|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Ed Dolan and other *******s are trying to slow you down
On Dec 1, 11:07 am, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"His Highness the TibetanMonkey, not your average backyard wrote in message ... (I do a collage trying to fix Ed's clumsiness. The stupid stuff is his) [...] On Dec 1, 8:43 am, "Edward Dolan" wrote: Those wars cost a pittance. What a bargain! I believe we should always employ our military somewhere in the world since ass always needs to be kicked. Right now it is Muslim ass that needs to be kicked but that could change in the near future. Who knows, we may soon have to kick North Korean ass and maybe even Chinese ass. We should already have leveled Iran with nuclear weapons, but we presently have a wimp in the White House who does not know his ass from a hole in the ground. The main thing is to keep our ass kicking ability up to par. We do not want our military sitting in barracks at home, getting drunk and raising hell with civilians. Nay, it is far better that they be gainfully employed abroad slaughtering our enemies. But if you want peace and quiet, why not move to Costa Rica. I prefer the American Empire myself. I think you are clown, but an evil clown... http://www.scaryforkids.com/pics/evil-clown-costume.jpg The sooner America applies your philosophy, the sooner everything will be over. No long agonizing over climate change, just cataclysmic event leading to the extinction of the species, and thus the New Kingdom will take over. This kingdom will be populated by rats and roaches. Well, it will not be populated by you or your progeny because Saint Edward the Great is going to ensure that at least one atom bomb gets dropped right on your head. If it takes out all of Florida, it will be no loss to the world. The whole damn state is nothing but a sand bar anyway. Yeah right... http://www.scaryforkids.com/pics/evil-clown-costume.jpg |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Does TM have a brain?
"His Highness the TibetanMonkey, not your average backyard philosopher"
wrote in message ... On Dec 1, 11:07 am, "Edward Dolan" wrote: [...] Well, it will not be populated by you or your progeny because Saint Edward the Great is going to ensure that at least one atom bomb gets dropped right on your head. If it takes out all of Florida, it will be no loss to the world. The whole damn state is nothing but a sand bar anyway. Yeah right... You've got **** for brains all right. Now what else is new? ****ing Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Ed Dolan and other *******s are trying to slow you down
On Dec 1, 3:10 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"His Highness the TibetanMonkey, not your average backyard wrote in message ... On Dec 1, 11:07 am, "Edward Dolan" wrote: [...] Well, it will not be populated by you or your progeny because Saint Edward the Great is going to ensure that at least one atom bomb gets dropped right on your head. If it takes out all of Florida, it will be no loss to the world. The whole damn state is nothing but a sand bar anyway. Yeah right... You've got **** for brains all right. Now what else is new? You sure are ugly! http://www.scaryforkids.com/pics/evil-clown-costume.jpg |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Republicans and other *******s are trying to slow you down
On 12/1/2010 7:28 AM, Opus wrote:
On Nov 30, 8:02 pm, Forrest wrote: snip My 400 HP sport/muscle car isn't envious of a folding bicycle. Well, some day I invite to a Triathlon where one of the events is to take the vehicle in the subway. No subways where I live, and even there were, I don't care for public transportation. I prefer not being at the mercy of bus/subway schedule. Good, and we're spending a trillion dollars to make sure that the oil necessary for ****heads like you remains available. ****heads like me? Care to elaborate or is your argument simply limited to name calling? People that drive vehicles with a decimal order of magnitude more power than they need to move their butts with fossil fuels, because they haven't learned to use public transportation and refuse to ride a bicycle to move their butts using their butts. Is that elaborate enough for you? And just to be precise, the war in Iraq cost a billion dollars a DAY for 6 years, do the math. That doesn't even begin to tackle the cost of the war in Afghanistan, and both of those wars were "off-budget" items during the Bush administration, roughly $3 trillion added to the deficit that wasn't even counted until 2008. Because public transportation is everywhere, right. Where I live there are no buses, no subways, no bike lanes. It would suicidal and inefficient time-wise to bike to work. So consequently I drive everywhere, and I might as well enjoy myself when I do it. If you really want to get into semantics, it could be considered decedent and unnecessary to ride a bike with 20 in or larger wheels or more than one gear, because everyone should be able to peddle a fixed gear bike up a steep hill and if you can't you're a "****head". |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Republicans and other *******s are trying to slow you down
On Dec 1, 4:53*pm, Forrest Hodge wrote:
On 12/1/2010 7:28 AM, Opus wrote: On Nov 30, 8:02 pm, Forrest *wrote: snip My 400 HP sport/muscle car isn't envious of a folding bicycle. Well, some day I invite to a Triathlon where one of the events is to take the vehicle in the subway. No subways where I live, and even there were, I don't care for public transportation. I prefer not being at the mercy of bus/subway schedule. Good, and we're spending a trillion dollars to make sure that the oil necessary for ****heads like you remains available. ****heads like me? Care to elaborate or is your argument simply limited to name calling? People that drive vehicles with a decimal order of magnitude more power than they need to move their butts with fossil fuels, because they haven't learned to use public transportation and refuse to ride a bicycle to move their butts using their butts. Is that elaborate enough for you? And just to be precise, the war in Iraq cost a billion dollars a DAY for 6 years, do the math. That doesn't even begin to tackle the cost of the war in Afghanistan, and both of those wars were "off-budget" items during the Bush administration, roughly $3 trillion added to the deficit that wasn't even counted until 2008. Because public transportation is everywhere, right. Where I live there are no buses, no subways, no bike lanes. It would suicidal and inefficient time-wise to bike to work. So consequently I drive everywhere, and I might as well enjoy myself when I do it. If you really want to get into semantics, it could be considered decedent and unnecessary to ride a bike with 20 in or larger wheels or more than one gear, because everyone should be able to peddle a fixed gear bike up a steep hill and if you can't you're a "****head". Hey, there are no sidewalks either in most suburbs made for the SUV so... what do we do, drive an SUV? Now one question, HOW CAN YOU ENJOY DRIVING A SPORTS CAR IN AMERICA? So many vigilantes blocking the road and so much predation in speeding tickets that you feel like driving is for dummies. I drive a car for dummies, some older Lexus.... (But Opus is right in pointing that out: the bicycle is the best choice whenever possible) |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Small Wheels are Good!
