#111
|
|||
|
|||
OT - Yakhont and Moskit
"Michael Press" wrote in message
... [...] Also, you have not said what you have against Iran that you want to bomb them. You are confusing Tom Sherman with me. I want to bomb the hell out of Iran and most other Moslem countries because I do not like their confounded religion. It keeps them permanently poor and savage and a threat to Western Civilization. But maybe you don't care about Western Civilization? Why not emigrate to Iran and see how you like it there. -- Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota aka The Last of the Crusaders! |
Ads |
#112
|
|||
|
|||
OT - Yakhont and Moskit
In article ,
Tºm Shermªn™ °_° " wrote: On 3/16/2011 10:08 PM, Michael Press wrote: Nothing wrong with pipe bands---but I am a big fan of military ordinance. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nY6nm-6eCzM But can it react fast enough to target the Yakhont and Moskit? Bomb Iran and find out. Whoops! I bombed Libya instead. Is that acceptable? -- Michael Press |
#113
|
|||
|
|||
OT - Yakhont and Moskit
On 3/20/2011 3:21 AM, Michael Press wrote:
In , Tºm Shermªn™ " wrote: On 3/16/2011 10:08 PM, Michael Press wrote: Nothing wrong with pipe bands---but I am a big fan of military ordinance. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nY6nm-6eCzM But can it react fast enough to target the Yakhont and Moskit? Bomb Iran and find out. Whoops! I bombed Libya instead. Is that acceptable? No. Libya does not have the latest in Russian anti-ship supersonic cruise missiles. -- Tºm Shermªn - 42.435731,-83.985007 I am a vehicular cyclist. |
#114
|
|||
|
|||
Ed Dolan & Music
Edward Dolan wrote:
"James" wrote in message ... Edward Dolan wrote: [...] But hard to argue with facts, don't you think? I did not dispute that it is prolific, but the reason why. The reason why is that everything else is even worse. Wrong again. I see you are closed to further learning. Products need not be near perfect or even good to be successful. But they can't be as bad as you imagine them to be either. I don't need to imagine. I have used and abused Microsnot products for many years, along side software from many other companies. You obviously have not, so don't know any better. Your ignorance must be bliss. Ignorance is bliss. You don't know how imperfect Bill's fancy is until you've looked elsewhere. Furthermore, IE9 will be just as woeful as all it's predecessors, possibly more so. Where the hell should I look? Apple? Linux? Well, yes they are better whole operating systems, but you needn't go that far to fix Bill's mail software problem. Your friend, Tom, has given you an answer. Linux is an abomination. Only geeks would ever bother with it. Microsoft is an abomination. Only poor ignorant souls bother with it. Tom mentioned Thunderbird. This is mail software that is to some degree operating system independent. It runs on Windows as well as Linux and Mac. It is not a question of which OS, in this case, but that the Microsoft offering that you (ab)use can be replaced by a far superior tool at no cost except your download bandwidth. http://www.mozillamessaging.com/en-U...rbird/all.html Some postings I get from Google Groups are fine, others aren't. I am convinced that the problem lies with those who are using Google Groups, not with my Windows Mail. I will admit that Tom Sherman knows one hell of a lot about this computer ****. I don't have a problem with mail from anyone, thanks to my superior mail reader. Just wait and see how quickly they run to stick on the bandaids. All Internet browsers continually and constantly need band aids. Things might improve if we would put hackers into prison for 20 years for even a single offense. IE has more than its fair share, partly because of substandard development, and then a substandard operating system on which it relies. IE 9 is getting very good reviews. I suspect you are still thinking of IE 6. Windows Vista and Windows 7 are great improvements on Windows XP. You need to get up to date. Nop. Vista and 7 are abominations. Way too slow and clunky with all the extra layers of security crap that wouldn't be necessary if the underlying OS was built tough - like a *nix OS. From mobile phones to super computers, it is simply better. It's all Google's fault. Microsoft is as innocent and pure as the wind driven snow. Bahahahaha, as pure as the wind that blows from my arse! Do you mean ass? No. I don't blow wind from my donkey. Do you? Are you paying for your newsreader - eternal-september? No. Then why the hell isn't everyone using it instead of Google Groups? Maybe they enjoy accessing the usenet mail from a browser. JS. |
#115
|
|||
|
|||
Ed Dolan & Music
On 3/20/2011 5:18 PM, James wrote:
