An open letter to Lance Armstrong ++++ not a bad idea

In article
,
ilan wrote:

On May 24, 10:07Â*pm, Frederick the Great wrote:
In article
,

Â*ilan wrote:
"Jeff MacGregor is a senior writer for ESPN.com and ESPN The
Magazine."

Actually, he is a self-important nothing who doesn't understand due
process and is wasting space in his magazine writing letters which
contradict presumption of innocence.

Presumption of innocence is for the courtroom only; and
only for some of the principals. (Who expects counsel
for the prosecution to presume innocence?) Anyone else
is at liberty to assign guilt as he pleases, subject
only to the laws of slander and libel.

Why not just do what this French article does:
http://www.20minutes.fr/article/7279...ion-soumission

That is, analyse the defendant's body language to determine guilt. As
a response, I want a video analysis proving that Lance's bike position
betrays his guilt? Oops, that was already done on French TV in 2005,
e.g., some supposed bike expert I've never heard of on TV station M6
showed as proof the fact that he was riding so fast up a hill that he
was actually coasting in the uphill turns! He neglected to show any of
his rivals who were riding 0.3 kph slower.

Everybody lies. We do not need proof.

--
Old Fritz