|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Luigi de Guzman wrote:
It is because during the equivalent period, the American bicycle scene was dominated by the "cruiser" type, which is nowhere near as elegant, efficient, or practical. Nonsense. The only thing the typical roadster might have to make it more capable than a balloon-tire cruiser is hub gearing (and not all roadsters have it) or front brakes (and not all Amercan cruisers lack those). Both kinds of bike are exceedingly rugged and comfortable, they both weigh tons/tonnes, and they have both maintained some sort of following ever since their heyday. Remember that balloon-tire cruisers evolved into mountain bikes, which looks to me like a favorable reflection upon their durability, relative comfort, and utility. I doubt that roadsters would have done the same if the geographic circumstances had been reversed. Pounding down Mt. Tamalpais on a rod-braked bike with ridiculously high standover sounds like a self-punishing mistake. Roadsters are adequately stylish the way they are, which is why the new ones look exactly like the old ones. But they are clearly not compelling enough to arouse the imagination of bike customizers, be they hot rodders, lowriders, or OEMs. Compared to a cantilever-framed, fat-tired tanker they look, well, Amish. I will surmise that the market segment you're thinking of is busy being nostalgic for the fat, chrome-encrusted sidewalk behemoths of its youth and is buying the new cruisers which I see at my bikeshop. So what makes a 50lb cruiser a "behemoth" when a 50lb roadster isn't? They are similar in wheelbase, and the roadster is taller and has bigger wheels. Maybe the Euro bike is a "leviathan" or a "juggernaut"? The few features that functionally distinguish a roadster from a cruiser are the full chaincase and pump/generator/lighting furniture-- things that lend themselves to allowing some poor schmuck (make that *bloke*) to slog to work in the rain and dark at 55 degrees latitude. In that respect such a bike is completely appropriate. For the intended use of a ballon tire cruiser (that is, carrying a youngster on short trips around the neighborhood, campus, or newspaper route) those features are superfluous. Chalo Colina |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Chalo wrote:
Roadsters are adequately stylish the way they are, which is why the new ones look exactly like the old ones. But they are clearly not compelling enough to arouse the imagination of bike customizers, be they hot rodders, lowriders, or OEMs. Compared to a cantilever-framed, fat-tired tanker they look, well, Amish. Now we're at the heart of the matter. Lowriders, wheelie bikes, chromed-up cruisers with whitewalls: I don't like them. If you think an old Raleigh (or Batavus, or Gazelle, or Pashley...) looks Amish, I think the whole curb-crusher cruiser thing looks tacky, and, frankly, un-bicycle, if there is such a concept. (Un-bicycle: I should explain that. I have never wanted my bicycle to be anything other than a bicycle. I don't want it to look like or act like a streamline train, or a fiftysomething Caddillac, or a Harley, or an F-86, or whatever. If I wanted a Caddy or a Harley, I'd get one. I just want a *bicycle*.) But then, I also have a fairly understated dress-sense, too, so. snip The few features that functionally distinguish a roadster from a cruiser are the full chaincase and pump/generator/lighting furniture-- things that lend themselves to allowing some poor schmuck (make that *bloke*) to slog to work in the rain and dark at 55 degrees latitude. In that respect such a bike is completely appropriate. For the intended use of a ballon tire cruiser (that is, carrying a youngster on short trips around the neighborhood, campus, or newspaper route) those features are superfluous. And we're back to "utility," aren't we? A fifty-pound roadster is transport, and meant to be ridden from point A to B. I don't see (maybe I'm too young to have seen) chromed-up cruisers being put to that same use. Kids around here ride BMXs, and a quick survey of the bikeracks at a nearby college campus shows...not a single cruiser. None. There are at least a few roadsters around town (Raleigh "Sports" types, with the smaller chainguard), though, being ridden by guys going to and from work. We'll agree to disagree here (not the first time, either): You back the cruiser. Fine. I'll back the roadster. Just so long as we can share the same road, I'm happy--even if either of us wouldn't be caught dead on the other's favored bicycle. -Luigi de gustibus non est disputandum, quod justus sum, et id tu scis. -- www.livejournal.com/users/ouij Photos, Rants, Raves |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Luigi de Guzman wrote:
I have never wanted my bicycle to be anything other than a bicycle. I don't want it to look like or act like a streamline train, or a fiftysomething Caddillac, or a Harley, or an F-86, or whatever. If I wanted a Caddy or a Harley, I'd get one. Ah, but what if you wanted an F-86? ;^) Chalo wrote: For the intended use of a ballon tire cruiser (that is, carrying a youngster on short trips around the neighborhood, campus, or newspaper route) those features are superfluous. A fifty-pound roadster is transport, and meant to be ridden from point A to B. I don't see (maybe I'm too young to have seen) chromed-up cruisers being put to that same use. Kids around here ride BMXs, and a quick survey of the bikeracks at a nearby college campus shows...not a single cruiser. None. But the design intent of those bikes was for conditions in the USA of the 1950s. At that time, you would have seen such bikes almost exclusively. Between marketing trends and the fact that teens are increasingly feeble when it comes to transporting themselves, BMX bikes have taken over. They are no match for big-wheeled bikes from a transportation standpoint, but they tolerate a whole lot more tomfoolery. I reckon that campus bike rack you checked didn't contain any 40-50 lb bikes at all outside of Xmart junkers. Am I right? There are at least a few roadsters around town (Raleigh "Sports" types, with the smaller chainguard), though, being ridden by guys going to and from work. They are hard to fault until you have to replace the BB or the headset. We'll agree to disagree here (not the first time, either): You back the cruiser. Fine. I'll back the roadster. Just so long as we can share the same road, I'm happy--even if either of us wouldn't be caught dead on the other's favored bicycle. You get me wrong. I bought a beautiful recent model Gazelle for my sister, and I think it was one of my better bike purchases ever. It came with internal gears, drum brakes, stainless steel rims, chaincase, skirt guards, pump, generator, lights, fenders, rear rack, folding panniers, bungee straps, and a wheel lock-- all original equipment. It looks sharp, though it leaves little room for nondestructive personalization. I don't have one because it would need to be a 72cm frame or so for proper fit. Stylewise though, there is no comparing the Gazelle updated roadster http://www.gazelle-hollandrad.de/bik...MEUR_D2_03.jpg to an updated cruiser like this: http://nirve.com/main/largepic.asp?id=1408 There's nothing wrong with the dowdier bike, but it fails to lead you on a flight of fancy. Chalo Colina |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
"Chalo" wrote in message om... Luigi de Guzman wrote: I have never wanted my bicycle to be anything other than a bicycle. I don't want it to look like or act like a streamline train, or a fiftysomething Caddillac, or a Harley, or an F-86, or whatever. If I wanted a Caddy or a Harley, I'd get one. Ah, but what if you wanted an F-86? ;^) You could buy one of the few still around. If you had enough money. Like this guy: http://popularmechanics.com/science/...2/index3.phtml or this guy: http://www.warbirdalley.com/F86-sf.htm Pete |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
A fifty-pound roadster is
transport, and meant to be ridden from point A to B. I don't see (maybe I'm too young to have seen) chromed-up cruisers being put to that same use. Kids around here ride BMXs, and a quick survey of the bikeracks at a nearby college campus shows...not a single cruiser. None. But the design intent of those bikes was for conditions in the USA of the 1950s. At that time, you would have seen such bikes almost exclusively. Sure. What I want to know is when the cantilevered frame became *the* North American bicycle, when there were so many production advantages to be had from straight tubes. Between marketing trends and the fact that teens are increasingly feeble when it comes to transporting themselves, BMX bikes have taken over. They are no match for big-wheeled bikes from a transportation standpoint, but they tolerate a whole lot more tomfoolery. There are always a bunch of BMX guys tricking in front of the skate shop here in town. They're pretty neat. I reckon that campus bike rack you checked didn't contain any 40-50 lb bikes at all outside of Xmart junkers. Am I right? You are correct. I do, however, see, from time to time, a Giant OCR 1. Some kid is riding from class to class on a roadie...! The funny thing is that I've only ever seen that bike parked on campus racks. To wander slightly off-topic, have you noticed that you've begun to recognize all the *bicycles*, if not the cyclists, in your neighborhood? I see the same bunch of guys riding around town, and even if I don't know them personally, I can recognize them by their bikes: The guy on the Independent Fabrications bike; the guy on the Trek 2200, and so on. There are at least a few roadsters around town (Raleigh "Sports" types, with the smaller chainguard), though, being ridden by guys going to and from work. They are hard to fault until you have to replace the BB or the headset. Many are just ridden until they disintegrate. snip There's nothing wrong with the dowdier bike, but it fails to lead you on a flight of fancy. And we're back to this. Flights of fancy aren't as