Edward Dolan wrote: "James" wrote in message ... Edward Dolan wrote: [...] But hard to argue with facts, don't you think? I did not dispute that it is prolific, but the reason why. The reason why is that everything else is even worse. Wrong again. I see you are closed to further learning. Products need not be near perfect or even good to be successful. But they can't be as bad as you imagine them to be either. I don't need to imagine. I have used and abused Microsnot products for many years, along side software from many other companies. You obviously have not, so don't know any better. Your ignorance must be bliss. Ignorance is bliss. You don't know how imperfect Bill's fancy is until you've looked elsewhere. Furthermore, IE9 will be just as woeful as all it's predecessors, possibly more so. Where the hell should I look? Apple? Linux? Well, yes they are better whole operating systems, but you needn't go that far to fix Bill's mail software problem. Your friend, Tom, has given you an answer. Linux is an abomination. Only geeks would ever bother with it. Microsoft is an abomination. Only poor ignorant souls bother with it. Tom mentioned Thunderbird. This is mail software that is to some degree operating system independent. It runs on Windows as well as Linux and Mac. It is not a question of which OS, in this case, but that the Microsoft offering that you (ab)use can be replaced by a far superior tool at no cost except your download bandwidth. http://www.mozillamessaging.com/en-U...rbird/all.html Some postings I get from Google Groups are fine, others aren't. I am convinced that the problem lies with those who are using Google Groups, not with my Windows Mail. I will admit that Tom Sherman knows one hell of a lot about this computer ****. I don't have a problem with mail from anyone, thanks to my superior mail reader. Just wait and see how quickly they run to stick on the bandaids. All Internet browsers continually and constantly need band aids. Things might improve if we would put hackers into prison for 20 years for even a single offense. IE has more than its fair share, partly because of substandard development, and then a substandard operating system on which it relies. IE 9 is getting very good reviews. I suspect you are still thinking of IE 6. Windows Vista and Windows 7 are great improvements on Windows XP. You need to get up to date. Nop. Vista and 7 are abominations. Way too slow and clunky with all the extra layers of security crap that wouldn't be necessary if the underlying OS was built tough - like a *nix OS. From mobile phones to super computers, it is simply better. It's all Google's fault. Microsoft is as innocent and pure as the wind driven snow. Bahahahaha, as pure as the wind that blows from my arse! Do you mean ass? No. I don't blow wind from my donkey. Do you? Are you paying for your newsreader - eternal-september? No. Then why the hell isn't everyone using it instead of Google Groups? Maybe they enjoy accessing the usenet mail from a browser. MS has dropped their public news servers and created a mail reader that makes using NNTP suck. Time to use something not dictated by the OS to access newsgroups. NNTP via TBird is better IMO. Using IE to read news is like using Word as a text editor for your email like Outlook (not express) does. |
#116
|
|||
|
|||
OT - Yakhont and Moskit
In article ,
Tºm Shermªn™ °_° " wrote: On 3/20/2011 3:21 AM, Michael Press wrote: In , Tºm Shermªn™ " wrote: On 3/16/2011 10:08 PM, Michael Press wrote: Nothing wrong with pipe bands---but I am a big fan of military ordinance. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nY6nm-6eCzM But can it react fast enough to target the Yakhont and Moskit? Bomb Iran and find out. Whoops! I bombed Libya instead. Is that acceptable? No. Libya does not have the latest in Russian anti-ship supersonic cruise missiles. It has to be Iran. They must have really hurt you. -- Michael Press |
#117
|
|||
|
|||
Ed Dolan & Music
"James" wrote in message
... Edward Dolan wrote: [...] Linux is an abomination. Only geeks would ever bother with it. Microsoft is an abomination. Only poor ignorant souls bother with it. [...] IE 9 is getting very good reviews. I suspect you are still thinking of IE 6. Windows Vista and Windows 7 are great improvements on Windows XP. You need to get up to date. Nop. Vista and 7 are abominations. Way too slow and clunky with all the extra layers of security crap that wouldn't be necessary if the underlying OS was built tough - like a *nix OS. From mobile phones to super computers, it is simply better. James is simply a MS hater, without rhyme or reason. If it were as bad as he says, no one in the world would ever be using it, whereas the truth is that entire the world is using it. What an idiot! It would make more sense for me to talk to the ether than to talk to him. -- Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#118