On 12/1/2010 3:53 PM, Forrest Hodge wrote:
[...] Because public transportation is everywhere, right. Where I live there are no buses, no subways, no bike lanes. It would suicidal and inefficient time-wise to bike to work. So consequently I drive everywhere, and I might as well enjoy myself when I do it. If you really want to get into semantics, it could be considered decedent and unnecessary to ride a bike with 20 in or larger wheels or more than one gear, because everyone should be able to peddle a fixed gear bike up a steep hill and if you can't you're a "****head". It is "pedal", not "peddle". Small wheel are fine for long distances - I have done 125 mile rides in less than 7 hours on bikes with ISO 305-mm and ISO 406-mm wheels. -- Tēm ShermĒn - 42.435731,-83.985007 I am a vehicular cyclist. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Republicans and other *******s are trying to slow you down
On 12/1/2010 5:03 PM, His Highness the TibetanMonkey, not your average
backyard philosopher wrote: On Dec 1, 4:53 pm, Forrest wrote: On 12/1/2010 7:28 AM, Opus wrote: On Nov 30, 8:02 pm, Forrest wrote: snip My 400 HP sport/muscle car isn't envious of a folding bicycle. Well, some day I invite to a Triathlon where one of the events is to take the vehicle in the subway. No subways where I live, and even there were, I don't care for public transportation. I prefer not being at the mercy of bus/subway schedule. Good, and we're spending a trillion dollars to make sure that the oil necessary for ****heads like you remains available. ****heads like me? Care to elaborate or is your argument simply limited to name calling? People that drive vehicles with a decimal order of magnitude more power than they need to move their butts with fossil fuels, because they haven't learned to use public transportation and refuse to ride a bicycle to move their butts using their butts. Is that elaborate enough for you? And just to be precise, the war in Iraq cost a billion dollars a DAY for 6 years, do the math. That doesn't even begin to tackle the cost of the war in Afghanistan, and both of those wars were "off-budget" items during the Bush administration, roughly $3 trillion added to the deficit that wasn't even counted until 2008. Because public transportation is everywhere, right. Where I live there are no buses, no subways, no bike lanes. It would suicidal and inefficient time-wise to bike to work. So consequently I drive everywhere, and I might as well enjoy myself when I do it. If you really want to get into semantics, it could be considered decedent and unnecessary to ride a bike with 20 in or larger wheels or more than one gear, because everyone should be able to peddle a fixed gear bike up a steep hill and if you can't you're a "****head". Hey, there are no sidewalks either in most suburbs made for the SUV so... what do we do, drive an SUV? Now one question, HOW CAN YOU ENJOY DRIVING A SPORTS CAR IN AMERICA? So many vigilantes blocking the road and so much predation in speeding tickets that you feel like driving is for dummies. I drive a car for dummies, some older Lexus.... (But Opus is right in pointing that out: the bicycle is the best choice whenever possible) If you live in suburbs and choose to ride a bike, that's your decision. You can move to the city and live in a more bike friendly place. There are trade offs to living an any given area. How can I drive driving a sports car? Easy, back country roads and a police force that concerns itself more with keeping violent offenders off the streets more so that it does with the occasional hooning. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Small Wheels are Good!
