OFF TOPIC FUN - The TROLL, Rear-ended

On Mar 29, 11:02 am, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message

...

"I have not used any language on ARBR that I do not see and hear every
night on the TV
and radio." Another Dolan prevarication.

On Mar 27, 11:57 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message

...
[...]

No worries there as that would be assault with a DEAD weapon, besides
he likes boys particularly one named Vandeman.

Why is McNamara always referencing boys. He must have something on his mind,
don't you think?
[...]

A L W A Y S ??? Pray tell, how does a single, solitary qualify as
"always". Where are all these other references you refer to? Do you
ever say anything that you can prove as fact. The unsubstantiated
assertionshas become a trademark tool in you arsenal of the absurd.
You want to know what is on my mind? What is on my mind is that you
are ... out of yours.

****ing Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

On Mar 29, 11:14 am, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message

...
[...]



Just stay off the sexual innuendo and all will be well with the world.
Saint
Edward the Great is a fearsome Saint and even Ed Dolan the Great fears
him.

Don't be so bold as to even presuppose that you are in any position to
lecture me. Innuendo and accusation are non synonyms. There is a
distinct difference between tongue-in-cheek innuendo and direct
accusation (read unsubstantiated allegation) and it is a given that
there is a substantial recognizable difference in severity and
magnitude between "dead weapon" and sodomy/pederasty and that is
neither open for discussion nor subject to debate. You have made the
mistake of pushing the wrong button on the wrong person. I will
caution you one final time ... should your persist, I will see to it
that all will not be right with your world ... of that much I can
promise you. The proper thing to do would have been for you to issue
a retraction, however one who does not recognize a wrong and who does
not take responsibility for his actions cannot be expected to hold
himself accountable. Pathological egomaniacs are like that. That
much I can accept. A reiteration of you uncorroborated assertion I
cannot and will not. - Jim McNamara

This from an asshole who makes sexual innuendos. He must have perderasty and
sodomy on his mind since he is always making reverences to boys. I urge
McNamara to stop thinking about these things. They are illegal and he will
go in prison where he will end up someone's bitch. Hey, you do not want to
end up having someone like Ed Gin ****ing you, do you? Or do you!

A L W A Y S ??? Pray tell, how does a single, solitary qualify as
"always". Where are all these other references you refer to? Please
provie the links. Do you ever say anything that you can prove as
factual? The unsubstantiated assertion has become a trademark tool in
your arsenal of the absurd. You want to know what is on my mind?
What is on my mind is that you are ... out of yours

What is illegal is libel ... defamation of character. What should be
illegal is you in possession of a computer and an internet connection
without clearance and certification from a therapist.

And for Christ's sakes, you dumb asshole, learn how to edit a post.

****ing Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

"JimmyMac" wrote in message
...
On Mar 29, 10:59 am, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message

...
[...]

You have aptly demonstrated that you are a pathological egomaniac who
will not be encumbered or restrained by social mores. The only issue
I have with that is when you make your problem my problem and now you
have. Not only have I showed my wife my posts, but I have showed here
your replies and I am at the moment doing my utmost to persuade her
that I should give you another chance before initiating a lawsuit and
this is from a woman who is beginning her internship as a therapist.
From that, you can assume that you that it was unwise to refer to her
husband as a pederast or to refer to her as fat and ugly. Now I could
care less if you call me an asshole. I'm OK with that and write that
off as just an opinion. I'll even let your miserable, failed attempt
to
provoke me with the "fat and ugly" remark regarding my wife, but should
you persist with charges of sodomy or pederasty ... well, lets just
say that you have been fairly forewarned.

You have been warned to stay off the sexual innuendo. If you don't, I
will
go after your wife, your dog and whatever else you value. You are a
whining
piece of ****, no better than Ed Gin - just another Chicago asshole!

Now go **** yourself and get off of ARBR, you whining piece of ****!

I don't respond very well to threats. Don't be so bold as to even
presuppose that you are in any position to threatened or warn me.

I am doing what you do to others. The difference is that you deserve it and
others don't.

