#1
|
|||
|
|||
Near Miss
Driving home today (yes, I know - you can shoot me later) I had left the
dual carrigeway in the left hand lane of the sliproad (Watchorn roundabout off North/Eastbound A38 headed into Alfreton if anyone knows it) and I got to the give way lines at the roundabout, looked to the right and saw a cyclist coming round the roundabout towards me. I reckoned that he would be in front of me in 3-5 seconds so although I could have got out in front I decided to wait and let him in front. I was then aware of another car (also turning left) coming howling past me and entering the roundabout at some speed. I can't honestly say that I saw whether the car passed behind or in front of the cyclist, but a couple of metres in the wrong direction and it would have passed through him. Cyclist gave me a wave, and some serious eyeball to the driver (who reached the queue at the next traffic lights a whole car length in front of me. Anyway, when I got home I thought that a call to Plod would be in order, and after the usual bit about needing 2 independant witnesses to do anything, the lady on the phone was quite positive, thanking me for calling etc. It helped that I had time to get the full index of the car, make, model and colour. It's the first time I've done that, and I feel that it hasn't made any difference and I doubt that I will ever hear anything more of it, but we are encouraged locally to be the "eyes and ears of the community" so I guess that's our part in it. Just glad not to be giving a witness statement for a fatal RTA. -- Nigel |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Near Miss
On Dec 18, 9:33 am, "Nigel Randell" wrote:
Anyway, when I got home I thought that a call to Plod would be in order, and after the usual bit about needing 2 independant witnesses to do anything, I always wonder if they respond in that way to other calls concerning criminal behaviour. "OK, we'll send an armed response unit out just as soon as we get another phone call from an independent witness telling us about the gunman you claim to have seen." James |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Near Miss
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Near Miss
Steve wrote:
Were they concerned about someone hitting that as 60mph on a dark road? Were they ****, all they cared about was if it was their force as it was very close to the county border, cue comedy exercise in passing the buck between multiple agencies. Hilarity ensues as 150kg ice-puck is shunted back and forth across county boundary! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Near Miss
"Chris" wrote in message
.. . Steve wrote: Were they concerned about someone hitting that as 60mph on a dark road? Were they ****, all they cared about was if it was their force as it was very close to the county border, cue comedy exercise in passing the buck between multiple agencies. Hilarity ensues as 150kg ice-puck is shunted back and forth across county boundary! Round here a motorcyclist killed themselves on the county boundary. Plod on both sides turned up and one of each had to wait with the body for quite a while while those higher up argued whose problem it was. cheers, clive |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Near Miss
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 08:32:33 +0000, Steve wrote:
Were they concerned about someone hitting that as 60mph on a dark road? Were they ****, all they cared about was if it was their force as it was very close to the county border, cue comedy exercise in passing the buck between multiple agencies. I've had that. I reported a drain gulley which had lost its grating, leaving a hole in teh road. It really needed a plate over it, but just plonking a traffic cone on top of the hole would have been an improvement. It was within 10m of a boundary, however, so they had to carefully investigate whether to plonk a traffic cone on it, or pass the problem to another force. regards, Ian SMith -- |\ /| no .sig |o o| |/ \| |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Near Miss
O
any difference and I doubt that I will ever hear anything more of it, but we are encouraged locally to be the "eyes and ears of the community" so I guess that's our part in it. you might think that information would be kept as potentially valuable intelligence.After all , a list of phone calls to the the police over even several years would be interesting if at some point their attention is drawn to the person for something nasty. But when I phoned Derbyshire police to report that a van driver had driven threateningly through a couple of cyclists and past my car then got out wanting a fight with me I was told that if no other witnesses made statements the report would be destroyed after 2 weeks and that would be that. So he could do this on a regular basis and if he finally got in real trouble no doubt he would claim it was a one-off. It might be that reporting his behavior as suspicious would result in a record being kept, but no action would be taken as I understand it. I had a near miss at that roundabout the night before when a car drew up alongside then turned across my front ,and it happened again last night on the thorntons roundabout where the cyclelane peters out as you get to the white line.i am going to lose my voice at this rate. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Near Miss
Nigel Randell wrote:
Driving home today (yes, I know - you can shoot me later) I had left the dual carrigeway in the left hand lane of the sliproad (Watchorn roundabout off North/Eastbound A38 headed into Alfreton if anyone knows it) and I got to the give way lines at the roundabout, looked to the right and saw a cyclist coming round the roundabout towards me. I reckoned that he would be in front of me in 3-5 seconds so although I could have got out in front I decided to wait and let him in front. I was then aware of another car (also turning left) coming howling past me and entering the roundabout at some speed. I can't honestly say that I saw whether the car passed behind or in front of the cyclist, but a couple of metres in the wrong direction and it would have passed through him. Cyclist gave me a wave, and some serious eyeball to the driver (who reached the queue at the next traffic lights a whole car length in front of me. Anyway, when I got home I thought that a call to Plod would be in order, and after the usual bit about needing 2 independant witnesses to do anything, the lady on the phone was quite positive, thanking me for calling etc. It helped that I had time to get the full index of the car, make, model and colour. It's the first time I've done that, and I feel that it hasn't made any difference and I doubt that I will ever hear anything more of it, but we are encouraged locally to be the "eyes and ears of the community" so I guess that's our part in it. Just glad not to be giving a witness statement for a fatal RTA. I congratulate you for having the balls to do something. It's a shame more people weren't like this. Whatever you do, don't discuss this in uk.rec.driving. You and the cyclist would have both got a lot of stick - you for !not positioning your car in a way to prevent someone from overtaking1", and the cyclist for "not making himself more aware". You'd both be called "f*ckwits". Additionally, even though you had no expectation of anyone passing you and turning left, you were supposed to have guessed that something like this might happen and the exact course of the dangerous driver even before you were aware he was there. IMHO - doesn't matter where you are, some tosser is going to do something, and if they can't get past you safely, they'd have probably rammed your car and you'd then be getting stick for not positioning your car further to the left! LOL. I think you did the right thing. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Near Miss
On 18 Dec 2007 13:34:38 GMT, Ian Smith wrote:
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 08:32:33 +0000, Steve wrote: Were they concerned about someone hitting that as 60mph on a dark road? Were they ****, all they cared about was if it was their force as it was very close to the county border, cue comedy exercise in passing the buck between multiple agencies. I've had that. I reported a drain gulley which had lost its grating, leaving a hole in teh road. It really needed a plate over it, but just plonking a traffic cone on top of the hole would have been an improvement. It was within 10m of a boundary, however, so they had to carefully investigate whether to plonk a traffic cone on it, or pass the problem to another force. Likewise, but I called the local authority. In fact first I called a friend in a neighbouring local authority, to get, from the horse's mouth, where the boundary is. (Apparently the signs are not necessarily placed on the border, but sited for best visibility etc). Once I'd determined whose the hole was (W Sussex in this case) I rang them up and put my point across. It was fixed within a few days. -- Tim fast and gripping, non pompous, glossy and credible. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Near Miss
Simon Dean wrote:
Nigel Randell wrote: Driving home today (yes, I know - you can shoot me later) I had left the dual carrigeway in the left hand lane of the sliproad (Watchorn roundabout off North/Eastbound A38 headed into Alfreton if anyone knows it) and I got to the give way lines at the roundabout, looked to the right and saw a cyclist coming round the roundabout towards me. I reckoned that he would be in front of me in 3-5 seconds so although I could have got out in front I decided to wait and let him in front. I was then aware of another car (also turning left) coming howling past me and entering the roundabout at some speed. I can't honestly say that I saw whether the car passed behind or in front of the cyclist, but a couple of metres in the wrong direction and it would have passed through him. Cyclist gave me a wave, and some serious eyeball to the driver (who reached the queue at the next traffic lights a whole car length in front of me. Anyway, when I got home I thought that a call to Plod would be in order, and after the usual bit about needing 2 independant witnesses to do anything, the lady on the phone was quite positive, thanking me for calling etc. It helped that I had time to get the full index of the car, make, model and colour. It's the first time I've done that, and I feel that it hasn't made any difference and I doubt that I will ever hear anything more of it, but we are encouraged locally to be the "eyes and ears of the community" so I guess that's our part in it. Just glad not to be giving a witness statement for a fatal RTA. I congratulate you for having the balls to do something. It's a shame more people weren't like this. Whatever you do, don't discuss this in uk.rec.driving. You and the cyclist would have both got a lot of stick - you for !not positioning your car in a way to prevent someone from overtaking1", and the cyclist for "not making himself more aware". I would have had to straddle the white line on the 2 lane slip road to do that. If there had been a collision then I think that the cyclist's front LED being distinctly green tinged would have counted against him. Having said that, I had no trouble at all seeing him - I think that actually looking helped a lot here. You'd both be called "f*ckwits". I would expect nothing less ;-) Additionally, even though you had no expectation of anyone passing you and turning left, you were supposed to have guessed that something like this might happen and the exact course of the dangerous driver even before you were aware he was there. IMHO - doesn't matter where you are, some tosser is going to do something, and if they can't get past you safely, they'd have probably rammed your car and you'd then be getting stick for not positioning your car further to the left! LOL. I think you did the right thing. You are right about the *******. There's not that many of them, but a little goes a long way. -- Nigel |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A near miss | habbywall | Unicycling | 0 | June 4th 06 03:04 AM |
Did I miss anything? | Davey Crockett | Racing | 0 | February 20th 06 06:19 PM |
Near miss | essendon93 | Australia | 9 | February 16th 06 11:46 PM |
Near Miss | Gags | Australia | 19 | July 24th 04 03:04 PM |