|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#131
|
|||
|
|||
Could Key West be a bike model for America?
Edward Dolan wrote:
"BrianNZ" wrote in message ... Edward Dolan wrote: "BrianNZ" wrote in message ... Edward Dolan wrote: "KingOfTheApes" wrote in message ... On Nov 6, 1:49 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote: [...] I propose that you actually accomplish something by ****ing yourself. No need. We all have been ****ed by this stupid war and the sheep like you who supported it. Hells Bells, I wanted this nation to kick ass in Iraq long before Bush ever even thought of it. But if Muslim terrorists want to kill us, I hope they murder you and your ilk first - you god damn liberal asshole! How many children did you send to the war? Unlike you, I am not stupid enough to ever have any children. Let the Muslim terrorists murder you and your children. It will serve you right for being so freaking stupid - you god damn liberal asshole! What is stupid about having children? They are the future of your country! But I don't believe in the future. I want to see the planet earth purged of its humanity and restored to its pre-human purity. I want to see the dinosaurs restored to their rightful domain. Yea ... Earth, the planet of the dinosaurs! Of course....feel free to throw yourself at the nearest dinosaur (alligator) to help get to this utopia. But that would deprive me of the pleasure of seeing liberal assholes like you being torn asunder. Of course, it's all about you......and your sick pleasures. BTW, the islamic terrorists that attacked on 911 came from Saudi Arabia, not Iraq....... Yes, you are right about that, but Iraq has long been a thorn in the loins of the West. It was a stroke of genius for Bush to strike at the heart of the Middle East by taking out Iraq. The war was over in a matter of a few weeks and everything since then has been merely a mopping up operation (an insurgency is not the same thing as a war). In the end, we will have achieved a great victory by showing the Muslim Arabs where they stand in the grand scheme of things - which is infinitely below us. Bush will go down in history as one of our greatest presidents for defending the West against the Muslim terrorists. If I had been president the entire Muslim world would already be a dead zone since I would have dropped hundreds of hydrogen bombs on them, thus insuring that the world of the future would be free of Muslims. The only good Muslim is a dead Muslim! Uh huh.....A bit of a contradiction to your statement above where you want everyone dead. Surely terrorists would be helping you rid the world of mankind? Your brothers in arms, so to speak. It is important who dies first. After the Arab Muslims have been killed, it will next be the turn of liberal assholes. When all in the world are indeed dead and gone, then (and only then) will it be time for Saint Edward the Great to depart this world of woe in order to reap His eternal reward. Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota What can I say.....bring it on. I'd probably die laughing if anyone calling themselves a 'Saint....the great' turned up. |
Ads |
#132
|
|||
|
|||
Could Key West be a bike model for America?
"BrianNZ" wrote in message ... Edward Dolan wrote: [...] But that would deprive me of the pleasure of seeing liberal assholes like you being torn asunder. Of course, it's all about you......and your sick pleasures. Jeez, I just HATE liberal assholes. What is wrong with that? [...] What can I say.....bring it on. I'd probably die laughing if anyone calling themselves a 'Saint....the great' turned up. Everything is relative. I am only a Great Saint by the pitiful standards that prevail today. Hey, if you are not ****ing everything in sight, then you are a Saint. Welcome to the club! I think Tom Sherman may also be a Saint, but not a Great Saint. He lives too high on the hog to be a Great Saint. We Great Saints are as poor as church mice and proud of it. The main problem with Tom Sherman as a Saint is that he does not respect and fear the Spanish Inquisition. He will rue that! Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#133
|
|||
|
|||
Could Key West be a bike model for America?
Edward Dolan wrote:
"BrianNZ" wrote in message ... Edward Dolan wrote: [...] But that would deprive me of the pleasure of seeing liberal assholes like you being torn asunder. Of course, it's all about you......and your sick pleasures. Jeez, I just HATE liberal assholes. What is wrong with that? [...] I don't like assholes either, but I don't care what their politics are. What can I say.....bring it on. I'd probably die laughing if anyone calling themselves a 'Saint....the great' turned up. Everything is relative. I am only a Great Saint by the pitiful standards that prevail today. Hey, if you are not ****ing everything in sight, then you are a Saint. Welcome to the club! I think Tom Sherman may also be a Saint, but not a Great Saint. He lives too high on the hog to be a Great Saint. We Great Saints are as poor as church mice and proud of it. The main problem with Tom Sherman as a Saint is that he does not respect and fear the Spanish Inquisition. He will rue that! Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota Excellent, I'm a Saint!!(but not from a lack of trying to **** everything in sight)....I do not fear or respect the Spanish Inquisition, because I'm not expecting it. |
#134
|
|||
|
|||
Could Key West be a bike model for America?
On Nov 6, 6:39*pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
What is stupid about having children? They are the future of your country! But I don't believe in the future. I want to see the planet earth purged of its humanity and restored to its pre-human purity. I want to see the dinosaurs restored to their rightful domain. Yea ... Earth, the planet of the dinosaurs! I think your world will be populated by roaches rathen than dinosaurs. Your stupidity will only end in an apocalyptic event. You sound pretty Nazi to me. Heil Ed Dolan the Great! And you are the prevailing mentality in this country! Until Obama, of course. Now there's some hope. And if not we've got the revolution, right? I think, Ed, you look like this... http://www.fulltimecasual.com/wp-con...px-dr_evil.jpg |
#135
|
|||
|
|||
Could Key West be a bike model for America?
"BrianNZ" wrote in message ... Edward Dolan wrote: [...] Jeez, I just HATE liberal assholes. What is wrong with that? [...] I don't like assholes either, but I don't care what their politics are. Liberal and asshole go together like bread and butter. What can I say.....bring it on. I'd probably die laughing if anyone calling themselves a 'Saint....the great' turned up. Everything is relative. I am only a Great Saint by the pitiful standards that prevail today. Hey, if you are not ****ing everything in sight, then you are a Saint. Welcome to the club! I think Tom Sherman may also be a Saint, but not a Great Saint. He lives too high on the hog to be a Great Saint. We Great Saints are as poor as church mice and proud of it. The main problem with Tom Sherman as a Saint is that he does not respect and fear the Spanish Inquisition. He will rue that! Excellent, I'm a Saint!!(but not from a lack of trying to **** everything in sight)....I do not fear or respect the Spanish Inquisition, because I'm not expecting it. You should fear the Spanish Inquisition because it lies in wait for lost souls like you! By the way, ****ing is for those who want babies. Do you want a baby? I am convinced it is the one and only thing that women want, but is it what men want? Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#136
|
|||
|
|||
Could Key West be a bike model for America?
"KingOfTheApes" wrote in message ... On Nov 6, 6:39 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote: What is stupid about having children? They are the future of your country! But I don't believe in the future. I want to see the planet earth purged of its humanity and restored to its pre-human purity. I want to see the dinosaurs restored to their rightful domain. Yea ... Earth, the planet of the dinosaurs! I think your world will be populated by roaches rathen than dinosaurs. Your stupidity will only end in an apocalyptic event. Only the rats and cockroaches will succeed us. They can survive anything, even atomic blasts. You sound pretty Nazi to me. Heil Ed Dolan the Great! Even Hitler, a stopped clock, was right twice a day. And you are the prevailing mentality in this country! Until Obama, of course. Now there's some hope. And if not we've got the revolution, right? Obama will be disaster for this country as are all liberals. Remember Carter? I think, Ed, you look like this... http://www.fulltimecasual.com/wp-con...px-dr_evil.jpg Nope, sorry, but I never go to a link unless it is fully explained beforehand. Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#137
|
|||
|
|||
Could Key West be a bike model for America?