Ed Gin and McNamara - two peas in a pod! At least Ed Gin was not a whiner -
and he didn't stalk anyone for years at a time either. Apparently, you have
no idea what a revulsion you are to any normal decent person.
[...]

You have no basis upon which to take anything from me that I value,
but I most certainly have such a basis (read libel, slander,
defamation of character), so just keep running your mouth. The hole
you are digging continues to deepen.

I will take whatever good name you have left on Usenet into the mud, just
like Ed Gin did. And everything will be fair game. You have been warned.
Stay off the sexual innuendo or else!

As for taking my wife, I'm not
sure what you mean. If you mean take as in acquire, good luck, since
her taste in men far exceeds anything that you could possibly offer.
If you mean take as in a fight, she could probably kick your sorry
ass.

I can't tell you how sorry I feel for your poor long-suffering wife, married
to an asshole like you. It may be that the both of you deserve one another,
but all marriages are made in Hell in any event.

One other thing ... I'll leave ARBR on my own terms and not at you
bidding, but I will make you an offer. Leave here and post no more
and, I will be right behind you. Deal or no deal????

You are a pest and that is all you are. I will increasingly ignore you in
the future since you are incapable of ever adding anything to the
conversation.

****ing Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

On Mar 29, 11:53 am, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message

...
[...]

Don't be so bold as to even presuppose that you are in any position to
lecture me. Innuendo and accusation are non synonyms. There is a
distinct difference between tongue-in-cheek innuendo and direct
accusation (read unsubstantiated allegation) and it is a given that
there is a substantial recognizable difference in severity and
magnitude between "dead weapon" and sodomy/pederasty and that is
neither open for discussion nor subject to debate.

Nope, no difference at all. Everyone knows what is meant when you reference
boys. I simply returned the innuendo but I did it 100 times better than you.
That is because I am 100 times smarter than you.

What you returned was not innuendo dullard, but rather deliberate,
unsubstantiated accusation deliberately intended to malign (sodomy/
pederasty ... libel ... defamation of character) ant that is a
prosecutable prescribed by law. I said this (definition of the law)
was no open for discussion or debate.

The last time I looked there were 4 lawyers in my family, one of whom is an
excellent litigator. Any suit of yours will immediately be met with a
countersuit. The judge will no doubt get a good laugh out of it but that is
all that will ever happen.

You would have no ground for a counter suit, but I have grounds for a
suit and the accusations you have publicly made are not taken as
lightly as you might think. Just ask your r lawyers in the family.
The only thing that just might spare you a lawsuit is the fact that
your complete lack of credibility does not impose a threat to my
character or reputation. No one take you at your word her anymore.

You have made the

mistake of pushing the wrong button on the wrong person.

The only mistake I ever made was thinking you were something other than the
asshole you have ever proven yourself to be.

A rebuttal in his own words ... "When I am on Usenet I try to be the
biggest idiot, asshole and jerk of them all. I set the standard for
one and all. I believe I can state with absolute assurance that I am
the Greatest Idiot, the Greatest Asshole and the Greatest Jerk that
Usenet has ever known in its' long and dishonored history."

I will

caution you one final time ... should your persist, I will see to it
that all will not be right with your world ... of that much I can
promise you.

Ed Gin pushed all your buttons too and it was child's play for him just as
it is for me because you are in fact a child. Listen to yourself - nothing
but a long whine. Christ, what a baby you are!

The proper thing to do would have been for you to issue

a retraction, however one who does not recognize a wrong and who does
not take responsibility for his actions cannot be expected to hold
himself accountable. Pathological egomaniacs are like that. That
much I can accept. A reiteration of you uncorroborated assertion I
cannot and will not. - Jim McNamara

Everything with me is tit for tat.

You know nothing of tits and tat's a fact.

Stay off the sexual innuendo or I will
crucify you. I spent 4 years in the Navy as an enlisted man and I know
everything there is to know about our human natures. You get into a name
calling contest with me, one with sexual overtones, and I promise you that
you will lose big time.

