A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » rec.bicycles » Racing
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Versus in HD?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 4th 09, 07:43 PM posted to rec.bicycles.racing
Jason Spaceman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 192
Default Versus in HD?

I thought I heard Phil Ligget mention that Versus was broadcasting in high
definition, but on OLN Canada I'm only getting standard definition. Is HD only
available in the US, and Canada being a few years behind the times is still only
carrying it in SD?



J. Spaceman


Ads
  #2  
Old July 4th 09, 08:38 PM posted to rec.bicycles.racing
Jason Spaceman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 192
Default Versus in HD?

Actually, nevermind. I see that Versus has a separate HD channel. Give OLN
Canada about 10 years, then they'll have an HD channel too.



J. Spaceman




Jason Spaceman wrote:

I thought I heard Phil Ligget mention that Versus was broadcasting in high
definition, but on OLN Canada I'm only getting standard definition. Is HD
only available in the US, and Canada being a few years behind the times is
still only carrying it in SD?



J. Spaceman



  #3  
Old July 4th 09, 09:13 PM posted to rec.bicycles.racing
bar
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 946
Default Versus in HD?

On Jul 4, 3:37*pm, Donald Munro wrote:
Jason Spaceman wrote:
I thought I heard Phil Ligget mention that Versus was broadcasting in
high definition, but on OLN Canada I'm only getting standard definition.

  #4  
Old July 5th 09, 04:26 AM posted to rec.bicycles.racing
Mike Jacoubowsky
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,972
Default Versus in HD?

"Jason Spaceman" wrote in message
...
I thought I heard Phil Ligget mention that Versus was broadcasting in
high
definition, but on OLN Canada I'm only getting standard definition.
Is HD only
available in the US, and Canada being a few years behind the times is
still only
carrying it in SD?



J. Spaceman


VS is definitely feeding their contractors HD. Dishnet/Echostar finally
came out with an HD channel for VS, and the HD content is wonderful
compared to the heavily-compressed and artifacted SD we lived with
before. The first inkling that things were going to be better came with
the rebroadcasted stages from the past (Lance: The Look Back) which were
of far better quality than the DVDs (which were already better than what
you saw on TV).

--Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles
www.ChainReactionBicycles.com


  #5  
Old July 5th 09, 08:42 AM posted to rec.bicycles.racing
Ryan Cousineau
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,044
Default Versus in HD?

In article ,
"Mike Jacoubowsky" wrote:

"Jason Spaceman" wrote in message
...
I thought I heard Phil Ligget mention that Versus was broadcasting in
high
definition, but on OLN Canada I'm only getting standard definition.
Is HD only
available in the US, and Canada being a few years behind the times is
still only
carrying it in SD?



J. Spaceman


VS is definitely feeding their contractors HD. Dishnet/Echostar finally
came out with an HD channel for VS, and the HD content is wonderful
compared to the heavily-compressed and artifacted SD we lived with
before. The first inkling that things were going to be better came with
the rebroadcasted stages from the past (Lance: The Look Back) which were
of far better quality than the DVDs (which were already better than what
you saw on TV).


OLN Canada does not use the "Versus" brand at this point. It also has
certain amounts of Canadian content not seen on the US channel. I
believe that it's a case of the channel operator licensing the brand and
some of the contract.

At least on my satellite service, OLN Canada doesn't have an HD channel.

--
Ryan Cousineau http://www.wiredcola.com/
"In other newsgroups, they killfile trolls."
"In rec.bicycles.racing, we coach them."
  #6  
Old July 5th 09, 12:47 PM posted to rec.bicycles.racing
P. Chisholm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 522
Default Versus in HD?

On Jul 4, 12:43*pm, Jason Spaceman
wrote:
I thought I heard Phil Ligget mention that Versus was broadcasting in high
definition, but on OLN Canada I'm only getting standard definition. *Is HD only
available in the US, and Canada being a few years behind the times is still only
carrying it in SD?

J. Spaceman


On Comcast, yes it's in HD, but in another 'package' that I don't
have.
  #7  
Old July 5th 09, 03:23 PM posted to rec.bicycles.racing
Tom Kunich
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,456
Default Versus in HD?

"P. Chisholm" wrote in message
...

On Comcast, yes it's in HD, but in another 'package' that I don't
have.


Dang! You mean you can't see the blackouts in high fidelity?