Edward Dolan wrote:
long rambling insane rant And of course, Eddy's insane rant contained not one single fact or shred of evidence that supports his insane bearded cave man cartoon conspiracy theory or that refutes one fact or one claim made by the hundreds of highly respected leaders, experts and professionals who have demonstrated that 9-11 was an inside job. But that's how the "mind' of a clueless conspiracy kook "works" - facts, logic, evidence, and expert research are their most feared enemies - well, after the Fearsome Bearded Cave Man. chuckle Eddy seems to "think" that many of our 9-11 rescue workers and heroes, along with the hundreds of highly respected, highly credible experts, leaders, and professionals listed below are all insane. Of course, Eddy can't quote one claim they make and explain why he "thinks" they're mistaken. Eddy can't do that, because that would require the ability to read and think. Eddy's "intellect" limits him to mindlessly spewing naught but childish kook drivel and rants.... http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?c...ticl eId=1856 http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles..._knowledge.htm Ex-Italian President: Intel Agencies Know 9/11 An Inside Job Man who blew the whistle on Gladio tells Italy's largest newspaper attacks were run by CIA, Mossad Coming from a widely respected former head of state, Cossiga's assertion that the 9/11 attacks were an inside job and that this is common knowledge amongst global intelligence agencies is highly unlikely to be mentioned by any establishment media outlets, because like the hundreds of other sober ex-government, military, air force professionals, allied to hundreds more professors and intellectuals - he can't be sidelined as a crackpot conspiracy theorist. http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles...6insidejob.htm A 28-year CIA career man and a former skeptic of alternative 9/11 explanations has gone further than ever before in voicing his convictions that the attacks bore the hallmarks of an inside job and the three buildings in the WTC complex were brought down by controlled demolition. Bill Christison is a former senior official of the CIA. He was a National Intelligence Officer and the Director of the CIA's Office of Regional and Political Analysis before his retirement in 1979. Since then he has written numerous articles on U.S. foreign policies. In Christison's recent article, Stop Belittling the Theories About September 11, he afforded credibility to the notion that "significant parts" of the official 9/11 story were false and after careful research he concluded that the twin towers and building 7, "were most probably destroyed by controlled demolition charges placed in the buildings." http://georgewashington.blogspot.com...-credible.html MILITARY LEADERS Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense under President Ronald Reagan (Col. Ronald D. Ray) said that the official story of 9/11 is "the dog that doesn't hunt" (bio) Director of the U.S. "Star Wars" space defense program in both Republican and Democratic administrations, who was a senior air force colonel who flew 101 combat missions (Col. Robert Bowman) stated that 9/11 was an inside job. He also said: "If our government had merely [done] nothing, and I say that as an old interceptor pilot?I know the drill, I know what it takes, I know how long it takes, I know what the procedures are, I know what they were, and I know what they?ve changed them to?if our government had merely done nothing, and allowed normal procedures to happen on that morning of 9/11, the Twin Towers would still be standing and thousands of dead Americans would still be alive. [T]hat is treason!" U.S. Army Air Defense Officer and NORAD Tac Director, decorated with the Purple Heart, the Bronze Star and the Soldiers Medal (Capt. Daniel Davis) stated: "there is no way that an aircraft . . . would not be intercepted when they deviate from their flight plan, turn off their transponders, or stop communication with Air Traffic Control ... Attempts to obscure facts by calling them a 'conspiracy Theory' does not change the truth. It seems, 'Something is rotten in the State.' " President of the U.S. Air Force Accident Investigation Board, who also served as Pentagon Weapons Requirement Officer and as a member of the Pentagon's Quadrennial Defense Review, and who was awarded Distinguished Flying Crosses for Heroism, four Air Medals, four Meritorious Service Medals, and nine Aerial Achievement Medals (Lt. Col. Jeff Latas) is a member of a group which doubts the government's version of 9/11 U.S. General, Commanding General of U.S. European Command and Supreme Allied Commander Europe, decorated with the Bronze Star, Silver Star, and Purple Heart (General Wesley Clark) said "We've never finished the investigation of 9/11 and whether the administration actually misused the intelligence information it had. The evidence seems pretty clear to me. I've seen that for a long time." Air Force Colonel and key Pentagon official (Lt. Colonel Karen Kwiatkowski) finds various aspects of 9/11 suspicious. She also said: (at page 26): "I have been told by reporters that they will not report their own insights or contrary evaluations of the official 9/11 story, because to question the government story about 9/11 is to question the very foundations of our entire modern belief system regarding our government, our country, and our way of life. [However], questioning the official story is also simply and fundamentally American." Lieutenant colonel, 24-year Air Force career, Vice Chancellor for Student Affairs at the Defense Language Institute (Lt. Colonel Steve Butler) said "Of course Bush knew about the impending attacks on America. He did nothing to warn the American people because he needed this war on terrorism." Two-Star general (Major General Albert Stubbelbine) questions the attack on the Pentagon U.S. Air Force fighter pilot, former instructor at the USAF Fighter Weapons School and NATO?s Tactical Leadership Program, with a 20-year Air Force career (Lt. Colonel Guy S. Razer) said the following: "I am 100% convinced that the attacks of September 11, 2001 were planned, organized, and committed by treasonous perpetrators that have infiltrated the highest levels of our government .... Those of us in the military took an oath to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic". Just because we have retired does not make that oath invalid, so it is not just our responsibility, it is our duty to expose the real perpetrators of 9/11 and bring them to justice, no matter how hard it is, how long it takes, or how much we have to suffer to do it. We owe it to those who have gone before us who executed that same oath, and who are doing the same thing in Iraq and Afghanistan right now. Those of us who joined the military and faithfully executed orders that were given us had to trust our leaders. The violation and abuse of that trust is not only heinous, but ultimately the most accurate definition of treason!" U.S. Marine Corps lieutenant colonel, a fighter pilot with over 300 combat missions flown and a 21-year Marine Corps career (Lt. Colonel Shelton F. Lankford) believes that 9/11 was an inside job, and said: "This isn't about party, it isn't about Bush Bashing. It's about our country, our constitution, and our future. ... Your countrymen have been murdered and the more you delve into it the more it looks as though they were murdered by our government, who used it as an excuse to murder other people thousands of miles away. If you ridicule others who have sincere doubts and who know factual information that directly contradicts the official report and who want explanations from those who hold the keys to our government, and have motive, means, and opportunity to pull off a 9/11, but you are too lazy or fearful, or ... to check into the facts yourself, what does that make you? .... Are you afraid that you will learn the truth and you can't handle it? ..." U.S. Navy 'Top Gun' pilot (Commander Ralph Kolstad) who questions the official account of 9/11 and is calling for a new investigation, says "When one starts using his own mind, and not what one was told, there is very little to believe in the official story". The Group Director on matters of national security in the U.S. Government Accountability Office said that President Bush did not respond to unprecedented warnings of the 9/11 disaster and conducted a massive cover-up instead of accepting responsibility Additionally, numerous military leaders from allied governments have questioned 9/11, such as: Canadian Minister of Defense, the top military leader of Canada (Paul Hellyer) Assistant German Defense Minister (Andreas Von Bulow) Commander-in-chief of the Russian Navy (Anatoli Kornukov) Chief of staff of the Russian armed forces (General Leonid Ivashov) INTELLIGENCE PROFESSIONALS Former military analyst and famed whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg recently said that the case of a certain 9/11 whistleblower is "far more explosive than the Pentagon Papers". He also said that the government is ordering the media to cover up her allegations about 9/11. And he said that some of the claims concerning government involvement in 9/11 are credible, that "very serious questions have been raised about what they [U.S. government officials] knew beforehand and how much involvement there might have been", that engineering 9/11 would not be humanly or psychologically beyond the scope of the current administration, and that there's enough evidence to justify a new, "hard-hitting" investigation into 9/11 with subpoenas and testimony taken under oath. A 27-year CIA veteran, who chaired National Intelligence Estimates and personally delivered intelligence briefings to Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, their Vice Presidents, Secretaries of State, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and many other senior government officials (Raymond McGovern) said ?I think at simplest terms, there?s a cover-up. The 9/11 Report is a joke?, and is open to the possibility that 9/11 was an inside job. A 29-year CIA veteran, former National Intelligence Officer (NIO) and former Director of the CIA's Office of Regional and Political Analysis (William Bill Christison) said ?I now think there is persuasive evidence that the events of September did not unfold as the Bush administration and the 9/11 Commission would have us believe. ... All three [buildings that were destroyed in the World Trade Center] were most probably destroyed by controlled demolition charges placed in the buildings before 9/11." (and see this). 