Give me time to work up a tremble. Do you think that you are the only
one who spent time in the military? The difference is that I do not
consider the time spent in the military to have taught me all that
therr is to know of human nature. This much I know, I am embarassed
to admit that we belong to the same species.

****ing Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

PS. Show this post to your wife and see what she thinks of it. She can't be
as big a baby as you are.

My wife has indicate that she wants to see no more of this ****.

"JimmyMac" wrote in message
...
On Mar 29, 11:14 am, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message
[...]
This from an asshole who makes sexual innuendos. He must have perderasty
and
sodomy on his mind since he is always making reverences to boys. I urge
McNamara to stop thinking about these things. They are illegal and he
will
go in prison where he will end up someone's bitch. Hey, you do not want
to
end up having someone like Ed Gin ****ing you, do you? Or do you!

A L W A Y S ??? Pray tell, how does a single, solitary qualify as
"always". Where are all these other references you refer to? Please
provie the links. Do you ever say anything that you can prove as
factual? The unsubstantiated assertion has become a trademark tool in
your arsenal of the absurd. You want to know what is on my mind?
What is on my mind is that you are ... out of yours

Once is quite enough. But my question to you is why is a sexagenarian like
you saying anything at all about boys? Even once?

Perry Butler of Fergus Falls, Minnesota was into making these kind of
innuendoes too and TS and I made short work of him.

What is illegal is libel ... defamation of character. What should be
illegal is you in possession of a computer and an internet connection
without clearance and certification from a therapist.

I should be getting some kind of an award for telling the truth about you,
but there is no justice on Usenet. In any event, if you can't stand the
heat, get out of the kitchen.

And for Christ's sakes, you dumb asshole, learn how to edit a post.

****ing Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

On Mar 29, 1:38 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message

...



On Mar 29, 10:59 am, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message

...
[...]

You have aptly demonstrated that you are a pathological egomaniac who
will not be encumbered or restrained by social mores. The only issue
I have with that is when you make your problem my problem and now you
have. Not only have I showed my wife my posts, but I have showed here
your replies and I am at the moment doing my utmost to persuade her
that I should give you another chance before initiating a lawsuit and
this is from a woman who is beginning her internship as a therapist.
From that, you can assume that you that it was unwise to refer to her
husband as a pederast or to refer to her as fat and ugly. Now I could
care less if you call me an asshole. I'm OK with that and write that
off as just an opinion. I'll even let your miserable, failed attempt
to
provoke me with the "fat and ugly" remark regarding my wife, but should
you persist with charges of sodomy or pederasty ... well, lets just
say that you have been fairly forewarned.

You have been warned to stay off the sexual innuendo. If you don't, I
will
go after your wife, your dog and whatever else you value. You are a
whining
piece of ****, no better than Ed Gin - just another Chicago asshole!

Now go **** yourself and get off of ARBR, you whining piece of ****!

I don't respond very well to threats. Don't be so bold as to even
presuppose that you are in any position to threatened or warn me.

I am doing what you do to others. The difference is that you deserve it and
others don't.

You are letting your imagination get the best of you.

Ed Gin and McNamara - two peas in a pod! At least Ed Gin was not a whiner -
and he didn't stalk anyone for years at a time either. Apparently, you have
no idea what a revulsion you are to any normal decent person.
[...]

And how would you now since you are not a normal decent person?

You have no basis upon which to take anything from me that I value,
but I most certainly have such a basis (read libel, slander,
defamation of character), so just keep running your mouth. The hole
you are digging continues to deepen.

I will take whatever good name you have left on Usenet into the mud, just
like Ed Gin did. And everything will be fair game. You have been warned.
Stay off the sexual innuendo or else!

With your credibility, I am to seriously perceive this as a threat?
YAAAAAAAAAAAAWN!!!!!

As for taking my wife, I'm not

sure what you mean. If you mean take as in acquire, good luck, since
her taste in men far exceeds anything that you could possibly offer.
If you mean take as in a fight, she could probably kick your sorry
ass.

I can't tell you how sorry I feel for your poor long-suffering wife, married
to an asshole like you. It may be that the both of you deserve one another,
but all marriages are made in Hell in any event.

