A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » rec.bicycles » Mountain Biking
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

UK puts National Park Rangers on Mountain Bikes--U.S. Needs to Dothe Same!



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old June 18th 13, 08:12 PM posted to alt.mountain-bike
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 148
Default UK puts National Park Rangers on Mountain Bikes--U.S. Needs to Dothe Same!

On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 2:02:03 PM UTC-4, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Monday, June 17, 2013 7:24:19 PM UTC-7, wrote:
In short, "they" ARE allowed in parks. So, liar, please explain how mountain biking is "by far" more damaging than things like hunting and driving a Jeep. Your semantic games are tedious, Michael. But, since that seems to be all you can handle, here you go: http://dnr.wi.gov/topic/parks/hunt/ A few dozen *Parks* where hunting is allowed. And that's just one state. It wouldn't be hard to find more... except for an idiot like you, I suppose. Now... How is riding a bicycle "by far" more damaging than that?


Those people are idiots. Like you. By definition, a park is to preserve nature, not kill it, like hunters & mountain bikers do.


I don't care about your silly conveniently-adapted-for-the-discussion definitions.

You wrote, "Mountain biking is by far the MOST damaging activity allowed in any park." That's ANY park. Obviously that includes approximately 6,600 US state parks and those in other parts of the world.

So how is riding a bicycle "by far" more damaging than hunting?
Ads
  #22  
Old June 19th 13, 12:17 AM posted to alt.mountain-bike
Mike Vandeman[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,755
Default UK puts National Park Rangers on Mountain Bikes--U.S. Needs to Dothe Same!

On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 12:12:19 PM UTC-7, wrote:
On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 2:02:03 PM UTC-4, Mike Vandeman wrote:

On Monday, June 17, 2013 7:24:19 PM UTC-7, wrote:


In short, "they" ARE allowed in parks. So, liar, please explain how mountain biking is "by far" more damaging than things like hunting and driving a Jeep. Your semantic games are tedious, Michael. But, since that seems to be all you can handle, here you go: http://dnr.wi.gov/topic/parks/hunt/ A few dozen *Parks* where hunting is allowed.


By definition, those aren't parks, whatever they are called. They are hunting grounds. Do you support hunting? Because you do support mountain biking, which also kills lots of animals. Not that a guy unwilling to give his real name matters....

And that's just one state. It wouldn't be hard to find more... except for an idiot like you, I suppose. Now... How is riding a bicycle "by far" more damaging than that?



Those people are idiots. Like you. By definition, a park is to preserve nature, not kill it, like hunters & mountain bikers do.




I don't care about your silly conveniently-adapted-for-the-discussion definitions.



You wrote, "Mountain biking is by far the MOST damaging activity allowed in any park." That's ANY park. Obviously that includes approximately 6,600 US state parks and those in other parts of the world.



So how is riding a bicycle "by far" more damaging than hunting?


  #23  
Old June 19th 13, 02:53 AM posted to alt.mountain-bike
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 148
Default UK puts National Park Rangers on Mountain Bikes--U.S. Needs to Dothe Same!

On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 7:17:49 PM UTC-4, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 12:12:19 PM UTC-7, wrote:

On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 2:02:03 PM UTC-4, Mike Vandeman wrote:




On Monday, June 17, 2013 7:24:19 PM UTC-7, wrote:




In short, "they" ARE allowed in parks. So, liar, please explain how mountain biking is "by far" more damaging than things like hunting and driving a Jeep. Your semantic games are tedious, Michael. But, since that seems to be all you can handle, here you go: http://dnr.wi.gov/topic/parks/hunt/ A few dozen *Parks* where hunting is allowed.




By definition, those aren't parks, whatever they are called. They are hunting grounds. Do you support hunting? Because you do support mountain biking, which also kills lots of animals. Not that a guy unwilling to give his real name matters....



By definition, they are parks. Just a few among the over 6,600 in the US alone.

Or are you suggesting that "state parks" aren't "parks" and a "regional preserve" can't be called a "park?"

Either way, how is riding a bicycle "by far" more damaging than hunting?


And that's just one state. It wouldn't be hard to find more... except for an idiot like you, I suppose. Now... How is riding a bicycle "by far" more damaging than that?







Those people are idiots. Like you. By definition, a park is to preserve nature, not kill it, like hunters & mountain bikers do.








I don't care about your silly conveniently-adapted-for-the-discussion definitions.








You wrote, "Mountain biking is by far the MOST damaging activity allowed in any park." That's ANY park. Obviously that includes approximately 6,600 US state parks and those in other parts of the world.








So how is riding a bicycle "by far" more damaging than hunting?

  #24  
Old June 19th 13, 05:39 AM posted to alt.mountain-bike
Mike Vandeman[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,755
Default UK puts National Park Rangers on Mountain Bikes--U.S. Needs to Dothe Same!