20-year Marine Corps infantry and intelligence officer, the second-ranking civilian in U.S. Marine Corps Intelligence, and former CIA clandestine services case officer (David Steele) stated that "9/11 was at a minimum allowed to happen as a pretext for war", and it was probably an inside job (see Customer Review dated October 7, 2006). A decorated 20-year CIA veteran, who Pulitzer-Prize winning investigative reporter Seymour Hersh called "perhaps the best on-the-ground field officer in the Middle East?, and whose astounding career formed the script for the Academy Award winning motion picture Syriana (Robert Baer) said that"the evidence points at" 9/11 having had aspects of being an inside job . The Division Chief of the CIA?s Office of Soviet Affairs, who served as Senior Analyst from 1966 - 1990. He also served as Professor of International Security at the National War College from 1986 - 2004 (Melvin Goodman) said "The final [9/11 Commission] report is ultimately a coverup." Professor of History and International Relations, University of Maryland. Former Executive Assistant to the Director of the National Security Agency. Former military attaché in China. 21-year career in U.S. Army Intelligence (Major John M. Newman, PhD, U.S. Army) questions the government's version of the events of 9/11. The head of all U.S. intelligence, the Director of National Intelligence (Mike McConnel) said "9/11 should have and could have been prevented" 9/11 COMMISSIONERS The 9/11 Commissioners knew that military officials lied to the Commission, and considered recommending criminal charges for such false statements, yet didn't bother to tell the American people (free subscription required). Indeed, the co-chairs of the Commission (Thomas Keane and Lee Hamilton) now admit that the Commission largely operated based upon political considerations. 9/11 Commission co-chair Lee Hamilton says "I don't believe for a minute we got everything right", that the Commission was set up to fail, that people should keep asking questions about 9/11, that the 9/11 debate should continue, and that the 9/11 Commission report was only "the first draft" of history. 9/11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey said that "There are ample reasons to suspect that there may be some alternative to what we outlined in our version . . . We didn't have access . . . ." 9/11 Commissioner Timothy Roemer said "We were extremely frustrated with the false statements we were getting" Former 9/11 Commissioner Max Cleland resigned from the Commission, stating: "It is a national scandal"; "This investigation is now compromised"; and "One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9-11 issue is so important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up". The Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission (John Farmer) who led the 9/11 staff's inquiry, said "I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described .... The tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years.... This is not spin. This is not true." SCIENTISTS A prominent physicist with 33 years of service for the Naval Research Laboratory in Washington, DC (Dr. David L. Griscom) said that the official theory for why the Twin Towers and world trade center building 7 collapsed "does not match the available facts" and supports the theory that the buildings were brought down by controlled demolition A world-renowned scientist, recipient of the National Medal of Science, America's highest honor for scientific achievement (Dr. Lynn Margulis) said: "I suggest that those of us aware and concerned demand that the glaringly erroneous official account of 9/11 be dismissed as a fraud and a new, thorough, and impartial investigation be undertaken." The former head of the Fire Science Division of the government agency which claims that the World Trade Centers collapsed due to fire (the National Institute of Standards and Technology), who is a Ph.D. in mechanical engineering, with more than 25 years experience in fire research and its applications, and is a professor in the Department of Fire Protection Engineering at the University of Maryland (Dr. James Quintiere), called for an independent review of the World Trade Center Twin Tower collapse investigation. "I wish that there would be a peer review of this," he said, referring to the NIST investigation. "I think all the records that NIST has assembled should be archived. I would really like to see someone else take a look at what they've done; both structurally and from a fire point of view. ... I think the official conclusion that NIST arrived at is questionable." Former Director for Research, Director for Aeronautical Projects, and Flight Research Program Manager for NASA's Dryden Flight Research Center, who holds masters degrees in both physics and engineering (Dwain A. Deets) says: "The many visual images (massive structural members being hurled horizontally, huge pyroclastic clouds, etc.) leave no doubt in my mind explosives were involved [in the destruction of the World Trade Centers on 9/11].'' A prominent physicist, former U.S. professor of physics from a top university, and a former principal investigator for the U.S. Department of Energy, Division of Advanced Energy Projects (Dr. Steven E. Jones) stated that the world trade centers were brought down by controlled demolition A U.S. physics professor who teaches at several universities (Dr. Crockett Grabbe) believes that the World Trade Centers were brought down by controlled demolition An expert on demolition (Bent Lund) said that the trade centers were brought down with explosives (in Danish) A Dutch demolition expert (Danny Jowenko) stated that WTC 7 was imploded A safety engineer and accident analyst for the Finnish National Safety Technology Authority (Dr. Heikki Kurttila) stated regarding WTC 7 that "The great speed of the collapse and the low value of the resistance factor strongly suggest controlled demolition." A 13-year professor of metallurgical engineering at a U.S. university, with a PhD in materials engineering, a former Congressional Office of Technology Assessment Senior Staff Member (Dr. Joel S. Hirschhorn), is calling for a new investigation of 9/11 A Danish professor of chemistry (Dr. Niels Harrit) said, in a mainstream Danish newspaper, "WTC7 collapsed exactly like a house of cards. If the fires or damage in one corner had played a decisive role, the building would have fallen in that direction. You don't have to be a woodcutter to grasp this" (translated) A former guidance systems engineer for Polaris and Trident missiles and professor emeritus, mathematics and computer science at a university concluded (Dr. Bruce R. Henry) that the Twin Towers "were brought down by planted explosives." A professor of mathematics (Gary Welz) said "The official explanation that I've heard doesn't make sense because it doesn't explain why I heard and felt an explosion before the South Tower fell and why the concrete was pulverized" STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS AND ARCHITECTS A prominent engineer with 55 years experience, in charge of the design of hundreds of major building projects including high rise offices, former member of the California Seismic Safety Commission and former member of the National Institute of Sciences Building Safety Council (Marx Ayres) believes that the World Trade Centers were brought down by controlled demolition (see also this) Two professors of structural engineering at a prestigious Swiss university (Dr. Joerg Schneider and Dr. Hugo Bachmann) said that, on 9/11, World Trade Center 7 was brought down by controlled demolition (translation here) Charles Pegelow, structural engineer, of Houston, Texas (and see this) Dennis Kollar, structural engineer, of West Bend, Wisconsin Doyle Winterton, structural engineer (retired) Haluk Akol, Structural Engineer and architect (ret.) William