immediately useful for getting to work on time and in presentable condition. I've seen updated Gazelles in commuter use (in London), and I must say that they seem pretty practical bikes, but they aren't anywhere near as good-looking as the older ones. [A Dutch friend reports that at her high school in Holland, there was a rivalry between the guys who rode Gazelles and the guys who rode Batavus bikes. Ford vs. Chevy, Dutch-style, I guess] IF I had the skill, it would be amusing to attempt to construct a "light heavyweight" roadster. Maybe a Reynolds 853 main triangle and fork, but in roadster lines. Or, for even more comedy value, how about a carbon-fiber roadster frame? You wouldn't even have to paint it, and, if it held up well to roadster use, it would definitely make me a carbon fiber believer. -Luigi -- www.livejournal.com/users/ouij Photos, Rants, Raves |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Luigi de Guzman wrote:
--snip-- There are always a bunch of BMX guys tricking in front of the skate shop here in town. They're pretty neat. I think it's pretty cool what these guys can do with those little bikes. Once in a while, my 13-yr-old son tries to imitate them, with rather messy results. I had to restock the first aid kid last time. --snip-- To wander slightly off-topic, have you noticed that you've begun to recognize all the *bicycles*, if not the cyclists, in your neighborhood? This afternoon, the DH and I went out riding, and some guy in lycra passed us. We kept tooling along. He passed us again. *blink* We never saw him at the side of the road or anything. I'm sure it was the same guy. That was weird. IF I had the skill, it would be amusing to attempt to construct a "light heavyweight" roadster. Maybe a Reynolds 853 main triangle and fork, but in roadster lines. Or, for even more comedy value, how about a carbon-fiber roadster frame? You wouldn't even have to paint it, and, if it held up well to roadster use, it would definitely make me a carbon fiber believer. The thing that concerns me about carbon fiber is, I've heard that any damage to the frame and it will deteriorate quickly from the point of damage. I have no idea if that's true, but if it is, it would definitely put me off carbon fiber. -km -- Only cowards fight kids -- unidentified Moscow protester the black rose proud to be owned by a yorkie http://community.webshots.com/user/blackrosequilts |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
"the black rose" wrote in message
... This afternoon, the DH and I went out riding, and some guy in lycra passed us. We kept tooling along. He passed us again. *blink* We never saw him at the side of the road or anything. I'm sure it was the same guy. That was weird. This happened to me one day on the way home from work. I'm grinding up the east high rise, and this guy passes me. Then, about two miles later, approaching the east channel bridge, he passes me again. I put on the sprint, catch up to his slipstream, and ask him how he managed to do that. He said that he had stopped at the toilets at the park on the Lid. I guess I must have passed him while he was in the loo. -- Warm Regards, Claire Petersky please substitute yahoo for mousepotato to reply Home of the meditative cyclist: http://home.earthlink.net/~cpetersky/Welcome.htm Personal page: http://www.geocities.com/cpetersky/ See the books I've set free at: http://bookcrossing.com/referral/Cpetersky |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
"the black rose" wrote in message
... Claire Petersky wrote: [some free-form musings] You've got the soul of a poet, Claire. Thank you for saying so, since I blather on so much around here, I hope that my posts aren't immediately marked as "read" without actually having been so. Hey, did I tell everyone it looks like I'm going to get one of my essays published in a literary magazine? Woo-hoo! -- Warm Regards, Claire Petersky please substitute yahoo for mousepotato to reply Home of the meditative cyclist: http://home.earthlink.net/~cpetersky/Welcome.htm Personal page: http://www.geocities.com/cpetersky/ See the books I've set free at: http://bookcrossing.com/referral/Cpetersky |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Claire Petersky wrote:
"the black rose" wrote in message ... Claire Petersky wrote: [some free-form musings] You've got the soul of a poet, Claire. Thank you for saying so, since I blather on so much around here, I hope that my posts aren't immediately marked as "read" without actually having been so. I suspect mine are, largely. But mine aren't as uniformly good as yours, usually. Hey, did I tell everyone it looks like I'm going to get one of my essays published in a literary magazine? Woo-hoo! Many congrats. where and when? -Luigi -- www.livejournal.com/users/ouij Photos, Rants, Raves |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pashley man's 3-sp. bike for sale | David | Marketplace | 2 | September 11th 04 04:52 AM |
pashley 26" | thinuniking | Unicycling | 23 | January 21st 04 10:11 AM |