On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 6:53:36 PM UTC-7, wrote:
On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 7:17:49 PM UTC-4, Mike Vandeman wrote:

On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 12:12:19 PM UTC-7, wrote:




On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 2:02:03 PM UTC-4, Mike Vandeman wrote:








On Monday, June 17, 2013 7:24:19 PM UTC-7, wrote:








In short, "they" ARE allowed in parks. So, liar, please explain how mountain biking is "by far" more damaging than things like hunting and driving a Jeep. Your semantic games are tedious, Michael. But, since that seems to be all you can handle, here you go: http://dnr.wi.gov/topic/parks/hunt/ A few dozen *Parks* where hunting is allowed.








By definition, those aren't parks, whatever they are called. They are hunting grounds. Do you support hunting? Because you do support mountain biking, which also kills lots of animals. Not that a guy unwilling to give his real name matters....






By definition, they are parks. Just a few among the over 6,600 in the US alone.



Or are you suggesting that "state parks" aren't "parks" and a "regional preserve" can't be called a "park?"



Either way, how is riding a bicycle "by far" more damaging than hunting?





And that's just one state. It wouldn't be hard to find more... except for an idiot like you, I suppose. Now... How is riding a bicycle "by far" more damaging than that?
















Those people are idiots. Like you. By definition, a park is to preserve nature, not kill it, like hunters & mountain bikers do.
















I don't care about your silly conveniently-adapted-for-the-discussion definitions.
















You wrote, "Mountain biking is by far the MOST damaging activity allowed in any park." That's ANY park. Obviously that includes approximately 6,600 US state parks and those in other parts of the world.
















So how is riding a bicycle "by far" more damaging than hunting?


A place where hunting is allowed is called a "hunting reserve". It's definitely not a park. Only an idiot (like you) would call that a park.
  #25  
Old June 19th 13, 11:47 AM posted to alt.mountain-bike
I love Mike
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 332
Default UK puts National Park Rangers on Mountain Bikes--U.S. Needs to Dothe Same!

Whatever fool.
  #26  
Old June 19th 13, 04:25 PM posted to alt.mountain-bike
Shraga
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 73
Default UK puts National Park Rangers on Mountain Bikes--U.S. Needs to Dothe Same!

On Jun 19, 12:39*am, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 6:53:36 PM UTC-7, wrote:
On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 7:17:49 PM UTC-4, Mike Vandeman wrote:


On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 12:12:19 PM UTC-7, wrote:


On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 2:02:03 PM UTC-4, Mike Vandeman wrote:


On Monday, June 17, 2013 7:24:19 PM UTC-7, wrote:


* In short, "they" ARE allowed in parks. So, liar, please explain how mountain biking is "by far" more damaging than things like hunting and driving a Jeep. Your semantic games are tedious, Michael. But, since that seems to be all you can handle, here you go:http://dnr.wi.gov/topic/parks/hunt/A few dozen *Parks* where hunting is allowed.


By definition, those aren't parks, whatever they are called. They are hunting grounds. Do you support hunting? Because you do support mountain biking, which also kills lots of animals. Not that a guy unwilling to give his real name matters....


By definition, they are parks. Just a few among the over 6,600 in the US alone.


Or are you suggesting that "state parks" aren't "parks" and a "regional preserve" can't be called a "park?"


Either way, how is riding a bicycle "by far" more damaging than hunting?


*And that's just one state. It wouldn't be hard to find more... except for an idiot like you, I suppose. Now... How is riding a bicycle "by far" more damaging than that?


Those people are idiots. Like you. By definition, a park is to preserve nature, not kill it, like hunters & mountain bikers do.


I don't care about your silly conveniently-adapted-for-the-discussion definitions.


You wrote, "Mountain biking is by far the MOST damaging activity allowed in any park." That's ANY park. Obviously that includes approximately 6,600 US state parks and those in other parts of the world.


So how is riding a bicycle "by far" more damaging than hunting?


A place where hunting is allowed is called a "hunting reserve". It's definitely not a park. Only an idiot (like you) would call that a park.



State parks are called "parks." And many allow hunting. I'm sure the
park officials you write letters to on a regular basis would
appreciate you calling them idiots.

Furthermore, you didn't answer the questions, as usual. I asked, "are
you suggesting that "state parks" aren't "parks" and a "regional
preserve" can't be called a "park?""




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mountain Bikers Destroying Jasper National Park, Canada Mike Vandeman Social Issues 1 November 11th 08 01:14 PM
Bicycling the trailridge in the Rocky Mountain National Park... Fer General 7 January 30th 08 10:07 PM
Biking in the Rocky Mountain National Park??? Fer General 4 November 4th 07 03:06 PM
Three (More) Mountain Bikers Arrested for Illegally Mountain Biking in Grand Canyon National Park Mike Vandeman Social Issues 8 March 18th 07 07:24 AM
Three (More) Mountain Bikers Arrested for Illegally Mountain Biking in Grand Canyon National Park Mike Vandeman Mountain Biking 6 March 16th 07 04:35 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.