|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
They are whingeing about petrol prices again!
On 20/11/2011 10:30, Simon Mason wrote:
On Nov 20, 9:48 am, Tony wrote: Of course that is the undoubted benefit of higher fuel prices so the higher the better. Lets get all those frivolous drivers off our roads so that serious road users can benefit. I bet the resulting lack of congestion would save on fuel costs in the end. Doug. Yes, the higher the better, we all know that only motorists use fuel. Those lorries, buses, trains, ambulances, hospitals, etc do not use fuel at all, they are powered by Pixie Dust that falls out of the skies in cloud cockoo land.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - In years to come when all of the oil has run out, those vehicles will be powered by biofuels made from palm oil, maize, wheat, sugar cane and all sorts of other renewable resources. We are in a transitional period when we are having to learn to be weaned off fossil fuels and into cleaner forms of energy which will benefit us all. Fantastic. With half the world in food poverty, and we grow crops to use for transportation fuel. -- Simon For personal replies, please use my reply-to address. |
Ads |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
They are whingeing about petrol prices again!
On 20/11/2011 10:18, Mr. Benn wrote:
"Dave - Cyclists VOR" wrote in message ... On 20/11/2011 08:50, Doug wrote: On 18-Nov-2011, Simon wrote: On 18/11/2011 14:48, Simon Mason wrote: On Nov 17, 7:33 am, Simon wrote: On 17/11/2011 04:05, Simon Mason wrote: On Nov 16, 11:46 pm, wrote: On Nov 16, 6:53 pm, wrote: Doug wrote: Fortunately this hardly affects cyclists at all. so why are you mentioning it here? "just about everybody on this group have said they own a car." I am not moaning about high petrol prices as a) I work for an oil company. b) I get a staff discount c) I hardly ever drive anyway. Win win win. Higher prices, less traffic! -- Simon For personal replies, please use my reply-to address.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - My fuel bills are going through the roof due to me driving Mrs M out to all of these hills. I've just put another 70 quids worth in. :-( It does not go far, I spend approx £80 a month on diesel. Still I’d rather pay £160 per month and see less traffic on the roads. Of course that is the undoubted benefit of higher fuel prices so the higher the better. Lets get all those frivolous drivers off our roads so that serious road users can benefit. I bet the resulting lack of congestion would save on fuel costs in the end. Still waiting for the penny to drop.... ========================================= It will when he realises that increases in food prices are largely due to increased transportation costs. Food is very cheap in the UK. It should be a lot more. If transportation costs were higher, there would be less unnecessary transportation of them. -- Simon For personal replies, please use my reply-to address. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
They are whingeing about petrol prices again!
On 20/11/2011 10:27, Mrcheerful wrote:
Doug wrote: On 18-Nov-2011, Simon wrote: On 18/11/2011 14:48, Simon Mason wrote: On Nov 17, 7:33 am, Simon wrote: On 17/11/2011 04:05, Simon Mason wrote: On Nov 16, 11:46 pm, wrote: On Nov 16, 6:53 pm, wrote: Doug wrote: Fortunately this hardly affects cyclists at all. so why are you mentioning it here? "just about everybody on this group have said they own a car." I am not moaning about high petrol prices as a) I work for an oil company. b) I get a staff discount c) I hardly ever drive anyway. Win win win. Higher prices, less traffic! -- Simon For personal replies, please use my reply-to address.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - My fuel bills are going through the roof due to me driving Mrs M out to all of these hills. I've just put another 70 quids worth in. :-( It does not go far, I spend approx £80 a month on diesel. Still I'd rather pay £160 per month and see less traffic on the roads. Of course that is the undoubted benefit of higher fuel prices so the higher the better. Lets get all those frivolous drivers off our roads so that serious road users can benefit. I bet the resulting lack of congestion would save on fuel costs in the end. Doug. and who do you think pays for your state benefit handouts? The Daily Wail Reader. -- Simon For personal replies, please use my reply-to address. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
They are whingeing about petrol prices again!