Rice, P.E., structural engineer, former professor of Vermont Technical College An architect, member of the American Institute of Architects, who has been a practicing architect for 20 years and has been responsible for the production of construction documents for numerous steel-framed and fire-protected buildings for uses in many different areas, including education, civic, rapid transit and industrial use (Richard Gage) disputes the claim that fire and airplane damage brought down the World Trade Centers and believes there is strong evidence of controlled demolition (many other architects who question 9/11 are listed here) LEGAL SCHOLARS Former Federal Prosecutor, Office of Special Investigations, U.S. Department of Justice under Presidents Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan; former U.S. Army Intelligence officer, and currently a widely-sought media commentator on terrorism and intelligence services (John Loftus) questions the government's version of 9/11. Former Inspector General, U.S. Department of Transportation; former Professor of Aviation, Dept. of Aerospace Engineering and Aviation and Professor of Public Policy, Ohio State University (Mary Schiavo) questions the government's version of 9/11. Professor of International Law at the University of Illinois, Champaign; a leading practitioner and advocate of international law; responsible for drafting the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, the American implementing legislation for the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention; served on the Board of Directors of Amnesty International (1988-1992), and represented Bosnia- Herzegovina at the World Court, with a Doctor of Law Magna Cum Laude as well as a Ph.D. in Political Science, both from Harvard University (Dr. Francis Boyle) questions the government's version of 9/11. Former prosecutor in the Organized Crime and Racketeering Section of the U.S. Justice Department and a key member of Attorney General Bobby Kennedy?s anti-corruption task force; former assistant U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois (J. Terrence "Terry" Brunner) questions the government's version of 9/11. Professor Emeritus, International Law, Professor of Politics and International Affairs, Princeton University; in 2001 served on the three-person UN Commission on Human Rights for the Palestine Territories, and previously, on the Independent International Commission on Kosovo (Richard Falk) questions the government's version of 9/11. Bessie Dutton Murray Distinguished Professor of Law Emeritus and Director, Center for Human Rights, University of Iowa; Fellow, World Academy of Art and Science. Honorary Editor, Board of Editors, American Journal of International Law (Burns H. Weston) questions the government's version of 9/11. Former president of the National Lawyers Guild (C. Peter Erlinder), who signed a petition calling for a real investigation into 9/11. And see petition. Assistant Professor of Criminal Justice at Troy University; associate General Counsel, National Association of Federal Agents; Retired Agent in Charge, Internal Affairs, U.S. Customs, responsible for the internal integrity and security for areas encompassing nine states and two foreign locations; former Federal Sky Marshall; 27-year U.S. Customs career (Mark Conrad) questions the government's version of 9/11. Professor of Law, University of Freiburg; former Minister of Justice of West Germany (Horst Ehmke) questions the government's version of 9/11. Director of Academic Programs, Institute for Policy and Economic Development, University of Texas, El Paso, specializing in executive branch secrecy policy, governmental abuse, and law and bureaucracy; former U.S. Army Signals Intelligence officer; author of several books on law and political theory (Dr. William G. Weaver) questions the government's version of 9/11. Famed trial attorney (Gerry Spence) questions the government's version of 9/11. Former Instructor of Criminal Trial Practice, Boalt Hall School of Law, University of California at Berkeley 11-year teaching career. Retired Chief Assistant Public Defender, Contra Costa County, California 31-year career (William Veale) said: "When you grow up in the United States, there are some bedrock principles that require concerted effort to discard. One is the simplest: that our leaders are good and decent people whose efforts may occasionally warrant criticism but never because of malice or venality... But one grows up. ... And with the lawyer's training comes the reliance on evidence and the facts that persuade... After a lot of reading, thought, study, and commiseration, I have come to the conclusion that the attacks of 9/11 were, in their essence, an inside job perpetrated at the highest levels of the U S government." MEMBERS OF CONGRESS Current U.S. Senator (Patrick Leahy) states "The two questions that the congress will not ask . . . is why did 9/11 happen on George Bush's watch when he had clear warnings that it was going to happen? Why did they allow it to happen?" Current Republican Congressman (Ron Paul) states that "we see the [9/11] investigations that have been done so far as more or less cover-up and no real explanation of what went on" Current Democratic Congressman (Dennis Kucinich) hints that we aren't being told the truth about 9/11 Former Democratic Senator (Mike Gravel) states that he supports a new 9/11 investigation and that we don't know the truth about 9/11 Former U.S. Republican Congressman and senior member of the House Armed Services Committee, and who served six years as the Chairman of the Military Research and Development Subcommittee (Curt Weldon) has shown that the U.S. tracked hijackers before 9/11, is open to hearing information about explosives in the Twin Towers, and is open to the possibility that 9/11 was an inside job FAMILY MEMBERS AND HEROIC FIRST RESPONDERS A common criticism of those who question 9/11 is that they are being "disrespectful to the victims and their families". However, half of the victim's families believe that 9/11 was an inside job (according to the head of the largest 9/11 family group, Bill Doyle) (and listen to this interview). Many family and friends of victims not only support the search for 9/11 truth, but they demand it (please ignore the partisan tone). See also this interview. Indeed, it has now become so clear that the 9/11 Commission was a whitewash that the same 9/11 widows who called for the creation of the 9/11 Commission are now demanding a NEW investigation (see also this video). And dying heroes, soon-to-be victims themselves, the first responders who worked tirelessly to save lives on and after 9/11, say that controlled demolition brought down the Twin Towers and that a real investigation is necessary. PSYCHIATRISTS AND PSYCHOLOGISTS Finally, those who attack people who question the government's version of 9/11 as "crazy" may wish to review the list of mental health professionals who have concluded that the official version of 9/11 is false: Psychiatrist Carol S. Wolman, MD Psychiatrist E. Martin Schotz Associate Clinical Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, as well as Radiology, at Duke University Medical Center D. Lawrence Burk, Jr., MD Board of Governors Distinguished Service Professor of Psychology and Associate Dean of the Graduate School at Ruters University Barry R. Komisaruk Professor of Psychology at University of New Hampshire William Woodward Professor of Psychology at University of Essex Philip Cozzolino Professor of Psychology at Goddard College Catherine Lowther Professor Emeritus of Psychology at California Institute of Integral Studies Ralph Metzner Professor of Psychology at Rhodes University Mike Earl-Taylor Retired Professor of Psychology at Oxford University Graham Harris Ph.D. in Clinical Psychology from the University of Nebraska and licensed Psychologist Ronald Feintech Ph.D. Clinical Neuropsychologist Richard Welser THOUSANDS OF OTHERS The roster above is only a sample. There are too many Ph.D. scientists and engineers, architects, military and intelligence officials, politicians, legal scholars and other highly-credible people who question 9/11 -- literally thousands -- to list in one place. Here are a few additional people to consider: The former director of the FBI (Louis Freeh) says there was a cover up by the 9/11 Commission Former air traffic controller, who knows the flight corridor which the two planes which hit the Twin Towers flew "like the back of my hand" and who handled two actual hijackings (Robin Hordon) says that 9/11 could not have occurred as the government says, and that planes can be tracked on radar even when their transponders are turned off (also, listen to this interview) Perhaps "the premiere collapse expert in the country", who 9/11 Commissioner Timothy Roemer referred to as a "very, very respected expert on building collapse", the head of the New York Fire Department's Special Operations Command and the most highly decorated firefighter in its NYFD history, who had previously "commanded rescue operations at many difficult and complex disasters, including the Oklahoma City Bombing, the 1993 World Trade Center Bombing, and many natural disasters worldwide" thought that the collapse of the South Tower was caused by bombs, because the collapse of the building was too even to have been caused by anything else (pages 5-6). Former Deputy Secretary for Intelligence and Warning under Nixon, Ford, and Carter (Morton Goulder), former former Deputy Director to the White House Task Force on Terrorism (Edward L. Peck), and former US Department of State Foreign Service Officer (J. Michael Springmann), as well as a who's who of liberals and independents) jointly call for a new investigation into 9/11 Former FBI agent (Robert Wright) says "The FBI, rather than trying to prevent a terrorist attack, was merely gathering intelligence so they would know who to arrest when a terrorist attack occurred." Former FBI translator, who the Department of Justice's Inspector General and several senators have called extremely credible (free subscription required) (Sibel Edmonds), said "If they were to do real investigations we would see several significant high level criminal prosecutions in this country. And that is something that they are not going to let out. And, believe me; they will do everything to cover this up". She also is leaning towards the conclusion that 9/11 was an inside job. http://georgewashington.blogspot.com...