OT Flame War

"Tom Sherman" wrote in message
...
Just zis Guy, you know? wrote:

On 18 Oct 2004 19:07:07 GMT, othanks (James S. Prine)
wrote in message :


"Colonel David Crockett...would *not* have supported Kerry."


And Dwight D Eisenhower's son does not support Shrub ;-)

Neither does Ronald Reagan's son - and Bush II claims to be Reagan's
political heir.

Michael Reagan does support Bush and Bush II never claimed to be Reagan's
political heir

Notice nobody of stature seems to be supporting Nader

And what revisionist right-wing website did you get this from?

Perhaps if you sought treatment for your chronic rectocranial inversion
problem, you would see that Kerry is already broadcasting most of the material
I've described here. He has yet to sign Form 180, and 94 pages of his military
records are still unavailable. Not right-wing rhetoric, but demonstrable fact.

Kerry's colleagues who served with him in Vietnam (aside from the severely
injured and the killed in action, only Kerry left his tour early...fact),
repeatedly describe him in negative ways...and many of them are long-time
Democrats who support the Democratic Party but sincerely detest Kerry himself.

All of these lies could be debunked here, but it is rather pointless,
since most already know better, and there is not much hope for those who
do not.

LOL...you sneer at people being bigoted and close-minded, yet you continually
fail to see that the worst offender here...is you, in that regard. And, as for
'lies', Kerry's own sworn statements are replete with them...remember his
infamous 'secret mission into Cambodia on Christmas Eve, '68? Debunked and
proven to be a lie. How he complained to the Fulbright Committee about his
boat only being equipped with .50 caliber machine guns...his 'sole weapons',
when the boats were also equipped with small arms and M-60 machine guns? No,
please don't let the facts get in the way of your left-wing venom

The quoted post does reveal Mr. James S. Prine as a partisan shill,
however, so it is of some service.

I used to be a registered Democrat, for many years. I finally learned the
error of my ways. As for a partisan shill, that is ridiculous. I just dislike
liars and phony 'war heroes' like Kerry immensely.




James S. Prine

"Colonel David Crockett...would *not* have supported Kerry."

http://hometown.aol.com/jsprine/

Neither does Ronald Reagan's son - and Bush II claims to be Reagan's
political heir.

Reagan's son is hardly worthy of mentioning his own father's name.


James S. Prine

"Colonel David Crockett...would *not* have supported Kerry."

http://hometown.aol.com/jsprine/

"Tom Sherman" wrote in message
...
Edward Dolan wrote:

...
Mr. Sherman also does not understand the nature of the Islamic religion
which advocates Jihad (Holy War). Until this religion is reformed, we
will always be in danger from them because they may be able to acquire
nuclear weapons....

Jihad is not holy war, but struggle. While holy war could be a jihad, it
could just as well refer to attempting to reach some goal of personal
achievement.

The whole world knows what jihad is except you. In practice, it means kill
the infidel unless he converts to Islam.

Of course, the mainstream US media often presents Arabs and Muslims in the
worst possible manner. And Mr. Dolan likes to reveal his opinionated
ignorance.

I do not see any Christians beheading Muslims. Until I do, I will continue
to g.d. those ****ing miserable Arab Muslims all the way to hell and back.

Mr. Dolan should learn more about the (fortunately small) Jewish sect that
wants to create cataclysmic disaster (such as nuclear war), since they
believe it will bring the Messiah who will lead the Jews to rule the
Earth.

Are those nut sects in power anywhere? Are they running around the world
bombing and beheading those who do not think like how they do? Why the hell
don't you go to a Muslim country and try to live there if you think they are
so g.d. wonderful?

--
Regards,

Ed Dolan - Minnesota

"Tom Sherman" wrote in message
...
James S. Prine wrote:

...
That's pretty lame. Bush was an excellent fighter pilot, and his
commanders
agreed on that. Flying is fighter aircraft is dangerous, no matter where
it's
done. When Bush applied to go to Vietnam, there was already a glut of
pilots;
he really wasn't needed as a pilot. He accrued more points than he
needed to
earn his Honorable Discharge. He signed off on his Form 180, allowing
total
access to his military records (something Kerry still hasn't done; the
Navy is
withholding 94 PAGES of documents of Kerry's military records, at Kerry's
own
request). Bush didn't travel to Paris to meet Communist agents (as did
Kerry),
and Bush didn't lie about "earning" Purple Hearts from minor,
self-inflicted
wounds....

And what revisionist right-wing website did you get this from?

All of these lies could be debunked here, but it is rather pointless,
since most already know better, and there is not much hope for those who
do not.

The quoted post does reveal Mr. James S. Prine as a partisan shill,
however, so it is of some service.