On 20/11/2011 10:37, Simon Mason wrote:
On Nov 20, 8:50 am, "Doug" wrote: On 18-Nov-2011, Simon wrote: On 18/11/2011 14:48, Simon Mason wrote: On Nov 17, 7:33 am, Simon wrote: On 17/11/2011 04:05, Simon Mason wrote: On Nov 16, 11:46 pm, wrote: On Nov 16, 6:53 pm, wrote: Doug wrote: Fortunately this hardly affects cyclists at all. so why are you mentioning it here? "just about everybody on this group have said they own a car." I am not moaning about high petrol prices as a) I work for an oil company. b) I get a staff discount c) I hardly ever drive anyway. Win win win. Higher prices, less traffic! -- Simon For personal replies, please use my reply-to address.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - My fuel bills are going through the roof due to me driving Mrs M out to all of these hills. I've just put another 70 quids worth in. :-( It does not go far, I spend approx £80 a month on diesel. Still I’d rather pay £160 per month and see less traffic on the roads. Of course that is the undoubted benefit of higher fuel prices so the higher the better. Lets get all those frivolous drivers off our roads so that serious road users can benefit. I bet the resulting lack of congestion would save on fuel costs in the end. Doug.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Agreed. Fuel is far too cheap - if people can afford to sit in traffic for an hour like I was the other night doing 8-9 mpg, then the fuel taxes need to be raised in order to force people to consider more sensible alternatives. I certainly won't be driving to work today, that's for sure. Me neither, I have for a long time considered that driving to work is a costly waste of resources. -- Simon For personal replies, please use my reply-to address. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
They are whingeing about petrol prices again!
Simon Mason wrote:
On Nov 17, 8:58 am, "Just zis Guy, you know?" wrote: On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 20:09:19 -0800 (PST), Bret Cahill wrote: Fortunately this hardly affects cyclists at all. When will these car addicts ever learn that motoring is costly and it goes with the territory. If they don't like it then they should not have chosen a lifestyle based on car dependency in the first place, instead of perpetually whining about their habit. There are actually some people who cannot ride a bike, due to problems with balance, orthopaedic problems etc. They should not be stigmatised. They cost more but it's hard to fall off a recumbent. A recumbent trike, anyway. Come to think of it, I don't think I have ever heard of *anyone* crashing or falling off a recumbent. http://www.aboutmyarea.co.uk/Hampshi...at-Segensworth |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
They are whingeing about petrol prices again!
On Nov 20, 12:55*pm, Simon Weaseltemper
wrote: On 20/11/2011 10:30, Simon Mason wrote: On Nov 20, 9:48 am, Tony *wrote: Of course that is the undoubted benefit of higher fuel prices so the higher the better. Lets get all those frivolous drivers off our roads so that serious road users can benefit. I bet the resulting lack of congestion would save on fuel costs in the end. Doug. Yes, the higher the better, we all know that only motorists use fuel. Those lorries, buses, trains, ambulances, hospitals, etc do not use fuel at all, they are powered by Pixie Dust that falls out of the skies in cloud cockoo land.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - In years to come when all of the oil has run out, those vehicles will be powered by biofuels made from palm oil, maize, wheat, sugar cane and all sorts of other renewable resources. We are in a transitional period when we are having to learn to be weaned off fossil fuels and into cleaner forms of energy which will benefit us all. Fantastic. With half the world in food poverty, and we grow crops to use for transportation fuel. -- Simon For personal replies, please use my reply-to address.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I know it makes no sense but we have to find new liquid fuel sources from somewhere other than oil, coal or gas because there won't be anymore left in the future. -- Simon Mason |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
They are whingeing about petrol prices again!
Just zis Guy, you know? wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 02:30:56 -0800 (PST), Simon Mason wrote: On Nov 20, 9:48 am, Tony Dragon wrote: Of course that is the undoubted benefit of higher fuel prices so the higher the better. Lets get all those frivolous drivers off our roads so that serious road users can benefit. I bet the resulting lack of congestion would save on fuel costs in the end. Doug. Yes, the higher the better, we all know that only motorists use fuel. Those lorries, buses, trains, ambulances, hospitals, etc do not use fuel at all, they are powered by Pixie Dust that falls out of the skies in cloud cockoo land.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - In years to come when all of the oil has run out, those vehicles will be powered by biofuels made from palm oil, maize, wheat, sugar cane and all sorts of other renewable resources. We are in a transitional period when we are having to learn to be weaned off fossil fuels and into cleaner forms of energy which will benefit us all. I sort of wonder if there is potential to grow these oil crops in third world countries. It's about time they got a look in. Guy 25 per cent of native nigerians make their living through the theft of fuel. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
They are whingeing about petrol prices again!