-collapse.html Structural Engineers Question Collapse of the World Trade Center One of the arguments that government apologists have used in trying to prop up the official story of why the World Trade Centers came down on 9/11 is that no structural engineers have questioned the government's version of events. However, that is now changing. The following structural engineers have now publicly challenged the government's account of the destruction of the Trade Centers on 9/11: Hugo Bachmann and Jörg Schneider, both emeritus professors in structural engineering at a prestigious Swiss university (translation here) Doyle Winterton, structural engineer (retired) Joseph M. Phelps, MS, PE. Structural Dynamicist (ret.), Charter Member, Structural Engineering Institute of the American Society of Civil Engineers Charles Pegelow, structural engineer, of Houston, Texas William Rice, P.E., structural engineer, former professor of Vermont Technical College When considered along with the other prominent scientists who question 9/11, it becomes impossible for any thinking person to accept at face value the government's version of the destruction of the World Trade Center. More experts who who have used science and hard evidence to prove demolition: http://journalof911studies.com/ Still more engineers and experts who explain why the Bush regime's magic fire theory is physically impossible. http://ae911truth.org/ Another one: http://www.vermontguardian.com/comme...inTowers.shtml And quite a few mo http://911proof.com/10.html More yet: http://11syyskuu.blogspot.com/2006/0...-of-wtc-7.html And a couple hundred mo http://www.patriotsquestion911.com/engineers.html -- They must find it difficult - those who have taken authority as the Truth, rather than Truth as the authority. - G. Massey http://911research.wtc7.net http://stj911.org http://stopthelie.com/1-hour_guide_to_911.html http://www.911truth.org Here's what happens to steel framed buildings exposed to raging infernos for hours on end. http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr69c.html On 9-11-01, WTC7, a 47 story steel framed building, which had only small, random fires, dropped in perfect symmetry at near free fall speed as in a perfectly executed controlled demolition. http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/videos.html http://911research.wtc7.net http://stj911.org http://stopthelie.com/1-hour_guide_to_911.html http://www.911truth.org Ever wonder who benefits from the 700 MILLION U.S. taxpayer dollars spent each DAY in Iraq? http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0223-08.htm http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?list=type&type=21 "They are waging a campaign of murder and destruction. And there is no limit to the innocent lives they are willing to take... men with blind hatred and armed with lethal weapons who are capable of any atrocity... they respect no laws of warfare or morality." -bu$h describing his own illegal invasion of Iraq. http://www.robert-fisk.com/iraqwarvictims_mar2003.htm http://www.commondreams.org/ http://thirdworldtraveler.com/ "Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter." -- Martin Luther King Jr. "To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918) Don't let bu$h do to the United States what his very close friend and top campaign contributor, Ken Lay, did to Enron... "The new America, born in sin and arrogance, delusional in Manifest Destiny, bred in overabundant gluttony, consumerist and materialist, fathered by George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and the Cabal of Criminality, a country flocked by sheeple, ignorant and conditioned, indifferent to a world growing up around it, living delusions of empire and of omnipotence, building hatred against it and its policies throughout the planet, slowly dumbing down its citizens, losing its edge in the sciences and arts, producing a nation of acquiescent automatons brainwashed to never question authority and always faithfully follow the crimes of governance." - Manuel Valenzuela |
#138
|
|||
|
|||
Could Key West be a bike model for America?
Vito wrote:
"Henry" wrote; snip As I've said, and you've ignored many times before As you've done many times before, you, like all bearded cave man cartoon conspiracy theorists, desperately avoid addressing the facts, evidence, and expert research, Here, try again. link restored These Mossad agents were observed filming and celebrating the demolitions. They said they were there to document the event. http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHART...eisraelis.html http://www.erichufschmid.net/TFC/Bol...-Israelis.html Muslim extremists, hostile to Saddam, perp'd the attack for their own reasons that had nothing to do with Iraq. You have not shred of evidence to support your conspiracy theory. The evidence that 9-11 was an inside job is solid and convincing to all but the most deluded conspiracy theorists. Tell us why you "think" Cheney would permit a known hijacked plane to enter the most heavy guarded airspace on the planet almost an hour after the first tower was hit. His stand down order resulted in a horrific loss of life and property. http://www.911truth.org/article_for_...70402105006226 3. Norman Mineta's mind-blowing testimony before the 9/11 Commission concerning the last fifty miles of flight of the plane that hit the Pentagon and Dick Cheney's orders about it, are matters of no apparent concern to Dunbar and Reagan. Thus, were one to rely on their telling, one would be unaware that Mineta was directed to the Presidential Emergency Operations Center in the White House sometime after the second plane hit the South Tower. One would not learn that he found Cheney in charge and being informed by a young man as to the path of the plane that hit the Pentagon. Nor would one know that Cheney was notified periodically that the plane was fifty miles out, thirty miles out, twenty, and ten. Avoiding the entire episode, Dunbar and Reagan obviously make no mention of the young manĀ?s inquiry of Cheney upon the final progress report, "Do the orders still stand"? Cheney's response, turning abruptly to the young man and asking pointedly if he (the young man) had heard anything to the contrary -- a fact of considerable importance for an understanding of the entire event -- therefore is not discussed in the pages of Debunking. As a consequence of this avoidance, one will find no examination of the ramifications of this testimony. One finds no query concerning the nature of the orders referred to, and no speculation concerning Pentagon defenses and their failure to deploy. There is no reference to the failure of the 9/11 Commission to find out who the young man was, or how many other people were in the room, and what their reactions were. There is no discussion of how the incident is simply eliminated from history by the adoption of an alternative chronology that contradicts a string of accounts and offers no explanation of why Norman Mineta, now holder of the Presidential Medal of Freedom, bestowed upon him by President Bush, would make up such an amazing tale or have such an elaborately embroidered faulty memory. None of these are matters for Dunbar and Reagan." http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/g...wayWithIt.html "The young man's reports to Cheney of the airliner's impending approach is followed by his urgent question whether "the orders still stand?" The young man was questioning the order. That question had to be about whether the order NOT to destroy the approaching plane still stood. Given the two prior attacks against the Twin Towers using the commercial airliners as weapons, an order to destroy the plane approaching the Pentagon would be the only order to give and would not be subject to question by the young man as the plane approached. Furthermore, had Cheney's order been to fire on the plane approaching the Pentagon (which first came near the White House), the anti-aircraft capacity of the Pentagon (or White House), would have sufficed to take out that plane, and certainly