge them to sign it.

Experience indicates that in the first instance a short letter is
best; if you are pushing at an open door there is not much point
boring them, and if they are pro then you need to find out why in
order to emphasise the arguments most likely to convince.

Check their interests and make reference to them if relevant (e.g.
child health, road safety).

For Labour MPS, especially those with a history of working in
childrens' issues, the number one button to press is that of rising
obesity. You can suggest that they "might not have been made aware"
that every country which has introduced helmet compulsion has suffered
dramatic drops in cycling, with the largest drop in every case being
among teenagers. In Syndey the drop in teenage cycling was up to 90%
as a direct result of the law, and has essentially not recovered.

46,000 people died of coronary heart disease due to inactivity last
year, and around a dozen children died of cycling-related head
injuries. A good key phrase is that the bill will almost certainly
shorten more lives than it could ever hope to save.

For Lib-Dem MPs you can appeal also to liberal principles: this Bill
is interference of a type unwarranted by the scale of the problem.

For Tories, especially right-wing Tories, the "nanny state" button
works well. What next, you can ask? Mandatory thermometers for
babies' baths?

It is also worth pointing out that the bill is contentious, as many
MPs are unaware of this, and that the Government has admitted that it
knows of no case where cyclist safety has improved due to increased
helmet wearing.

They will probably also be unaware that a TRL survey showed that 93.5%
of children on urban minor roads are not currently wearing helmets, so
any law would present massive enforcement problems (good one to go for
with any MP with a history of promoting police issues, also possibly
worth asking your local police to write to the MP along these lines).

The way the law is drafted it will also raise the possibility of
criminalising parents, teachers, bike shop employees, youth leaders
and the like if a child removes their helmet even without permission.
If you are a youth leader or teacher this is one to lead with: it
risks criminalising you even if the child removes the lid without your
knowledge. The most likely outcome, as presented by several people I
have met who have youth leadership experience, is that cycling will
simply be dropped as being too risky in terms of personal exposure to
prosecution.

And finally, you might mention that the list of organisations opposed
to compulsion includes: the British Medical Association, the Royal
College of General Practitioners, the Royal Society for the Prevention
of Accidents, the National Cycling Strategy Board, the Association of
Cycle Traders (who actually sell helmets so are one of the few bodies
who have anything to gain from the law), British Cycling, CTC, the
Cycle Campaign Network - and indeed just about every body concerned
with cycling or cycle safety.


If you are going to see your MP make sure you take a copy of the CTC
leaflet with you
url:http://www.ctc.org.uk/resources/Campaigns/CTC12ppleafleta_w.pdf
- your right to ride rep may have a proper printed one, or you can get
one from Cotterell House.


The Bill is to be read on April 23. On that day Oxfam are asking all
MPs to be in their constituencies for a do of some kind. But...
second on the menu is a Tory PMB calling for a referendum on Europe,
so there may well be more MPs than we would like (if there aree too
few MPs in the house, as there generally are, it only takes one to
call for a count and the bill goes back to the ed of the queue and
will die). If your MP is pro compulsion - join Oxfam and lobby for
them to be in their constituency that day!

--
Guy
===
May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

88% of helmet statistics are made up, 65% of them at Washington University
Ads
  #2  
Old April 4th 04, 10:29 AM
Tony Raven
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Lobbying against Martlew

Just zis Guy, you know? wrote:

The Bill is to be read on April 23. On that day Oxfam are asking all
MPs to be in their constituencies for a do of some kind. But...
second on the menu is a Tory PMB calling for a referendum on Europe,
so there may well be more MPs than we would like (if there aree too
few MPs in the house, as there generally are, it only takes one to
call for a count and the bill goes back to the ed of the queue and
will die).


Since her career in Parliament seems to be over for the time being, won't your
MP, as a keen cyclist, turn up and ask for a count?

Tony


  #3  
Old April 4th 04, 01:26 PM
Just zis Guy, you know?
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Lobbying against Martlew

On Sun, 4 Apr 2004 10:29:32 +0100, "Tony Raven"
wrote in message
:

Since her career in Parliament seems to be over for the time being, won't your
MP, as a keen cyclist, turn up and ask for a count?


She is out of the country that day with a long-standing commitment.
The one or two other reliable ones are similarly committed elsewhere.

--
Guy
===
May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

88% of helmet statistics are made up, 65% of them at Washington University
  #4  
Old April 4th 04, 06:16 PM
Just zis Guy, you know?
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Lobbying against Martlew - pages updated

url:http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk/web/public.nsf/Documents/martlew_bill
now updated to include the preceding and some other stuff.

--
Guy
===
May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

88% of helmet statistics are made up, 65% of them at Washington University
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Guardian diary notices Martlew Mark McN UK 8 April 3rd 04 12:57 PM
Government supports Martlew? Tony Raven UK 13 April 1st 04 08:11 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.