|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Wildlife Need Habitat Off-Limits to Humans!
"Mike Vandeman" wrote in message ... On Fri, 9 Feb 2007 23:50:53 -0500, "Stormin Mormon" wrote: Comments inserted following my initials. Did you say something? Yes, you are cyclophobic troll. It sucks to be you. === I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8 years fighting auto dependence and road construction.) Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of! http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Wildlife Need Habitat Off-Limits to Humans!
S Curtiss wrote:
"Mike Vandeman" wrote in message news On Fri, 9 Feb 2007 14:51:58 -0500, "S Curtiss" wrote: "The great push of man's numbers," does not include the random visitation of man to a habitat. Prove it. That is just your own opinion, supported by NOTHING. Awww.... Mikey... You are a middle-man whose usefullness has been outdone. The injection of your "total exclusion" opinions into the writings of others is hardly useful, realistic or beneficial to the discussion of preservation. The "middle-man" has been eliminated as the actual reserach and the actual researchers are accessible to everyone. The agencies that used to rely on comments such as yours have access to the original information at the touch of a button. The average person also has access and can make up their own minds without the benefit of elitists' medling. You sit on a "warehouse" of outdated product as everyone else moves forward with direct contact, actual research and educated decisions. You are not smarter than anyone else. Your opinions no longer have influence as nobody is interested in what research you quote as everyone has access to the full context of the original. The actual researcher who complied the original research is much more qualified than you to offer recommendations from their findings. Perhaps you should have a "Going Out Of Business" sale. People may need birdcage filler or fishwraps or puppy-training paper.... The author, here, was trying to convey the idea that we need to set aside space that development efforts will not be allowed to reach. ...which in no way implies that mountain biking should be removed from every natural area. Creating "human free" areas does not imply complete bans on nature cycling in every non-paved area. Did you say something? Yep. And anyone with the common sense logic beyond that of a doorknob will know what it is and that you have nothing to dispute it. Well, as mikey likes to say, you can't dispute the truth. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wildlife Need Habitat Off-Limits to Humans! | Mike Vandeman | Mountain Biking | 7 | August 30th 06 09:33 AM |
Wildlife Need Habitat Off-Limits to Humans! | Mike Vandeman | Social Issues | 0 | August 27th 06 04:15 AM |
Wildlife Need Habitat Off-Limits to Humans! | Andy H | Mountain Biking | 0 | November 13th 05 01:55 PM |
Wildlife Need Habitat Off-Limits to Humans! | Jason | Mountain Biking | 0 | November 12th 05 12:54 PM |
[OT] CONservation hooligans at work, RSPB, WT, WWT, SNH slaughtering wildlife by the million while claiming to protect wildlife. | Mark Thompson | UK | 2 | February 22nd 04 05:59 PM |