to have attempted to take out that plane. Since the Langley/Norfolk jets are at least 10 minutes away and out of range, Cheney's order is about the on-site Pentagon or White House defenses. Neither a shoot-down nor an attempted shoot-down occurred, and since Mineta does not speak of a last-second change in orders by Cheney, the only supportable conclusion is that Cheney's order was NOT to defend the Pentagon, an order so contrary to both common sense and military defense that it, and it alone, explains the questioning by the young man." http://www.911truth.org/article_for_...70402105006226 3. Norman Mineta's mind-blowing testimony before the 9/11 Commission concerning the last fifty miles of flight of the plane that hit the Pentagon and Dick Cheney's orders about it, are matters of no apparent concern to Dunbar and Reagan. Thus, were one to rely on their telling, one would be unaware that Mineta was directed to the Presidential Emergency Operations Center in the White House sometime after the second plane hit the South Tower. One would not learn that he found Cheney in charge and being informed by a young man as to the path of the plane that hit the Pentagon. Nor would one know that Cheney was notified periodically that the plane was fifty miles out, thirty miles out, twenty, and ten. Avoiding the entire episode, Dunbar and Reagan obviously make no mention of the young manĀ?s inquiry of Cheney upon the final progress report, "Do the orders still stand"? Cheney's response, turning abruptly to the young man and asking pointedly if he (the young man) had heard anything to the contrary -- a fact of considerable importance for an understanding of the entire event -- therefore is not discussed in the pages of Debunking. As a consequence of this avoidance, one will find no examination of the ramifications of this testimony. One finds no query concerning the nature of the orders referred to, and no speculation concerning Pentagon defenses and their failure to deploy. There is no reference to the failure of the 9/11 Commission to find out who the young man was, or how many other people were in the room, and what their reactions were. There is no discussion of how the incident is simply eliminated from history by the adoption of an alternative chronology that contradicts a string of accounts and offers no explanation of why Norman Mineta, now holder of the Presidential Medal of Freedom, bestowed upon him by President Bush, would make up such an amazing tale or have such an elaborately embroidered faulty memory. None of these are matters for Dunbar and Reagan." http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/g...wayWithIt.html "The young man's reports to Cheney of the airliner's impending approach is followed by his urgent question whether "the orders still stand?" The young man was questioning the order. That question had to be about whether the order NOT to destroy the approaching plane still stood. Given the two prior attacks against the Twin Towers using the commercial airliners as weapons, an order to destroy the plane approaching the Pentagon would be the only order to give and would not be subject to question by the young man as the plane approached. Furthermore, had Cheney's order been to fire on the plane approaching the Pentagon (which first came near the White House), the anti-aircraft capacity of the Pentagon (or White House), would have sufficed to take out that plane, and certainly to have attempted to take out that plane. Since the Langley/Norfolk jets are at least 10 minutes away and out of range, Cheney's order is about the on-site Pentagon or White House defenses. Neither a shoot-down nor an attempted shoot-down occurred, and since Mineta does not speak of a last-second change in orders by Cheney, the only supportable conclusion is that Cheney's order was NOT to defend the Pentagon, an order so contrary to both common sense and military defense that it, and it alone, explains the questioning by the young man." http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.p...xt=va&aid=8788 With regard to the morning of 9/11, everyone agrees that at some time after 9:03 (when the South Tower of the World Trade Center was struck) and before 10:00, Vice President Dick Cheney went down to the Presidential Emergency Operations Center (PEOC), sometimes simply called the ?bunker,? under the east wing of the White House. Everyone also agrees that, once there, Cheney was in charge---that he was either making decisions or relaying decisions from President Bush. But there is enormous disagreement as to exactly when Cheney entered the PEOC. According to The 9/11 Commission Report, Cheney arrived ?shortly before 10:00, perhaps at 9:58? (The 9/11 Commission Report [henceforth 9/11CR], 40). This official time, however, contradicts almost all previous reports, some of which had him there before 9:20. This difference is important because, if the 9/11 Commission?s time is correct, Cheney was not in charge in the PEOC when the Pentagon was struck, or for most of the period during which United Flight 93 was approaching Washington. But if the reports that have him there by 9:20 are correct, he was in charge in the PEOC all that time. Mineta?s Report of Cheney?s Early Arrival The most well-known statement contradicting the 9/11 Commission was made by Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta during his public testimony to the 9/11 Commission on May 23, 2003. Saying that he ?arrived at the PEOC at about 9:20 AM,? Mineta reported that he then overheard part of an ongoing conversation, which had obviously begun before he arrived, between a young man and Vice President Cheney. This conversation was about a plane coming toward Washington and ended with Cheney confirming that ?the orders still stand.? When Commissioner Timothy Roemer later asked Mineta how long after his arrival he overheard this conversation about whether the orders still stood, Mineta replied: ?Probably about five or six minutes.? This would mean, Roemer pointed out, ?about 9:25 or 9:26.? This is a remarkable contradiction. Given the fact that Cheney, according to Mineta, had been engaged in an ongoing exchange, he must have been in the PEOC for several minutes before Mineta?s 9:20 arrival. If Cheney had been there since 9:15, there would be a 43-minute contradiction between Mineta?s testimony and The 9/11 Commission Report. Why would such an enormous contradiction exist? One possible explanation would be that Mineta was wrong. His story, however, is in line with that of many other witnesses. Other Reports Supporting Cheney?s Early Arrival Richard Clarke reported that he, Cheney, and Condoleezza Rice had a brief meeting shortly after 9:03, following which the Secret Service wanted Cheney and Rice to go down to the PEOC. Rice, however, first went with Clarke to the White House?s Video Teleconferencing Center, where Clarke was to set up a video conference, which began at about 9:10. After spending a few minutes there, Rice said, according to Clarke: ?You?re going to need some decisions quickly. I?m going to the PEOC to be with the Vice President. Tell us what you need.? At about 9:15, Norman Mineta arrived and Clarke ?suggested he join the Vice President? (Against All Enemies, 2-5). Clarke thereby implied that Cheney was in the PEOC several minutes prior to 9:15. In an ABC News program on the first anniversary of 9/11, Cheney?s White House photographer David Bohrer reported that, shortly after 9:00, some Secret Service agents came into Cheney?s office and said, ?Sir, you have to come with us.? During this same program, Rice said: ?As I was trying to find all of the principals, the Secret Service came in and said, ?You have to leave now for the bunker. The Vice President's already there. There may be a plane headed for the White House.?? ABC?s Charles Gibson then said: ?In the bunker, the Vice President is joined by Rice and Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta? (?9/11: Interviews by Peter Jennings,? ABC News, September 11, 2002). The 9/11 Commission?s Late-Arrival Claim The 9/11 Commission agreed that the vice president was hustled down to the PEOC after word was received that a plane was headed towards the White House. It claimed, however, that this word was not received until 9:33. But even then, according to the Commission, the Secret Service agents immediately received another message, telling them that the aircraft had turned away, so ?[n]o move was made to evacuate the Vice President at this time.? It was not until ?just before 9:36? that the Secret Service ordered Cheney to go below (9/11CR 39). But even after he entered the underground corridor at 9:37, Cheney did not immediately go to the PEOC. Rather: Once inside, Vice President Cheney and the agents paused in an area of the tunnel that had a secure phone, a bench, and television. The Vice President asked to speak to the President, but it took time for the call to be connected. He learned in the tunnel that the Pentagon had been hit, and he saw television coverage of the smoke coming from the building. (9/11CR 40) Next, after Lynne Cheney ?joined her husband in the tunnel,? the Commission claimed, ?Mrs. Cheney and the Vice President moved from the tunnel to the shelter conference room? after the call ended, which was not until after 9:55. As for Rice, the Commission added, she ?entered the conference room shortly after the Vice President? (9/11CR 40). The contradiction could not be clearer. According to the Commission, Cheney, far from entering the PEOC before 9:20, as Mineta and others said, did not arrive there until about 9:58, 20 minutes after the 9:38 strike on the Pentagon, about which he had learned in the corridor. Cheney?s Account on Meet the Press The 9/11 Commission?s account even contradicted that given by Cheney himself in a well-known interview. Speaking to Tim Russert on NBC?s Meet the Press only five days after 9/11, Cheney said: ?