A flaming liberal ideologue complaining about the truth. He is nothing but a
Bush hater - just like that other Bush hater, Michael Moore (who is big fat
white pig with no brains). Mr. Sherman needs to debunk himself first and
foremost. But he is not even going to vote for Kerry. Does that not just
about tell us all we need to know about this nut case.

--
Regards,

Ed Dolan - Minnesota

"Tom Sherman" wrote in message
...
Mark Leuck wrote:

"Tom Sherman" wrote in message
...

James S. Prine wrote:


They have a long way to go to equal the 2-3 million Vietnamese
civilians
killed by the US


Cites, please?...

This is common historical knowledge - would you ask for a citation that
Germany invaded Poland in 1939? Sheesh!

--
Tom Sherman - Curmudgeon and Pedant


When ask for facts you deflect the issue, I've yet to see any evidence
the
US killed 2 to 3 million people

Considering all of the other complaints you seem to have about the US
perhaps you want to believe this happend?

AFP wire service published estimates of 2 million civilian deaths in South
Vietnam, 2 million civilian deaths in North Vietnam, and 1.1 Vietnamese
military deaths for the war, for a total of 5.1 million. I deliberately
used very conservative numbers.

It would have been even better if we had killed every one of those communist
*******s in North Vietnam. Johnson did not know **** about how to fight a
war. He also did not know **** about how to fight poverty either. But that
is your typical liberal for you - a total ****- up in all departments. Kerry
would be another Johnson.

--
Regards,

Ed Dolan - Minnesota

"Tom Sherman" wrote in message
...
Just zis Guy, you know? wrote:

On 18 Oct 2004 19:07:07 GMT, othanks (James S. Prine)
wrote in message :


"Colonel David Crockett...would *not* have supported Kerry."


And Dwight D Eisenhower's son does not support Shrub ;-)

Neither does Ronald Reagan's son - and Bush II claims to be Reagan's
political heir.

Ron Jr. is a flaming homo. Almost all homos are liberals, just like all
abortionists are liberals and just like all America haters are liberals. Mr.
Sherman is in good company.

--
Regards,

Ed Dolan - Minnesota

"Tom Sherman" wrote in message
...
James S. Prine wrote:

This is common historical knowledge - would you ask for a citation that
Germany invaded Poland in 1939?


No, the 'facts' about the Vietnamese civilians killed during the Vietnam
War
were generated primarily by propaganda-happy the Communists...hardly
people I'd
base any serious research on.

Yes, the North Vietnamese reported LOWER than actual numbers of Vietnamese
casualties to keep their morale up.

Gosh! You mean your communist buddies would actually tell lies? I am shocked
at this revelation from you. I thought all communist, socialist and liberal
jackasses were incapable of ever telling any lies.

--
Regards,

Ed Dolan - Minnesota

"Edward Dolan" wrote in message
...

"Tom Sherman" wrote in message
...
Just zis Guy, you know? wrote:

On 18 Oct 2004 19:07:07 GMT, othanks (James S. Prine)
wrote in message :


"Colonel David Crockett...would *not* have supported Kerry."


And Dwight D Eisenhower's son does not support Shrub ;-)

Neither does Ronald Reagan's son - and Bush II claims to be Reagan's
political heir.

Ron Jr. is a flaming homo. Almost all homos are liberals, just like all
abortionists are liberals and just like all America haters are liberals.
Mr.
Sherman is in good company.

Ron Jr is not gay, try research next time

http://us.imdb.com/name/nm0713985/bio

"Mark Leuck" wrote in message
news:VQ1dd.389535$mD.186091@attbi_s02...

"Edward Dolan" wrote in message
...

"Tom Sherman" wrote in message
...
Just zis Guy, you know? wrote:

On 18 Oct 2004 19:07:07 GMT, othanks (James S. Prine)
wrote in message :


"Colonel David Crockett...would *not* have supported Kerry."


And Dwight D Eisenhower's son does not support Shrub ;-)

Neither does Ronald Reagan's son - and Bush II claims to be Reagan's
political heir.

Ron Jr. is a flaming homo. Almost all homos are liberals, just like all
abortionists are liberals and just like all America haters are liberals.
Mr.
Sherman is in good company.

Ron Jr is not gay, try research next time

http://us.imdb.com/name/nm0713985/bio

The above link does not tell us much at all about Ron Jr. I do know that he
was in the ballet (the Joffrey I believe) and that right there is a very bad
sign. But he has the reputation of having been a homo, which would not
surprise me. But what I have against him is his disloyalty to his father. He
really ought shut up if he can't say anything nice about his father.

--
Regards,

Ed Dolan - Minnesota