On 12/1/2010 6:50 PM, Tēm ShermĒn °_° wrote:
On 12/1/2010 3:53 PM, Forrest Hodge wrote: [...] Because public transportation is everywhere, right. Where I live there are no buses, no subways, no bike lanes. It would suicidal and inefficient time-wise to bike to work. So consequently I drive everywhere, and I might as well enjoy myself when I do it. If you really want to get into semantics, it could be considered decedent and unnecessary to ride a bike with 20 in or larger wheels or more than one gear, because everyone should be able to peddle a fixed gear bike up a steep hill and if you can't you're a "****head". It is "pedal", not "peddle". Small wheel are fine for long distances - I have done 125 mile rides in less than 7 hours on bikes with ISO 305-mm and ISO 406-mm wheels. I'll take your word for it. If I have to be somewhere 125 miles away I'd rather drive there and be there in about 1/3 of the time it takes to bike. That's not to say I dislike the bicycle, I don't and I do bike for exercise (though not for 125 miles). But the majority of the time if you live in the suburbs or a rural area, the car is a much more practical means of conveyance. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Small Wheels are Good!
"Forrest Hodge" wrote in message
... On 12/1/2010 6:50 PM, Tēm ShermĒn °_° wrote: On 12/1/2010 3:53 PM, Forrest Hodge wrote: [...] Because public transportation is everywhere, right. Where I live there are no buses, no subways, no bike lanes. It would suicidal and inefficient time-wise to bike to work. So consequently I drive everywhere, and I might as well enjoy myself when I do it. If you really want to get into semantics, it could be considered decedent and unnecessary to ride a bike with 20 in or larger wheels or more than one gear, because everyone should be able to peddle a fixed gear bike up a steep hill and if you can't you're a "****head". It is "pedal", not "peddle". Small wheel are fine for long distances - I have done 125 mile rides in less than 7 hours on bikes with ISO 305-mm and ISO 406-mm wheels. I have never done a century in less than 12 hours. That means it is an all day ride, from dawn to dusk. 100 miles is too many. 70 miles in one day is enough for anyone. I'll take your word for it. If I have to be somewhere 125 miles away I'd rather drive there and be there in about 1/3 of the time it takes to bike. That's not to say I dislike the bicycle, I don't and I do bike for exercise (though not for 125 miles). But the majority of the time if you live in the suburbs or a rural area, the car is a much more practical means of conveyance. Forest Hodge is quite right about the suburbs and rural areas not being friendly to cyclists. Large cities and small towns are the best venues for cycling whether they have bike paths or not. However, some rural areas, like Wisconsin for instance, do have lots of county blacktops which are fine for cycling, but here in Minnesota it is mostly gravel roads in the countryside. A gravel road will wear you down, especially on a recumbent. Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Republicans and other *******s are trying to slow you down
On Dec 1, 10:29*pm, Forrest Hodge wrote:
On 12/1/2010 5:03 PM, His Highness the TibetanMonkey, not your average backyard philosopher wrote: On Dec 1, 4:53 pm, Forrest *wrote: On 12/1/2010 7:28 AM, Opus wrote: On Nov 30, 8:02 pm, Forrest * *wrote: snip My 400 HP sport/muscle car isn't envious of a folding bicycle. Well, some day I invite to a Triathlon where one of the events is to take the vehicle in the subway. No subways where I live, and even there were, I don't care for public transportation. I prefer not being at the mercy of bus/subway schedule. Good, and we're spending a trillion dollars to make sure that the oil necessary for ****heads like you remains available. ****heads like me? Care to elaborate or is your argument simply limited to name calling? People that drive vehicles with a decimal order of magnitude more power than they need to move their butts with fossil fuels, because they haven't learned to use public transportation and refuse to ride a bicycle to move their butts using their butts. Is that elaborate enough for you? And just to be precise, the war in Iraq cost a billion dollars a DAY for 6 years, do the math. That doesn't even begin to tackle the cost of the war in Afghanistan, and both of those wars were "off-budget" items during the Bush administration, roughly $3 trillion added to the deficit that wasn't even counted until 2008. Because public transportation is everywhere, right. Where I live there are no buses, no subways, no bike lanes. It would suicidal and inefficient time-wise to bike to work. So consequently I drive everywhere, and I might as well enjoy myself when I do it. If you really want to get into semantics, it could be considered decedent and unnecessary to ride a bike with 20 in or larger wheels or more than one gear, because everyone should be able to peddle a fixed gear bike up a steep hill and if you can't you're a "****head". Hey, there are no sidewalks either in most suburbs made for the SUV so... what do we do, drive an SUV? Now one question, HOW CAN YOU ENJOY DRIVING A SPORTS CAR IN AMERICA? So many vigilantes blocking the road and so much predation in speeding tickets that you feel like driving is for dummies. I drive a car for dummies, some older Lexus.... (But Opus is right in pointing that out: the bicycle is the best choice whenever possible) If you live in suburbs and choose to ride a bike, that's your decision. You can move to the city and live in a more bike friendly place. There are trade offs to living an any given area. The city is NOT a more bike friendly place. In the city you find the monkeys riding on sidewalks... You call that friendly? How can I drive driving a sports car? Easy, back country roads and a police force that concerns itself more with keeping violent offenders off the streets more so that it does with the occasional hooning. Sorry, you can have a Mazda Miata to have fun and save a lot of gas. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|