[A]fter I talked to the president, . . . I went down into . . . the Presidential Emergency Operations Center. . . . [W]hen I arrived there within a short order, we had word the Pentagon's been hit.? Cheney himself, therefore, indicated that he had entered the PEOC prior to the (9:38) strike on the Pentagon, not 20 minutes after it, as the Commission would later claim. Dealing with the Contradictions How did the 9/11 Commission deal with the fact that its claim about the time of Cheney?s arrival in the PEOC had been contradicted by Bohrer, Clarke, Mineta, Rice, several news reports, and even Cheney himself? It simply omitted any mention of these contradictory reports. Of these omissions, the most important was the Commission?s failure to mention Norman Mineta?s testimony, even though it was given to the Commission in an open hearing---as can be seen by reading the transcript of that session (May 23, 2003). This portion of Mineta?s testimony was also deleted from the official version of the video record of the 9/11 Commission hearings in the 9/11 Commission archives. (It can, however, be viewed on the Internet.) During an interview for the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation in 2006, Hamilton was asked what ?Mineta told the Commission about where Dick Cheney was prior to 10 AM.? Hamilton replied: ?I do not recall? (?9/11: Truth, Lies and Conspiracy: Interview: Lee Hamilton,? CBC News, 21 August 2006). It was surprising that Hamilton could not recall, because he had been the one doing the questioning when Mineta told the story of the young man?s conversation with Cheney. Hamilton, moreover, had begun his questioning by saying to Mineta: ?You were there [in the PEOC] for a good part of the day. I think you were there with the Vice President.? And Mineta?s exchange with Timothy Roemer, during which it was established that Mineta had arrived at about 9:20, came immediately after Hamilton?s interrogation. And yet Hamilton, not being able to recall any of this, simply said, ?we think that Vice President Cheney entered the bunker shortly before 10 o?clock.? Obliterating Mineta?s Problematic Testimony To see possible motives for the 9/11 Commission?s efforts to obliterate Mineta?s story from the public record, we need to look at the conversation he reported to the Commission. He said: During the time that the airplane was coming in to the Pentagon, there was a young man who would come in and say to the Vice President, ?The plane is 50 miles out.? ?The plane is 30 miles out.? And when it got down to ?the plane is 10 miles out,? the young man also said to the Vice President, ?Do the orders still stand?? And the Vice President turned and whipped his neck around and said, ?Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?? Mineta?s story had dangerous implications with regard to the strike on the Pentagon, which occurred at 9:38. According to the 9/11 Commission, the military did not know that an aircraft was approaching the Pentagon until 9:36, so that it ?had at most one or two minutes to react to the unidentified plane approaching Washington? (9/11CR 34). That claim was essential for explaining, among other things, why the Pentagon had not been evacuated before it was struck---a fact that resulted in 125 deaths. A spokesperson for Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld, when asked why this evacuation had not occurred, said: ?The Pentagon was simply not aware that this aircraft was coming our way? (Newsday, Sept. 23, 2001). Mineta?s testimony implied, by contrast, that Cheney and others knew that an aircraft was approaching Washington about 12 minutes before that strike. Even more problematic was the question of the nature of ?the orders.? Mineta assumed, he said, that they were orders to have the plane shot down. But the aircraft was not shot down. Also, the expected orders, especially on a day when two hijacked airliners had already crashed into buildings in New York, would have been to shoot down any nonmilitary aircraft entering the ?prohibited? airspace over Washington, in which ?civilian flying is prohibited at all times? (?Pilots Notified of Restricted Airspace; Violators Face Military Action,? FAA Press Release, September 28, 2001). If those orders had been given, there would have been no reason to ask if they still stood. The question made sense only if the orders were to do something unusual---not to shoot the aircraft down. It appeared, accordingly, that Mineta had inadvertently reported Cheney?s confirmation of stand-down orders. That Mineta?s report was regarded as dangerous is suggested by the fact that the 9/11 Commission, besides deleting Mineta?s testimony and delaying Cheney?s entrance to the bunker by approximately 45 minutes, also replaced Mineta?s story with a new story about an incoming aircraft. According to The 9/11 Commission Report, here is what really happened: At 10:02, the communicators in the shelter began receiving reports from the Secret Service of an inbound aircraft. . . . At some time between 10:10 and 10:15, a military aide told the Vice President and others that the aircraft was 80 miles out. Vice President Cheney was asked for authority to engage the aircraft. . . . The Vice President authorized fighter aircraft to engage the inbound plane. . . . The military aide returned a few minutes later, probably between 10:12 and 10:18, and said the aircraft was 60 miles out. He again asked for authorization to engage. The Vice President again said yes. (9/11CR 41) The 9/11 Commission thereby presented the incoming aircraft story as one that ended with an order for a shoot down, not a stand down. And by having it occur after 10:10, the Commission not only disassociated it from the Pentagon strike but also ruled out the possibility that Cheney?s shootdown authorization might have led to the downing of United Flight 93 (which crashed, according to the Commission, at 10:03). Given the fact that the 9/11 Commission?s account of Cheney?s descent to the bunker contradicted the testimony of not only Norman Mineta but also many other witnesses, including Cheney himself, Congress and the press need to launch investigations to determine what really happened. -- They must find it difficult - those who have taken authority as the Truth, rather than Truth as the authority. - G. Massey http://911research.wtc7.net http://stj911.org http://stopthelie.com/1-hour_guide_to_911.html http://www.911truth.org Here's what happens to steel framed buildings exposed to raging infernos for hours on end. http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr69c.html On 9-11-01, WTC7, a 47 story steel framed building, which had only small, random fires, dropped in perfect symmetry at near free fall speed as in a perfectly executed controlled demolition. http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/videos.html http://911research.wtc7.net http://stj911.org http://stopthelie.com/1-hour_guide_to_911.html http://www.911truth.org Ever wonder who benefits from the 700 MILLION U.S. taxpayer dollars spent each DAY in Iraq? http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0223-08.htm http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?list=type&type=21 "They are waging a campaign of murder and destruction. And there is no limit to the innocent lives they are willing to take... men with blind hatred and armed with lethal weapons who are capable of any atrocity... they respect no laws of warfare or morality." -bu$h describing his own illegal invasion of Iraq. http://www.robert-fisk.com/iraqwarvictims_mar2003.htm http://www.commondreams.org/ http://thirdworldtraveler.com/ "Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter." -- Martin Luther King Jr. "To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918) Don't let bu$h do to the United States what his very close friend and top campaign contributor, Ken Lay, did to Enron... "The new America, born in sin and arrogance, delusional in Manifest Destiny, bred in overabundant gluttony, consumerist and materialist, fathered by George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and the Cabal of Criminality, a country flocked by sheeple, ignorant and conditioned, indifferent to a world growing up around it, living delusions of empire and of omnipotence, building hatred against it and its policies throughout the planet, slowly dumbing down its citizens, losing its edge in the sciences and arts, producing a nation of acquiescent automatons brainwashed to never question authority and always faithfully follow the crimes of governance." - Manuel Valenzuela |
#139
|
|||
|
|||
Could Key West be a bike model for America?