She just popped in and asked if I was engaging the moron again? That
would be you.

One other thing ... I'll leave ARBR on my own terms and not at you
bidding, but I will make you an offer. Leave here and post no more
and, I will be right behind you. Deal or no deal????

You are a pest and that is all you are. I will increasingly ignore you in
the future since you are incapable of ever adding anything to the
conversation.

You really know how to hurt a guy. Is that a promise ... I mean one
that you will uncharacteristically keep for a change. I look forward
to you ignoring me. Can't same that I can guarantee the same. One of
your pearls of wisdom said it all ... "Jim McNamara, you are my
perennial stalker. How would I ever get though the week without you
here to remind me of what a jackass I am."

****ing Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

"JimmyMac" wrote in message
...
On Mar 29, 11:53 am, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message

...
[...]

Don't be so bold as to even presuppose that you are in any position to
lecture me. Innuendo and accusation are non synonyms. There is a
distinct difference between tongue-in-cheek innuendo and direct
accusation (read unsubstantiated allegation) and it is a given that
there is a substantial recognizable difference in severity and
magnitude between "dead weapon" and sodomy/pederasty and that is
neither open for discussion nor subject to debate.

Nope, no difference at all. Everyone knows what is meant when you
reference
boys. I simply returned the innuendo but I did it 100 times better than
you.
That is because I am 100 times smarter than you.

What you returned was not innuendo dullard, but rather deliberate,
unsubstantiated accusation deliberately intended to malign (sodomy/
pederasty ... libel ... defamation of character) ant that is a
prosecutable prescribed by law. I said this (definition of the law)
was no open for discussion or debate.

That is what our lawyers would argue about and that is what a judge would
dismiss as a lot of foolishness. Cry babies like you regularly get laughed
out of court.

The last time I looked there were 4 lawyers in my family, one of whom is
an
excellent litigator. Any suit of yours will immediately be met with a
countersuit. The judge will no doubt get a good laugh out of it but that
is
all that will ever happen.

You would have no ground for a counter suit, but I have grounds for a
suit and the accusations you have publicly made are not taken as
lightly as you might think. Just ask your r lawyers in the family.
The only thing that just might spare you a lawsuit is the fact that
your complete lack of credibility does not impose a threat to my
character or reputation. No one take you at your word her anymore.

Everyone in the world KNOWS that you are an Asshole! You prove that every
time you post a message to Usenet. The only character or reputation you have
is one of an Asshole! But I can make it much worse for you than that if you
persist in making innuendoes about boys or any other sexual subjects that
are taboo.

I would have as much ground for a countersuit as you think you have for a
suit. It is not possible to reference a boy like you did without implying
pederasty and most likely sodomy. See you in court - as a lawyer would say.
[...]

Stay off the sexual innuendo or I will
crucify you. I spent 4 years in the Navy as an enlisted man and I know
everything there is to know about our human natures. You get into a name
calling contest with me, one with sexual overtones, and I promise you
that
you will lose big time.

Give me time to work up a tremble. Do you think that you are the only
one who spent time in the military? The difference is that I do not
consider the time spent in the military to have taught me all that
therr is to know of human nature. This much I know, I am embarassed
to admit that we belong to the same species.

Enlisted guys in the Navy were into 24 hour gutter language, most of it
sexual in nature. I heard it solid for 4 years. You are a naïf and in over
your head if you think you can out-gutter me.

PS. Show this post to your wife and see what she thinks of it. She can't
be
as big a baby as you are.

My wife has indicate that she wants to see no more of this ****.

Well Hells Bells, she at least is not an asshole like you. I suggest you try
to stay on her good side and not make any more references to boys. She might
get the wrong idea about you if you continue to do that.

****ing Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

On Mar 29, 2:00 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message

...



On Mar 29, 11:14 am, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message
[...]
This from an asshole who makes sexual innuendos. He must have perderasty
and
sodomy on his mind since he is always making reverences to boys. I urge
McNamara to stop thinking about these things. They are illegal and he
will
go in prison where he will end up someone's bitch. Hey, you do not want
to
end up having someone like Ed Gin ****ing you, do you? Or do you!

