#11
|
|||
|
|||
Belt drive
On 2019-04-30 12:16, Joerg wrote:
On 2019-04-29 18:52, Andre Jute wrote: On Tuesday, April 30, 2019 at 12:35:24 AM UTC+1, Joerg wrote: On 2019-04-29 16:02, John B. wrote: On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 07:16:27 -0700, Joerg wrote: On 2019-04-28 15:07, John B. wrote: On Sun, 28 Apr 2019 07:46:33 -0700, Joerg wrote: On 2019-04-27 15:55, John B. wrote: On Sat, 27 Apr 2019 07:59:25 -0700, Joerg wrote: On 2019-04-26 16:12, John B. wrote: On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 07:27:05 -0700, Joerg wrote: On 2019-04-25 16:32, John B. wrote: On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 14:16:28 -0700, Joerg wrote: On 2019-04-25 14:03, Sir Ridesalot wrote: On Thursday, April 25, 2019 at 3:22:36 PM UTC-4, Joerg wrote: On 2019-04-25 11:00, Roger Merriman wrote: Joerg wrote: On 2019-04-12 07:27, db wrote: My son is set on getting a belt drive for the bike he is building. What is good about them? You have to have the exact length for your bike, and if it breaks, it is very expensive to replace. So, why? Dad gave him too much money :-) Now, a shaft drive, that would be great. Imagine it would be much heavier and complicated, they have been tried and used on MTB but don’t seem to have been cracked, I think generally the extra weight/cost though a E-MTB would mitigate that? Motorcycle manufacturers have figured it out, most of all BMW. That company should also build MTB, they know how it's done. Weight doesn't always matter, especially not for many MTB riders. We just want less wear and most importanly not have to clean and lube the chain every 50 miles. It often takes the bicycle industry decades longer to figure something out. Such as decent heavy-duty rack space on FS MTB and central-battery powered lighting where, no surprise, I had to build it all myself. Beats me why one still cannot buy this: http://www.analogconsultants.com/ng/bike/Muddy5.JPG It's lasted many thousand hard miles now which included heavy loads. Yeah, that bike is heavy but it never breaks down anymore. Given a choice I’d love a belt drive bike for the commute as I clock up fairly respectable distances per day which does chew though the drive chain. I'd be careful ... https://www.thelocal.se/20180524/ike...-lead-to-falls -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/ Weight of an MTB doesn't matter? What a crock full of El Toro Poo Poo! Maybe weight doesn't matter in your world but it sure does to a LOT of other MTB users. I keep telling you Joerg; your best bet to get the durability that you say YOU need is to buy a small gasoline powered dirt motorcycle and convert it to pedal power. After all, weight doesn't matter to you. Within reason, of course. There are people who rather ride a bicycle that weighs 10lbs more than customary but in contrast to others they generally arrive at their destinations on time, due to a lack of breakdowns. I happen to be one of those. The only times during the last years (!) that I didn't arrive on time were when I assisted others during repairs. Because they didn't have thorn-resistant tubes et cetera. But Joerg, I ride a conventional steel frame bicycle and I haven't had a breakdown, or even something that came loose so I couldn't ride, in 20 years or more. In fact, in thinking back I can't even remember a time that my bike broke and I couldn't ride it. No flats in 20 years? I didn't say anything about flat tires but I don't judge a flat tire to be a "breakdown" or "came loose" A flat tire without any tools _is_ a breakdown. He get to hoof it out of the wilderness for then next 10-20 miles. But in all the years I've been riding a bicycle I have NEVER had a flat tire that I couldn't fix in a matter of minutes. Way back in the old "sew-up" tire days you didn't even need any tools. Fix it with your bare hands. Now try that with a Gatorskin or a Vee Rubber 700c 25mm. Yeah, it can be done but you won't be able to feel some of your fingertips for a while. I bought a pair of Gatorskin tires, oh probably 10 years ago, and contrary to their advertised proof against flats promptly had two flats in less than 5 Km of riding. I haven't used a gatorskin since. I never use them anymore either. I found them a bit undersized, a bear to get on. The running surface is sturdy and no flats there. Also, one of them made it to a record 2500mi while no others ever exceeded 2000mi by much on the rear. However, all other Gatorskins I had failed prematurely in their sidewalls and that's what makes them unacceptable to me. As for Vee tires, I have the feeling that they are a very cheap Thai made tire or at least I saw some for sale in a store called "Super Cheap" for something like 3 dollars each, so I don't use those either. Just because something is cheap does not mean it is a bad product. No, but it does mean that it is cheap and cheap can be produced by using less than quality materials. I've been told that the cheap tires in Thailand all made from a rubber mix that contains a lot of carbon black, which makes them harder and they wear less and thus are very well regarded by those who can't afford to buy tires frequently. Unfortunately hard tires also "grip the road" less well and have minimal traction. I do not need Tour de France level cornering performance and found them to be quite adequate for riding. Especially the MTB tires because there durability and sturdiness counts a lot more than sqeezing the last tenth of an mph out of a ride. On both the road bike and the MTB I want beefy sidewalls and so far tires made in Thailand gave me that, plus a decent number of miles in terms of wear. I really don't understand this fetish with how many miles a bicycle tire lasts. After all, compared to something like auto tires or egg beaters they are pretty cheap. How would you like it if you had to switch out the tires on your car every 2500mi? Besides, it ain't cheap: 1. SUV, four tires, $70 each so $280 total, 1st set lasted 70000mi and still had half the tread. I only replaced them because they were around 15 years old. 2. Gatorskin, $45, lasted 2500mi at which point the tread surface was at bare minimum. 3. Vittoria Zafiro, $13, 2000mi. Want more? I trust you can do the math. -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/ I dunno what you're doing, Joerg, but you're doing it wrong. Compare this to your expensive misfortunes with supposedly "cheap" tyres: 1. Schwalbe 622x60 Big Apples, pair, plus T19A Ultraleigt tubes, pair, total delivered to my door Euro 66 -- half-worn at 8500km/5300m Maybe your riding style or terrain. I tend to always go full bore, whatever the leg muscles can deliver. That ain't wrong, that's my mode of operation because I don't like to go slow. None of my local bike friends milks more than 2500mi out of a rear tire. None. Andre Jute The best is always in the end the cheap option Expensive does always not mean good. Certainly not with bicycle tires. Sorry, should read "Expensive does not always mean good". -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What is the case with belt drive? | Andre Jute[_2_] | Techniques | 62 | October 27th 09 07:42 AM |
Belt Drive Arrives | Leo Lichtman[_2_] | Techniques | 1 | November 21st 08 11:40 PM |
Belt drive parts | hhu | Techniques | 0 | January 30th 05 09:26 PM |
SS Belt Drive? | supabonbon | Mountain Biking | 23 | November 18th 04 09:53 PM |
SS Belt Drive? | supabonbon | Techniques | 39 | November 18th 04 09:53 PM |