The Older Clown timidly cowered and lied:
He's another of life's failures: desperate to prove that he really "knows" more than the academic community at Cornell who employed him to keep their floors clean. It takes a "special" sort of imbecile to hide behind its killfile while it spews blatant lies about its betters. The older clown is precisely such a cowardly, self loathing clown. Would that we all could have such comical, self abusing, impotent "critics". chuckle http://www.journalof911studies.com/v...impossible.pdf 9/11 and the Twin Towers: Sudden Collapse Initiation was Impossible By Frank Legge, PhD (Chemistry) and Tony Szamboti, Mechanical Engineer 23 Dec 2007 Numerous arguments have been presented that the Twin Towers at the World Trade Centre could not have collapsed in the observed manner due to the cause asserted in the NIST report, namely damage from plane impact and fire. 1 The bases of these arguments include the rapidity and symmetry of collapse, 2 the adequacy of the steel supports, 3 and the finding of incendiary residues in the dust. 4 It has also been argued that the initiating event in the official explanation, the sudden collapse of one storey, 1 could not have occurred because the steel was not hot enough. 5 This argument is based on data set out in the NIST report itself. There is another argument, as will be described here, that is based simply on the behaviour of hot steel under load. No calculations are involved and no knowledge of the temperature of the steel is required. In the official explanation the collapse occurs in two stages. In the first stage one storey, damaged by plane impact and fire, suddenly collapses. This allows the section of the tower above to fall freely down and hit the lower section. In the second stage the energy of this impact is said to be sufficient to cause the top of the lower section to disintegrate. This material adds to the falling mass and further impacts cause disintegration to continue in a rapid sequence all the way to the ground.6 Let us consider the situation just prior to the first stage. There are some damaged columns, some fire, and a claimed ack of fireproofing. Given the substantial safety factor in the building design, the number of damaged columns is far too few to put the buildings at risk without the fire. This is elaborated on in the NIST report and elsewhere.1, 7 We will ignore the fact that according to the physical evidence data within the body of the NIST report, and contrary to its conclusion, the steel did not get very hot. We will assume the strongest case for the official theory: the fire was uniform over the whole area and very hot. The fire has to heat the steel, which takes time. Eventually the steel gets hot enough that it cannot carry the load in the initiating storey. It starts to sag. At this point there has been no disruption of the columns, other than that caused by the plane impact, hence most of the columns are still attached to the floors above and below and are continuous, passing up and down into other storeys, giving the columns rigidity. The length of the columns between attachments is too short for buckling to occur. 8 Failure must therefore be by compression. As the steel sags two things will happen: the columns, as they shorten, will become wider, which is obvious; and the inherent strength of the steel will increase, which is not obvious. It is well established however that the yield strength of steel increases as the degree of distortion increases. This tendency increases with rising temperature and is pronounced at the temperatures required for collapse, as can be seen in the graph below. 9 For both of these reasons the initial sag cannot be catastrophic but will be very slow and the rate will depend on the rate of heat input. A rising temperature will be needed to offset both the significant increase in yield strength and the slight increase in cross-section area, if collapse is to progress. It is clear therefore that the upper section should only have moved down slowly and only continued to do so if additional heat was supplied. A slow, protracted, and sagging collapse was not observed however with either tower. As observed in videos of both tower collapses, the upper sections suddenly start to fall and disintegrate.10 In the case of the south tower, initially a lean of the upper section developed but within the first second this turned into a rapid collapse with upper section disintegration, just as was observed with the north tower. It appears therefore that the official concept of a free fall collapse of the upper portion through the initiation storey, due to heat effects from fire, is a fantasy. If the temperature did become high enough for collapse to occur it could not have happened in the observed manner. 9 In particular it could not have been sudden and thus could not have produced the velocity, and hence the momentum and kinetic energy, upon which the official story depends for the second stage of collapse. In contrast, all observations are in accord with the use of explosives in a timed sequence. The case that the NIST report must be corrected is confirmed. If this report is not corrected the suspicion will remain that its purpose was not so much to inform as to deceive. -- They must find it difficult - those who have taken authority as the Truth, rather than Truth as the authority. - G. Massey http://911research.wtc7.net http://stj911.org http://stopthelie.com/1-hour_guide_to_911.html http://www.911truth.org Here's what happens to steel framed buildings exposed to raging infernos for hours on end. http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr69c.html On 9-11-01, WTC7, a 47 story steel framed building, which had only small, random fires, dropped in perfect symmetry at near free fall speed as in a perfectly executed controlled demolition. http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/videos.html http://911research.wtc7.net http://stj911.org http://stopthelie.com/1-hour_guide_to_911.html http://www.911truth.org Ever wonder who benefits from the 700 MILLION U.S. taxpayer dollars spent each DAY in Iraq? http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0223-08.htm http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?list=type&type=21 "They are waging a campaign of murder and destruction. And there is no limit to the innocent lives they are willing to take... men with blind hatred and armed with lethal weapons who are capable of any atrocity... they respect no laws of warfare or morality." -bu$h describing his own illegal invasion of Iraq. http://www.robert-fisk.com/iraqwarvictims_mar2003.htm http://www.commondreams.org/ http://thirdworldtraveler.com/ "Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter." -- Martin Luther King Jr. "To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918) Don't let bu$h do to the United States what his very close friend and top campaign contributor, Ken Lay, did to Enron... "The new America, born in sin and arrogance, delusional in Manifest Destiny, bred in overabundant gluttony, consumerist and materialist, fathered by George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and the Cabal of Criminality, a country flocked by sheeple, ignorant and conditioned, indifferent to a world growing up around it, living delusions of empire and of omnipotence, building hatred against it and its policies throughout the planet, slowly dumbing down its citizens, losing its edge in the sciences and arts, producing a nation of acquiescent automatons brainwashed to never question authority and always faithfully follow the crimes of governance." - Manuel Valenzuela |
#140
|
|||
|
|||
Could Key West be a bike model for America?
Funny how bearded cave man cartoon conspiracy theorists talk
about their conspiracy theory at the most bizarre times - almost like a Tourrets attack - and then run away when you challenge 'em to think or explain what they had on their "mind"... . chuckle Road Glidin' Don wrote: If you disagree with Henry about the twin towers being blown up by Bush to give an excuse for attacking Iraq, then you also "fear the message." Enjoy the taste of each other's medicine, boys. I don't believe that Bush blew up the towers. He's far too incompetent. These Mossad agents might know something about it, though. They were observed filming and celebrating the demolitions. They said they were there to document the event. http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHART...eisraelis.html http://www.erichufschmid.net/TFC/Bol...-Israelis.html Also, we have evidence that Cheney gave a stand down order as flight 77 approached the Pentagon. It's quite a stretch to believe that a known hijacked 757 would be permitted to fly into the most heavily guarded air space on the planet an hour *after* the first tower was hit. http://www.journalof911studies.com/l...tagonOn911.pdf The meek, slight man who allegedly forced a burly Vietnam era Fighter pilot to hand over his plane and then proceeded to perform high speed aerobatics over the Pentagon couldn't even fly a Cessna. http://911research.wtc7.net/disinfo/...badpilots.html But of course, these are facts and evidence that bearded cave man cartoon conspiracy theorists are incapable of discussing, because they show that 9-11 was an inside job. There's something "special" about a conspiracy theorist who isn't able to explain or discuss his own conspiracy.... ;-) -- http://911research.wtc7.net http://www.journalof911studies.com/ http://www.911truth.org Here's what happens to steel framed buildings exposed to raging infernos for hours on end. http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/anal...are/fires.html http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr69c.html On 9-11-01, WTC7, a 47 story steel framed building, which had only small, random fires, dropped in perfect symmetry at near free fall speed as in a perfectly executed controlled demolition. http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/videos.html http://wtc7.net/articles/FEMA/WTC_ch5.htm Ever wonder who benefits from the 700 MILLION U.S. taxpayer dollars spent each DAY in Iraq? http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0223-08.htm http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?list=type&type=21 "They are waging a campaign of murder and destruction. And there is no limit to the innocent lives they are willing to take... men with blind hatred and armed with lethal weapons who are capable of any atrocity... they respect no laws of warfare or morality." -bu$h describing his own illegal invasion of Iraq. http://www.robert-fisk.com/iraqwarvictims_mar2003.htm http://www.commondreams.org/ http://thirdworldtraveler.com/ "Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter." -- Martin Luther King Jr. "To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918) Don't let bu$h do to the United States what his very close friend and top campaign contributor, Ken Lay, did to Enron... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Could Key West be a bike model for America? | KingOfTheApes | General | 196 | November 27th 08 04:57 AM |
Could Key West be a bike model for America? | KingOfTheApes | Social Issues | 191 | November 27th 08 04:57 AM |
TT: 1. Deutschland Uber Alles 2. America 3. America | Ted van de Weteringe | Racing | 4 | September 25th 08 07:26 PM |
These mp3 interviews -Air America -Know why there is about to be civil war in America. A MUST LISTEN | harbinger | Australia | 17 | June 4th 06 12:16 AM |
Cannondale R500 (2004 model) or R700 (2005 model) | slakemoth | General | 1 | July 22nd 05 07:37 PM |