A L W A Y S ??? Pray tell, how does a single, solitary qualify as
"always". Where are all these other references you refer to? Please
provie the links. Do you ever say anything that you can prove as
factual? The unsubstantiated assertion has become a trademark tool in
your arsenal of the absurd. You want to know what is on my mind?
What is on my mind is that you are ... out of yours

Once is quite enough. But my question to you is why is a sexagenarian like
you saying anything at all about boys? Even once?

BUT ... BUT ... BUT your contended that there were many references by
implication (read ALWAYS). Dunderhead, rather that extracting
something completely out of context, why not revisit the original
reference that addressed your disinterest in the female gender ...
mysogynist that you are. The reference in no way denoted my sexual
preference regardless of what knid of spin you vainly attempted to put
on it. Gee you're so dumb as to be pitiful.

Perry Butler of Fergus Falls, Minnesota was into making these kind of
innuendoes too and TS and I made short work of him.

Had better luck then with Perry than you are haveing with me, I take
it?

What is illegal is libel ... defamation of character. What should be
illegal is you in possession of a computer and an internet connection
without clearance and certification from a therapist.

I should be getting some kind of an award for telling the truth about you,
but there is no justice on Usenet. In any event, if you can't stand the
heat, get out of the kitchen.

I second that. So when does the truth begin may I ask?

And for Christ's sakes, you dumb asshole, learn how to edit a post.

****ing Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

"JimmyMac" wrote in message
...
On Mar 29, 1:38 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
[...]
Ed Gin and McNamara - two peas in a pod! At least Ed Gin was not a
whiner -
and he didn't stalk anyone for years at a time either. Apparently, you
have
no idea what a revulsion you are to any normal decent person.
[...]

And how would you now since you are not a normal decent person?

I never stalk anyone and I never reference boys out of nowhere like you do.
[...]

You are a pest and that is all you are. I will increasingly ignore you in
the future since you are incapable of ever adding anything to the
conversation.

You really know how to hurt a guy. Is that a promise ... I mean one
that you will uncharacteristically keep for a change. I look forward
to you ignoring me. Can't same that I can guarantee the same. One of
your pearls of wisdom said it all ... "Jim McNamara, you are my
perennial stalker. How would I ever get though the week without you
here to remind me of what a jackass I am."

The above is ancient history now that you have resorted to sexual innuendo.
I now put you right along side of Ed Gin, although to his credit, he was
never a whiner like you are. He was at least a man's man, no matter how
criminal and scurrilous.

****ing Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

"JimmyMac" wrote in message
...
On Mar 29, 2:00 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message

...



On Mar 29, 11:14 am, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message
[...]
This from an asshole who makes sexual innuendos. He must have
perderasty
and
sodomy on his mind since he is always making reverences to boys. I
urge
McNamara to stop thinking about these things. They are illegal and he
will
go in prison where he will end up someone's bitch. Hey, you do not
want
to
end up having someone like Ed Gin ****ing you, do you? Or do you!

A L W A Y S ??? Pray tell, how does a single, solitary qualify as
"always". Where are all these other references you refer to? Please
provie the links. Do you ever say anything that you can prove as
factual? The unsubstantiated assertion has become a trademark tool in
your arsenal of the absurd. You want to know what is on my mind?
What is on my mind is that you are ... out of yours

Once is quite enough. But my question to you is why is a sexagenarian
like
you saying anything at all about boys? Even once?

BUT ... BUT ... BUT your contended that there were many references by
implication (read ALWAYS). Dunderhead, rather that extracting
something completely out of context, why not revisit the original
reference that addressed your disinterest in the female gender ...
mysogynist that you are. The reference in no way denoted my sexual
preference regardless of what knid of spin you vainly attempted to put
on it. Gee you're so dumb as to be pitiful.

You were attempting to denote MY sexual preferences. I am waiting for your
apology.
[...]

****ing Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows -
Minnesota