|
|||
|
|||
Ed Dolan & Music
Edward Dolan wrote:
"James" wrote in message ... Edward Dolan wrote: [...] Linux is an abomination. Only geeks would ever bother with it. Microsoft is an abomination. Only poor ignorant souls bother with it. [...] IE 9 is getting very good reviews. I suspect you are still thinking of IE 6. Windows Vista and Windows 7 are great improvements on Windows XP. You need to get up to date. Nop. Vista and 7 are abominations. Way too slow and clunky with all the extra layers of security crap that wouldn't be necessary if the underlying OS was built tough - like a *nix OS. From mobile phones to super computers, it is simply better. James is simply a MS hater, without rhyme or reason. If it were as bad as he says, no one in the world would ever be using it, whereas the truth is that entire the world is using it. What an idiot! It would make more sense for me to talk to the ether than to talk to him. Ed Dolan is simply a MS adorer, without even considering that better alternatives exist. I expect he owns a Land Rover as well. If not, he's tarred with the same brush at least. Unknown to Ed, the world is not fixated by Bills latest buggy offerings, or wowed by semi secret background downloads of bandaids. What a fool! The ether is a non existent medium, so talking to it, or even suggesting talking to it, is irrational and nonsensical. Ed is simply irrational. I realise talking sense to someone who is irrational and who doesn't realise the difference between his arse and an ass is pointless. JS. |
#119
|
|||
|
|||
Ed Dolan & Music
On 3/22/2011 12:15 AM, Edward Dolan wrote:
wrote in message ... Edward Dolan wrote: [...] Linux is an abomination. Only geeks would ever bother with it. Microsoft is an abomination. Only poor ignorant souls bother with it. [...] IE 9 is getting very good reviews. I suspect you are still thinking of IE 6. Windows Vista and Windows 7 are great improvements on Windows XP. You need to get up to date. Nop. Vista and 7 are abominations. Way too slow and clunky with all the extra layers of security crap that wouldn't be necessary if the underlying OS was built tough - like a *nix OS. From mobile phones to super computers, it is simply better. James is simply a MS hater, without rhyme or reason. If it were as bad as he says, no one in the world would ever be using it, whereas the truth is that entire the world is using it. What an idiot! It would make more sense for me to talk to the ether than to talk to him. Popularity is *not* an indicator of quality. To use an analogy Ed can understand, there are dozens of lip-syncing pop "musicians" [1] that outsell Beethoven, but there is more quality in a short Woo [2] composition than all the schlock combined. [1] To use the term *very* loosely. [2] Without opus number; e.g. compositions Beethoven considered unworthy of being assigned an opus number. -- Tºm Shermªn - 42.435731,-83.985007 I am a vehicular cyclist. |
#120
|
|||
|
|||
Ed Dolan & Music
"James" wrote in message
... Edward Dolan wrote: [...] James is simply a MS hater, without rhyme or reason. If it were as bad as he says, no one in the world would ever be using it, whereas the truth is that entire the world is using it. What an idiot! It would make more sense for me to talk to the ether than to talk to him. Ed Dolan is simply a MS adorer, without even considering that better alternatives exist. I expect he owns a Land Rover as well. If not, he's tarred with the same brush at least. I have already stated repeatedly that I am not in the least enamored of any of this computer **** regardless of OS. Pay attention! By the way, I own a 1988 Mazda 626. It gets well over 30 miles to the gallon. God only knows what a spendthrift fool like you own! Unknown to Ed, the world is not fixated by Bills latest buggy offerings, or wowed by semi secret background downloads of bandaids. What a fool! I have already stated repeatedly that the computer and the Internet is a seriously flawed technology. Pay attention! The ether is a non existent medium, so talking to it, or even suggesting talking to it, is irrational and nonsensical. But you do not exist either, just like all Apple zombies. Like all such nitwits, you have more money than brains and don't have a clue about how to spend it sensibly. Ed is simply irrational. I realise talking sense to someone who is irrational and who doesn't realise the difference between his arse and an ass is pointless. My rationality exists on a different plane than yours. The fact is that MS rules. Anyone who says otherwise is woefully ignorant and not susceptible to reason. Now take your "better alternatives" and shove them up your dumb ass! -- Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|