  #8  
Old July 6th 09, 02:24 AM posted to rec.bicycles.racing
Mark J.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 840
Default Versus in HD?

P. Chisholm wrote:
On Jul 4, 12:43 pm, Jason Spaceman
wrote:
I thought I heard Phil Ligget mention that Versus was broadcasting in high
definition, but on OLN Canada I'm only getting standard definition. Is HD only
available in the US, and Canada being a few years behind the times is still only
carrying it in SD?

J. Spaceman


On Comcast, yes it's in HD, but in another 'package' that I don't
have.


For anyone who's seen Versus Tour (or other racing) coverage in HD:

Is the on-road picture quality any good? I assumed that the
transmissions from the motos and the helicopters was low-def, so Versus
HD would just allow us to see low-def source video rebroadcast in hi-def
(which could be even worse). Then you're left with P&P's pores (and
Bobke's receding hairline) in high-def.

Seriously, though, was I wrong above? It's not too late for me to
upgrade my Comcast "package."

Mark J.
  #9  
Old July 6th 09, 10:38 AM posted to rec.bicycles.racing
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,035
Default Versus in HD?

On Sun, 05 Jul 2009 18:24:00 -0700, "Mark J."
wrote:

Seriously, though, was I wrong above? It's not too late for me to
upgrade my Comcast "package."

Mark J.


The picture is pretty uniform HD, with no real drop off in quality. It
does mean that we will probably get pixilation more often under bad
conditions, but I can live with that.

Curtis L. Russell
Odenton, MD (USA)
Just someone on two wheels...
  #10  
Old July 6th 09, 05:49 PM posted to rec.bicycles.racing
Zeno
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 115
Default Versus in HD?

On Jul 6, 3:38*am, wrote:


The picture is pretty uniform HD, with no real drop off in quality. It
does mean that we will probably get pixilation more often under bad
conditions, but I can live with that.

Curtis L. Russell
Odenton, MD (USA)
Just someone on two wheels...


The on the road segments may be in 16x9 HD format size, but they are
definitely NOT in "high definition" (full 760P or 1080i resolution) .
You can tell this by looking at the foliage in the helicopter shots
which is little more than a series of green smudges. Faces of the
riders lose all detail. The very heavy pixelation during high action
sequences is another give away . The video compressor is working into
the red trying to fit the changing action into too small a pipe. Such
pixelation is by no means inevitable, it's just a symptom that VS. is
renting too little bandwidth and are cramming too much into it. Loss
of detail and pixelation is an inevitable result of this. BUT IT DOES
NOT HAVE TO BE THIS WAY. VS IS JUST CUTTING CORNERS. The cameras may
be shooting in true HD, but lack of adequate transmission bandwidth is
killing the high definition. This is the same thing that happens when
you try to shoe horn an HD video into a low bandwidth UTube picture.
It's not HD any more.

I believe this is because probably because the signal is being
heavily compressed for satellite relay that the effective resolution
is no better than "SD" standard definition analog. VS, probably
rents a transponder that can't handle full HD bandwidth. (CHEAP) The
screen ratio may be 16X9, but resolution isn't significantly better
than on an old analog TV during the road sequences.

Versus is is trying to hide this dumbing down by image manipulation.
Long shots show the bunch looking sharper because Versus is
apparently using a heavy "edge sharpening" filter on the receiving end
to give the illusion of higher detail. This works in static shots in
the booth, but IMO, on the road, this often looks worse. If you
have ever put too much "sharpenning" into a photo in a program like
Photoshop, you know what I mean. Some of VS 'HD" Stanley Cup games
really suffered from over sharpening.

If you watched VS "HD" coverage of the Spring Classics, you saw the
same poor video quality. Essentially a standard definition broadcast
in 16X9 format. I was hoping they would spend the extra $ for the
Tour to broadcast true HD, but apparently the bean counters won.

Zeno

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
No MSR on Versus? [email protected] Racing 0 March 20th 09 01:04 PM
Versus [email protected] Racing 0 July 7th 08 05:43 AM
Versus: TDF in HD? RLB Racing 6 December 7th 06 06:12 AM
24 versus 26 skianduniaddict Unicycling 13 March 20th 06 10:36 AM
1" versus 1 1/8" Headset??? Ryan Bates Techniques 55 December 13th 03 06:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.