On Nov 20, 12:50*pm, Simon Weaseltemper
wrote: ISTM bizarre that in this day and age we have old folk frightened to put their heating on in the winter because they cannot afford the fuel bills, and we have teenagers and single mums on benefits, running around in cars. We had a young single mum in the paper the other day on benefits who was moaning about the car high parking prices outside of the dole office where she had to sign on now and again. The world has gone mad. -- Simon Mason |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
They are whingeing about petrol prices again!
On 20/11/2011 12:58, Simon Weaseltemper wrote:
On 20/11/2011 10:18, Mr. Benn wrote: "Dave - Cyclists VOR" wrote in message ... On 20/11/2011 08:50, Doug wrote: On 18-Nov-2011, Simon wrote: On 18/11/2011 14:48, Simon Mason wrote: On Nov 17, 7:33 am, Simon wrote: On 17/11/2011 04:05, Simon Mason wrote: On Nov 16, 11:46 pm, wrote: On Nov 16, 6:53 pm, wrote: Doug wrote: Fortunately this hardly affects cyclists at all. so why are you mentioning it here? "just about everybody on this group have said they own a car." I am not moaning about high petrol prices as a) I work for an oil company. b) I get a staff discount c) I hardly ever drive anyway. Win win win. Higher prices, less traffic! -- Simon For personal replies, please use my reply-to address.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - My fuel bills are going through the roof due to me driving Mrs M out to all of these hills. I've just put another 70 quids worth in. :-( It does not go far, I spend approx £80 a month on diesel. Still I’d rather pay £160 per month and see less traffic on the roads. Of course that is the undoubted benefit of higher fuel prices so the higher the better. Lets get all those frivolous drivers off our roads so that serious road users can benefit. I bet the resulting lack of congestion would save on fuel costs in the end. Still waiting for the penny to drop.... ========================================= It will when he realises that increases in food prices are largely due to increased transportation costs. Food is very cheap in the UK. It should be a lot more. Should it? Why do you say that UK living standards should be reduced? |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
They are whingeing about petrol prices again!
On 20/11/2011 13:01, Simon Weaseltemper wrote:
On 20/11/2011 10:37, Simon Mason wrote: On Nov 20, 8:50 am, "Doug" wrote: On 18-Nov-2011, Simon wrote: On 18/11/2011 14:48, Simon Mason wrote: On Nov 17, 7:33 am, Simon wrote: On 17/11/2011 04:05, Simon Mason wrote: On Nov 16, 11:46 pm, wrote: On Nov 16, 6:53 pm, wrote: Doug wrote: Fortunately this hardly affects cyclists at all. so why are you mentioning it here? "just about everybody on this group have said they own a car." I am not moaning about high petrol prices as a) I work for an oil company. b) I get a staff discount c) I hardly ever drive anyway. Win win win. Higher prices, less traffic! -- Simon For personal replies, please use my reply-to address.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - My fuel bills are going through the roof due to me driving Mrs M out to all of these hills. I've just put another 70 quids worth in. :-( It does not go far, I spend approx £80 a month on diesel. Still I’d rather pay £160 per month and see less traffic on the roads. Of course that is the undoubted benefit of higher fuel prices so the higher the better. Lets get all those frivolous drivers off our roads so that serious road users can benefit. I bet the resulting lack of congestion would save on fuel costs in the end. Doug.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Agreed. Fuel is far too cheap - if people can afford to sit in traffic for an hour like I was the other night doing 8-9 mpg, then the fuel taxes need to be raised in order to force people to consider more sensible alternatives. I certainly won't be driving to work today, that's for sure. Me neither, I have for a long time considered that driving to work is a costly waste of resources... ....so you don't bother going? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
the media flurry about petrol prices ... | Bleve | Australia | 39 | April 28th 06 04:06 AM |
Control petrol prices | [email protected] | Australia | 9 | April 20th 06 09:11 PM |
Petrol prices and mirrors | Spoken4 | Australia | 39 | April 11th 06 11:36 AM |
[OT] Petrol | Zog The Undeniable | UK | 55 | September 19th 05 11:19 AM |
Another way to avoid high petrol prices? | BruceA | Australia | 14 | September 10th 05 02:54 PM |